|
|
ÐÏ à¡± á > þÿ 5 7 þÿÿÿ 2 3 4 ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿì¥Á @ ð ¿ Ë_ bjbjîFîF %Ò Œ, Œ, ïS Û ÿÿ ÿÿ ÿÿ ˆ ’ ’ ’ ˜ ´ L L L ` ¤4 ¤4 ¤4 ¤4 , Ð5 œ ` [ ¶ x6 x6 x6 x6 x6 x6 x6 x6 ¨Z ªZ ªZ ªZ ªZ ªZ ªZ »[ R ^ ò ªZ L x6 x6 x6 x6 x6 ªZ L L x6 x6 ¿Z êL êL êL x6 Ì L x6 L x6 ¨Z êL x6 ¨Z êL êL ú |U l L L Y x6 l6 ðu=¹ Æ ¤4 DG \ èV * TY T ÕZ 0 [ W þ ÿ^ I : ÿ^ T Y ` ` L L L L ÿ^ L Y D êL x6 x6 x6 ªZ ªZ ` ` D, ¤4 ÚL ` ` ¤4 COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA Rathwell c. Rathwell, [1978] 2 R.C.S. 436 Date : 1978-01-19 Lloyd William Thomas Rathwell (Défendeur) Appelant; et Helen Marie Rathwell (Demanderesse) Intimée.
|
|
|
ÐÏ à¡± á > þÿ þÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿì¥Á @ ð ¿ ïJ bjbjîFîF %ž Œ, Œ, ? Ú ÿÿ ÿÿ ÿÿ ˆ ’ ’ ’ ˜ ´ L L L ` ¤3 ¤3 ¤3 ¤3 ´ X4 ” ` ;V ¶ ø4 ø4 ø4 ø4 ø4 ø4 ø4 ø4 ÞU àU àU àU àU àU àU ñV R CY ò àU L ø4 ø4 ø4 ø4 ø4 àU L L ø4 ø4 õU êI êI êI ø4 p L ø4 L ø4 ÞU êI ø4 ÞU êI êI Š Q L L NT ø4 ì4 4X.¹ Æ ¤3 hA 6R " ŠT T V 0 ;V XR ö 5Z ˆF F 5Z D NT ` ` L L L L 5Z L NT êI ø4 ø4 ø4 àU àU ` ` D+ ¤3 ÎI ` ` ¤3 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Rathwell v. Rathwell, [1978] 2 S.C.R. 436 Date: 1978-01-19 Lloyd William Thomas Rathwell (Defendant) Appellant; and Helen Marie Rathwell (Plaintiff) Respondent. 1977: May 10, 11; 1978: January 19. Present: Laskin C.J. and Martland, Judson, Ritchie, Spence, Pigeon, Dickson, Beetz and de Grandpré JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR SASKATCHEWAN Husband and wife — Matrimonial property — Farmlands registered in husband's name — Purchases paid for in part out of joint account — Contribution by wife of both money and labour to farming operation — Intention of parties to treat operation as joint venture — Wife's claim to half-interest — Application of doctrine of resulting trust — Constructive trust, The appellant and the respondent (Mr, and Mrs. Rathwell) were married on July 4, 1944. He was a soldier, 24 years of age. She was an administrative clerk in the Royal Canadian Air Force, 21 years of age. Six months later she left the Air Force and went to live with her husband's parents on their farm. He was posted overseas. Following his return to Canada and discharge from the Army, the appellant and his wife decided to make farming their way of life. They opened a joint bank account in which their wartime savings (about $700 each) were deposited. It was the only account they ever had. During their mar ried life all the moneys they received, or to which they became entitled, went into the joint account and all payments, for whatever purpose, were made therefrom. In 1946, moneys from the joint account were used to provide the $780 initial payment on two quarter-sections of land purchased under the Veterans' Land Act. The balance of the purchase price, amounti
|
