aupr – -Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot 36 Results  csc.lexum.org
  document  
Ðrecouvrement€de€la€part€de€Revenu€Canada€jusquð ðen€1998€ð" ð€Est-ce€que€les€d lais€deÐ „ Ðprescription€f d ral€et€provincial€emp chent€Revenu€Canada€de€recouvrer€aupr s€duÐ ˜ Ðcontribuable€des€cr ances€fiscales€f d rales€et€provinciales?€ð" ð€Loi€sur€la€responsabilit Ð ´ 0 Ðcivile€de€lð ð tat€et€le€contentieux€administratif,€L.R.C.€1985,€ch.
Ðfederal€and€provincial€limitation€periods€bar€Revenue€Canada€from€collecting€taxpayerð ðsÐ „ Ðfederal€and€provincial€tax€debts€ð" ð€Crown€Liability€and€Proceedings€Act,€R.S.C.€1985,Ð ˜ Ðc.€C„50,€s.32€ð" ð€Limitation€Act,€R.S.B.C.€1996,€c.266,€ss.1,€3(5).Ð ´ 0 ÐÌà œ àCrown€ð" ð€Liability€ð" ð€Prescription€and€limitation€ð" ð€Collection€of€federalÐ ä ` Ðtax€debt€ð" ð€Whether€term€ð ðproceedingsð ð€in€federal€limitation€provision€encompassesÐ | ø Ðcollection€procedures€available€under€Income€Tax€Act€ð" ð€Whether€cause€of€action€aroseÐ  Ðð ðotherwise€than€in€a€provinceð ð€ð" ð€Whether€Income€Tax€Act€complete€code€excludingÐ ¬ ( Ðapplication€of€federal€limitation€period€to€collection€procedures€ð" ð€Crown€Liability€andÐ D À ÐProceedings€Act,€R.S.C.€1985,€c.€C-50,€s.32.Ð Ü X ÐÌà œ àLimitation€of€actions€ð" ð€Collection€of€provincial€tax€debt€ð" ð€Definition€ofÐ ˆ Ðaction€ð" ð€Whether€phrase€ð ðself€help€remedyð ð€in€definition€of€ð ðð ðactionð ð€in€provincialÐ ¤ Ðlimitation€legislation€encompasses€collection€procedures€available€under€provincialÐ
  document  
€€[Je€souligne.]Ð l/Ø'2 « Ð « Ð ÐÓ »1 ÓÐ 80¤(3 ÐÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñýg4 Ýà $ àÚ ƒ z Ú97Ú ÚÛ € z a Ûà « àÝ ÝEn€lð ðesp ce,€tout€comme€dans€lð ðarr t€ò òRoss€Riveró ó,€la€nature€et€lð ðimportanceÐ ” Ðdu€droit€des€bandes€appelantes€sur€ces€terres€avant€1938,€ainsi€que€lð ðintervention€de€laÐ , ˜ ÐCouronne€pour€leur€compte,€en€tant€quð ðinterm diaire€exclusif€aupr s€de€tiers€(y€comprisÐ Ä 0 Ðla€province),€ont€impos € €la€Couronne€lð ðobligation€de€fiduciaire€de€faire€montre€deÐ \ È Ðloyaut €et€de€bonne€foi,€de€communiquer€lð ðinformation€de€fa on€compl te,€eu€ gard€auxÐ ô ` Ðcirconstances,€et€dð ðagir€avec€la€diligence€ð ðordinaireð ð€requise€dans€ce€quð ðelle€consid raitÐ Œ ø Ðraisonnablement€ tre€lð ðint r t€des€b n ficiaires€de€cette€obligation.
Ðbut€be€conflicting:€€ò òSamson€Indian€Nation€and€Band€v.€Canadaó ó,€[1995]€2€F.C.€762Ð Ô-@&0 Ð(C.A.).€€As€the€Campbell€River€Band€acknowledged€in€its€factum,€ð ð[t]he€Crownð ðsÐ l/Ø'2 Ðposition€as€fiduciary€is€necessarily€uniqueð ð€(para.€96).€In€resolving€the€dispute€betweenÐ ” ÐCampbell€River€Band€members€and€the€non„Indian€settlers€named€Nunns,€for€example,Ð , ˜ Ðthe€Crown€was€not€solely€concerned€with€the€band€interest,€nor€should€it€have€been.€€TheÐ Ä 0 ÐIndians€were€ð ðvulnerableð ð€to€the€adverse€exercise€of€the€governmentð ðs€discretion,€but€soÐ \ È Ðtoo€were€the€settlers,€and€each€looked€to€the€Crown€for€a€fair€resolution€of€their€dispute.€Ð ô ` ÐAt€that€stage,€ò òprior€to€reserve€creationó ó,€the€Court€cannot€ignore€the€reality€of€theÐ Œ ø Ðconflicting€demands€confronting€the€government,€asserted€both€by€the€competing€bandsÐ $  Ðthemselves€and€by€non„Indians.€€As€Dickson€J.€said€in€ò òGuerinó ó,€ò òsupraó ó,€at€p.€385:Ý ƒ % ÑýSW nW ݌Р¼ ( ÐŒÝ ÝÌÓ Óà0 « àà ø àIt€should€be€noted€that€fiduciary€duties€generally€arise€only€with€regardÐ ì X Ðto€obligations€originating€in€a€private€law€context.€Public€law€duties,€theÐ ¸ $ Ðperformance€of€which€requires€the€exercise€of€discretion,€do€not€ò òtypicallyó óÐ „ ð Ðgive€rise€to€a€fiduciary€relationship.€€[Emphasis€added.]Ð P ¼ « Ð « Ð ÐÌÓ ò] ÓÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý¯_ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú97Ú ÚÛ € z a Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àHere,€as€in€ò òRoss€Riveró ó,€the€nature€and€importance€of€the€appellant€bandsð ðÐ € ì Ðinterest€in€these€lands€prior€to€1938,€and€the€Crownð ðs€intervention€as€the€exclusiveÐ „ Ðintermediary€to€deal€with€others€(including€the€province)€on€their€behalf,€imposed€on€theÐ ° ÐCrown€a€fiduciary€duty€to€act€with€respect€to€the€interest€of€the€aboriginal€peoples€withÐ H ´ Ðloyalty,€good€faith,€full€disclosure€appropriate€to€the€subject€matter€and€with€ð ðordinaryð ðÐ à!L ! Ðdiligence€in€what€it€reasonably€regarded€as€the€best€interest€of€the€beneficiaries.€€As€theÐ x#ä # Ðdispute€evolved€into€conflicting€demands€between€the€appellant€bands€themselves,€theÐ %| % ÐCrown€continued€to€exercise€public€law€duties€in€its€attempt€to€ascertain€ð ðthe€places€theyÐ ¨& ' Ðwish€to€haveð ð€(as€stated€at€para.24),€and,€as€a€fiduciary,€it€was€the€Crownð ðs€duty€to€beÐ @(¬ ) Ðeven„handed€towards€and€among€the€various€beneficiaries.€€An€assessment€of€theÐ Ø)D"+ ÐCrownð ðs€discharge€of€its€fiduciary€obligations€at€the€reserve„creation€stage€must€haveÐ p+Ü#- Ðregard€to€the€context€of€the€times.€€The€trial€judge€concluded€that€e
  document  
May:€Ý ƒ % ÑýÈ ã ݌Рð ` ÐŒÝ ÝÌÓ Óà0 œ à[ò òtraductionó ó]€Je€me€suis€renseign e€aupr s€du€bureau€r gional€du€SCC€ Ð  ÐAbbotsford€(C.-B.)€et,€par€lð ðinterm diaire€de€Mò òmeó óAnneKelly,€aupr s€deÐ ì \ Ðlð ðadministration€centrale€ €Ottawa.
ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 ÑýèQ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú102Ú ÚÛ € z f Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThe€Security€Reclassification€Scale€(ð ðSRSð ð)€is€a€computer€application€thatÐ l+Ü#- Ðprovides€a€security€rating€based€on€data€entered€with€respect€to€various€factors€relatedÐ -t%/ Ðto€the€assessment€of€risk:€(1)€the€seriousness€of€the€offence€committed€by€the€offender;Ð œ. '1 Ð(2)€the€existence€of€outstanding€charges€against€the€offender;€(3)€the€offenderð ðsÐ 40¤(3 Ðperformance€and€behaviour€while€under€sentence;€(4)€the€offenderð ðs€social,€criminalÐ  Ðand,€if€applicable,€young„offender€history;€(5)€any€physical€or€mental€illness€or€disorderÐ ( ˜ Ðsuffered;€(6)€the€offenderð ðs€potential€for€violent€behaviour;€and€(7)€the€offenderð ðsÐ À 0 Ðcontinued€involvement€in€criminal€activities.€€The€SRS€scale€has€been€developed€toÐ X È Ðassist€caseworkers€to€determine€the€most€appropriate€level€of€security€at€key€pointsÐ ð ` Ðthroughout€the€offenderð ðs€sentence:€SOP€700„14,€at€paras.€18„19.Ý ƒ 0 ÑýèQ R ݌Рˆ ø ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 Ñý·V Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú103Ú ÚÛ € z g Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThe€SRS€is€completed€by€assigning€scores€to€several€factors€assessing€theÐ ¸ ( Ðoffenderð ðs€security€risk€and€custody€performance.€The€SRS€provides€numerical€ð ðcut„offÐ P À Ðlevelsð ð€which€determine€a€security€rating.€If€the€officer€completing€the€review€does€notÐ è X Ðagree€with€the€results€provided€by€the€SRS,€he€or€she€€may€override€the€results€and€giveÐ € ð Ða€different€security€classification.€The€override€provisions€are€incorporated€in€the€SRSÐ ˆ Ðas€a€meanÔf ÔÔg ÔsÔf ÔÔg Ô€to€address€factors€that€may€compel€the€transfer€of€an€offender€to€a€securityÐ ° Ðlevel€that€is€different€from€the€one€obtained€through€the€computer€application:€Ð H ¸ ÐSOP700„14,€at€para.€20.Ý ƒ 0 Ñý·V ÒV ݌Рà P ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 Ñý­Z Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú104Ú ÚÛ € z h Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThe€appellants€acted€diligently€in€requesting€more€information€on€the€SRSÐ !€ Ðincluding€its€scoring€matrix.€The€matrix€contains€the€information€that€would€allowÐ ¨" " Ðthem€to€understand€how€the€numerical€results€were€arrived€at.€This€tool€is€necessaryÐ @$° $ Ðin€order€to€determine€if€there€had€been€an€error€in€assigning€scores€to€the€variousÐ Ø%H & Ðfactors€and€to€evaluate€the€accuracy€of€the€final€computerized€score€that€was€generated.€Ð p'à ( ÐÝ ƒ 0 Ñý­Z ÈZ ÝŒÌŒÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 Ñýg] Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú105Ú ÚÛ € z i Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àIn€the€courts€below,€the€respondents€claimed€that€the€scoring€matrix€wasÐ  * #, Ðnot€available.€The€chambers€judge€accept
  document  
Ðdes€communes€de€Grande-Bretagne€et€celle€du€Canada€avaient€toutes€deux€le€ò òpouvoiró óÐ Ô)D"+ ÐÔ_ Ôdð ðembaucherÔ_ Ô€et€de€cong dier€leurs€employ s,€mais€cela€ne€prouve€pas€Ô_ Ôquð ðilÔ_ Ô€estÐ l+Ü#- Ðn cessaire€que€ces€actes€soient€ò òimmunis só ó€contre€tout€contrð= ðle€judiciaire€en€applicationÐ -t%/ Ðâ âde€la€doctrine€du€privil ge€parlementaire.€€Tant€Ô_ Ôlð ðart.Ô_ ԁ18€de€la€ò òLoi€constitutionnelle€deÐ œ. '1 Ð1867ó ó€que€Ô_ Ôlð ðart.Ô_ ԁ4€de€la€ò òLoi€sur€le€Parlement€du€Canada€ó ó tablissent€des€distinctionsÐ  Ðentre€les€ð ðprivil ges,€Ô_ ÔÔ_ ÔÔ_ Ôimmunit sÔ_ Ô€et€Ô_ ÔÔ_ ÔÔ_ ÔpouvoirsÔ_ ԁð ð€du€Ô_ ÔParlement.Ô_ ÔÔ_ ÔÔ_ ÔÝ ƒ 0 Ñý‡ ¢ ݌Р( ˜ Ðâ âŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 ÑýÚ• Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú57Ú ÚÛ € z 9 Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àLes€avocats€ont€port € €Ô_ Ôlð ðattentionÔ_ Ô€de€la€Cour€plusieurs€documentsÐ X È Ðhistoriques€qui€ tablissent€selon€eux€Ô_ Ôlð ðexistenceÔ_ Ô€Ô_ Ôdð ðunÔ_ Ô€tel€privil ge€en€Grande-BretagneÐ ð ` Ðavant€1867,€ainsi€que€Ô_ Ôlð ðexistenceÔ_ Ô€de€ce€privil ge€ici€au€Canada.€€Plus€particuli rement,Ð ˆ ø Ðla€ò òHouse€of€Commons€(Offices)€Act,€1812€ó ó(R.-U.),€52Geo.Ô_ Ô3,Ô_ Ô€ch.11,€autorise€le€d pð= ðtÐ  ÐÔ_ Ôdð ðuneÔ_ Ô€plainte€aupr s€du€pr sident€de€la€Chambre€pour€[ò òtraductionó ó]€ð ðinconduite€ouÐ ¸ ( Ðincomp tence€Ô_ Ôdð ðunÔ_ Ô€greffier,€Ô_ Ôdð ðunÔ_ Ô€employ ,€Ô_ Ôdð ðunÔ_ Ô€officier,€Ô_ Ôdð ðunÔ_ Ô€messager€ou€Ô_ Ôdð ðunÔ_ Ô€autreÐ P À Ðserviteur€travaillant€pour€la€Chambre€des€communesð ð,€et€conf re€au€pr sident€le€droitÐ è X Ðde€suspendre€de€leurs€fonctions€ou€de€d mettre€les€personnes€reconnues€coupablesÐ € ð ÐÔ_ Ôdð ðuneÔ_ Ô€telle€inconduite.€Cette€loi€est€cens e€codifier€la€pratique€en€vigueur€ €Ô_ Ôlð ð poqueÔ_ ÔÐ ˆ Ðde€son€adoption.€Dans€le€contexte€canadien,€r f rence€a€ t €faite€ €Ô_ Ôlð ðò òActeÔ_ Ô€concernantÐ ° ÐÔ_ Ôlð ð conomieÔ_ Ô€Int rieure€de€la€Chambre€des€Communes€et€pour€Ô_ Ôdð ðautresÔ_ Ô€Ô_ ÔfinsÔ_ ÔÔ_ Ôó ó,€S.C.Ô_ ԁ1868,Ð H ¸ Ðch.27,€dont€le€libell €est€analogue€ €celui€de€la€loi€britannique€pr cit e.Ý ƒ 0 ÑýÚ• õ• ݌Рà P ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 Ñýî Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú58Ú ÚÛ € z : Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àÔ_ ÔLð ðarticleÔ_ ԁ151€du€ò òR glement€de€la€Chambre€des€communesó ó,€qui€Ô_ Ônð ðaÔ_ Ô€pas€ t Ð !€ Ðmodifi €depuis€son€adoption€en€1867,€pr voit€ce€qui€suit:Ý ƒ 0 Ñýî ž ݌Р¨" " ÐŒÝ ÝÌÓ Óà0 œ àà ø àò òLe€Greffier€de€la€Chambreó ó€est€responsable€de€la€garde€de€tous€lesÐ Ø%H & Ðdocuments€et€archives€de€la€Chambre€et€a€la€direction€et€ò òle€contrð= ðle€duÐ ¤& ' Ðpersonnel€des€bureauxó ó,€sous€r serve€des€i
Ðso,€these€services€are€not€treated€as€protected€by€privilege.ó ó€€[EmphasisÐ )x!* Ðadded;€para.€Ô_ Ô246.]Ô_ ÔÔ_ ÔÔ_ ÔÔ_ ÔÐ Ô)D"+ œ Ð œ Ð ÐÌÓ Ó...Ô_ ÔÐ l+Ü#- ÐÓ EJ ÓÌà0 œ àà ø àò òIt€follows€that€management€functions€relating€to€the€provision€ofÐ -t%/ Ðservices€in€either€House€are€only€exceptionally€subject€to€privilege.ó óÐ Ð-@&0 Ð[Emphasis€added;€para.€Ô_ Ô248.]Ô_ ÔÔ_ ÔÔ_ ÔÓ ÓÔ_ ÔÐ œ. '1 œ Ð œ Ð ÐÔ_ ÔÐ 40¤(3 ÐI€have€already€referred€to€the€British€Joint€Committeeð ðs€view€that€it€ð ðwould€be€goingÐ  Ðtoo€farð ð€to€hold€that€ð ða€dispute€over€the€Ô_ Ô...Ô_ Ô€dismissal€of€a€cleaner€could€not€be€decidedÐ ( ˜ Ðby€a€court€or€industrial€tribunal€in€the€ordinary€wayð ð€(para.€241).Ð À 0 ÐÌÝ ‚ Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ Ñý~M Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú62Ú ÚÛ € z > Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àIt€is€clear€from€these€observations€that,€in€the€U.K.,€the€management€ofÐ ð ` Ðò òsomeó ó€employees€would€be€covered€by€privilege€but€only€if€a€connection€wereÐ ˆ ø Ðestablished€between€that€category€of€employees€and€the€exercise€by€the€House€of€itsÐ  Ðfunctions€as€a€legislative€and€deliberative€assembly,€including€its€role€in€holding€theÐ ¸ ( Ðgovernment€to€account.€€A€privilege€in€those€terms€would€be€considerably€narrowerÐ P À Ðthan€that€claimed€by€the€appellants.Ý ƒ Ñý~M ™M ݌Рè X ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ ÑýhP Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú63Ú ÚÛ € z ? Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThe€appellants€also€rely€on€the€opinion€of€the€English€Court€of€Kingð ðsÐ ˆ ÐBench€in€ò òR.€v.€GrahamÔ_ Ô„Campbell;Ô_ Ô€Ex€parte€Herbertó ó,€[1935]€1€K.B.€594.€€In€that€case,Ð ° Ðthe€satirist€A.€P.€Herbert€(author€of€ò òUncommon€Lawó ó€and€other€parodies)€laid€anÐ H ¸ Ðinformation€against€fifteen€Members€of€Parliament,€and€a€House€employee,€for€servingÐ à P Ðalcohol€in€the€Palace€of€Westminster€without€a€licence.€€In€a€brief€five€paragraphÐ x è Ðjudgment,€Lord€Hewart€stated€that€the€ð ðinternal€affairsð ð€of€the€House€included€theÐ !€ Ðservice€of€alcohol€and€that€in€any€event€the€Licensing€Acts€were,€in€their€Ô_ Ôterms,Ô_ Ô€ð ðquiteÐ ¨" " Ðinapplicable€to€the€House€of€Commonsð ð€(p.€602).€€In€so€holding,€Lord€HewartÐ @$° $ Ðð ðdepartedð ð,€as€he€admitted€at€p.€602,€from€the€ð ðobservations€of€my€illustriousÐ Ø%H & Ðpredecessor,€Lord€Russell€C.J.,€in€ò òWilliamson€v.€Ô_ ÔNorris€Ô_ Ôó ó[Ô_ ÔÔ_ ÔÔ_ Ô[1899]Ô_ Ô€1€Q.B.€7,€Ô_ Ô12]ð ð.Ô_ Ô€€TheÐ p'à ( Ðfacts€of€the€case€are€readily€distinguishable,€of€course.€€The€impact€of€liquor€servicesÐ )x!* Ðwould€be€felt€only€by€members€of€Parliament€and€their€guests.€€The€ò òEx€parte€Herbertó óÐ  * #, Ðcase€did€not€involve€the€ex
  document  
€€Elle€a€fait€des€v rifications€minutieuses€aupr s€de€propri taires€de€terrains€situ sÐ $ À Ðdans€une€zoneP-3€pour€arriver€de€nouveau€ €la€conclusion€quð ðaucun€terrain€convenableÐ ¼ X Ðnð ð tait€ €vendre.
ÐŒÝ ÝÐ Ô/p)4 ÐÝ ‚ Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ ÑýØš Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú20Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àAt€the€urging€of€the€Mayor,€the€Congregation€met€with€the€Municipalityð ðsÐ d Ðbuilding€inspector€the€next€day,€July€7.€€The€building€inspector€indicated€on€a€map€theÐ ü ˜ Ðlocation€of€P„3€zones€in€which€the€Congregation€could€purchase€land€to€build€its€placeÐ ” 0 Ðof€worship.€€The€building€inspector€added€that€if€no€land€were€available€for€purchase€inÐ , È ÐZone€P„3,€the€Congregation€would€have€to€reapply€for€a€zoning€variance.€€To€this€point,Ð Ä ` Ðthe€Municipalityð ðs€conduct€cannot€be€faulted.€Ý ƒ ÑýØš óš ݌Р\ ø ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ Ñý㝠Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú21Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àFollowing€this€advice,€the€Congregation€renewed€its€search€for€available€landÐ Œ ( Ðin€Zone€P„3.€€Again€its€search€turned€up€no€available€land€in€P„3€zones€and€theÐ $ À ÐCongregation€took€its€search€to€other€zones.€€It€found€a€suitable€lot€in€a€commercial€zoneÐ ¼ X Ðat€2373€Labelle€Boulevard€ð" ð€only€400€metres€from€another€place€of€worship€ð" ð€andÐ T ð Ðentered€into€a€conditional€purchase€agreement.€Still€following€the€building€inspectorð ðsÐ ì ˆ Ðearlier€advice,€the€Congregation€filed€a€second€request€for€a€zoning€variance.Ý ƒ Ñý㝠þ ݌Р„ ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ Ñý ¡ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú22Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThe€Congregationð ðs€accompanying€letter,€dated€February€1,€1993,€detailedÐ ´ P Ðits€four„year„long€effort€to€build€a€place€of€worship€in€the€Municipality€and€expressed€itsÐ L è Ðinability€to€find€any€available€land€in€Zone€P„3.€It€requested€a€zoning€variance€for€theÐ ä € Ðcommercial„zoned€property€it€now€proposed€to€acquire.€€The€Congregation€asked€for€anÐ |! " Ðaudience€with€the€Municipality€in€order€to€personally€present€its€construction€plans.€Ý ƒ Ñý ¡ $¡ ݌Р#° $ ÐŒÝ Ýò òÌó óÝ ‚ Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ ÑýÕ£ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú23Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThree€days€later,€on€February€4,€the€Municipality€sent€the€Congregation€aÐ D&à ( Ðletter€summarily€denying€its€request.€€It€gave€no€reasons€for€this€decision.€€TheÐ Ü'x!* ÐMunicipality€did€not€engage€in€an€evaluative€process€like€the€one€it€undertook€inÐ t) #, Ðresponse€to€the€Congregationð ðs€first€request€for€a€zoning€variance,€nor€indeed€anyÐ +¨$. Ðevaluative€process€at€all.€€The€Municipality€did€not€refer€the€matter€to€its€Comit .€€It€didÐ ¤,@&0 Ðnot€study€the€financial€impact€of€granting€the€zoning€variance.€€And€it€did€not€grant€theÐ
  document  
€UGB„16Ô # † X ú X X X ú š # ÔÔ ‡ X ú X X X ú ÔÐ ' Œ ü ‹ ‹' ÐÔ # † X ú X X X ú œš # ÔÓ Óò òÔ ‡ X ú X X X ú Ôó óProduire€les€documents€qui€auraient€ t Ð ô d Ðd pos s€par€Mò òmeó ó€Jos e€M thot€ou€Mò òeó óPierreÐ À 0 ÐMeunier€aupr s€de€lð ðex cutif€de€la€R gie€ouÐ Œ ü Ðde€la€SIGED€et€faisant€ tat€des€d marchesÐ X È Ðeffectu es€aupr s€du€minist re€deÐ $ ” Ðlð ðEnvironnement€et€de€la€Faune.Ô # † X ú X X X ú › # ÔÔ ‡ X ú X X X ú ÔÐ 1 ' % ð ` 1 ÐÓ ô˜ ÓÓ › ÓÌÔ # † X ú X X X ú ¸œ # Ôò òó óÔ ‡ X ú X X X ú ÔÔ*‹ ƒ 4 H 6 « d « d d d Ü d d Ü [ d d [ 0 H 2 Ü Ð Ü Ð ‹ ÔÔ, d d ÔÔ, Ü d d ÔÔ, [ d d ÔÔ+ ÔÐ ?
ÐCanadaó ó,ò ò€ó ó2nd€ed.€€Toronto:€€Butterworths,€1999.Ð )x!* ” Ð ” Ð ÐÌà0 ” àà Ü àWalton,€Frederick€Parker.€€ò òThe€Scope€and€Interpretation€of€the€Civil€Code€of€LowerÐ  * #, ÐCanadaó ó.€€Toronto:€€Butterworths,€1980.Ó p6 ÓÐ l+Ü#- ” Ð ” Ð ÐÌÓ B Ü , ‚X « ø Ü 8 ô ÿÿ Ü , ‚X ” œ ø Ü 8 ¼ B Óà « àAPPEAL€from€a€judgment€of€the€Quebec€Court€of€Appeal,€[2001]€R.J.Q.Ð œ. '1 Ð2461,€[2001]€Q.J.€No.€4823€(QL),€reversing€in€part€decisions€of€the€Superior€CourtÐ 40¤(3 Ðdismissing€in€whole€or€in€part€objections€raised€by€the€appellant€during€examinations€onÐ  Ðdiscovery€after€defence.€€Appeal€dismissed.Ð ( ˜ ÐÌà « àò òR al€Forestó ó,€ò òClaude€Marseilleó ó€and€ò òEnrico€Forlinió ó,€for€the€appellant.Ð X È ÐÌà « àò òOlivierF.Kottó ó,€ò òBernardP.€Quinnó ó€and€ò òMercedes€Glockseisenó ó,€for€theÐ ˆ ø Ðrespondent.Ð  ÐÌà « àò òGiuseppeBattistaó ó,€for€the€intervener€Barreau€du€Qu bec.Ð P À ÐÌà « àò òDenisJacquesó ó,€for€the€intervener€the€Canadian€Bar€Association.Ð € ð ÐÌà « àEnglish€version€of€the€judgment€of€the€Court€delivered€byÐ ° ÐÌà « àò òLeBel€J.ó ó€ð" ðÐ à P Ѐ€Ð x è ÐÓ Ü , ‚X a ø Ü 8 ô Ü , ‚X « ø Ü 8 ¼ ÓI.à0 a àò òIntroductionÐ !€ a Ð a Ð ÐÓ @ Ü , ‚X « ø Ü 8 ¼ Ü , ‚X a ø Ü 8 ¼ Ù@ @ ÓÌó óÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý•A Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú1Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àThis€appeal€is€incidental€to€an€action€for€damages€brought€by€the€respondent,Ð @$° $ ÐFoster€Wheeler€Power€Company€Ltd.€(ð ðFosterð ð),€against€the€appellant,€the€City€ofÐ Ø%H & ÐMontr al€(the€ð ðCityð ð),€further€to€the€cancellation€of€a€project€involving€the€constructionÐ p'à ( Ðof€a€solid€waste€recycling€centre€and€a€municipal€incinerator€(the€Ô_ Ôð ðprojectð ð).Ô_ Ô€€DuringÐ )x!* Ðexaminations€on€discovery€after€defence,€Fosterð ðs€lawyers€and€lawyers€representing€someÐ  * #, Ðof€the€interveners€wanted€to€ask€witnesses€questions€about€information€related€to€certainÐ 8,¨$. Ðaspects€of€the€project€that€was€obtained€from€lawyers€representing€the€municipalÐ Ð-@&0 Ðauthorities€in€the€matter€of€that€project.€€Although€the€appellant€objected€that€theseÐ h/Ø'2 Ðquestions€violated€professional€secrecy,€the€Quebec€Superior€Court€and€the€Quebec€CourtÐ  Ðof€Appeal€allowed€a€certain€number€of€these€questions.€€This€appeal€concerns€the€scopeÐ ( ˜ Ðof€professional€secrecy€in€Quebec€civil€law€and€the€means€of€exercising€it,€specificallyÐ À 0 Ðwith€respect€to€one€of€its€components,€namely,€the€immunity€from€disclosing€confidentialÐ X È Ðinformation€to€others€in€a€judicial€proceeding.€€For€the€reasons€I€shall€give€here,€I
  document  
Ðd livre€un€certificat€de€pr t€ €lð ð tudiant€qui€y€a€droit€suivant€le€ò òRAFEó ó,€lð ðautorisant€ Ð Ô/p)4 Ðcontracter€un€emprunt€dans€les€90€jours€aupr s€dð ðune€institution€financi re€reconnue€parÐ d Ðle€ministre.Ô # † X % X X  X % Ç› # ÔÔ ‡  X % X X X % ÔÔ_ q p Ô€€Lð ð tat€assume€le€paiement€des€int r ts€(ò òLAFEó ó,€art.€24ò òó óÔ # † X % X X  X % O # ÔÔ ‡  X % X X X % Ô)€et€garantit€leÐ ü ˜ Ðremboursement€du€capital.
Ðcertificate,€he€had€to€begin€repaying€the€principal€and€paying€the€interest€on€the€loan€uponÐ d Ðthe€expiration€of€the€exemption€period,€that€is,€on€January1,1999.Ý ƒ % ÑýZd ud ݌Рü ˜ Ðâ âŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñýeh Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú9Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àAround€July21,1998,€the€appellant€inquired€about€the€repayment€of€his€loan.€Ð , È ÐA€Royal€Bank€representative€informed€him€verbally€that€interest€on€the€loan€had€beenÐ Ä ` Ðdebited€since€June1,1998€and€that€the€principal€would€be€repayable€as€ofÐ \ ø ÐDecember1,1998,€in€accordance€with€the€directives€issued€by€Aide€financi re€auxÐ ô  Ð tudiants.€€As€a€result€of€the€1997€and€1998€legislative€amendments,€the€appellant€wasÐ Œ ( Ðbeing€charged€interest€on€his€loan€that,€under€the€certificate€signed€in€1996,€was€supposedÐ $ À Ðto€have€been€paid€by€the€Minister.€€Ý ƒ % Ñýeh €h ݌Р¼ X ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý¾k Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú10Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àOn€August7,€1998,€the€appellant€repaid€the€principal€of€the€loan€and€paid,Ð ì ˆ Ðwithout€prejudice,€$308.53€for€the€interest€accrued€from€June1€to€August6,1998.€Ý ƒ % Ñý¾k Ùk ݌Р„ ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý;m Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú11Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThe€appellant€was€authorized€to€institute,€on€behalf€of€himself€and€otherÐ ´ P Ðstudents€forming€a€specific€group,€a€class€action€against€the€respondent,€the€AttorneyÐ L è ÐGeneral€of€Quebec,€seeking€reimbursement€of€the€interest€paid€on€the€loans€that€had€beenÐ ä € Ðgranted€(ò òDikranian€v.€Qu bec€(Minist re€de€lð ð ducation)ó ó,€[1999]€Q.J.€No.2086€(QL)Ð |! " Ð(Sup.€Ct.),€ò òper€ó óL vesqueJ.).€€He€argued€that€Quebecð ðs€Minist re€de€lð ð ducation€had€toÐ #° $ Ðpay€that€interest€in€accordance€with€the€loan€certificate€issued€before€the€legislativeÐ ¬$H & Ðamendments€were€passed.€Ý ƒ % Ñý;m Vm ݌РD&à ( ÐŒÝ ÝÌ3.ò òJudicial€Historyó óÐ t) #, ÐÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % ÑýÖp Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú12Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àOn€December13,€2001,€JournetJ.€of€the€Superior€Court€dismissed€theÐ ¤,@&0 Ðappellantð ðsaction.€€On€January27,2004,€a€majority€of€the€Court€of€Appeal€dismissed€hisÐ
  document  
€15€pr voyait€:Ý ƒ % Ñý® É ÝŒÐ ” 0 ÐŒÝ ÝÌÓ ÓÓ Ü , ‚X « ø Ü ™ ô Ü , ‚X « ø Ü 8 ¼ Óà0 « àò òà ø à15.ó óà ™ àLe€ministre€d livre,€ €lð ð tudiant€qui€y€a€droit€et€qui€est€inscrit€ouÐ Ä ` Ðr put €inscrit€au€sens€du€r glement,€un€certificat€de€pr t€dont€les€modalit sÐ  , Ðde€pr sentation€et€celles€de€versement€du€pr t€sont€d termin es€parÐ \ ø Ðr glement,€lð ðautorisant€ò ò €contracteró ó€un€emprunt€aupr s€dð ðun€ tablissementÐ ( Ä Ðfinancier€reconnu€par€le€ministre.Ó Œ ÓÐ ô  « Ð « Ð ÐÓ @ Ü , ‚X « ø Ü 8 ¼ Ü , ‚X « ø Ü ™ [ ž @ ÓÌLe€verbe€ð ð€contracter€ð ð€ tait€aussi€employ €aux€art.€40,€41€et€62€de€la€ò òLAFEó ó,€ainsi€quð ð Ð $ À Ðlð ðart.€56€du€ò òRAFEó ó,€avant€les€modifications.Ð ¼ X ÐÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñýæ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú25Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àBref,€tout€emprunteur€ou€pr teur€raisonnable€prenant€connaissance€duÐ ì ˆ Ðdocument€sð ðestimerait€li €par€un€contrat,€comme€lð ða€dit€le€juge€Rothman.€Il€appert€aussiÐ „ Ðque€toutes€les€parties€au€pr sent€litige€reconnaissent€la€relation€contractuelle€entreÐ ¸ Ðlð ð tudiant€et€lð ðinstitution€financi re.Ý ƒ % Ñýæ ݌Р´ P ÐŒÝ ÝÌÓ 9 Ü , ƒX ø Ü 8 ô Ü , ‚X « ø Ü 8 ¼ 9 Ó4.1.2à0 4 àò òLe€contrat€de€pr t€:€le€certificat€de€pr tó óÐ ä € 4 Ð 4 Ð ÐÓ = Ü , ‚X « ø Ü 8 ¼ Ü , ƒX ø Ü 8 ¼ ! = ÓÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñýë! Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú26Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àLe€contrat€de€pr t€sign €le€15€novembre€1996€par€lð ð tudiant€et€lð ðinstitutionÐ #° $ Ðfinanci re€contient€les€clauses€suivantes€:Ý ƒ % Ñýë! " ݌Р¬$H & ÐŒÝ ÝÌÓ Óà0 « àÔ ‡  X % X X X % Ô[ò òtraductionó ó]€€Le€pr sent€contrat€intervient€conform ment€aux€exigencesÐ Ü'x!* Ðde€la€Loi€sur€lð ðaide€financi re€aux€ tudiants€(L.R.Q.,€ch.€A„13.3)€et€de€sonÐ ¨(D"+ Ðr glement€dð ðapplication€(A„13.3,€art.€1)€et€aux€exigences€du€Programme€deÐ t) #, Ðgarantie€de€pr t€pour€lð ðachat€dð ðun€micro„ordinateur,€le€cas€ ch ant.Ô # † X % X X  X % e# # ÔÔ_ ‡ † ÔÐ @*Ü#- « Ð « Ð ÐÌà0 « àÔ ‡  X % X X X % ÔSans€restreindre€la€port e€de€ce€qui€pr c de,€les€parties€conviennentÐ Ø+t%/ Ð galement€de€ce€qui€suit:Ô # † X % X X  X % S% # ÔÔ_ ˆ ‡ ÔÐ ¤,@&0 « Ð « Ð Ðà0 « àÐ « Ð « Ð Ðà0 « àÔ ‡  X % X X X % ÔPRð* ðT€CONFORME€ð ð€LA€LOI€SUR€Lð ðAIDE€FINANCIð.
ÐŒÝ ÝÐ Ô/p)4 ÐÓ Óà0 « àà Ü àBut€that€being€said,€once€it€has€been€concluded€that€the€contractualÐ d Ðrights€and€obligations€of€a€student€borrower€and€a€lender€bank€satisfy€theÐ 0 Ì Ðrequirements€of€the€statute€and€the€regulations,€we€must€logically€look€to€theÐ ü ˜ Ðcontract€concluded€and€the€law€that€then€existed€to€determine€the€rights€andÐ È d Ðobligations€of€the€borrowing€student.€[para.26]Ó ÈÛ ÓÐ ” 0 « Ð « Ð ÐÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % ÑýÔÝ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú28Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àThus,€the€substantive€issue€is€whether€the€rights€conferred€by€the€contract€ofÐ Ä ` Ðloan€can€be€unilaterally€modified€by€the€legislature,€which€is€not€a€signatory€to€theÐ \ ø Ðcontract.€€Ý ƒ % ÑýÔÝ ïÝ ÝŒÐ ô  ÐŒÝ ÝÌÓ Ü , ‚X ž × z ” •X Ü , ‚X « Ü 8 n Ó4.2à0 ž àò òVested€Rightsó óÐ $ À ž Ð ž Ð ÐÌÓ ? Ü , ‚X « ‚, z ” •X Ü , ‚X ž × z ” •X ? ÓÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý3à Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú29Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àBefore€considering€the€question€of€vested€rights,€I€would€like€to€note€that€aÐ T ð Ðdistinction€must€be€drawn€between€the€principle€of€vested€rights€and€the€principle€againstÐ ì ˆ Ðretroactivity.€€This€issue€is€of€great€importance€here.€€The€Attorney€General€of€QuebecÐ „ Ðsubmits€that€the€principle€of€the€retroactivity€of€legislation€is€not€in€issue€and€asks€theÐ ¸ ÐCourt€to€apply€the€principle€of€the€retrospectivity€of€legislation€that€was€recentlyÐ ´ P Ðreiterated€in€ò ò piciers€Unis€M tro-Richelieu€Inc.,€division€ð ð conogrosð ð€v.€Collinó ó,€[2004]Ð L è Ð3S.C.R.257,€2004SCC59.€€However,€it€should€be€noted€right€away€that€ò ò piciers€UnisÐ ä € Ðó ódealt€with€the€application€of€the€ò òImplementation€Actó ó,€ss.2€and€3€of€which€indicate€thatÐ |! " Ðð ðthe€recent€reform€of€the€ò òCivil€Code€ó óis€based€not€on€the€principles€established€at€commonÐ #° $ Ðlaw,€principles€which€give€great€importance€to€vested€rights.€€Rather,€it€is€a€systemÐ ¬$H & Ðessentially€based€on€the€ideas€of€the€French€jurist€PaulRoubier,€a€system€which€clearlyÐ D&à ( Ðdispenses€with€the€notion€of€vested€rightsð ð€(P.-A.Cð= ðt ,€ò òThe€Interpretation€of€LegislationÐ Ü'x!* Ðin€Canada€ó ó(3rded.€2000),€at€p.118).€€This€appeal€does€not€concern€a€dispute€resultingÐ t) #, Ðfrom€the€coming€into€force€of€the€ò òC.C.Q.ó ó€€We€must€therefore€apply€the€ò òInterpretationÐ +¨$. ÐActó ó,€R.S.Q.,€c.I-16,€which€gives€effect€to€the€principle€of€ð ðacquired€rightsð ð€in€s.12.€€Ý ƒ % Ñý3à Nà ݌Р¤,@&0 Ðâ âŒÝ ÝÐ
  document  
€€Le€12Ð œ ÐaoðE ðt€1991,€il€d pose€une€plainte€aupr s€de€lð ðappelante,€la€Commission€des€droits€de€laÐ 4 ¸ Ðpersonne€et€des€droits€de€la€jeunesse€(ð ð€Commission€ð ð),€all guant€avoir€ t €cong di Ð Ì P Ðdu€seul€fait€de€sa€d claration€de€culpabilit ,€en€contravention€de€lð ðart.
ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñýòj Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú3Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àOn€July29,1991,€Mr.Roy€tried€to€resume€his€position,€without€success.€OnÐ l ð ÐAugust12,1991,€he€filed€a€complaint€with€the€appellant,€Commission€des€droits€de€laÐ ˆ Ðpersonne€et€des€droits€de€la€jeunesse€(ð ðCommissionð ð),€alleging€that€he€had€beenÐ œ Ðdismissed€owing€to€the€mere€fact€of€having€been€convicted€of€an€offence,€contrary€toÐ 4 ¸ Ðs.18.2€of€the€ò òQuebec€Charteró ó.€€That€section€reads€as€follows:Ý ƒ % Ñýòj k ÝŒÐ Ì P ÐŒÝ ÝÌÓ Óà0 « àò ò18.2.€ó ó€No€one€may€dismiss,€refuse€to€hire€or€otherwise€penalize€a€person€inÐ ü!€ Ðhis€employment€owing€to€the€mere€fact€that€he€was€convicted€of€a€penal€orÐ È"L ! Ðcriminal€offence,€if€the€offence€was€in€no€way€connected€with€theÐ ”# " Ðemployment€or€if€the€person€has€obtained€a€pardon€for€the€offence.Ó m ÓÐ `$ä # « Ð « Ð ÐÌThe€Commission€investigated€and€proposed€that€the€employer€take€remedial€measures.Ð ' ' ÐNo€agreement€was€reached.€€The€Commission€applied€to€the€Human€Rights€TribunalÐ ()¬ ) Ð(ð ðTribunalð ð)€for€redress€against€Maksteel€and€its€Vice-President€of€Finance,Ð À*D"+ ÐMichaelGareau.Ð X,Ü#- Ðâ âÐ ð-t%/ ÐÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % ÑýÁp Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú4Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àThe€Tribunal€was€of€the€opinion€that€s.18.2€of€the€ò òQuebec€Charteró ó€is€anÐ | Ðâ âexpression€of€recognition€for€the€rights€of€individuals€with€a€criminal€record€to€work,€toÐ ˜ Ðbe€protected€from€discrimination€in€employment€and€to€be€reintegrated€into€society.€€ItÐ ¬ 0 Ðobserved€that€every€provision€of€the€ò òQuebec€Charteró ó€must€be€given€a€large€and€liberal,Ð D È Ðpurposive€interpretation.€€The€Tribunal€then€found€that€s.18.2€protects€the€employmentÐ Ü ` Ðof€a€person€who€is€incarcerated.€€In€its€view,€because€imprisonment€is€the€direct€result€ofÐ t ø Ða€conviction,€the€actual€cause€of€the€dismissal€is€the€conviction€itself.€€The€TribunalÐ  Ðconcluded€that€this€was€a€case€of€indirect€discrimination€which€gave€rise€to€a€duty€toÐ ¤ ( Ðmake€reasonable€accommodation,€and€that€the€respondents€had€failed€to€discharge€thatÐ
  document  
153(QL),€2004BCPC22.Ð ü ˜ ÐÌÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 ÑýZ¸ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú18Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àB.V.N.€a€interjet €appel€aupr s€de€la€Cour€dð ðappel€de€laÐ , È ÐColombie-Britannique,€reprochant€notamment€au€juge€charg €de€la€d termination€de€laÐ Ä ` Ðpeine€de€sð ð tre€fond € €tort€sur€le€principe€de€la€dissuasion€g n rale.
Ðin€part,€deleting€certain€conditions€that€have€no€relevance€here.€€Oppal€J.A.,€in€concurringÐ Ô/p)4 Ðreasons,€agreed€that€the€principle€of€general€deterrence€is€still€applicable,€ò òalbeitó ó€on€aÐ d Ðsomewhat€more€limited€basis.€€B.V.N.€appeals€to€this€Court,€arguing€that€the€courtsÐ ü ˜ Ðbelow€fell€into€error€in€considering€general€deterrence€as€a€relevant€factor€and€submittingÐ ” 0 Ðthat€a€different€result€would€have€been€reached€had€this€error€not€been€made.Ý ƒ 0 ÑýKŽ fŽ ݌Р, È ÐŒÝ ÝÌÓ ? Ü , ‚X ž « ø Ü 8 ô Ü , ‚X « ø Ü 8 ¼ ? Ó3.à0 ž àò òDeterrence€and€the€ò òYCJAó óó óÐ \ ø ž Ð ž Ð ÐÌ3.1à0 ž àò òThe€YCJA:€A€New€Sentencing€Regimeó óÐ Œ ( ž Ð ž Ð ÐÓ C Ü , ‚X « ø Ü 8 ¼ Ü , ‚X ž « ø Ü 8 ¼ Ü” C ÓÌÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 Ñý – Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú19Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àThe€ò òYCJAó ó€came€into€force€on€April€1,€2003.€€Notably,€Parliament€did€notÐ ¼ X Ðsimply€amend€its€predecessor,€the€ò òYOAó ó,€it€repealed€it.€€The€ò òYCJAó ó€is€a€complex€piece€ofÐ T ð Ðlegislation€that€has€substantially€changed€the€Canadian€youth€justice€system€at€variousÐ ì ˆ Ðstages€of€the€process€including:€at€the€front€end,€by€encouraging€greater€use€of€theÐ „ Ðdiversionary€programs;€at€bail€hearings,€by€substantially€limiting€pre„trial€detention;€andÐ ¸ Ðin€the€adult€sentencing€process,€by€the€presumptive€application€of€adult€sentences€forÐ ´ P Ðsome€of€the€most€serious€offences.€€Most€of€all,€the€ò òYCJAó ó€brought€about€substantial€Ð L è Ðchanges€in€the€general€youth€sentencing€process.€€The€statute€provides€more€specificÐ ä € Ðguidance€to€judges.€€Detailed€sentencing€principles€are€expressly€set€out.€€SentencingÐ |! " Ðoptions€are€more€regulated.€€Factors€to€be€taken€into€account€are€spelled€out.€€MandatoryÐ #° $ Ðrestrictions€are€placed€on€the€use€of€custodial€sentences.€€The€new€sentencing€provisionsÐ ¬$H & Ðhave€been€characterized€as€ð ðthe€most€systematic€attempt€in€Canadian€history€to€structureÐ D&à ( Ðjudicial€discretion€regarding€the€sentencing€of€juvenilesð ð:€€J.€V.€Roberts€and€N.€Bala,Ð Ü'x!* Ðð ðUnderstanding€Sentencing€Under€the€ò òYouth€Criminal€Justice€Actó óð ð€(2003),€41€ò òAlta.€L.Ð t) #, ÐRev.ó ó€395,€at€p.€396.Ý ƒ 0 Ñý – – ݌Р+¨$. ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 Ñýäœ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú20Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àCounsel€for€both€appellants€and€respondents€spent€much€time€on€theseÐ
  document  
€€Lð ðintim e€a€eu€gain€de€cause€enÐ l/Ø'2 Ðappel€aupr s€de€la€Cour€du€Banc€de€la€Reine€de€lð ðAlberta,€et€cette€derni re€a€ordonn €laÐ ” Ðtenue€dð ðun€nouveau€proc s:€(1998),€225€A.R.225.€€La€Cour€dð ðappel€de€lð ðAlberta€a€rejet Ð , ˜ Ðlð ðappel€de€cette€d cision€et€confirm €lð ðordonnance€de€nouveau€proc s€rendue€par€le€jugeÐ Ä 0 Ðdð ðappel€des€poursuites€sommaires:€(2000),€271A.R.263.€€Lð ðappelant€a€obtenuÐ \ È Ðlð ðautorisation€de€former€un€pourvoi€devant€notre€Cour€le€17mai2001:€[2001]€1Ð ô ` ÐR.C.S.xii.Ý ƒ % Ñýò ݌РŒ ø ÐŒÝ ÝÌÓ ÓÓ E Ü , ‚X ž œ ø Ü 8 ô ÿÿ ç 7 „ ç « ç C ¼ E ÓÔ& , ÔII.
Ðtaxpayer€when€the€CCRA€exercises€its€investigative€function?Ý ƒ % Ñý.v Iv ݌РÔ-@&0 ÐŒÝ ÝÐ l/Ø'2 ÐÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý£y Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú2Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àUltimately,€we€conclude€that€compliance€audits€and€tax€evasionÐ ” Ðinvestigations€must€be€treated€differently.€€While€taxpayers€are€statutorily€bound€to€co„Ð , ˜ Ðoperate€with€CCRA€auditors€for€tax€assessment€purposes€(which€may€result€in€theÐ Ä 0 Ðapplication€of€regulatory€penalties),€there€is€an€adversarial€relationship€that€crystallizesÐ \ È Ðbetween€the€taxpayer€and€the€tax€officials€when€the€predominant€purpose€of€an€officialð ðsÐ ô ` Ðinquiry€is€the€determination€of€penal€liability.€€When€the€officials€exercise€this€authority,Ð Œ ø Ðconstitutional€protections€against€self„incrimination€prohibit€CCRA€officials€who€areÐ $  Ðinvestigating€ITA€offences€from€having€recourse€to€the€powerful€inspection€andÐ ¼ ( Ðrequirement€tools€in€ss.€231.1(1)€and€231.2(1).€€Rather,€CCRA€officials€who€exercise€theÐ T À Ðauthority€to€conduct€such€investigations€must€seek€search€warrants€in€furtherance€of€theirÐ ì X Ðinvestigation.Ý ƒ % Ñý£y ¾y ݌Р„ ð ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý›~ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú3Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àHere,€ò òó óthe€material€that€the€trial€judge€excluded€from€the€Information€toÐ ´ ÐObtain€A€Search€Warrant€owing€to€a€ò òCharteró ó€violation€was€in€fact€validly€gatheredÐ L ¸ Ðpursuant€to€the€auditorð ðs€inspection€and€requirement€powers.€€Accordingly,€the€searchesÐ ä P Ðultimately€carried€out€were€authorized€by€warrant,€and€no€s.€8€violation€occurred.€Ð | è ÐTherefore,€we€would€dismiss€the€appeal€and€confirm€the€Court€of€Appeal€of€Albertað ðsÐ !€ Ðorder€of€a€new€trial.Ý ƒ % Ñý›~ ¶~ ݌Р¬" " ÐŒÝ ÝÌÓ B Ü , ‚X ž œ ø Ü 8 ô ÿÿ Ü , ‚X œ ø Ü 8 ¼ B ÓI.à ž àò òFactual€Backgroundó óÐ Ü%H & ÐÌÓ B Ü , ‚X œ ø Ü 8 ô ÿÿ Ü , ‚X ž œ ø Ü 8 ¼ B ÓÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % ÑýJ‚ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú4Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThe€appellant,€Warren€Jarvis,€is€a€farmer€in€Alberta.€€His€wife,€GeorgiaÐ )x!* ÐJarvis,€was,€until€the€time€of€her€death,€an€artist€earning€income€from€the€sale€of€herÐ ¤* #, Ðworks.€€Mrs.€Jarvis€reported€this€income€on€her€annual€individual€tax€returns.Ý ƒ % ÑýJ‚ e‚ ÝŒÐ
  document  
€€Il€peut,€par€certificat,€attesterÐ ˜' ' Ðun€montant€dð ðimpð= ðt€impay €(par.223(2))€et€enregistrer€ce€certificat€aupr s€de€la€CourÐ 0)¬ ) Ðf d rale€(par.223(3)).€€D s€lors,€le€certificat€est€r put € tre€un€jugement€de€cette€cour.€Ð È*D"+ ÐCelle-ci€peut€alors€produire€un€certificat,€une€notification€ou€un€bref€faisant€preuve€duÐ `,Ü#- Ðcontenu€du€certificat€vis €au€par.223(2),€dont€le€ministre€peut€se€servir€pour€grever€dð ðuneÐ ø-t%/ ÐsðE ðret ,€dð ðun€privil ge,€dð ðune€priorit €ou€dð ðun€autre€droit€un€bien€situ €dans€une€provinceÐ / '1 Ð(par.
Ðexercise€of€debt€collection.€€If€a€taxpayer€does€not€have€the€ability€to€satisfy€a€tax€debtÐ Ô P Ðprior€to€the€expiration€of€the€limitation€period,€the€Minister€can€choose€from€a€variety€ofÐ l è Ðmeans€to€extend€the€limitation€period.€€In€ò òRoss€v.€Canadaó ó,€[2002]€2€C.T.C.€222,€2002Ð "€ ÐFCT€401,€the€Federal€Court,€Trial€Division,€held€that€the€registration€of€a€certificate€withÐ œ# " Ðthe€Federal€Court€in€accordance€with€s.€223(3)€of€the€ò òITAó ó€gives€rise€to€a€renewal€of€theÐ 4%° $ Ðlimitation€period.€€See€also€ò òMacKinnon€v.€ò òó óCanadaó ó,€[2002]€4€C.T.C.€48,€2002€FCT€824,Ð Ì&H & Ðwhere€the€court€found€that€the€taxpayerð ðs€acknowledgement€of€indebtedness€by€way€ofÐ d(à ( Ða€hypothecation€agreement€with€the€Minister,€and€his€partial€payment€of€the€tax€debt,Ð ü)x!* Ðeach€served€to€renew€the€limitation€period.€€There€is€no€need€to€exhaustively€set€out€theÐ ”+ #, Ðways€in€which€the€Minister€can€extend€the€limitation€period,€other€than€to€note€that€thereÐ ,-¨$. Ðare€numerous€avenues€open€to€the€Minister€by€which€renewals€may€be€effected.€€ThereÐ Ä.@&0 Ðis€no€credible€basis€to€support€the€submission€that€the€laws€of€prescription€willÐ \0Ø'2 Ðundermine€the€equitable€collection€of€taxes€when€minimum€diligence€would€have€theÐ „ Ðopposite€effect.Ý ƒ % Ñý÷± ² ݌Р˜ ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % ÑýÉ» Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú19Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThe€appellantð ðs€submission€that€the€rationales€for€limitation€periods€militateÐ L È Ðagainst€their€application€to€tax€collection€cannot€be€correct.€€As€noted€above,€limitationÐ ä ` Ðprovisions€are€based€upon€what€have€been€described€as€the€certainty,€evidentiary,€andÐ | ø Ðdiligence€rationales:€€see€ò òM.€(K.)ó ó,€ò òsupraó ó,€at€p.€29ò òó ó.€€The€certainty€rationale€recognizes€that,Ð  Ðwith€the€passage€of€time,€an€individual€ð ðshould€be€secure€in€his€reasonable€expectationÐ ¬ ( Ðthat€he€will€not€be€held€to€account€for€ancient€obligationsð ð:€€ò òM.€(K.)ó ó,€ò òsupraó ó,€at€p.€29.€€TheÐ D À Ðevidentiary€rationale€recognizes€the€desire€to€preclude€claims€where€the€evidence€usedÐ Ü X Ðto€support€that€claim€has€grown€stale.€€The€diligence€rationale€encourages€claimants€ð ðtoÐ t ð Ðact€diligently€and€not€ð ðsleep€on€their€rightsð ðð ð:€€ò òM.€(K.)ó ó,€ò òsupraó ó,€at€p.€30.€€Ý ƒ % ÑýÉ» ä» ÝŒÐ ˆ ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý„À Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú20Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àEach€of€the€rationales€submitted€as€applicable€to€there€being€no€limitationÐ
  document  
€€La€nature€et€Ô_ Ôlð ðimportanceÔ_ Ô€de€Ô_ Ôlð ðint r tÔ_ Ô€des€bandes€appelantes€dans€cesÐ $  Ðterres€avant€1938€ainsi€que€Ô_ Ôlð ðinterventionÔ_ Ô€de€la€Couronne€en€tant€Ô_ Ôquð ðinterm diaireÔ_ ÔÐ ¼ ( Ðexclusif€aupr s€des€tiers,€y€compris€la€province,€ont€impos € €la€Couronne€une€obligationÐ T À Ðde€fiduciaire,€mais€il€Ô_ Ônð ðyÔ_ Ô€a€aucune€raison€justifiant€de€conclure€que€les€obligations€deÐ ì X Ðloyaut ,€de€bonne€foi€et€de€communication€compl te€de€Ô_ Ôlð ðinformationÔ_ Ô€eu€ gard€auxÐ „ ð Ðcirconstances€Ô_ Ônð ðontÔ_ Ô€pas€ t €respect es.
Ðequitable€conduct€by€the€claimant€and€are€always€subject€to€the€discretion€of€the€court.€Ð Ô-@&0 ÐÐ l/Ø'2 Ðà « àBoth€branches€of€the€doctrine€of€laches€and€acquiescence€are€applicable€inÐ ” Ðthis€case:€€conduct€equivalent€to€a€waiver€is€found€in€the€declarations,€representations€andÐ , ˜ Ðfailures€to€assert€the€alleged€rights€in€circumstances€that€required€assertion;€andÐ Ä 0 Ðprosecution€of€the€claim€would,€in€each€case,€be€unreasonable€because€each€band€reliedÐ \ È Ðon€the€ò òstatus€quoó ó€and€improved€its€reserve€under€the€understanding€that€the€other€bandÐ ô ` Ðmade€no€further€claim.€€All€of€this€was€done€with€sufficient€knowledge€of€the€underlyingÐ Œ ø Ðfacts€relevant€to€a€possible€claim.Ð $  ÐÌà « àOn€the€evidence,€no€fiduciary€duty€has€been€breached€and€no€ð ðequitableð ðÐ T À Ðremedy€is€available€either€to€dispossess€an€incumbent€band€that€is€entitled€to€theÐ ì X Ðbeneficial€interest,€or€to€require€the€Crown€to€pay€ð ðequitableð ð€compensation€for€itsÐ „ ð Ðrefusal€to€bring€about€such€a€wrongful€dispossession.€Ð ˆ ÐÌò òÔ& ` ÔApplication€of€Limitation€Periodsó óÐ L ¸ ÐÌà « àIn€any€event,€the€appellant€bandsð ð€claims€are€barred€by€the€expiry€of€theÐ | è ÐÔ' ` L ËZ Ôapplicable€limitation€periods.€€Section€39(1)€of€the€ò òFederal€Court€Actó ó€incorporates€byÐ !€ Ðreference€the€applicable€British€Columbia€limitation€legislation.€€The€Campbell€RiverÐ ¬" " ÐBandð ðs€claim€for€possession€of€Reserve12€was€complete€no€later€than€in€1938€and€wasÐ D$° $ Ðsubject€to€a€20-year€limitations€period€under€s.16€of€the€1897€B.C.€ò òStatute€ofÐ Ü%H & ÐLimitationsó ó.€€The€Cape€Mudge€Bandð ðs€claim€for€possession€of€Reserve11€arose€whenÐ t'à ( Ðthe€Campbell€River€Band€went€into€possession€of€that€reserve€prior€to€1888€and€wasÐ )x!* Ðextinguished€around€the€time€the€band€signed€the€1907€Resolution.€€Even€if€the€runningÐ ¤* #, Ðof€the€limitation€periods€was€postponed€due€to€a€lack€of€pertinent€information,€allÐ
  document  
S-26,€nð ðobligeait€pas€non€plus€les€intim s€ €signifier€lð ðavis€dð ðappel€ €la€premi reÏnation€Sagkeeng€tant€et€aussi€longtemps€quð ðelle€nð ðaurait€pas€obtenu€aupr s€dð ðun€juge€deÐ l/Ø'2 Ðnotre€Cour€une€ordonnance€lð ðautorisant€ €intervenir,€ €la€suite€dð ðune€demande€fond e€surÏlð ðart.
Ðhis€mother€to€British€Columbia€where,€eventually,€he€came€into€the€care€of€the€BritishÏColumbia€Ministry€of€Children€and€Families€(as€it€now€is).Ý ƒ % Ñý› ¶ ݌Рl/Ø'2 ÐŒÝ ÝÔ # † X -¦ X X X -¦U # ÔÔ ‡ X -¦ X X X -¦ ÔÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý× Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú3Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThe€trial€judge€found€that€both€the€applicant€and€the€respondents€wereÐ , ˜ Ðsincere€and€loving€grandparents€and€each€were€capable€of€offering€a€good€home€toÏÔ_ ÔIshmaelÔ_ Ô.€€In€his€reasons,€he€gave€considerable€emphasis€to€the€aboriginal€heritage€ofÏÔ_ ÔIshmaelÔ_ Ôð ðs€motherð ðs€side.€€He€said€that€ð ðaboriginal€heritage€and€the€ability€of€hisÏbiological€grandfather€to€preserve€and€enhance€it€are€important€considerationsð ð€(para.Ï46),€and€that€the€claims€of€the€applicant€to€custody€were€soundly€based€on€ð ðties€ofÏblood,€his€obvious€love€and€affection€for€Ô_ ÔIshmaelÔ_ Ô,€his€aboriginal€heritage,€[and]€hisÏdemonstrated€ability€to€provide€a€home€and€care€for€his€familyð ð€(para.€49).€€At€theÏsame€time,€the€trial€judge€extensively€reviewed€the€other€circumstances€of€the€parties,Ïincluding€the€stability€of€the€respective€homes,€and€concluded€that€ð ð[Ô_ Ôt]heÔ_ Ô€submissionÏthat€Ô_ ÔIshmaelÔ_ Ôð ðs€aboriginal€heritage€is€virtually€a€determining€factor€here,€oversimplifiesÏa€very€complex€caseð ð€(para.€47).€€The€trial€judge€did€not€agree€that€an€order€grantingÏcustody€of€Ô_ ÔIshmaelÔ_ Ô€to€the€respondents€would€uproot€him€from€his€culture.€€Ô_ ÔIshmaelÔ_ Ô€isÏAfrican„American€on€his€putative€fatherð ðs€side,€aboriginal€Canadian€on€his€motherð ðsÏside,€and€has€lived€a€significant€part€of€his€life€with€his€adoptive€grandparents,€who€areÏneither.€€As€the€trial€judge€said,€ð ð[Ô_ Ôt]hisÔ_ Ô€is€not€a€case€of€taking€an€aboriginal€child€andÏplacing€him€with€a€non„aboriginal€family€in€complete€disregard€for€his€culture€andÏheritage.€€The€fact€is€that€Melissa€is€the€[adopted]€daughter€of€[the€respondents]€andÏÔ_ ÔIshmaelÔ_ Ô€is€their€grandsonð ð€(para.€46).Ý ƒ % Ñý× ò ÝŒÌŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý ( Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú4Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThe€trial€judgment€was€reversed€by€the€Court€of€Appeal,€which€putÐ )x!* Ðemphasis€on€the€apparent€stability€at€the€time€of€the€appeal€of€the€relationship€betweenÏthe€applicant€and€Ô_ ÔJ.S.Ô_ Ô,€and€the€fact€Ô_ ÔIshmaelÔ_ Ô€appeared€ð ðwell€integrated€into€the€familyÏunit€of€[the€applicant],€Ô_ ÔJ.S.Ô_ Ô,€and€their€daughter,€Ô_ ÔSharleenÔ_ ÔÔ # † X -¦ X X X -¦· # ÔÔ ‡ X -¦ X X X -¦ Ô.€.€.€.€€Ô_ ÔJ.S.Ô_ Ô€is€proving€to€be€aÐ Ô-@&0 Ðresource€of€stability€to€[the
  document  
€€Apr s€avoir€tent ,€enÐ l ð Ðvain,€de€r int grer€son€poste,€il€d pose€une€plainte€aupr s€de€la€Commission€des€droitsÐ ˆ Ðde€la€personne€et€des€droits€de€la€jeunesse,€all guant€avoir€ t €cong di €du€seul€fait€deÐ œ Ðsa€d claration€de€culpabilit ,€en€contravention€de€lð ðart.
Ðon€parole.€€After€trying€to€resume€his€position,€without€success,he€filed€a€complaint€withÐ Ô X Ðthe€Commission€des€droits€de€la€personne€et€des€droits€de€la€jeunesse,€alleging€that€heÐ l ð Ðhad€been€dismissed€owing€to€the€mere€fact€of€having€been€convicted€of€an€offence,Ð ˆ Ðcontrary€to€s.18.2€of€the€ò òCharter€of€Human€Rights€and€Freedomsó ó.€€The€Quebec€HumanÐ œ ÐRights€Tribunal€ruled€in€favour€of€the€complaint.€€The€Court€of€Appeal€reversed€thatÐ 4 ¸ Ðdecision.Ð Ì P ÐÌà œ àò òHeldó ó:€€The€appeal€should€be€dismissed.€€Section€18.2€of€the€ò òCharteró ó€does€notÐ ü!€ Ðprotect€an€employee€from€dismissal€where€the€real€reason€is€the€fact€that€the€employeeÐ ”# " Ðis€not€available€for€work€because€he€or€she€happens€to€be€incarcerated.Ð ,%° $ ÐÌà œ àò òPeró ó€Gonthier,€Iacobucci,€Binnie,€Arbour,€LeBel€and€Deschamps€JJ.:€€ThereÐ \(à ( Ðis€a€significant€difference€between€the€scope€of€s.18.2€and€the€scope€of€s.10€of€theÐ ô)x!* Ðò òCharteró ó.€€Protection€against€discrimination€based€on€criminal€record€applies€only€inÐ Œ+ #, Ðrespect€of€employment€and€covers€only€those€cases€in€which€the€criminal€record€is€theÐ $-¨$. Ðonly€basis€for€the€decision€or€the€action€taken.€€Section€18.2€contains€its€own€rulesÐ ¼.@&0 Ðgoverning€justification,€and€accordingly€does€not€require€resort€to€s.20€of€the€ò òCharter.Ð T0Ø'2 Ðó óIf€the€person€has€obtained€a€pardon€for€the€offence€committed,€whether€or€not€the€offenceÐ | Ðwas€connected€with€the€employment,€the€protection€is€absolute.€€Moreover,€if€there€is€noÐ ˜ Ðconnection€between€the€criminal€record€and€the€employment,€the€protection€is€alsoÐ ¬ 0 Ðcomplete.€€The€finding€that€there€has€been€an€infringement€of€the€right€to€equality€resultsÐ D È Ðdirectly€from€the€differential€treatment.€€The€employeeð ðs€abilities€or€potentialÐ Ü ` Ðcontribution€to€the€business€are€not€relevant.€€In€the€context€of€an€independentÐ t ø Ðjustification€mechanism€being€provided€in€s.18.2,€the€ð ðreasonable€accommodationð ðÐ  Ðstandard€established€in€ò òMeiorinó ó€in€relation€to€ò òbona€fideó ó€occupational€requirements€playsÐ ¤ ( Ðno€role.Ð
  document  
€Ý ƒ % Ñýyy ”y ݌Р, ˜ ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý[~ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú64Ú ÚÛ € z @ Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àSi€le€syndicat€nð ðinsiste€pas€pour€que€ses€statuts€soient€respect s€ou€nð ðimposeÐ \ È Ðpas€de€mesures€disciplinaires€en€cas€de€violation,€les€syndiqu s€pourraient€peut- tre,€enÐ ô ` Ðplus€de€b n ficier€des€proc dures€internes€existantes,€intenter€des€poursuites€aupr s€duÐ Œ ø ÐConseil€canadien€des€relations€industrielles€ou€dð ðune€cour€de€justice,€selon€la€nature€deÐ $  Ðla€plainte.
Ðto€result€in€claims€against€their€personal€assets€absent€the€existence€of€an€identifiableÐ Ô-@&0 Ðwrongdoer€in€breach€of€some€duty,€like€the€required€elements€of€a€tort€action,€thisÐ l/Ø'2 Ðwould€have€a€chilling€effect€on€union€democracy.€€The€importance€of€the€democraticÐ ” Ðrights€of€union€members,€including€the€right€to€dissent,€was€pointed€out€in€ò òTippett€v.Ð , ˜ ÐInternational€Typographical€Union,€Local€226ó ó€(1975),€63€D.L.R.€(3d)€522€(B.C.S.C.),Ð Ä 0 Ðat€p.€546:Ý ƒ % ÑýTd od ݌Р\ È ÐŒÝ ÝÌÓ Óà0 ž àà0 ` ž Ð ž Ð àà ä àAll€members€of€trade€unions€have€the€unqualified€right€to€speakÐ Œ ø Ðout€against€the€manner€in€which€union€affairs€are€conducted.€€There€is€aÐ X Ä Ðright€of€dissent.€€There€is€a€right€to€seek€decertification,€subject€to€theÐ $  Ðcondition€that€no€member€of€a€union€shall€conspire€with€his€employer€toÐ ð \ Ðinjure€his€union.€€I€point€out,€moreover,€that€dual€unionism€is€a€fact€of€lifeÐ ¼ ( Ðin€this€Province.€€No€person€can€be€expelled€or€penalized€by€a€trade€unionÐ ˆ ô Ðfor€insisting€on€his€rights.€Ð T À ` Ð ` Ð ÐÌà ž àÌÓ ÓExposing€the€personal€assets€of€dissenting€union€members€to€liability€would€beÐ ¸ $ Ðantithetical€to€this€ð ðunqualified€rightð ð€of€union€members€to€speak€out€against€theÐ P ¼ Ðagenda€of€their€bargaining€agent.€€The€result€would€be€to€discourage€memberÐ è T Ðparticipation€in€union€affairs€and€to€erode€union€democracy.Ð € ì ÐÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñýìk Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú61Ú ÚÛ € z = Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà ž àAs€well,€I€agree€with€Winkler€J.€that€trade€unions€would€find€it€difficult€to€recruitÐ ° Ðmembers€or€obtain€certificates€to€bargain€collectively€if€the€act€of€joining€a€trade€unionÐ H ´ Ðexposed€individuals€to€personal€liability€in€damages€to€other€members€for€allegedÐ à!L ! Ðbreaches€of€provisions€of€the€constitution.€€Further,€if€union€members€were€permittedÐ x#ä # Ðto€bring€suit€against€other€members€instead€of€resorting€to€internal€dispute€resolutionÐ %| % Ðmechanisms€where€breaches€of€the€constitution€were€alleged,€the€ability€of€unions€toÐ ¨& ' Ðresolve€internal€conflicts€would€be€hindered.€€This€loss€of€control€over€internal€affairsÐ @(¬ ) Ðwould€undermine€the€ability€of€unions€to€present€a€united€front€to€employers€andÐ Ø)D"+ Ðpursue€the€collective€interests€of€their€members.Ý ƒ % Ñýìk l ݌Рp+Ü#- ÐŒÝ ÝÔ # † X €J X X X €Jûc # ÔÔ ‡ X €J X X X €J ÔÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñýzp Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú62Ú ÚÛ € z > Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà ž àÔ # † X €J X X X €JZp # ÔÔ ‡ X €J X X X €J Ôò òó óTo€summarize,€on€grounds€of€both€law€and€policy,€I€conclude€th
  document  
Ðdemande€a€expir €le€20€d cembre€2004.€€Or,€la€demande€nð ða€ t €d pos e€aupr s€de€laÐ Ô/p)4 ÐCour€que€le€19€avril€2005,€soit€quelque€six€mois€apr s€la€date€de€lð ðarr t€de€la€CourÐ d Ðdð ðappel€de€la€Saskatchewan€et€quatre€mois€apr s€lð ðexpiration€du€d lai€prescrit€par€lð ðal.Ð ü ˜ Ð58(1)ò òaó ó)€de€la€Loiò òó ó.Ý ƒ Ñý - ݌Р” 0 ÐŒÝ ÝÔ # † X a¼ X X X a¼Z!
Ðafter€the€judgment€of€the€Court€of€Appeal€for€Saskatchewan€and€four€months€after€theÐ d Ðexpiry€of€the€time€prescribed€in€s.€58(1)(ò òaó ó)€of€the€Actò òó ó.Ý ƒ Ñým ˆ ݌Рü ˜ Ðâ âŒÝ ÝÔ # † X h¼ X X X h¼M # ÔÔ ‡ X h¼ X X X h¼ ÔÔ USCE. , ÔÌÝ ‚ Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ ÑýÖ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú3Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àÔ # † X h¼ X X X h¼¤ # ÔÔ ‡ X h¼ X X X h¼ ÔÔ CE. , US. , à ÔSection€59(1)€of€the€Act€provides€that,€under€special€circumstances,€the€CourtÐ , È Ðor€a€judge€may€extend€the€time€prescribed€by€s.€58(1)(ò òaó ó).€€Counsel€for€the€applicant€hasÐ Ä ` Ðsworn€an€affidavit€explaining€the€delay€in€bringing€this€leave€application.Ý ƒ ÑýÖ ñ ݌Р\ ø ÐŒÝ ÝÔ # † X h¼ X X X h¼ˆ # ÔÔ ‡ X h¼ X X X h¼ ÔÔ USCE. , ÔÌÝ ‚ Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ Ñýp Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú4Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àÔ # † X h¼ X X X h¼> # ÔÔ ‡ X h¼ X X X h¼ ÔÔ CE. , US. , ] ÔIn€his€affidavit,€counsel€for€the€applicant€affirms€that€he€received€instructionsÐ Œ ( Ðto€proceed€with€an€application€for€leave€to€appeal€on€October€20,€2004.€€The€applicantð ðsÐ $ À Ðintention€to€seek€leave€to€appeal€was€initially€communicated€to€Crown€counsel€by€letterÐ ¼ X Ðdated€October€28,€2004.€€However,€he€did€not€file€his€application€for€leave€to€appeal€untilÐ T ð Ðò òApril€19ó ó,€2005.Ý ƒ Ñýp ‹ ÝŒÐ ì ˆ ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ Ñý\# Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú5Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àIn€explaining€this€delay,€counsel€for€the€applicant€states€that€a€senior€partnerÐ ¸ Ðat€his€firm,€his€father„in„law,€was€seriously€injured€in€a€motorcycle€accident€onÐ ´ P ÐSeptember€26,€2004€and€was€unable€to€return€to€work€until€December€2004.€€HeÐ L è Ðsubsequently€departed€on€January€4,€2005,€for€a€previously€scheduled€vacation€of€aboutÐ ä € Ðtwo€and€one€half€months.€€Moreover,€another€lawyer€at€the€same€firm€was€expecting€aÐ |! " Ðchild€and,€shortly€after€the€motorcycle€accident,€was€required€by€her€physician€to€reduceÐ #° $ Ðher€workload.€€She€subsequently€departed€on€maternity€leave€on€February€15,€2005.€€AsÐ ¬$H & Ða€result€of€these€events,€counsel€for€the€applicant€and€his€wife€were€required€to€take€overÐ D&à ( Ðthe€trials€originally€scheduled€for€their€colleagues€as€well€as€manage€their€own€caseloadsÐ Ü'x!* Ðand€oversee€the€law€office.€€Although€he€started€working€on€the€application€for€leave€toÐ t) #, Ðappeal€during€the€Christmas€break€of€2004,€he€states€that€he€was€only€able€to€completeÐ +¨$. Ðthe€written€materials€in€April€once€his€senior€partner€returned€from€vacation.Ý ƒ Ñý\# w# ݌Р¤,@&0 Ðâ âŒÝ ÝÔ # † X h¼ X X X h¼"! # ÔÔ ‡ X h¼ X X X h¼ ÔÔ USCE. , ÔÐ
  document  
ó óÐ Á ` ÐÌÔ ‡ X %† X X X %† Ôà œ àð ð€compter€dð ðavril€1985,€lð ðaccus €a,€en€sa€qualit €dð ðavocat,Ô # † X %† X X X %†t # Ô€fait€desÐ ñ  Ðd marches€aupr s€de€divers€niveaux€de€gouvernement€pour€le€compte€de€deux€soci t sÏdans€le€but€dð ðobtenir€des€subventions.Ô ‡ X %† X X X %† Ô€€Il€a€poursuivi€ces€activit s€apr s€sa€nominationÐ !
¡j ÓÌà „ àÝ ‚ ³¹ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ ³¹âk ÝÔ2 *e ÔÚ Ú13Ú Ú.Ô3 Ôà0 Ü àÝ Ý€à ž àà œ àà ø àThe€positions€of€the€parties€on€this€point€can€be€easily€summarized.€Ð } ÐThe€appellant€has€submitted€that€the€wording€of€the€section€is€quite€clear€and€shouldÏnot€be€deviated€from.€€In€order€for€the€Crown€to€prove€the€ò òmens€reaó ó€required€by€theÐ ­ L ! Ðsection,€it€must€establish€nothing€more€than€that€an€accused€possessed€an€intentionÏto€commit€the€acts€therein,€combined€with€a€knowledge€of€all€relevant€circumstances.€ÏOn€the€other€hand,€the€respondent€submits€that€s.€121(1)(ò òaó ó)€requires€a€finding€ofÐ u% ' Ðð ðcorruptionð ð,€and€that€the€Crown€must€establish€that€an€accused€received€the€benefitÐ '¬ ) Ðò òas€a€result€of€his€or€her€position€as€government€employeeó ó.€€The€employee€must€alsoÐ ¥(D"+ Ðknow€that€this€was€the€reason€why€the€benefit€was€conferred.€€Additionally,€it€wasÏargued€that€absent€this€mental€element,€the€crime€would€be€one€of€strict€liability.Ý ƒ ³¹âk l ÝŒÐ Ü Ð Ü Ð Ðâ âŒÝ ÝÐ m- '1 Ðà „ àÝ ‚ ³¹ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ ³¹¨p ÝÔ2 *e ÔÚ Ú14Ú Ú.Ô3 Ôà0 Ü àÝ Ý€à ž àà œ àà ø àI€shall€deal€with€the€last€point€first,€as€I€believe€it€is€the€most€easilyÐ a Ðâ âdisposed€of.€As€I€recently€stated€for€a€majority€of€the€Court€in€ò òR.€v.€Hincheyó ó,€[1996]Ð ù ˜ Ð3€S.C.R.€1128,€at€para.€3,€it€is€clear€that€an€intention€to€commit€a€prohibited€actÏcombined€with€knowledge€of€the€relevant€circumstances€is€an€accepted€form€ofÏcriminal€œculpabilityÔ CE. , US. , k ÔÔ # † X Õ¼ X X X ï.ÿj # ÔÔ ‡ X Õ¼ X X X Õ¼ Ô,›€and€that€this€should€not€be€equated€with€a€strict€liability€offence:Ý ƒ ³¹¨p Óp ݌РÁ ` Ü Ð Ü Ð ÐŒÝ ÝÌÔ US. , CE. , ÔÓ Óà0 ž àà0 œ ž Ð ž Ð àQuite€simply,€this€offence€cannot€be€one€of€strict€liability€as€it€requires€aÏò òbona€fideó ó€mental€element.€€At€a€minimum,€the€charge€given€to€the€juryÐ ½ \ Ðrequired€they€find€that€the€appellant€possessed€an€intention€to€commit€aÏprohibited€act,€while€having€subjective€knowledge€of€the€circumstances.€€AsÏDoherty€J.A.€recognized€when€dealing€with€this€very€offence€in€ò òR.€v.Ð ! À ÐGreenwoodó ó€(1991),€8€C.R.€(4th)€235€(Ont.€C.A.),€at€pp.€255„56:Ð í Œ œ Ð œ Ð ÐÓ ßs ÓÓ ÓÌà0 ž àà0 œ ž Ð ž Ð àà0 ø œ Ð œ Ð àà Ü àA€conscious€choice€to€perform€a€prohibited€act,€combined€withÏknowledge€that€all€or€at€least€some€of€the€relevant€circumstances€exist,Ïis€a€well„recognized€form€of€criminal€culpability:€see€ò òR.€v.€SaultÐ ¼ ÐSte.Marie€(Cityó ó),€supra,€at€p.€1324€œ(S.C.R.).€.€.ñ = ñ€ñ = ñ;›€A.€W.€Mewett€andÐ é ˆ ÐM.Manning,€ò òCriminal€Lawó 󀄄€2d.€ed.€(Toro
  document  
May:€Ý ƒ % ÑýÈ ã ݌Рð ` ÐŒÝ ÝÌÓ Óà0 œ à[ò òtraductionó ó]€Je€me€suis€renseign e€aupr s€du€bureau€r gional€du€SCC€ Ð  ÐAbbotsford€(C.-B.)€et,€par€lð ðinterm diaire€de€Mò òmeó óAnneKelly,€aupr s€deÐ ì \ Ðlð ðadministration€centrale€ €Ottawa.
ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 ÑýèQ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú102Ú ÚÛ € z f Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThe€Security€Reclassification€Scale€(ð ðSRSð ð)€is€a€computer€application€thatÐ l+Ü#- Ðprovides€a€security€rating€based€on€data€entered€with€respect€to€various€factors€relatedÐ -t%/ Ðto€the€assessment€of€risk:€(1)€the€seriousness€of€the€offence€committed€by€the€offender;Ð œ. '1 Ð(2)€the€existence€of€outstanding€charges€against€the€offender;€(3)€the€offenderð ðsÐ 40¤(3 Ðperformance€and€behaviour€while€under€sentence;€(4)€the€offenderð ðs€social,€criminalÐ  Ðand,€if€applicable,€young„offender€history;€(5)€any€physical€or€mental€illness€or€disorderÐ ( ˜ Ðsuffered;€(6)€the€offenderð ðs€potential€for€violent€behaviour;€and€(7)€the€offenderð ðsÐ À 0 Ðcontinued€involvement€in€criminal€activities.€€The€SRS€scale€has€been€developed€toÐ X È Ðassist€caseworkers€to€determine€the€most€appropriate€level€of€security€at€key€pointsÐ ð ` Ðthroughout€the€offenderð ðs€sentence:€SOP€700„14,€at€paras.€18„19.Ý ƒ 0 ÑýèQ R ݌Рˆ ø ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 Ñý·V Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú103Ú ÚÛ € z g Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThe€SRS€is€completed€by€assigning€scores€to€several€factors€assessing€theÐ ¸ ( Ðoffenderð ðs€security€risk€and€custody€performance.€The€SRS€provides€numerical€ð ðcut„offÐ P À Ðlevelsð ð€which€determine€a€security€rating.€If€the€officer€completing€the€review€does€notÐ è X Ðagree€with€the€results€provided€by€the€SRS,€he€or€she€€may€override€the€results€and€giveÐ € ð Ða€different€security€classification.€The€override€provisions€are€incorporated€in€the€SRSÐ ˆ Ðas€a€meanÔf ÔÔg ÔsÔf ÔÔg Ô€to€address€factors€that€may€compel€the€transfer€of€an€offender€to€a€securityÐ ° Ðlevel€that€is€different€from€the€one€obtained€through€the€computer€application:€Ð H ¸ ÐSOP700„14,€at€para.€20.Ý ƒ 0 Ñý·V ÒV ݌Рà P ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 Ñý­Z Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú104Ú ÚÛ € z h Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThe€appellants€acted€diligently€in€requesting€more€information€on€the€SRSÐ !€ Ðincluding€its€scoring€matrix.€The€matrix€contains€the€information€that€would€allowÐ ¨" " Ðthem€to€understand€how€the€numerical€results€were€arrived€at.€This€tool€is€necessaryÐ @$° $ Ðin€order€to€determine€if€there€had€been€an€error€in€assigning€scores€to€the€variousÐ Ø%H & Ðfactors€and€to€evaluate€the€accuracy€of€the€final€computerized€score€that€was€generated.€Ð p'à ( ÐÝ ƒ 0 Ñý­Z ÈZ ÝŒÌŒÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 Ñýg] Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú105Ú ÚÛ € z i Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àIn€the€courts€below,€the€respondents€claimed€that€the€scoring€matrix€wasÐ  * #, Ðnot€available.€The€chambers€judge€accept
  document  
* Ðainsi€sa€capacit €de€gagner€un€revenu.Ó ÓÐ Ô)D"+ œ Ð œ Ð ÐÌð ð€lð ðappui€de€cette€action€de€port e€g n rale,€lð ðappelante€a€pr sent €des€ l ments€deÐ -t%/ Ðpreuve€ tablissant€lð ðomission€de€lð ðencadrer€et€de€la€conseiller€judicieusement€au€sujetÐ œ. '1 Ðde€son€avenir,€ainsi€que€la€diffusion€n gligente€dans€la€facult ,€par€des€moyens€autresÐ 40¤(3 Ðque€le€signalement€effectu €aupr s€du€SPE,€de€lð ðid e€que€lð ðappelante€pourrait€avoirÐ  Ðagress €des€enfants.Ð ( ˜ ÐÌÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 Ñý«ø Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú31Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àBref,€en€lð ðesp ce,€la€proximit €d coulait€non€pas€simplement€dð ðunÐ X È Ðmalencontreux€signalement€effectu €aupr s€du€SPE,€mais€du€lien€g n ral€qui€existaitÐ ð ` Ðentre€les€professeurs€de€lð ðUniversit Memorial€et€leurs€ tudiants.€€M me€si€elle€ tudiaitÐ ˆ ø Ðð ð €distanceð ð,€lð ðappelante€ tait€un€membre€de€la€communaut €universitaire€qui€payaitÐ  Ðdes€frais€de€scolarit ,€ce€qui€avait€pour€effet€de€g n rer€des€droits€et€responsabilit sÐ ¸ ( Ðmutuels.€€Le€lien€entre€lð ðappelante€et€lð ðUniversit €avait€un€fondement€contractuel,€ceÐ P À Ðqui€donnait€naissance€ €des€obligations€de€nature€ €la€fois€contractuelle€et€d lictuelle:Ð è X Ðò òCentral€Trust€Co.€c.€Rafuseó ó,€[1986]€2R.C.S.147.Ý ƒ 0 Ñý«ø Æø ݌Р€ ð ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 Ñý¡ü Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú32Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àLa€question€de€savoir€si€une€obligation€de€diligence€sera€annul e€dans€leÐ ° Ðcas€o €les€parties€sont€des€ trangers€qui€nð ðont€entre€eux€dð ðautre€lien€que€les€ v nementsÐ H ¸ Ðentourant€un€ð ðsignalementð ð€ne€devrait€ tre€tranch e€que€lorsquð ðelle€se€posera.€€ðÀ ðÐ à P Ðsupposer€que€la€politique€g n rale€exprim e€dans€la€Loi€puisse,€dans€un€tel€cas,€annulerÐ x è Ðla€responsabilit €susceptible€de€r sulter€dð ðun€signalement€n gligent,€comme€nous€leÐ !€ Ðverrons€plus€loin,€cette€politique€ne€justifie€aucunement€dð ðannuler€la€responsabilit €quiÐ ¨" " Ðserait€par€ailleurs€engag e€dð ðapr s€les€faits€de€la€pr sente€affaire.
Ðto€the€making€of€the€CPS€report€and€would€not€excuse€the€University€and€its€employeesÐ Ô)D"+ Ðfrom€failure€to€live€up€to€their€broader€responsibilities€to€the€appellant€as€a€member€ofÐ l+Ü#- Ðthe€university€community.€€The€facts€in€this€case€do€not€trigger€the€protection€of€the€ActÐ -t%/ Ðbecause,€quite€simply,€the€respondent€Dr.€Rowe€acted€on€nothing€more€than€speculationÐ œ. '1 Ðand€conjecture€in€making€his€report€which,€as€Director€of€the€School€of€Social€Work,Ð 40¤(3 Ðhe€must€have€known€would€have€serious€consequences€within€the€small€community€ofÐ  Ðsocial€workers€in€Newfoundland,€including€the€likely€posting€of€the€appellantð ðs€nameÐ ( ˜ Ðon€the€provincial€Child€Abuse€Registry.Ý ƒ ` Ñý¢ò ½ò ݌РÀ 0 ÐŒÝ ÝÔ # † X ãÐ X X b X ãÐ?ô # ÔÔ ‡ b X ãÐ X X X ãÐ ÔÌÓ E Ü , ‚X « ‚á ä …X } L ¤ Ü , ‚X « Œ †X } L X E Óà0 « à(2)à0 m « !« ! àò òThe€Standard€of€Careó óÐ ð ` m !m ! ÐÓ I Ü , ‚X « Œ †X } L X Ü , ‚X « ‚á ä …X } L X uù I ÓÌÝ ‚ ` Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ ` Ñý`ú Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú33Ú ÚÛ € z ! Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àThe€standard€of€care€that€ought€to€be€exercised€by€professors€towards€theirÐ  Ðstudents€was€emphasized€in€the€testimony€of€Dr.€Wayne€Ludlow€who,€during€theÐ ¸ ( Ðrelevant€1994„1996€period,€was€the€Dean€of€Student€Affairs€at€Memorial€University.€Ð P À ÐDr.Ludlow€testified:Ý ƒ ` Ñý`ú {ú ݌Рè X ÐŒÝ ÝÌÓ Óà0 « àThe€relationship€between€the€professor€and€the€student€is€a€specialÐ ˆ Ðrelationship€...€[I]t€is€an€imbalanced€relationship€because€professor€is€allÐ ä T Ðknowing,€and€I€can€see€now€the€fear€and€trembling€of€the€young€first„yearÐ ° Ðstudents€when€they€went€to€classes,€someone€in€a€flowing€black€robe.€€SoÐ | ì Ðthe€power€balance€was€evident....Ó ÓÐ H ¸ « !« ! ÐÌÝ ‚ ` Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ ` ÑýSþ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú34Ú ÚÛ € z " Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àThose€whose€professional€responsibilities€include€the€exercise€of€suchÐ x è Ðpower€over€the€careers€and€future€lives€of€fee„paying€students€are€required€to€take€theÐ !€ Ðnecessary€care€to€get€their€facts€straight€before€taking€a€potential€career„ending€actionÐ ¨" " Ðin€relation€to€a€student.€€While€legislative€and€judicial€policy€mandates€the€quickÐ @$° $ Ðreporting€of€information€of€suspected€child€abuse,€it€does€not€do€so€to€the€exclusion€ofÐ Ø%H & Ðconsideration€of€the€legitimate€interests€of€the€person€named€in€the€report,€or€theÐ p'à ( Ðinterests€of€informants.€€This€€is€not€at€all€to€say€that€the€respondents€were€obliged€toÐ )x!* Ðconduct€their€own€investigation€of€the€suspected€abuse.€€Informants€are€ò ònot€ó órequired€toÐ  * #, Ðha
  document  
ð€Annexe€sur€les€indemnit s€dð ðaccident€l gales€ð" ðÐ ˜ 0 ÐÔ_ ÔAccidentsÔ_ Ô€survenus€apr s€le€31d cembre€1993€mais€avant€le€1ò òeró ónovembre€1996,€r gl.Ð 0 È Ðde€lð ðOnt.776/93,€art.71,€72.ó óÐ È ` ÐÌà œ àUne€assur e,€victime€dð ðun€accident€de€la€route,€a€obtenu€le€versementÐ ø  Ðdð ðindemnit s€l gales€par€lð ðassureur€intim .€€Ce€dernier€a€cess €de€verser€ces€indemnit sÐ  ( Ðle€8mai€1996.€€Dans€son€avis€de€cessation€dð ðindemnisation,€il€a€inform €lð ðassur e€de€sonÐ ( À Ðdroit€de€faire€une€demande€de€m diation€aupr s€de€la€Commission€des€assurances€deÐ À X Ðlð ðOntario,€si€elle€nð ð tait€pas€dð ðaccord€avec€sa€d cision€de€cesser€les€versements.€Ð X ð ÐLð ðassur e€a€pr sent €une€demande€de€m diation€conform ment€ €la€ò òLoi€sur€lesÐ ð ˆ Ðassurancesó ó,€mais€la€m diation€a€ chou .€€Le€8septembre€1998,€lð ðassur e€a€produit€uneÐ ˆ Ðd claration€dans€laquelle€elle€r clamait€le€versement€des€indemnit s€l gales€impay es€etÐ ¸ Ðde€celles€ €venir.€€Lð ðassureur€a€pr sent €une€motion€visant€ €obtenir€un€jugementÐ ¸ P Ðsommaire€pour€le€motif€que€la€demande€de€lð ðassur e€ tait€prescrite€en€raison€du€d lai€deÐ P è Ðprescription€de€deux€ans€pr vu€au€par.281(5)€de€la€ò òLoi€sur€les€assurancesó ó.€€La€CourÐ è € Ðsup rieure€de€justice€a€accueilli€cette€motion€et€a€rejet €lð ðaction.€€La€Cour€dð ðappel€deÐ €! " Ðlð ðOntario€a€confirm €ce€jugement,€ €la€majorit .
Ðð! ð€Statutory€Accident€Benefits€Schedule€ð" ð€Accidents€after€December31,€1993€and€beforeÐ h ÐNovember1,€1996,€O.€Reg.€776/93,€ss.71,€72.ó óÐ ˜ ÐÌà œ àAn€insured,€who€was€the€victim€of€a€motor€vehicle€accident,€receivedÐ 0 È Ðstatutory€benefits€from€the€respondent€insurer.€€The€insurer€ceased€paying€those€benefitsÐ È ` Ðon€May8,€1996.€€Its€notice€of€termination€advised€the€insured€of€her€right€to€seekÐ ` ø Ðmediation€through€the€Ontario€Insurance€Commission€should€she€disagree€with€theÐ ø  Ðcessation€of€payments.€€The€insured€filed€for€mediation€as€required€by€the€ò òInsurance€Actó ó,Ð  ( Ðbut€the€mediation€failed.€€On€September8,€1998,€the€insured€issued€a€statement€of€claimÐ ( À Ðfor€ongoing€statutory€benefits.€€The€insurer€presented€a€motion€for€summary€judgmentÐ À X Ðon€the€grounds€that€the€claim€was€barred€under€the€two„year€limitation€period€set€out€inÐ X ð Ðs.281(5)€of€the€ò òInsurance€Actó ó.€€The€Superior€Court€of€Justice€allowed€the€motion€andÐ ð ˆ Ðdismissed€the€action.€€A€majority€of€the€Court€of€Appeal€upheld€that€judgment.Ð ˆ ÐÌà œ àò òHeldó ó€(Bastarache€J.€dissenting):€€The€appeal€should€be€allowed.Ð ¸ P ÐÌà œ àò òPeró ó€McLachlin€C.J.€and€Gonthier,€Iacobucci,€Binnie,€Arbour€and€LeBel€JJ.:€Ð è € ÐThe€two„year€limitation€period€under€s.281(5)€of€the€ò òInsurance€Actó ó€only€begins€to€runÐ €! " Ðupon€the€issuance€by€the€insurer€of€a€valid€refusal.€€No€such€refusalò ò€ó óis€given€if€there€hasÐ #° $ Ðnot€been€adequate€compliance€with€s.71€of€the€ò òStatutory€Accident€Benefits€Scheduleó óÐ °$H & Ð(ð ðò òSABSó óð ð).€€Section71€obliges€insurers€to€inform€claimants€of€the€entire€disputeÐ H&à ( Ðresolution€process€under€ss.279€to€283€of€the€ò òInsurance€Actó ó€and€not€merely€the€rightÐ à'x!* Ðunder€s.280(1)€to€refer€a€dispute€to€mediation.€€This€information€must€be€provided€inÐ x) #, Ðstraightforward€and€clear€language,€directed€towards€an€unsophisticated€person.€€At€aÐ +¨$. Ðminimum,€the€information€should€include€a€description€of€the€most€important€points€ofÐ ¨,@&0 Ðthe€dispute€resolution€process,€such€as€the€right€to€seek€mediation,€the€right€to€arbitrateÐ @.Ø'2 Ðor€litigate€if€mediation€fails,€that€mediation€must€be€attempted€before€resorting€toÐ Ø/p)4 Ðarbitration€or€litigation€and€the€relevant€time€limits€that€govern€the€entire€process.€€SinceÐ h Ðthe€insured€was€only€informed€of€the€first€step€of€the€process,€a€proper€refusal€was€notÐ ˜ Ðgiven.€€Consequently,€the€limitation€period€under€s.281(5)€of€the€ò òInsurance€Actó ó€di
  document  
38(6)€de€laò ò€Child€Welfare€ActÐ Ô)D"+ Ðó óexon rait€lð ðUniversit €de€toute€responsabilit €li e€au€signalement€effectu €aupr s€duÐ l+Ü#- ÐSPE,€le€jugeRowe€ne€partageait€pas€son€avis€quant€ €la€port e€de€cette€disposition.€Ð -t%/ ÐSelon€lui,€ce€paragraphe€ne€pouvait€ tre€oppos €comme€moyen€de€d fense€ €lð ðargumentÐ œ. '1 Ðde€Mò òmeó óYoung€selon€lequel€lð ðUniversit ,€par€ses€manquements€internes,€avait€agi€deÐ 40¤(3 Ðmani re€n gligente€et€illicite€en€la€privant€dð ðune€carri re€en€travail€social.€€Des€craintesÐ  Ðque€ces€agissements€aient€caus €un€pr judice€lð ðincitaient€ €conclure€quð ðun€nouveauÐ ( ˜ Ðproc s€ tait€n cessaire.€€Dans€son€ordonnance€formelle,€la€Cour€dð ðappel€a€simplementÐ À 0 Ðaccueilli€lð ðappel€et€rejet €lð ðaction€de€la€demanderesse,€le€jugeRoberts€ tant€dissident.Ý ƒ 0 Ñý Ò »Ò ݌РX È ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 ÑýZÛ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú24Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àMò òmeó óYoung€se€pourvoit€maintenant€devant€notre€Cour.Ý ƒ 0 ÑýZÛ uÛ ÝŒÐ ˆ ø ÐŒÝ ÝÌÔ& ` ÔÓ B Ü , ‚X ž ø Ü 8 ô Š Ü , ‚X œ ø Ü 8 ô – B ÓIV.à0 ž àò òAnalyseó óÐ ¸ ( ž Ð ž Ð ÐÓ F Ü , ‚X œ ø Ü 8 ô – Ü , ‚X ž ø Ü 8 ô – iÜ F ÓÌÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 Ñý-Ý Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú25Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àLes€questions€soulev es€en€lð ðesp ce€peuvent€ tre€r parties€dans€les€troisÐ è X Ðprincipales€cat gories€suivantes:Ô' ` ¸ ]Ü ÔÝ ƒ 0 Ñý-Ý HÝ ÝŒÐ € ð ÐŒÝ ÝÌà œ à(1)à0 ø àLa€nature€de€la€cause€dð ðaction;Ð ° ø Ð ø Ð ÐÌà œ à(2)à0 ø àlð ðobligation€et€la€protection€pr vues€ €lð ðart.38€de€la€ò òChild€Welfare€Actó ó;Ð à P ø Ð ø Ð ÐÌà0 œ à(3)à0 ø œ Ð œ Ð àla€question€de€savoir€si€le€droit€et€la€preuve€ tayent€lesÐ !€ Ðdommages-int r ts€accord s€par€le€jury.Ð ¨" " ø Ð ø Ð ÐÌÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 Ñý5à Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú26Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àEn€examinant€ces€questions,€nous€devons€nous€rappeler€du€principe€selonÐ Ø%H & Ðlequel€les€cours€dð ðappel€ne€doivent€ carter€le€verdict€dð ðun€jury€que€sð ðil€sð ðagit€dð ðunÐ p'à ( Ðverdict€qui€nð ðaurait€pas€pu€ tre€rendu€par€un€jury€raisonnable€ayant€re u€des€directivesÐ )x!
} L X ¤Õ I ÓÌÝ ‚ ` Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ ` ÑýØ× Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú26Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àIn€approaching€these€questions,€we€must€bear€in€mind€the€principle€thatÐ ˆ ø Ðappellate€courts€should€not€overturn€the€verdict€of€a€jury€unless€it€is€one€that€noÐ  Ðreasonable€jury,€properly€instructed,€could€reach:€ò òHousen€v.€Nikolaisenó ó,€[2002]€2€S.C.R.Ð ¸ ( Ð235,€2002€SCC€33;€ò òH.L.€v.€Canada€(Attorney€General)ó ó,€[2005]€1€S.C.R.€401,€2005€SCCÐ P À Ð25.Ý ƒ ` ÑýØ× ó× ÝŒÐ è X ÐŒÝ ÝÌÓ E Ü , ‚X ž « Œ †X } L ¤ Ü , ‚X « Œ †X } L X E ÓA.à0 ž àò òThe€Nature€of€the€Cause€of€Actionó óÐ ˆ ž !ž ! ÐÓ I Ü , ‚X « Œ †X } L X Ü , ‚X ž « Œ †X } L X IÚ I ÓÔ ‡ b X ãÐ X X X ãÐ ÔÌÝ ‚ ` Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ ` ÑýKÛ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú27Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àÔ # † X ãÐ X X b X ãÐ+Û # ÔÔ ‡ b X ãÐ X X X ãÐ ÔThe€jury€was€asked€whether€Leslie€Bella€or€William€Rowe,€by€their€acts€orÐ H ¸ Ðomissions,€had€breached€the€duty€of€care€they€owed€to€the€appellant.€€This€is€the€classicÐ à P Ðformulation€of€the€cause€of€action€in€negligence.€€It€is€premised€on€a€relationshipÐ x è Ðbetween€the€plaintiff€and€the€defendant,€which€in€turn€gives€rise€to€a€duty€of€care€on€theÐ !€ Ðdefendant€toward€the€plaintiff.€€Breach€of€the€standard€of€care€imposed€by€that€dutyÐ ¨" " Ðcreates€legal€liability€for€damages€caused€by€the€breach.€€There€was€evidence€before€theÐ @$° $ Ðjury€capable€of€establishing€all€the€elements€of€the€tort€of€negligence.€€Ý ƒ ` ÑýKÛ fÛ ÝŒÐ Ø%H & ÐŒÝ ÝÌÓ E Ü , ‚X « ‚á ä …X } L ¤ Ü , ‚X « Œ †X } L X E Óà0 « à(1)à0 m « !« ! àò òExistence€of€a€Duty€of€Careó óÐ )x!* m !m ! ÐÓ I Ü , ‚X « Œ †X } L X Ü , ‚X « ‚á ä …X } L X ß I ÓÌÝ ‚ ` Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ ` Ñý à Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú28Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àThe€Court€recently€affirmed€in€ò òCooper€v.€Hobartó ó,€[2001]€3€S.C.R.€537,Ð 8,¨$. Ð2001€SCC€79,€at€para.€24,€and€ò òMartel€Building€Ltd.€v.€Canadaó ó,€[2000]2€S.C.R.€860,Ð Ð-@&0 Ð2000€SCC€60,€at€para.€46,€that€the€ð ðdutyð ð€analysis€proceeds€in€two€stages:Ý ƒ ` Ñý à 'à ݌Рh/Ø'2 ÐŒÝ ÝÌà0 « à(a)à0 ä « !« ! àIs€there€a€sufficiently€close€relationship€of€proximity€between€theÐ ( ˜ Ðparties€such€that,€in€the€reasonable€contemplation€of€theÐ À 0 Ðdefendant,€carelessness€on€its€part€might€cause€damage€to€theÐ X È Ðplaintiff?Ð ð ` ä !ä ! ÐÌà0 « à(b)à0 ä « !« ! àIf€so,€are€there€any€considerations€which€ought€to€negative€orÐ  Ðlimit:€(a)the€scope€of€the€duty;€(b)the€class€of€persons€to€whomÐ ¸ ( Ðit€is€owed;€or€(c)the€damages€to€which€a€breach€of€it€may€giveÐ P À Ðrise?Ð è X ä !ä ! ÐÌÔ # † X ãÐ X X b X ãÐþÛ # ÔÔ ‡ b X ãÐ X X X ã
  document  
* Ðainsi€sa€capacit €de€gagner€un€revenu.Ó ÓÐ Ô)D"+ œ Ð œ Ð ÐÌð ð€lð ðappui€de€cette€action€de€port e€g n rale,€lð ðappelante€a€pr sent €des€ l ments€deÐ -t%/ Ðpreuve€ tablissant€lð ðomission€de€lð ðencadrer€et€de€la€conseiller€judicieusement€au€sujetÐ œ. '1 Ðde€son€avenir,€ainsi€que€la€diffusion€n gligente€dans€la€facult ,€par€des€moyens€autresÐ 40¤(3 Ðque€le€signalement€effectu €aupr s€du€SPE,€de€lð ðid e€que€lð ðappelante€pourrait€avoirÐ  Ðagress €des€enfants.Ð ( ˜ ÐÌÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 Ñý«ø Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú31Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àBref,€en€lð ðesp ce,€la€proximit €d coulait€non€pas€simplement€dð ðunÐ X È Ðmalencontreux€signalement€effectu €aupr s€du€SPE,€mais€du€lien€g n ral€qui€existaitÐ ð ` Ðentre€les€professeurs€de€lð ðUniversit Memorial€et€leurs€ tudiants.€€M me€si€elle€ tudiaitÐ ˆ ø Ðð ð €distanceð ð,€lð ðappelante€ tait€un€membre€de€la€communaut €universitaire€qui€payaitÐ  Ðdes€frais€de€scolarit ,€ce€qui€avait€pour€effet€de€g n rer€des€droits€et€responsabilit sÐ ¸ ( Ðmutuels.€€Le€lien€entre€lð ðappelante€et€lð ðUniversit €avait€un€fondement€contractuel,€ceÐ P À Ðqui€donnait€naissance€ €des€obligations€de€nature€ €la€fois€contractuelle€et€d lictuelle:Ð è X Ðò òCentral€Trust€Co.€c.€Rafuseó ó,€[1986]€2R.C.S.147.Ý ƒ 0 Ñý«ø Æø ݌Р€ ð ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 Ñý¡ü Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú32Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àLa€question€de€savoir€si€une€obligation€de€diligence€sera€annul e€dans€leÐ ° Ðcas€o €les€parties€sont€des€ trangers€qui€nð ðont€entre€eux€dð ðautre€lien€que€les€ v nementsÐ H ¸ Ðentourant€un€ð ðsignalementð ð€ne€devrait€ tre€tranch e€que€lorsquð ðelle€se€posera.€€ðÀ ðÐ à P Ðsupposer€que€la€politique€g n rale€exprim e€dans€la€Loi€puisse,€dans€un€tel€cas,€annulerÐ x è Ðla€responsabilit €susceptible€de€r sulter€dð ðun€signalement€n gligent,€comme€nous€leÐ !€ Ðverrons€plus€loin,€cette€politique€ne€justifie€aucunement€dð ðannuler€la€responsabilit €quiÐ ¨" " Ðserait€par€ailleurs€engag e€dð ðapr s€les€faits€de€la€pr sente€affaire.
Ðto€the€making€of€the€CPS€report€and€would€not€excuse€the€University€and€its€employeesÐ Ô)D"+ Ðfrom€failure€to€live€up€to€their€broader€responsibilities€to€the€appellant€as€a€member€ofÐ l+Ü#- Ðthe€university€community.€€The€facts€in€this€case€do€not€trigger€the€protection€of€the€ActÐ -t%/ Ðbecause,€quite€simply,€the€respondent€Dr.€Rowe€acted€on€nothing€more€than€speculationÐ œ. '1 Ðand€conjecture€in€making€his€report€which,€as€Director€of€the€School€of€Social€Work,Ð 40¤(3 Ðhe€must€have€known€would€have€serious€consequences€within€the€small€community€ofÐ  Ðsocial€workers€in€Newfoundland,€including€the€likely€posting€of€the€appellantð ðs€nameÐ ( ˜ Ðon€the€provincial€Child€Abuse€Registry.Ý ƒ ` Ñý¢ò ½ò ݌РÀ 0 ÐŒÝ ÝÔ # † X ãÐ X X b X ãÐ?ô # ÔÔ ‡ b X ãÐ X X X ãÐ ÔÌÓ E Ü , ‚X « ‚á ä …X } L ¤ Ü , ‚X « Œ †X } L X E Óà0 « à(2)à0 m « !« ! àò òThe€Standard€of€Careó óÐ ð ` m !m ! ÐÓ I Ü , ‚X « Œ †X } L X Ü , ‚X « ‚á ä …X } L X uù I ÓÌÝ ‚ ` Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ ` Ñý`ú Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú33Ú ÚÛ € z ! Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àThe€standard€of€care€that€ought€to€be€exercised€by€professors€towards€theirÐ  Ðstudents€was€emphasized€in€the€testimony€of€Dr.€Wayne€Ludlow€who,€during€theÐ ¸ ( Ðrelevant€1994„1996€period,€was€the€Dean€of€Student€Affairs€at€Memorial€University.€Ð P À ÐDr.Ludlow€testified:Ý ƒ ` Ñý`ú {ú ݌Рè X ÐŒÝ ÝÌÓ Óà0 « àThe€relationship€between€the€professor€and€the€student€is€a€specialÐ ˆ Ðrelationship€...€[I]t€is€an€imbalanced€relationship€because€professor€is€allÐ ä T Ðknowing,€and€I€can€see€now€the€fear€and€trembling€of€the€young€first„yearÐ ° Ðstudents€when€they€went€to€classes,€someone€in€a€flowing€black€robe.€€SoÐ | ì Ðthe€power€balance€was€evident....Ó ÓÐ H ¸ « !« ! ÐÌÝ ‚ ` Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ ` ÑýSþ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú34Ú ÚÛ € z " Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àThose€whose€professional€responsibilities€include€the€exercise€of€suchÐ x è Ðpower€over€the€careers€and€future€lives€of€fee„paying€students€are€required€to€take€theÐ !€ Ðnecessary€care€to€get€their€facts€straight€before€taking€a€potential€career„ending€actionÐ ¨" " Ðin€relation€to€a€student.€€While€legislative€and€judicial€policy€mandates€the€quickÐ @$° $ Ðreporting€of€information€of€suspected€child€abuse,€it€does€not€do€so€to€the€exclusion€ofÐ Ø%H & Ðconsideration€of€the€legitimate€interests€of€the€person€named€in€the€report,€or€theÐ p'à ( Ðinterests€of€informants.€€This€€is€not€at€all€to€say€that€the€respondents€were€obliged€toÐ )x!* Ðconduct€their€own€investigation€of€the€suspected€abuse.€€Informants€are€ò ònot€ó órequired€toÐ  * #, Ðha
  document  
€€En€vertu€du€par. 223(3),€un€certificat€enregistr €aupr sÐ "€ Ðde€la€Cour€f d rale€est€r put € tre€un€jugement€de€cette€cour.€€Comme€le€note€leÐ œ# " ÐjugeRothstein€au€par. 35:Ý ƒ % Ñý ô "ô ݌Р4%° $ ÐŒÝ ÝÌÓ Óà0 V àUne€sommation€de€payer€en€vertu€de€lð ðarticle224€(mod.€par€L.C.€1994,Ð d(à ( Ðch.21,€art.€101)€est€analogue€ €une€ordonnance€de€saisie-arr t€rendue€par€uneÐ 0)¬ ) Ðcour.€[...]€La€saisie€et€la€vente€de€biens€meubles€pr vue[s]€auÐ ü)x!* Ðparagraphe225(1)€est€une€disposition€similaire€ €un€bref€dð ðex cution€d livr Ð È*D"+ Ðpar€un€tribunal.Ó ÓÐ ”+ #, V Ð V Ð ÐÌEn€lui€accordant€le€pouvoir€de€recouvrer€les€cr ances€fiscales€de€cette€fa on,€le€l gislateurÐ Ä.
Ðin€Respect€of€a€Cause€of€Actionð ð?ó óÓ ÓÐ „ ø Ð ø Ð ÐÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý§Ì Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú23Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThe€application€of€s.€32€is€limited€to€ð ðproceedings€by€or€against€the€CrownÐ 8!´ Ðin€respect€of€a€cause€of€actionð ð.€Ý ƒ % Ñý§Ì ÂÌ ÝŒÐ Ð"L ! ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % ÑýùÍ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú24Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àInterpreted€in€their€grammatical€and€ordinary€sense,€these€words€clearlyÐ &| % Ðencompass€the€statutory€collection€procedures€in€the€ò òITAó ó.€€Although€the€wordÐ ˜' ' Ðð ðproceedingð ð€is€often€used€in€the€context€of€an€action€in€court,€its€definition€is€moreÐ 0)¬ ) Ðexpansive.€€The€Manitoba€Court€of€Appeal€stated€in€ò òRoyce€v.€MacDonald€(Municipality)Ð È*D"+ Ðó ó(1909),€12€W.L.R.€347,€at€p.€350,€that€the€ð ðword€ð ðproceedingð ð€has€a€very€wide€meaning,Ð `,Ü#- Ðand€includes€steps€or€measures€which€are€not€in€any€way€connected€with€actions€orÐ ø-t%/ Ðsuitsð ð.€€In€ò òBlackð ðs€Law€Dictionary€ó ó(6th€ed.€1990),€at€p.€1204,€the€definition€ofÐ / '1 Ðð ðproceedingð ð€includes,€ò òinter€aliaó ó,€ð ðan€act€necessary€to€be€done€in€order€to€obtain€a€givenÐ „ Ðend;€a€prescribed€mode€of€action€for€carrying€into€effect€a€legal€rightð ð.Ý ƒ % ÑýùÍ Î ÝŒÐ ˜ ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý}Ò Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú25Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThe€statutory€collection€procedures€closely€resemble€various€proceedings€inÐ L È Ðcourt.€€The€registration€of€a€certificate€in€Federal€Court€is€deemed€by€s.€223(3)€to€be€aÐ ä ` Ðjudgment€of€that€court.€€As€Rothstein€J.A.€notes€at€para.€35:Ý ƒ % Ñý}Ò ˜Ò ݌Р| ø ÐŒÝ ÝÌÓ Óà0 œ àA€requirement€to€pay€under€section€224€(as€am.€by€S.C.€1994,€c.€21,€s.€101)Ð ¬ ( Ðis€analogous€to€a€garnishing€order€issued€by€a€court.€.€.€.€Seizure€and€sale€ofÐ x ô Ðchattels€under€subsection€225(1)€is€a€provision€closely€parallel€to€a€writ€ofÐ D À Ðexecution€issued€by€a€court.Ó ÓÐ Œ œ Ð œ Ð ÐÌBy€granting€the€power€to€effect€the€collection€of€tax€debts€in€this€manner,€Parliament€hasÐ @ ¼ Ðprovided€the€Minister€with€an€efficient€and€expeditious€alternative€to€bringing€a€courtÐ Ø T Ðaction.€€However,€the€court€and€non„court€collection€procedures€are€identical€in€purpose.€Ð p ì ÐBoth€are€mechanisms€by€which€the€Minister€is€able€to€enforce€the€collection€of€tax€debtsÐ „ Ðand€thereby€carry€into€effect€the€legal€rights€of€the€Crown.€€It€is€evident€that€both€kindsÐ   Ðof€procedures€are€appropriately€characterized€as€legal€proceedings.Ð 8!´ ÐÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % ÑýdØ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú26Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThe€appellantð ðs€submission€turns€on€whether€thes
  document  
Ðde€la€Commission€ni€approuv e€par€elle,€cela€pr suppose€que€la€Commission€pourrait€refuserÐ Ó-"*& Ðde€verser€une€indemnit €en€d pit€de€la€reconnaissance€expresse€de€lð ðexistence€de€tous€lesÐ ¹. +' ÐÔ_ Ôfaits€y€donnant€droit.€En€lð ðabsence€de€preuve€ tayant€cette€hypoth se,€elle€ne€peut€ treÐ ± Ðconsid r e€comme€un€facteur€permettant€de€d terminer€le€sens€v ritable€des€termesÐ — æ Ðemploy s€dans€la€police€dð ðassurance€et€dans€lð ðò òInsurance€Act.ó óÝ ƒ / ÿÿ* ~ ݌Р} Ì ÐŒÓ S ÓÓ Ô ÓÝ ÝÝ ‚ / ÿÿÿ ÝÔ S X ¶ ÔÓ S ÓÓ Ô ÓÝ ÝÝ ‚ / ÿÿÿ¦# ÝÝ ÝLe€droit€de€lð ðouvrier€ò òð ðde€recevoirð ð€ó ódes€prestations€nð ðest€pas€subordonn €au€d pð= ðt€dð ðuneÐ X Ðdemande€en€bonne€et€due€forme€et€ €lð ðapprobation€de€celle„ci.€Une€interpr tation€diff renteÐ ï > Ðsignifierait€que€la€responsabilit €de€lð ðassureur€pourrait€ tre€modifi e€ €son€d savantage€par€unÐ Õ $ Ðacte€ind pendant€de€lð ðassur ,€c.„ „d.€quð ðelle€d pendrait€du€d pð= ðt€par€lð ðassur €dð ðune€demandeÐ » Ðdð ðindemnisation€aupr s€de€la€Commission.€Une€pareille€situation€va€ €lð ðencontre€des€r glesÐ ¡ ð Ðdð ðinterpr tation€ordinairement€applicables€ €un€contrat€de€ce€genre.Ý ƒ / ÿÿ¦# ú# ݌Р‡ Ö ÐŒÓ S ÓÓ Ô ÓÝ ÝÝ ‚ / ÿÿÿ ÝÔ S b À ÔÓ S ÓÓ Ô ÓÝ ÝÝ ‚ / ÿÿÿ!' ÝÝ Ýò òLe€ó ójuge€en€chef€Laskin€et€les€juges€Spence€et€Dickson,€ò òdissidents:€ó óNonobstant€le€faitÐ b Ðque€la€r gle€ò òcontra€proferentem€ó óne€sð ðapplique€pas,€il€convient€dð ðinterpr ter€largement€lesÐ ù H Ðstipulations€dð ðun€contrat€et€dð ðinterpr ter€ troitement€ses€clauses€restrictives.€Le€termeÐ ß . Ðð ðprestationsð ð€a€une€signification€plus€large€et€une€port e€plus€g n rale€que€le€termeÐ Å Ðð ðindemnit ð ð.€Le€droit€de€recevoir€des€prestations€au€titre€dð ðun€accident€du€travail€nð ðexiste€queÐ « ú Ðsi€lð ðouvrier€a€demand €et€obtenu€une€indemnit .Ý ƒ / ÿÿ!' u' ݌Р‘ à ÐŒÓ S ÓÓ Ô ÓÝ ÝÑ € 6 l ` ÑÝ ‚ 0 ÿÿÿ ÝÔ S l Ê ÔÓ S ÓÓ Ø ÓÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 ÿÿÿ“* ÝÝ ÝPOURVOI€contre€un€arr t€de€la€Cour€dð ðappel€de€lð ðOntarioÝ ‚ $ ÿÿÿ ÝÔ USFR. , Ôò òÝ ÝÔ_ ÔÑ È ÑÔ FRUS. , Ô× ƒ 8 ×Ý ƒ 7 ÿÿ Ýò…òÚ Ú1Ú Úó…óÝ Ý× ×Ý ‚ $ ÿÿÿC+ ƒ ÝÔ FR. , FR. , Ôó óÝ Ý€rejetant€un€appel€dð ðunÐ l Ðjugement€du€juge€Cavers,€de€cour€de€comt .€Pourvoi€accueilli,€le€juge€en€chef€Laskin€et€lesÐ R Ðjuges€Spence€et€Dickson€ tant€dissidents.Ý ƒ 0 ÿÿ“* ç* ݌Рé 8 ÐŒÓ S ÓÓ Ø ÓÝ ÝÝ ‚ 3 ÿÿÿ ÝÔ S u Ä " q ÔÓ S Óò òÝ ÝÓ S S ÓÝ ‚ 3 ÿÿÿW- ÝÝ ÝR.F.
t‹ =— B lù >— B ¤Ó ?— B ì× @— B ܳ A— B dé B— B Üô C— B œi D— B µ E— B Ô? F— B @ G— B ”@ H— B ÄØ I— B Ù J— B d‘ K— B ä‘ L— B $’ M— B d’ N— B Ķ O— B · P— B D· Q— B „· R— B Ä· S— B ¸ T— B D¸ U— B „¸ V— B ĸ W— B ¹ X— B D¹ Y— B „¹ Z— B Ĺ [— B º \— B Dº ]— B „º w w ² ² 3 3 º º Ð J J ž = = M M ] l l i i Œ3 Œ3 Ä4 Ä4 Y Y µZ µZ îZ îZ :[ ! } } ¹ ¹ : : Á Á à Q Q ® D D Y q q s s l l “3 “3 Ë4 Ë4 Y Y ¼Z ¼Z õZ õZ :[ ! = *€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags €PlaceName €= *€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags €PlaceType €8 *€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags €City €9 *€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags €State €8 *€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags €date €B ! *€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags €country-region €9 " *€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags €place € €1 €10 €1974 €1975 €28 €29 €Day €Month €Year" ! " ! " ! " " " " " " " " " " " " " % . / ª ± Õ Ø Ù Ü ! ' 1 9 e j r z ( 3 Ç Í # ô ÿ ( / Y _  ˜ ³ ¸ À È ; A Ž ™  – , 2 – š 2 7 - 1 > A ! ! ˜! ! Î# Ó# Ô# Ú# [- `- . %. _/ f/ / –/ Ë/ Ö/ Y1 a1 |1 1 ‰1 ‘1 03 43 ó4 þ4 C9 E9 R9 U9 w> z> °@ ³@ tC yC †N ‰N IW TW úW ýW ¤Z ªZ øZ +[ +[ -[ -[ .[ .[ 0[ 1[ 3[ 4[ 6[ 7[ :[ " : Ñ Ô Õ ô  ®  — $ % Ê Ô 7 a b l · Á à ÷ ø R S V {   š 3 \ n p ç é I1 •1 –1 ™1 t4 4 ´9 ·9 : : ~  $N &N Q Q †Y ŠY zZ „Z øZ úZ [ [ )[ +[ +[ -[ -[ .[ .[ 0[ 1[ 3[ 4[ 6[ 7[ :[ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 " : øZ )[ +[ +[ -[ -[ .[ .[ 0[ 1[ 3[ 4[ 6[ 7[ :[ . / øZ +[ +[ -[ -[ .[ .[ 0[ 1[ 3[ 4[ 6[ 7[ :[ |ÿÿÿR÷Ö¹ÿ }ÿÿÿV;º/ÿ ~ÿÿÿR ÿ ÿÿÿÌ žŒÿ €ÿÿÿž–À ÿ ÿÿÿŒæ´Ïÿ ‚ÿÿÿº0ò(ÿ ƒÿÿÿrØþ¦ÿ ˆÿÿÿVY>Ûÿ ‰ÿÿÿÌÅ ‚ÿ d€ ˜UÉ ÿ t:GR æ8ÿ Á6tWö| u ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ „ „˜þ Æ ^„ `„˜þ . „  „˜þ Æ   ^„  `„˜þ . „8 „˜þ Æ 8 ^„8 `„˜þ . „Ð „˜þ Æ Ð ^„Ð `„˜þ . „ „˜þ Æ ^„ `„˜þOJ QJ o( ·ð „  „˜þ Æ   ^„  `„˜þOJ QJ o( ·ð „8 „˜þ Æ 8 ^„8 `„˜þOJ QJ o( ·ð „Ð „˜þ Æ Ð ^„Ð `„˜þOJ QJ o( ·ð „h „˜þ Æ h ^„h `„˜þ . „h „˜þ Æ h ^„h `„˜þOJ QJ o( ·ð „ˆ „àþ Æ ˆ ^„ˆ `„àþB* ph ( ) „ˆ „àþ Æ ˆ ^„ˆ `„àþB* ph ( ) „q „þ Æ q ^„q `„þ‡h ˆH [ ]  „  „˜þ Æ   ^„  `„˜þ‡h ˆH . ’ „p „Lÿ Æ p ^„p `„Lÿ‡h ˆH .  „@ „˜þ Æ @ ^„@ `„˜þ‡h ˆH .  „ „˜þ Æ ^„ `„˜þ‡h ˆH . ’ „à „Lÿ Æ à ^„à `„Lÿ‡h ˆH .  „° „˜þ Æ ° ^„° `„˜þ‡h ˆH .  „€ „˜þ Æ € ^„€ `„˜þ‡h ˆH . ’ „P „Lÿ Æ P ^„P `„Lÿ‡h ˆH . Á6tW t:GR d€ ˆÿÿÿ ÿÿÿ ~ÿÿÿ }ÿÿÿ |ÿÿÿ ‰ÿÿÿ ƒÿÿÿ ‚ÿÿÿ ÿÿÿ €ÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿ å ~O ºP€ \g’ Èz® Jµ øZ [ :[ ÿ R e p l a c e  ÿÿ R e p l a c e æ L f Š ý ± . þæ L f Š ý ± . þæ L f Š ý ± . þæ L f Š ý ± . þæ L f Š ý ± . 0 @ 9[ @ @
  document  
€267,ò òó ó€sont€les€suivantes:Ý ƒ % ÑýEp `p ݌Р, ˜ ÐŒÝ ÝÌò òó óà0 « àò ò[traduction]Ð \ È « Ð « Ð Ðà0 « àò ò2à0 ø « Ð « Ð àó óó óÓ Ó(1)à0 8 ø Ð ø Ð àLa€Direction€g n rale€des€permis€dð ðalcool,€ tablie€au€sein€duÐ ô ` Ðminist re,€est€maintenue.Ð 8 Ð 8 Ð ÐÌà « àà0 ø à(2)à0 8 ø Ð ø Ð àLa€Direction€g n rale€peut€d livrer€des€licences€et€des€permisÐ X Ä Ðdð ðachat€dð ðalcool€aupr s€de€la€Direction€g n rale€de€laÏdistribution€des€boissons€alcooliques,€pour€revente€et€usage€enÏconformit €avec€la€pr sente€loi€et€la€ò òLiquor€Distribution€Actó ó.Ð ¼ ( 8 Ð 8 Ð ÐÓ ÓÌò òà « à3ó óÓ Óà0 ø à(1)à0 8 ø Ð ø Ð àConform ment€ €la€ò òPublic€Service€Actó ó,€le€ministre€nomme€leÐ Œ Ðdirecteur€g n ral€et€fixe€sa€r mun ration.Ð 8 Ð 8 Ð ÐÌà « àà0 ø à(2)à0 8 ø Ð ø Ð àSous€r serve€des€d crets€et€des€directives€du€ministre€touchantÐ „ ð Ðdes€questions€dð ðint r t€g n ral,€le€directeur€g n ral€doitÐ 8 Ð 8 Ð ÐÌà0 « àà0 ø « Ð « Ð àà0 Ü ø Ð ø Ð àa)à0 8 Ü Ð Ü Ð àappliquer€la€pr sente€loi;Ð è T 8 Ð 8 Ð ÐÌà0 « àà0 ø « Ð « Ð àà0 Ü ø Ð ø Ð àb)à0 8 Ü Ð Ü Ð àsurveiller€tous€les€ tablissements€et€les€fabricants€dð ðalcoolÐ € ì Ðtitulaires€dð ðun€permis.Ð 8 Ð 8 Ð ÐÓ ÓÌò òà « à20Ó Óó óà0 ø à(1)à0 8 ø Ð ø Ð àEn€plus€des€autres€pouvoirs€qui€lui€sont€conf r s€par€laÐ ° Ðpr sente€loi,€le€directeur€g n ral€peut,€de€sa€propre€initiative€ouÏ €la€suite€dð ðune€plainte,€prendre€des€mesures€contre€un€titulaireÏde€permis€pour€lð ðun€ou€lð ðautre€des€motifs€suivants:Ð 8 Ð 8 Ð ÐÌà0 « àà0 ø « Ð « Ð àà0 Ü ø Ð ø Ð àa)à0 8 Ü Ð Ü Ð àle€titulaire€du€permis€contrevient€ €une€exigence€de€la€pr senteÐ ¬" " Ðloi,€des€r glements€et€dð ðune€condition€attach e€ €son€permis;Ð 8 Ð 8 Ð ÐÌà0 « àà0 ø « Ð « Ð àà0 Ü ø Ð ø Ð àb)à0 8 Ü Ð Ü Ð àle€titulaire€du€permis€est€d clar €coupable€dð ðune€infraction€auxÐ %| % Ðlois€du€Canada€ou€de€la€Colombie„Britannique€ou€auxÏr glements€dð ðune€municipalit €et€dð ðun€district€r gional,€siÏlð ðinfraction€se€rapporte€ €lð ð tablissement€ou€ €sa€gestion;Ð 8 Ð 8 Ð ÐÌà0 « àà0 ø « Ð « Ð àà0 Ü ø Ð ø Ð àc)à0 8 Ü Ð Ü Ð àle€titulaire€du€permis€omet,€de€fa on€r p t e,€de€garder€sonÐ )x!
8 Ð 8 Ð ÐÌà œ àà ø àà Ü à(i)€à0 8 àreceive€the€remuneration€set€by€the€Lieutenant€Governor€inÐ Ô-@&0 ÐCouncil,€andÐ 8 Ð 8 Ð Ðâ âÐ l/Ø'2 Ðà0 œ àà0 ø œ Ð œ Ð àà0 Ü ø Ð ø Ð àà0 8 Ü Ð Ü Ð àà Ü à(ii)€be€paid€reasonable€expenses€incurred€in€carrying€out€theirÏâ âduties€as€members€of€the€appeal€board.Ð 8 Ð 8 Ð ÐÌà œ à(3)€à0 ø àThe€chair€of€the€appeal€board€may€designate€one€Ô_ Ôñ ¥ ñmemberñ ¥ ñÔ_ ÔÔ_ Ôñ ¥ ñpersonñ ¥ ñÔ_ Ô€as€viceÐ ø d Ðchair.Ð ø Ð ø Ð ÐÌà œ à(4)€à0 ø àSubject€to€section€Ô_ Ô31ñ ¦ ñ€ñ ¦ ñ(6)Ô_ Ô€and€(8),€the€appeal€board€must€hear€andÐ \ È Ðdetermine€any€matter€appealed€under€section€31.Ð ø Ð ø Ð ÐÌà œ à(5)€à0 ø àThe€chair€of€the€appeal€board€may€establish€one€or€more€panels€of€theÐ À , Ðappeal€board,€each€consisting€of€one€or€3€members€of€the€appealÏboard,€as€the€chair€considers€advisable,€to€hear€any€matter€that€isÏbefore€the€appeal€board,€and€when€a€panel€is€established,Ð ø Ð ø Ð ÐÌà œ àà ø à(a)€à0 8 àthe€chair€must€appoint€one€of€the€members€of€the€panel€toÐ ¼ ( Ðpreside€at€meetings€of€the€panel,€andÐ 8 Ð 8 Ð ÐÌà0 œ àà ø à(b)€à0 8 œ Ð œ Ð àthe€panel€has€the€jurisdiction€of€the€appeal€board€with€respectÐ Œ Ðto€matters€under€this€Act€that€come€before€the€appeal€Ô_ Ôboard.ñ © ññ ¨ ññ ¨ ññ © ññ ª ñ..ñ ª ñÔ_ ÔÐ 8 Ð 8 Ð ÐÓ ÓÌÓ ‡™ ÓÓ ÓÔ_ Ôñ § ñ...ñ § ñÔ_ ÔÔ_ Ôñ § ñÌñ § ñÔ_ ÔÓ ¤™ ÓÌÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý š Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú16Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThe€preamble€to€the€ò òConstitution€Act,€1867ó ó€provides,€in€part:Ý ƒ % Ñý š 5š ݌Рˆ ÐŒÝ ÝÌÌà0 œ àà Ü àà œ à€€€€€Whereas€the€Provinces€of€Canada,€Nova€Scotia,€and€New€BrunswickÏhave€expressed€their€Desire€to€be€federally€united€into€One€DominionÏunder€the€Crown€of€the€United€Kingdom€of€Great€Britain€and€Ireland,€withÏa€Constitution€similar€in€Principle€to€that€of€the€United€Kingdom€.€.€Ô_ Ô.ñ « ñ.ñ « ñÔ # † X -¤ X X X -¤« # ÔÔ_ ÔÐ ä P œ Ð œ Ð ÐÌÓ ï} ÓÓ ÓÌÓ ëœ ÓIII.€€ò òIssueó óÐ H ´ ÐÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý; Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú17Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThe€issue€is€whether€members€of€the€Liquor€Appeal€Board€are€sufficientlyÐ x#ä # Ðindependent€to€render€decisions€on€violations€of€the€ò òÔ ‡ X -¤ X X X -¤ Ôó óActò òÔ # † X -¤ X X X -¤`ž # ÔÔ ‡ X -¤ X X X -¤ Ôó ó€and€impose€the€penalties€itÐ %| % Ðprovides.€€The€other€grounds€raised€by€Ô # † X -¤ X X X -¤«ž # ÔÔ ‡ X -¤ X X X -¤ Ôthe€respondentÔ # † X -¤ X X X -¤HŸ # ÔÔ ‡ X -¤ X X X -¤ Ô€against€the€Ô # † X -¤ X X X -¤˜Ÿ # ÔÔ ‡ X -¤ X X X -¤ Ôvalidity€of€the€SeniorÐ ¨& ' ÐInspectorð ðs€initial€Ô # † X -¤ X X X -¤çŸ # ÔÔ ‡ X -¤ X X X -¤ Ôdecision€to€impose€a€pe
  document  
ó óÐ Á ` ÐÌÔ ‡ X %† X X X %† Ôà œ àð ð€compter€dð ðavril€1985,€lð ðaccus €a,€en€sa€qualit €dð ðavocat,Ô # † X %† X X X %†t # Ô€fait€desÐ ñ  Ðd marches€aupr s€de€divers€niveaux€de€gouvernement€pour€le€compte€de€deux€soci t sÏdans€le€but€dð ðobtenir€des€subventions.Ô ‡ X %† X X X %† Ô€€Il€a€poursuivi€ces€activit s€apr s€sa€nominationÐ !
¡j ÓÌà „ àÝ ‚ ³¹ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ ³¹âk ÝÔ2 *e ÔÚ Ú13Ú Ú.Ô3 Ôà0 Ü àÝ Ý€à ž àà œ àà ø àThe€positions€of€the€parties€on€this€point€can€be€easily€summarized.€Ð } ÐThe€appellant€has€submitted€that€the€wording€of€the€section€is€quite€clear€and€shouldÏnot€be€deviated€from.€€In€order€for€the€Crown€to€prove€the€ò òmens€reaó ó€required€by€theÐ ­ L ! Ðsection,€it€must€establish€nothing€more€than€that€an€accused€possessed€an€intentionÏto€commit€the€acts€therein,€combined€with€a€knowledge€of€all€relevant€circumstances.€ÏOn€the€other€hand,€the€respondent€submits€that€s.€121(1)(ò òaó ó)€requires€a€finding€ofÐ u% ' Ðð ðcorruptionð ð,€and€that€the€Crown€must€establish€that€an€accused€received€the€benefitÐ '¬ ) Ðò òas€a€result€of€his€or€her€position€as€government€employeeó ó.€€The€employee€must€alsoÐ ¥(D"+ Ðknow€that€this€was€the€reason€why€the€benefit€was€conferred.€€Additionally,€it€wasÏargued€that€absent€this€mental€element,€the€crime€would€be€one€of€strict€liability.Ý ƒ ³¹âk l ÝŒÐ Ü Ð Ü Ð Ðâ âŒÝ ÝÐ m- '1 Ðà „ àÝ ‚ ³¹ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ ³¹¨p ÝÔ2 *e ÔÚ Ú14Ú Ú.Ô3 Ôà0 Ü àÝ Ý€à ž àà œ àà ø àI€shall€deal€with€the€last€point€first,€as€I€believe€it€is€the€most€easilyÐ a Ðâ âdisposed€of.€As€I€recently€stated€for€a€majority€of€the€Court€in€ò òR.€v.€Hincheyó ó,€[1996]Ð ù ˜ Ð3€S.C.R.€1128,€at€para.€3,€it€is€clear€that€an€intention€to€commit€a€prohibited€actÏcombined€with€knowledge€of€the€relevant€circumstances€is€an€accepted€form€ofÏcriminal€œculpabilityÔ CE. , US. , k ÔÔ # † X Õ¼ X X X ï.ÿj # ÔÔ ‡ X Õ¼ X X X Õ¼ Ô,›€and€that€this€should€not€be€equated€with€a€strict€liability€offence:Ý ƒ ³¹¨p Óp ݌РÁ ` Ü Ð Ü Ð ÐŒÝ ÝÌÔ US. , CE. , ÔÓ Óà0 ž àà0 œ ž Ð ž Ð àQuite€simply,€this€offence€cannot€be€one€of€strict€liability€as€it€requires€aÏò òbona€fideó ó€mental€element.€€At€a€minimum,€the€charge€given€to€the€juryÐ ½ \ Ðrequired€they€find€that€the€appellant€possessed€an€intention€to€commit€aÏprohibited€act,€while€having€subjective€knowledge€of€the€circumstances.€€AsÏDoherty€J.A.€recognized€when€dealing€with€this€very€offence€in€ò òR.€v.Ð ! À ÐGreenwoodó ó€(1991),€8€C.R.€(4th)€235€(Ont.€C.A.),€at€pp.€255„56:Ð í Œ œ Ð œ Ð ÐÓ ßs ÓÓ ÓÌà0 ž àà0 œ ž Ð ž Ð àà0 ø œ Ð œ Ð àà Ü àA€conscious€choice€to€perform€a€prohibited€act,€combined€withÏknowledge€that€all€or€at€least€some€of€the€relevant€circumstances€exist,Ïis€a€well„recognized€form€of€criminal€culpability:€see€ò òR.€v.€SaultÐ ¼ ÐSte.Marie€(Cityó ó),€supra,€at€p.€1324€œ(S.C.R.).€.€.ñ = ñ€ñ = ñ;›€A.€W.€Mewett€andÐ é ˆ ÐM.Manning,€ò òCriminal€Lawó 󀄄€2d.€ed.€(Toro
  document  
Ðpr sent es€au€surintendant€ €lð ð gard€de€la€demande.Ð /¤(3 N Ð N Ð ÐÐ Ô/p)4 Ðà0 ` àà " à6.à0 N ` Ð ` Ð àLes€modalit s€contractuelles€qui€permettent€les€retraitsÐ d Ðdð ðexc dent.Ð 0 Ì N Ð N Ð ÐÌà0 ` àà " à7.à0 N ` Ð ` Ð àUn€avis€indiquant€que€des€copies€du€rapport€et€des€certificatsÐ È d Ðd pos s€aupr s€du€surintendant€ €lð ðappui€de€la€demande€relativeÐ ” 0 Ð €lð ðexc dent€peuvent€ tre€consult es€aux€bureaux€de€lð ðemployeur,Ð ` ü Ðet€des€renseignements€sur€la€fa on€dð ðobtenir€des€copies€du€rapport.Ð , È N Ð N Ð ÐÌà0 ` àà " à(2)Lð ðemployeur€d pose€une€copie€de€lð ðavis€exig €par€leÐ Ä ` Ðparagraphe78(2)€de€la€Loi€avant€de€le€transmettre€aux€personnes€vis es€ Ð  , Ðce€paragraphe.Ð \ ø ` Ð ` Ð ÐÌà@ Ô Ô ' V à...ˆÐ ô  ÐÌà0 ` àà " à(4)La€demande€que€pr sente€un€employeur€en€vue€dð ðobtenir,Ð Œ ( Ðconform ment€au€paragraphe78(1)€de€la€Loi,€le€consentement€duÐ X ô Ðsurintendant€pour€le€pr l vement€dð ðune€somme€sur€un€r gime€qui€continueÐ $ À Ðdð ðexister€est€accompagn e€dð ðune€copie€certifi e€conforme€de€lð ðavis€vis €auÐ ð Œ Ðparagraphe(1),€dð ðune€d claration€selon€laquelle€le€paragraphe78(2)€de€laÐ ¼ X ÐLoi€a€ t €respect ,€de€d tails€sur€les€cat gories€de€personnes€qui€ont€re uÐ ˆ $ Ðlð ðavis€et€de€la€date€ €laquelle€le€dernier€avis€a€ t €distribu .
/ Ð / Ð ÐÌà œ àà0 ø à4.à0 / ø Ð ø Ð àThe€formula€for€allocating€the€surplus€among€the€planÐ Ô)D"+ Ðbeneficiaries.Ð  * #, / Ð / Ð ÐÌà œ àà0 ø à5.à0 / ø Ð ø Ð àAn€estimate€of€the€amount€allocated€to€the€person.Ð 8,¨$. / Ð / Ð ÐÌà0 œ àà Ü àà œ àà0 ø œ Ð œ Ð à6.à0 / ø Ð ø Ð àThe€options€available€to€the€person€concerning€the€method€forÐ Ð-@&0 Ðdistributing€the€amount€allocated€to€the€person€and€the€periodÐ œ. '1 Ðwithin€which€any€election€respecting€the€options€must€be€made.Ð h/Ø'2 / Ð / Ð ÐÐ 40¤(3 Ðà0 œ àà Ü àà œ àà0 ø œ Ð œ Ð à7.à0 / ø Ð ø Ð àThe€method€of€distribution€that€will€be€used,€if€an€election€isÐ  Ðnot€made€within€the€specified€period.Ð \ Ì / Ð / Ð ÐÌà0 œ àà Ü àà0 œ œ Ð œ Ð àà0 ø œ Ð œ Ð à8.à0 / ø Ð ø Ð àThe€name€and€details€of€the€person€to€be€contacted€with€respectÐ ô d Ðto€any€questions€arising€out€of€the€statement.Ð À 0 / Ð / Ð ÐÌà0 œ àà Ü àà œ àà0 ø œ Ð œ Ð à9.à0 / ø Ð ø Ð àNotice€that€the€allocation€of€surplus€and€the€options€availableÐ X È Ðfor€distributing€it€are€subject€to€the€approval€of€theÐ $ ” ÐSuperintendent€and€of€the€Canada€Customs€and€RevenueÐ ð ` ÐAgency,€and€may€be€adjusted€Ô_ Ôaccordingly.Ô_ ÔÓ ÓÔ_ ÔÐ ¼ , / Ð / Ð ÐÔ_ ÔÓ N " Ü , ‚X ž ø / ‡ h þ ô Ü , ‚X œ ø / ‡ h þ ö N ÓÌÔ_ Ô(3)Ô_ ÔÔ_ Ôà0 ž àò òFinancialÔ_ Ô€Services€Commission€of€Ontario€Act,€1997ó ó,€S.O.€1997,€c.€28Ð ì \ ž Ð ž Ð ÐÓ R " Ü , ‚X œ ø / ‡ h þ ö Ü , ‚X ž ø / ‡ h þ ö v R ÓÓ ÓÌÓ % Óà œ àò òà0 ø à1.ó ó€€In€this€Act,Ð Œ ø Ð ø Ð ÐÌÓ Ó...Ð ´ $ ÐÓ ÓÌà œ àð ðregulated€sectorð ð€means€a€sector€that€consists€of,Ð L ¼ ÐÌà0 œ àà0 ø œ Ð œ Ð à(a)à0 / ø Ð ø Ð àall€co-operative€corporations€to€which€the€ò òCo-operativeÐ ä T ÐCorporations€Act€ó óapplies;Ð ° / Ð / Ð Ðà0 œ àÐ œ Ð œ Ð Ðà0 œ àà0 ø œ Ð œ Ð à(b)à0 / ø Ð ø Ð àall€credit€unions,€caisses€populaires€and€leagues€to€which€theÐ H ¸ Ðò òCredit€Unions€and€Caisses€Populaires€Act,€1994ó ó€applies;Ð „ / Ð / Ð Ðà0 œ àÐ œ Ð œ Ð Ðà0 œ àà0 ø œ Ð œ Ð àÔ_ Ô(cÔ_ Ô)à0 / ø Ð ø Ð àall€persons€engaged€in€the€business€of€insurance€and€governedÐ ¬ Ðby€the€ò òInsurance€Actó ó;Ð x è / Ð / Ð Ðà0 œ àÐ œ Ð œ Ð Ðà0 œ àà0 ø œ Ð œ Ð à(d)à0 / ø Ð ø Ð àall€corporations€registered€or€incorporated€under€the€ò òLoan€andÐ !€ ÐTrust€Corporations€Actó ó;Ð Ü!L ! / Ð / Ð Ðà0 œ àÐ œ Ð œ Ð Ðà0 œ àà0 ø œ Ð œ Ð à(e)à0 / ø Ð ø Ð àall€mortgage€brokers€registered€under€the€ò òMortgage€BrokersÐ t#ä # ÐActó ó;€orÐ @$° $ / Ð / Ð Ðà0 œ àÐ œ Ð œ Ð Ðà0 œ àà0 ø œ Ð œ Ð à(f)à0 / ø Ð ø Ð àall€persons€who€establish€or€administer€a€pension€plan€withinÐ Ø%H & Ðthe€meaning€of€t
  document  
€UGB„16Ô # † X ú X X X ú š # ÔÔ ‡ X ú X X X ú ÔÐ ' Œ ü ‹ ‹' ÐÔ # † X ú X X X ú œš # ÔÓ Óò òÔ ‡ X ú X X X ú Ôó óProduire€les€documents€qui€auraient€ t Ð ô d Ðd pos s€par€Mò òmeó ó€Jos e€M thot€ou€Mò òeó óPierreÐ À 0 ÐMeunier€aupr s€de€lð ðex cutif€de€la€R gie€ouÐ Œ ü Ðde€la€SIGED€et€faisant€ tat€des€d marchesÐ X È Ðeffectu es€aupr s€du€minist re€deÐ $ ” Ðlð ðEnvironnement€et€de€la€Faune.Ô # † X ú X X X ú › # ÔÔ ‡ X ú X X X ú ÔÐ 1 ' % ð ` 1 ÐÓ ô˜ ÓÓ › ÓÌÔ # † X ú X X X ú ¸œ # Ôò òó óÔ ‡ X ú X X X ú ÔÔ*‹ ƒ 4 H 6 « d « d d d Ü d d Ü [ d d [ 0 H 2 Ü Ð Ü Ð ‹ ÔÔ, d d ÔÔ, Ü d d ÔÔ, [ d d ÔÔ+ ÔÐ ?
ÐCanadaó ó,ò ò€ó ó2nd€ed.€€Toronto:€€Butterworths,€1999.Ð )x!* ” Ð ” Ð ÐÌà0 ” àà Ü àWalton,€Frederick€Parker.€€ò òThe€Scope€and€Interpretation€of€the€Civil€Code€of€LowerÐ  * #, ÐCanadaó ó.€€Toronto:€€Butterworths,€1980.Ó p6 ÓÐ l+Ü#- ” Ð ” Ð ÐÌÓ B Ü , ‚X « ø Ü 8 ô ÿÿ Ü , ‚X ” œ ø Ü 8 ¼ B Óà « àAPPEAL€from€a€judgment€of€the€Quebec€Court€of€Appeal,€[2001]€R.J.Q.Ð œ. '1 Ð2461,€[2001]€Q.J.€No.€4823€(QL),€reversing€in€part€decisions€of€the€Superior€CourtÐ 40¤(3 Ðdismissing€in€whole€or€in€part€objections€raised€by€the€appellant€during€examinations€onÐ  Ðdiscovery€after€defence.€€Appeal€dismissed.Ð ( ˜ ÐÌà « àò òR al€Forestó ó,€ò òClaude€Marseilleó ó€and€ò òEnrico€Forlinió ó,€for€the€appellant.Ð X È ÐÌà « àò òOlivierF.Kottó ó,€ò òBernardP.€Quinnó ó€and€ò òMercedes€Glockseisenó ó,€for€theÐ ˆ ø Ðrespondent.Ð  ÐÌà « àò òGiuseppeBattistaó ó,€for€the€intervener€Barreau€du€Qu bec.Ð P À ÐÌà « àò òDenisJacquesó ó,€for€the€intervener€the€Canadian€Bar€Association.Ð € ð ÐÌà « àEnglish€version€of€the€judgment€of€the€Court€delivered€byÐ ° ÐÌà « àò òLeBel€J.ó ó€ð" ðÐ à P Ѐ€Ð x è ÐÓ Ü , ‚X a ø Ü 8 ô Ü , ‚X « ø Ü 8 ¼ ÓI.à0 a àò òIntroductionÐ !€ a Ð a Ð ÐÓ @ Ü , ‚X « ø Ü 8 ¼ Ü , ‚X a ø Ü 8 ¼ Ù@ @ ÓÌó óÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý•A Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú1Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àThis€appeal€is€incidental€to€an€action€for€damages€brought€by€the€respondent,Ð @$° $ ÐFoster€Wheeler€Power€Company€Ltd.€(ð ðFosterð ð),€against€the€appellant,€the€City€ofÐ Ø%H & ÐMontr al€(the€ð ðCityð ð),€further€to€the€cancellation€of€a€project€involving€the€constructionÐ p'à ( Ðof€a€solid€waste€recycling€centre€and€a€municipal€incinerator€(the€Ô_ Ôð ðprojectð ð).Ô_ Ô€€DuringÐ )x!* Ðexaminations€on€discovery€after€defence,€Fosterð ðs€lawyers€and€lawyers€representing€someÐ  * #, Ðof€the€interveners€wanted€to€ask€witnesses€questions€about€information€related€to€certainÐ 8,¨$. Ðaspects€of€the€project€that€was€obtained€from€lawyers€representing€the€municipalÐ Ð-@&0 Ðauthorities€in€the€matter€of€that€project.€€Although€the€appellant€objected€that€theseÐ h/Ø'2 Ðquestions€violated€professional€secrecy,€the€Quebec€Superior€Court€and€the€Quebec€CourtÐ  Ðof€Appeal€allowed€a€certain€number€of€these€questions.€€This€appeal€concerns€the€scopeÐ ( ˜ Ðof€professional€secrecy€in€Quebec€civil€law€and€the€means€of€exercising€it,€specificallyÐ À 0 Ðwith€respect€to€one€of€its€components,€namely,€the€immunity€from€disclosing€confidentialÐ X È Ðinformation€to€others€in€a€judicial€proceeding.€€For€the€reasons€I€shall€give€here,€I
  document  
ó óÐ Á ` ÐÌÔ ‡ X %† X X X %† Ôà œ àð ð€compter€dð ðavril€1985,€lð ðaccus €a,€en€sa€qualit €dð ðavocat,Ô # † X %† X X X %†t # Ô€fait€desÐ ñ  Ðd marches€aupr s€de€divers€niveaux€de€gouvernement€pour€le€compte€de€deux€soci t sÏdans€le€but€dð ðobtenir€des€subventions.Ô ‡ X %† X X X %† Ô€€Il€a€poursuivi€ces€activit s€apr s€sa€nominationÐ !
¡j ÓÌà „ àÝ ‚ ³¹ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ ³¹âk ÝÔ2 *e ÔÚ Ú13Ú Ú.Ô3 Ôà0 Ü àÝ Ý€à ž àà œ àà ø àThe€positions€of€the€parties€on€this€point€can€be€easily€summarized.€Ð } ÐThe€appellant€has€submitted€that€the€wording€of€the€section€is€quite€clear€and€shouldÏnot€be€deviated€from.€€In€order€for€the€Crown€to€prove€the€ò òmens€reaó ó€required€by€theÐ ­ L ! Ðsection,€it€must€establish€nothing€more€than€that€an€accused€possessed€an€intentionÏto€commit€the€acts€therein,€combined€with€a€knowledge€of€all€relevant€circumstances.€ÏOn€the€other€hand,€the€respondent€submits€that€s.€121(1)(ò òaó ó)€requires€a€finding€ofÐ u% ' Ðð ðcorruptionð ð,€and€that€the€Crown€must€establish€that€an€accused€received€the€benefitÐ '¬ ) Ðò òas€a€result€of€his€or€her€position€as€government€employeeó ó.€€The€employee€must€alsoÐ ¥(D"+ Ðknow€that€this€was€the€reason€why€the€benefit€was€conferred.€€Additionally,€it€wasÏargued€that€absent€this€mental€element,€the€crime€would€be€one€of€strict€liability.Ý ƒ ³¹âk l ÝŒÐ Ü Ð Ü Ð Ðâ âŒÝ ÝÐ m- '1 Ðà „ àÝ ‚ ³¹ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ ³¹¨p ÝÔ2 *e ÔÚ Ú14Ú Ú.Ô3 Ôà0 Ü àÝ Ý€à ž àà œ àà ø àI€shall€deal€with€the€last€point€first,€as€I€believe€it€is€the€most€easilyÐ a Ðâ âdisposed€of.€As€I€recently€stated€for€a€majority€of€the€Court€in€ò òR.€v.€Hincheyó ó,€[1996]Ð ù ˜ Ð3€S.C.R.€1128,€at€para.€3,€it€is€clear€that€an€intention€to€commit€a€prohibited€actÏcombined€with€knowledge€of€the€relevant€circumstances€is€an€accepted€form€ofÏcriminal€œculpabilityÔ CE. , US. , k ÔÔ # † X Õ¼ X X X ï.ÿj # ÔÔ ‡ X Õ¼ X X X Õ¼ Ô,›€and€that€this€should€not€be€equated€with€a€strict€liability€offence:Ý ƒ ³¹¨p Óp ݌РÁ ` Ü Ð Ü Ð ÐŒÝ ÝÌÔ US. , CE. , ÔÓ Óà0 ž àà0 œ ž Ð ž Ð àQuite€simply,€this€offence€cannot€be€one€of€strict€liability€as€it€requires€aÏò òbona€fideó ó€mental€element.€€At€a€minimum,€the€charge€given€to€the€juryÐ ½ \ Ðrequired€they€find€that€the€appellant€possessed€an€intention€to€commit€aÏprohibited€act,€while€having€subjective€knowledge€of€the€circumstances.€€AsÏDoherty€J.A.€recognized€when€dealing€with€this€very€offence€in€ò òR.€v.Ð ! À ÐGreenwoodó ó€(1991),€8€C.R.€(4th)€235€(Ont.€C.A.),€at€pp.€255„56:Ð í Œ œ Ð œ Ð ÐÓ ßs ÓÓ ÓÌà0 ž àà0 œ ž Ð ž Ð àà0 ø œ Ð œ Ð àà Ü àA€conscious€choice€to€perform€a€prohibited€act,€combined€withÏknowledge€that€all€or€at€least€some€of€the€relevant€circumstances€exist,Ïis€a€well„recognized€form€of€criminal€culpability:€see€ò òR.€v.€SaultÐ ¼ ÐSte.Marie€(Cityó ó),€supra,€at€p.€1324€œ(S.C.R.).€.€.ñ = ñ€ñ = ñ;›€A.€W.€Mewett€andÐ é ˆ ÐM.Manning,€ò òCriminal€Lawó 󀄄€2d.€ed.€(Toro
1 2 Arrow