|
ÐCanadaó ó,ò ò€ó ó2nd€ed.€€Toronto:€€Butterworths,€1999.Ð )x!* ” Ð ” Ð ÐÌà0 ” àà Ü àWalton,€Frederick€Parker.€€ò òThe€Scope€and€Interpretation€of€the€Civil€Code€of€LowerÐ * #, ÐCanadaó ó.€€Toronto:€€Butterworths,€1980.Ó p6 ÓÐ l+Ü#- ” Ð ” Ð ÐÌÓ B Ü , ‚X « ø Ü 8 ô ÿÿ Ü , ‚X ” œ ø Ü 8 ¼ B Óà « àAPPEAL€from€a€judgment€of€the€Quebec€Court€of€Appeal,€[2001]€R.J.Q.Ð œ. '1 Ð2461,€[2001]€Q.J.€No.€4823€(QL),€reversing€in€part€decisions€of€the€Superior€CourtÐ 40¤(3 Ðdismissing€in€whole€or€in€part€objections€raised€by€the€appellant€during€examinations€onÐ Ðdiscovery€after€defence.€€Appeal€dismissed.Ð ( ˜ ÐÌà « àò òR al€Forestó ó,€ò òClaude€Marseilleó ó€and€ò òEnrico€Forlinió ó,€for€the€appellant.Ð X È ÐÌà « àò òOlivierF.Kottó ó,€ò òBernardP.€Quinnó ó€and€ò òMercedes€Glockseisenó ó,€for€theÐ ˆ ø Ðrespondent.Ð ÐÌà « àò òGiuseppeBattistaó ó,€for€the€intervener€Barreau€du€Qu bec.Ð P À ÐÌà « àò òDenisJacquesó ó,€for€the€intervener€the€Canadian€Bar€Association.Ð € ð ÐÌà « àEnglish€version€of€the€judgment€of€the€Court€delivered€byÐ ° ÐÌà « àò òLeBel€J.ó ó€ð" ðÐ à P Ѐ€Ð x è ÐÓ Ü , ‚X a ø Ü 8 ô Ü , ‚X « ø Ü 8 ¼ ÓI.à0 a àò òIntroductionÐ !€ a Ð a Ð ÐÓ @ Ü , ‚X « ø Ü 8 ¼ Ü , ‚X a ø Ü 8 ¼ Ù@ @ ÓÌó óÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý•A Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú1Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àThis€appeal€is€incidental€to€an€action€for€damages€brought€by€the€respondent,Ð @$° $ ÐFoster€Wheeler€Power€Company€Ltd.€(ð ðFosterð ð),€against€the€appellant,€the€City€ofÐ Ø%H & ÐMontr al€(the€ð ðCityð ð),€further€to€the€cancellation€of€a€project€involving€the€constructionÐ p'à ( Ðof€a€solid€waste€recycling€centre€and€a€municipal€incinerator€(the€Ô_ Ôð ðprojectð ð).Ô_ Ô€€DuringÐ )x!* Ðexaminations€on€discovery€after€defence,€Fosterð ðs€lawyers€and€lawyers€representing€someÐ * #, Ðof€the€interveners€wanted€to€ask€witnesses€questions€about€information€related€to€certainÐ 8,¨$. Ðaspects€of€the€project€that€was€obtained€from€lawyers€representing€the€municipalÐ Ð-@&0 Ðauthorities€in€the€matter€of€that€project.€€Although€the€appellant€objected€that€theseÐ h/Ø'2 Ðquestions€violated€professional€secrecy,€the€Quebec€Superior€Court€and€the€Quebec€CourtÐ Ðof€Appeal€allowed€a€certain€number€of€these€questions.€€This€appeal€concerns€the€scopeÐ ( ˜ Ðof€professional€secrecy€in€Quebec€civil€law€and€the€means€of€exercising€it,€specificallyÐ À 0 Ðwith€respect€to€one€of€its€components,€namely,€the€immunity€from€disclosing€confidentialÐ X È Ðinformation€to€others€in€a€judicial€proceeding.€€For€the€reasons€I€shall€give€here,€I
|