|
|
A política do SpamCop invariavelmente gera falsos positivos e já me causou problemas com e-mails legítimos. A lista de bloqueio SpamCop permite abusos e às vezes erra feio. Por favor, considerem deixar de usar o SpamCop como lista de bloqueio nas suas configurações de SMTP.
|
|
|
I am writing to ask that you please don’t trust the Spamcop blocklist. It’s been shown many times to use a hopelessly broken algorithm. It is an exceptionally poor indicator of whether a site is a source of unsolicited bulk email. In Spamcop’s own words, the blocklist “is aggressive and often errs on the side of blocking mail. When implementing the SCBL, provide users with the information about how the SCBL and your mail system filter their email. Ideally, they should have a choice of filtering options. Many mailservers operate with blacklists in a ‘tag only’ mode, which is preferable in many situations.” Spamcop’s policy is guaranteed to generate false positives, and your use of their RBL in your mail configuration has caused me problems with legitimate email. The SpamCop BL is a system that is open to abuse, and can be very inaccurate. Please consider removing spamcop as one of your blocklists in your SMTP configuration. It is causing me serious problems.
|
|
|
Je vous écris pour vous demander d’arrêter d’utiliser les listes noires de Spamcop. Il a été démontré maintes fois que leurs services utilisent un algorithme irrémédiablement brisé. Spamcop est un indicateur très pauvre pour décider si un site est la source de courriels non sollicités. Selon Spamcop eux-même, leurs listes "est agressive et est souvent erronée quand il est question de bloquer des courriels. Quand vous implémentez la SCBL, vous devez donner aux utilisatrices et aux utilisateurs de l’information sur la manière dont la SCBLet votre système filtre les courriels. Dans l’idéal, elles et ils devraient avoir le choix du filtre en place. Beaucoup de serveur fonctionnent par des listes noires dans le mode “tag seulement”, ce qui est préférable dans bien des situations.". Les pratiques de Spamcop sont garanties de générer de faux-positifs et votre utilisation de leurs listes dans vos configurations courriel m’ont causées des problèmes avec des courriels légitimes. Les listes Spamcop sont un système qui permet l’abus et qui peut manquer d’acuité. Merci de considérer d’enlever Spamcop de vos listes dans vos configurations SMTP. Cela me cause de sérieux problèmes.
|
|
|
I am writing to ask that you please don’t trust the Spamcop blocklist. It’s been shown many times to use a hopelessly broken algorithm. It is an exceptionally poor indicator of whether a site is a source of unsolicited bulk email. In Spamcop’s own words, the blocklist “is aggressive and often errs on the side of blocking mail. When implementing the SCBL, provide users with the information about how the SCBL and your mail system filter their email. Ideally, they should have a choice of filtering options. Many mailservers operate with blacklists in a ‘tag only’ mode, which is preferable in many situations.” Spamcop’s policy is guaranteed to generate false positives, and your use of their RBL in your mail configuration has caused me problems with legitimate email. The SpamCop BL is a system that is open to abuse, and can be very inaccurate. Please consider removing spamcop as one of your blocklists in your SMTP configuration. It is causing me serious problems.
|
