|
In a letter to the respondent, the applicant opposed the disclosure of both the retail and Crown leases. In reply, the ATIP Coordinator advised the applicant of the respondent's decision to disclose the retail leases with certain key, confidential terms removed. This was acceptable to the applicant. The ATIP Coordinator also indicated that the respondent intended to release the Crown leases in their entirety. This decision is the subject of the applicant's s. 44 application. Amongst the arguments invoked by the applicant is that the Crown leases do not come within the scope of the request because they are not agreements signed since April 1997. The respondent is of the view that the leases should be disclosed because they are referenced in other documents that come within the request and because they carry a historical and contextual relevance for agreements signed since April 1997.
|