honore – -Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot 8 Results  scc.lexum.org
  Cour suprême du Canada ...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
LA COUR: Alors, si le propriétaire du magasin n'honore pas les crédits, y a‑t‑il un problème à ce qu'une personne continue de mettre de l'argent dans cette machine?
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
THE COURT:  So if the store owner doesn't honour the credits, where's the problem in somebody pumping money into that thing?
  Cour suprême du Canada ...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
ET LA PRÉSENTE COUR ORDONNE EN OUTRE que le présent jugement soit communiqué au Directeur des terres destinées aux anciens combattants afin qu’il veille à ce que le défendeur honore le droit de la demanderesse établi aux présentes lors de la vente ou de la cession de ladite propriété.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
AND THIS COURT DOTH FURTHER ORDER AND ADJUDGE that Judgment herein be lodged with the Director of Veterans’ Land Act for the purpose of having the Defendant honour the Plaintiffs interest as determined herein upon sale or disposition of the said property.
  Cour suprême du Canada ...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Si un homme perd son carnet de chèques ou néglige de fermer à clé le bureau dans lequel il le garde et qu'un serviteur ou un inconnu s'en empare, selon nous, on ne saurait prétendre qu'un banquier qui honore son chèque contrefait aurait le droit de débiter son client de ce paiement.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
If such negligence could disentitle the Plaintiffs, to what extent is it to go? If a man should lose his cheque‑book, or neglect to lock the desk in which it is kept, and a servant or stranger should take it up, it is impossible in our opinion to contend that a banker paying his forged cheque would be entitled to charge his customer with that payment.
  Cour suprême du Canada ...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
[TRADUCTION]  Sans aucun doute, un banquier qui honore un chèque contrefait est d'une manière générale tenu de verser le montant de nouveau à son client parce que, au premier chef, il a payé sans en avoir l'autorisation.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
Undoubtedly, a banker who pays a forged check, is in general bound to pay the amount again to his customer, because, in the first instance, he pays without authority. On this principle the two cases which have been cited were decided, because it is the duty of the banker to be acquainted with his customer's hand‑writing, and the banker, not the customer, must suffer if a payment is made without authority.
  Cour suprême du Canada ...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
[88] Dans Rattray Publications, le juge Finlayson a indiqué que, [traduction] « lorsqu’une banque tirée honore un chèque malgré l’annulation valide de l’ordre de paiement de sorte qu’une dette juste se trouve ainsi payée, la banque peut [débiter le compte du client et] avoir gain de cause dans une action en remboursement introduite contre elle par son client tireur » (p. 509).
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
[88] In Rattray Publications, Finlayson J.A. stated that “where a drawee bank honours a cheque notwithstanding a valid countermand and the effect is to satisfy a just debt, the bank may [debit the customer’s account and] successfully defend an action by [the] customer/drawer for reimbursement” (p. 509).  Further, where a payment does not satisfy a just debt, the bank “may have an action in restitution against the holder of a certified cheque” (ibid.). Indeed, if a bank has certified a cheque, it cannot deny the authenticity of the drawer’s signature and the sufficiency of the funds. However, certification does not affect the traceability of the underlying funds.
  Cour suprême du Canada ...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Quoiqu’on n’honore pas la garantie lorsque la montre a été vendue hors du réseau, ni le fabricant japonais ni le distributeur canadien n’ont l’obligation de l’honorer dans le cas d’une montre achetée à l’intérieur du réseau.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
The watches sold, whether inside or outside the dealer network, were identical and were only sold under the Seiko trademark which attached to and separated them from other products. The legal effect of the guarantees was also identical. While the guarantee of a watch sold outside the network was not honoured, there was no legal obligation on the part of the Japenese manufacturer or its Canadian distributor to honour the guarantee held by a purchaser who bought a watch from within the network. Indeed, in the absence of a contract with the manufacturer (who in practice indemnified respondent for the repairs it effected), respondent’s legal position with respect to the guarantee was no different from that of the vendors selling outside the system.
  Cour suprême du Canada ...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Accepter que Trustco était tenue de remettre les fonds à Me McLeod reviendrait aussi à dire que la banque tirée qui honore un chèque fait un paiement au preneur sans même avoir déterminé qui est le détenteur du chèque.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
[54] To accept Canada’s position would mean that the presentment for payment was made by the payee to the drawee before the cheques were deposited. That is not what happened in this case. To accept that Trustco became liable to pay Mr. McLeod would also mean that a drawee bank which honours a cheque makes payment to the payee without determining who the holder of the cheque is. Canada’s position is inconsistent with the fact that a bank that accepts a cheque for deposit does not in so doing act in the capacity of a drawee even if it also happens to be the drawee. Canada’s interpretation would also mean that whenever demands are made by third parties, banks would have to determine whether payees — who, when cheques are negotiated, are often not even their customers — are liable to make payments. No such requirement exists at common law or is provided for in the BEA.