dci – Übersetzung – Keybot-Wörterbuch

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Français English Spacer Help
Ausgangssprachen Zielsprachen
Keybot      5'807 Ergebnisse   266 Domänen   Seite 8
  www.galerie-be-espace.com  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
[7] Défense des enfants International Palestine, « La nouvelle loi israélienne autorise la détention des enfants âgés de 12 ans », le 11 août 2016, disponible sur: http://www.dci-palestine.org/new_israeli_law_allows_children_as_young_as_12_to_be_jailed
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine paxchristi.net as primary domain
[2] La Resolución 181 de las Naciones Unidas, aprobada en la asamblea general de 1947, hacía un llamado a la partición de Palestina en un estado árabe y un estado judío, donde la ciudad de Jerusalén se consideraría un corpus separatum (entidad separada) la cual debería ser gobernada por un régimen internacional especial.  La resolución se pude encontrar en el siguiente enlace: http://research.un.org/en/docs/ga/quick/regular/2
  www.hotel-irma.com  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
DHEA (déhydroépiandrostérone), également connue comme androstenolone ou prastérone (DCI), ainsi que 3β-hydroxyandrost-5-en-17-one ou 5-androsten-3β-ol-17-one, est une hormone importante de stéroïdes endogène.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine vitamarket.net as primary domain
Dhea (Dehydroepiandrosterone) also known as androstenolone or prasterone (INN), as well as 3β-hydroxyandrost-5-en-17-one or 5-androsten-3β-ol-17-one, is an important endogenous steroid hormone. DHEA is the short form of dehydroepiandrosterone but there are also other synonyms described by medical science terms which include C19 steroid, SHEA-FA, 7-KETO, The mother steroid and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate. nutrient potentially affecting drug toxicity: Corticosteroids including Prednisone . Synthetic form of DHEA is available as a supplement in capsule, liquid, tablet, sublingual forms. The source material of either soy or wild yams is converted to DHEA. 3-beta-hydroxy-5-androstene-17-one, 3.beta.-Hydroxyandrost-5-en-17-one, 3beta-hydroxy-5-androstene-17-one, 3beta-hydroxy-androst-5-en -17-one, 3beta-Hydroxy-D5-androstene-17-one, 3beta-Hydroxyandrost-5-en-17-one, 3beta-Hydroxyandrost-5-ene-17-one, 3-beta-hydroxy-5-etioallocholan -en-17-one, 5-androstene-3beta-ol-one-17.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine vitamarket.net as primary domain
Oczywiscie najbardziej istotny wplyw DHEA (dehydroepiandrosteronu) wzrosla androgenów (meskich hormonów). Jest to badanie bardzo male, ale sugeruje, ze gdy nasze niskie poziomy DHEA (dehydroepiandrosteronu) i poziomu kortyzolu sa wysokie, moze zostac uzupelnione jest korzystne z 5 lub 10 mg DHEA codziennie, zwlaszcza, jesli nie uzywasz bioidentical hormony. Bo DHEA (dehydroepiandrosteronu) moze znacznie zwiekszyc poziom innych hormonów, to jest wazne, aby sprawdzic poziom hormonów, regularnie, aby utrzymac równowage. miesnie masa, sila miesni, intadominal tluszczu, kosci gestosci mineralnej, markerów obrotu kostnego, wrazliwosc na insuline. Poziom DHEA doprowadzila do wyczerpania trwale, oslabiona odpornosc, a zwiekszone stany zapalne. Anty-Aging, energii, Enhancer nastroju, sklad ciala, zmniejszyc chroniczny stan zapalny, zdrowie kosci, uklad sercowo-naczyniowy, funkcje neurologiczne, DHEA jest mikronizowany zwiekszenie absorpcji. DHEA konwertuje lub stymuluje produkcje estrogenów, testosteron, progesteron, kortyzon i wiele innych hormonów steroidowych. DHEA jest szybko staje sie znany jako anty starzenie sie cud XXI wieku. DHEA jest przeksztalcany w innych hormonów przez organizm i dlatego dziala jako prekursor lub pro hormon.
  www.pmprb-cepmb.gc.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
European Medicines Agency. Questions et réponses sur le retrait de la demande de commercialisation pour Ellefore (dénomination commune internationales (DCI) : desvenlafaxine), 23 octobre 2008. Disponible en ligne à l´adresse suivante : http://www.emea.europa.eu/humandocs/PDFs/EPAR/ellefore/H-932-WQ&A-en.pdf
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine pmprb-cepmb.gc.ca as primary domain
In 2009, both strengths of Pristiq were sold in one country listed in the Regulations, namely, the United States. In compliance with the Guidelines, the prices of Pristiq in Canada did not exceed the prices of the same drug product in this country.
  ccdonline.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Lors d'un précédent arrêté, le Tribunal des droits de la personne avait décrété que l'intervention dépistage précoce chez des enfants ayant des troubles d'apprentissage, les services particuliers et la formation, maximisaient nettement les succès scolaires et qu'une distinction illicite état systématiquement exercée à l'égard de ces enfants handicapés. Il ajouta que le jeune Moore avait vraiment été victime de discrimination quand le programme spécialisé DCI avait été supprimé suite à des compressions budgétaires.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine ccdonline.ca as primary domain
This decision of the British Colombia ("BC") Supreme Court concerns Jeffrey Moore, a child with dyslexia who was discriminated against because he was not provided with sufficient supports from the School District and nor the Ministry of Education early enough for him to prosper as a student. The initial Tribunal decision found that earlier screening for children with learning disabilities and specific services and training result in dramatically greater academic success and that students with learning disabilities were systematically discriminated against. The Tribunal also held that Moore was discriminated against as there were funding cuts which resulted in the closure of a specialized program known as "DC1". However the BC Supreme Court concluded that the Tribunal erred because it mischaracterized the "service customarily available to the public"[87]. The court stressed the importance of a strict comparator group analysis between the plaintiff and similarly situated students who require special education services. This decision held two problematic conclusions. Firstly, the majority found that the service customarily available to the public was special education. Secondly, the majority stressed that students such as Moore are not entitled to a "standard of perfection" of services rather, reasonable steps to have their needs met[88].
  www.ccdonline.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Lors d'un précédent arrêté, le Tribunal des droits de la personne avait décrété que l'intervention dépistage précoce chez des enfants ayant des troubles d'apprentissage, les services particuliers et la formation, maximisaient nettement les succès scolaires et qu'une distinction illicite état systématiquement exercée à l'égard de ces enfants handicapés. Il ajouta que le jeune Moore avait vraiment été victime de discrimination quand le programme spécialisé DCI avait été supprimé suite à des compressions budgétaires.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine ccdonline.ca as primary domain
This decision of the British Colombia ("BC") Supreme Court concerns Jeffrey Moore, a child with dyslexia who was discriminated against because he was not provided with sufficient supports from the School District and nor the Ministry of Education early enough for him to prosper as a student. The initial Tribunal decision found that earlier screening for children with learning disabilities and specific services and training result in dramatically greater academic success and that students with learning disabilities were systematically discriminated against. The Tribunal also held that Moore was discriminated against as there were funding cuts which resulted in the closure of a specialized program known as "DC1". However the BC Supreme Court concluded that the Tribunal erred because it mischaracterized the "service customarily available to the public"[87]. The court stressed the importance of a strict comparator group analysis between the plaintiff and similarly situated students who require special education services. This decision held two problematic conclusions. Firstly, the majority found that the service customarily available to the public was special education. Secondly, the majority stressed that students such as Moore are not entitled to a "standard of perfection" of services rather, reasonable steps to have their needs met[88].
Arrow 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Arrow