aam – -Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot 7 Results  www5.agr.gc.ca
  Mise en place d'un agen...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
L'équipe de recherche du Dr Carisse a développé dans les dernières années un agent antiparasitaire microbien (AAM),
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine www5.agr.gc.ca as primary domain
Over the past years, Dr. Carisse's research team developed a microbial pest control agent (MPCA),
  Mise en place d'un agen...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
. Les études en laboratoire et en champ ont démontré que cet AAM est très efficace pour réduire l'inoculum primaire de champignons pathogènes. Il parasite les structures de survie de certains types de champignons mélanisés, dont
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine www5.agr.gc.ca as primary domain
. Laboratory studies and studies in the field have shown that this MPCA is very effective in reducing the primary inoculum of the pathogenic fungi. It parasitizes the survival structures of certain types of melanised fungi, including
  Effect of a direct-fed ...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Pour les travaux présentés ici, nous avons utilisé des bouvillons d’engraissement (n = 288) de poids comparables et nous leur avons donné une ration contenant des additifs alimentaires microbiens (AAM) (8 × 109 UFC de la souche BP 31702 de Saccharomyces cerevisiae et 5 × 108UFC de la souche BT 1386 de Lactobacillus acidophilus par animal par jour; AAM) ou une ration sans additif alimentaire microbien (témoin).
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine www5.agr.gc.ca as primary domain
Feedlot steers (n = 288) were blocked by weight and fed a diet containing a direct-fed microbial (8 × 109 CFU Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain BP-31702; 5 × 108 CFU Lactobacillus acidophilus strain BT-1386/animal/day; DFM) or were not fed DFM (control). Steers in each treatment were housed in separate pens, with 12 animals per pen and 12 pens per cohort. Compared to controls, animals in the DFM cohort tended to have improved feed conversion (P=0.06) when expressed on a carcass weight basis although rate of gain, carcass yield and quality grades were similar. Fifteen freshly voided fecal pat (FP) samples per pen (10 g/pat; 150 g/pen) were subsampled prior to administration of the DFM (background; d-2) and on 3 different occasions after DFM administration (d 30, 57, and 85). Fecal grab (FG), hock swab (HS; 100 cm2-area), and perineum swabs (PS; 100 cm2-area) were taken from each animal prior to shipment for slaughter (d 119 and 140). Perineum swabs were 4.76 and 2.04 times more likely (P=0.01) to have Escherichia coli O157 present when compared to HS and FG, respectively. In the present study, PS was more sensitive than FG or HS at detecting E. coli O157 in feedlot cattle, but no differences between DFM and control cohorts were observed in E. coli O157 in post-treatment samples. Although feed conversion on a carcass weight basis tended to be improved by feeding the DFM, additional large-scale commercial feedlot studies will be necessary to determine cost-effectiveness, dose-dependency, and efficacy of this DFM product for enhancing growth and possibly mitigating E. coli O157 in feedlot cattle.
  Effect of a direct-fed ...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Pour les travaux présentés ici, nous avons utilisé des bouvillons d’engraissement (n = 288) de poids comparables et nous leur avons donné une ration contenant des additifs alimentaires microbiens (AAM) (8 × 109 UFC de la souche BP 31702 de Saccharomyces cerevisiae et 5 × 108UFC de la souche BT 1386 de Lactobacillus acidophilus par animal par jour; AAM) ou une ration sans additif alimentaire microbien (témoin).
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine www5.agr.gc.ca as primary domain
Feedlot steers (n = 288) were blocked by weight and fed a diet containing a direct-fed microbial (8 × 109 CFU Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain BP-31702; 5 × 108 CFU Lactobacillus acidophilus strain BT-1386/animal/day; DFM) or were not fed DFM (control). Steers in each treatment were housed in separate pens, with 12 animals per pen and 12 pens per cohort. Compared to controls, animals in the DFM cohort tended to have improved feed conversion (P=0.06) when expressed on a carcass weight basis although rate of gain, carcass yield and quality grades were similar. Fifteen freshly voided fecal pat (FP) samples per pen (10 g/pat; 150 g/pen) were subsampled prior to administration of the DFM (background; d-2) and on 3 different occasions after DFM administration (d 30, 57, and 85). Fecal grab (FG), hock swab (HS; 100 cm2-area), and perineum swabs (PS; 100 cm2-area) were taken from each animal prior to shipment for slaughter (d 119 and 140). Perineum swabs were 4.76 and 2.04 times more likely (P=0.01) to have Escherichia coli O157 present when compared to HS and FG, respectively. In the present study, PS was more sensitive than FG or HS at detecting E. coli O157 in feedlot cattle, but no differences between DFM and control cohorts were observed in E. coli O157 in post-treatment samples. Although feed conversion on a carcass weight basis tended to be improved by feeding the DFM, additional large-scale commercial feedlot studies will be necessary to determine cost-effectiveness, dose-dependency, and efficacy of this DFM product for enhancing growth and possibly mitigating E. coli O157 in feedlot cattle.
  Effect of a direct-fed ...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Pour les travaux présentés ici, nous avons utilisé des bouvillons d’engraissement (n = 288) de poids comparables et nous leur avons donné une ration contenant des additifs alimentaires microbiens (AAM) (8 × 109 UFC de la souche BP 31702 de Saccharomyces cerevisiae et 5 × 108UFC de la souche BT 1386 de Lactobacillus acidophilus par animal par jour; AAM) ou une ration sans additif alimentaire microbien (témoin).
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine www5.agr.gc.ca as primary domain
Feedlot steers (n = 288) were blocked by weight and fed a diet containing a direct-fed microbial (8 × 109 CFU Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain BP-31702; 5 × 108 CFU Lactobacillus acidophilus strain BT-1386/animal/day; DFM) or were not fed DFM (control). Steers in each treatment were housed in separate pens, with 12 animals per pen and 12 pens per cohort. Compared to controls, animals in the DFM cohort tended to have improved feed conversion (P=0.06) when expressed on a carcass weight basis although rate of gain, carcass yield and quality grades were similar. Fifteen freshly voided fecal pat (FP) samples per pen (10 g/pat; 150 g/pen) were subsampled prior to administration of the DFM (background; d-2) and on 3 different occasions after DFM administration (d 30, 57, and 85). Fecal grab (FG), hock swab (HS; 100 cm2-area), and perineum swabs (PS; 100 cm2-area) were taken from each animal prior to shipment for slaughter (d 119 and 140). Perineum swabs were 4.76 and 2.04 times more likely (P=0.01) to have Escherichia coli O157 present when compared to HS and FG, respectively. In the present study, PS was more sensitive than FG or HS at detecting E. coli O157 in feedlot cattle, but no differences between DFM and control cohorts were observed in E. coli O157 in post-treatment samples. Although feed conversion on a carcass weight basis tended to be improved by feeding the DFM, additional large-scale commercial feedlot studies will be necessary to determine cost-effectiveness, dose-dependency, and efficacy of this DFM product for enhancing growth and possibly mitigating E. coli O157 in feedlot cattle.
  Effect of a direct-fed ...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Pour les travaux présentés ici, nous avons utilisé des bouvillons d’engraissement (n = 288) de poids comparables et nous leur avons donné une ration contenant des additifs alimentaires microbiens (AAM) (8 × 109 UFC de la souche BP 31702 de Saccharomyces cerevisiae et 5 × 108UFC de la souche BT 1386 de Lactobacillus acidophilus par animal par jour; AAM) ou une ration sans additif alimentaire microbien (témoin).
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine www5.agr.gc.ca as primary domain
Feedlot steers (n = 288) were blocked by weight and fed a diet containing a direct-fed microbial (8 × 109 CFU Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain BP-31702; 5 × 108 CFU Lactobacillus acidophilus strain BT-1386/animal/day; DFM) or were not fed DFM (control). Steers in each treatment were housed in separate pens, with 12 animals per pen and 12 pens per cohort. Compared to controls, animals in the DFM cohort tended to have improved feed conversion (P=0.06) when expressed on a carcass weight basis although rate of gain, carcass yield and quality grades were similar. Fifteen freshly voided fecal pat (FP) samples per pen (10 g/pat; 150 g/pen) were subsampled prior to administration of the DFM (background; d-2) and on 3 different occasions after DFM administration (d 30, 57, and 85). Fecal grab (FG), hock swab (HS; 100 cm2-area), and perineum swabs (PS; 100 cm2-area) were taken from each animal prior to shipment for slaughter (d 119 and 140). Perineum swabs were 4.76 and 2.04 times more likely (P=0.01) to have Escherichia coli O157 present when compared to HS and FG, respectively. In the present study, PS was more sensitive than FG or HS at detecting E. coli O157 in feedlot cattle, but no differences between DFM and control cohorts were observed in E. coli O157 in post-treatment samples. Although feed conversion on a carcass weight basis tended to be improved by feeding the DFM, additional large-scale commercial feedlot studies will be necessary to determine cost-effectiveness, dose-dependency, and efficacy of this DFM product for enhancing growth and possibly mitigating E. coli O157 in feedlot cattle.
  Effect of a direct-fed ...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Pour les travaux présentés ici, nous avons utilisé des bouvillons d’engraissement (n = 288) de poids comparables et nous leur avons donné une ration contenant des additifs alimentaires microbiens (AAM) (8 × 109 UFC de la souche BP 31702 de Saccharomyces cerevisiae et 5 × 108UFC de la souche BT 1386 de Lactobacillus acidophilus par animal par jour; AAM) ou une ration sans additif alimentaire microbien (témoin).
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine www5.agr.gc.ca as primary domain
Feedlot steers (n = 288) were blocked by weight and fed a diet containing a direct-fed microbial (8 × 109 CFU Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain BP-31702; 5 × 108 CFU Lactobacillus acidophilus strain BT-1386/animal/day; DFM) or were not fed DFM (control). Steers in each treatment were housed in separate pens, with 12 animals per pen and 12 pens per cohort. Compared to controls, animals in the DFM cohort tended to have improved feed conversion (P=0.06) when expressed on a carcass weight basis although rate of gain, carcass yield and quality grades were similar. Fifteen freshly voided fecal pat (FP) samples per pen (10 g/pat; 150 g/pen) were subsampled prior to administration of the DFM (background; d-2) and on 3 different occasions after DFM administration (d 30, 57, and 85). Fecal grab (FG), hock swab (HS; 100 cm2-area), and perineum swabs (PS; 100 cm2-area) were taken from each animal prior to shipment for slaughter (d 119 and 140). Perineum swabs were 4.76 and 2.04 times more likely (P=0.01) to have Escherichia coli O157 present when compared to HS and FG, respectively. In the present study, PS was more sensitive than FG or HS at detecting E. coli O157 in feedlot cattle, but no differences between DFM and control cohorts were observed in E. coli O157 in post-treatment samples. Although feed conversion on a carcass weight basis tended to be improved by feeding the DFM, additional large-scale commercial feedlot studies will be necessary to determine cost-effectiveness, dose-dependency, and efficacy of this DFM product for enhancing growth and possibly mitigating E. coli O157 in feedlot cattle.