lfi – -Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot 12 Results  www.blakesbusinessclass.com
  La Cour d’appel ferme l...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
(la « LFI »). Le Parlement n’a jamais modifié l’une ou l’autre de ces lois afin de permettre la subordination en equity, et ce, même si ce principe est enchâssé depuis 1978 dans le
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine blakesbusinessclass.com as primary domain
As part of the USSC CCAA proceedings, USS advanced creditor claims against USSC for approximately C$2.2-billion.
  Procédure sous le régim...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
(Canada) (la « LFI »).
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine blakesbusinessclass.com as primary domain
(Canada) (BIA).
  Procédure sous le régim...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
En effet, leur validité avait été contestée en raison de l’absence de contrepartie au moment de la signature des contrats de sûreté, et pour le motif qu’elles étaient nulles puisqu’il s’agissait d’une préférence frauduleuse aux termes de l’article 95 de la LFI.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine blakesbusinessclass.com as primary domain
The Court (with the exception of one claim that remains to be determined) also confirmed USS’s secured claims. Their validity had been challenged for lack of consideration at the time the security agreements were executed and on the grounds that they were void because they constituted a fraudulent preference under section 95 of the BIA.
  La Cour d’appel ferme l...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Même si la CAO semble avoir exclu l’application de la subordination reconnue en equity dans les procédures en vertu de la LACC, elle n’a pas écarté la possibilité que ce principe puisse être invoqué dans des procédures sous le régime de la LFI.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine blakesbusinessclass.com as primary domain
Although the OCA appears to have excluded equitable subordination from applying in future CCAA proceedings, it did leave the door open for the doctrine to be applied in BIA proceedings. Specifically, it noted that courts have broader jurisdiction under the BIA to grant a remedy such as equitable subordination, as well as a legislative purpose more relevant to the potential reordering of creditor priorities.
  La Cour d’appel ferme l...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Même si la CAO semble avoir exclu l’application de la subordination reconnue en equity dans les procédures en vertu de la LACC, elle n’a pas écarté la possibilité que ce principe puisse être invoqué dans des procédures sous le régime de la LFI.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine blakesbusinessclass.com as primary domain
Although the OCA appears to have excluded equitable subordination from applying in future CCAA proceedings, it did leave the door open for the doctrine to be applied in BIA proceedings. Specifically, it noted that courts have broader jurisdiction under the BIA to grant a remedy such as equitable subordination, as well as a legislative purpose more relevant to the potential reordering of creditor priorities.
  Cour de l’Ontario : les...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
, le juge Newbould a privilégié une interprétation de la LACC qui n’encourage pas les débiteurs ni les autres parties intéressées à entamer des procédures de liquidation en vertu de la LFI en plus de procédures de restructuration potentielles aux termes de la LACC, et ce, afin d’obtenir un traitement distinct à l’égard des intérêts post-requête.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine blakesbusinessclass.com as primary domain
The Bondholders submitted that the Canadian Debtors’ and Monitor’s motion to determine the Bondholders’ entitlement to claim for post-filing interest was premature. It was their position that:  (i) distributions to unsecured creditors could not be made in the absence of a CCAA plan; (ii) it is well-settled law (as acknowledged by Justice Newbould) that a CCAA plan can provide for post-filing interest; (iii) whether or not post-filing interest would be provided for in a plan should be the subject of negotiations between the interested parties not pre-determination by the court; and (iv) therefore, it was “entirely premature and inappropriate” for the Ontario Court to insert itself into the process at this stage of the proceedings and to dictate in advance what the parties’ CCAA plan negotiations should or should not include. Further, the Bondholders asserted that such negotiations cannot meaningfully take place until the Allocation Dispute is settled and each of the Canadian, U.S. and EMEA Debtors determine what proceeds they have for distribution to their particular creditors.
  Cour de l’Ontario : les...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
, le juge Newbould a privilégié une interprétation de la LACC qui n’encourage pas les débiteurs ni les autres parties intéressées à entamer des procédures de liquidation en vertu de la LFI en plus de procédures de restructuration potentielles aux termes de la LACC, et ce, afin d’obtenir un traitement distinct à l’égard des intérêts post-requête.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine blakesbusinessclass.com as primary domain
The Bondholders submitted that the Canadian Debtors’ and Monitor’s motion to determine the Bondholders’ entitlement to claim for post-filing interest was premature. It was their position that:  (i) distributions to unsecured creditors could not be made in the absence of a CCAA plan; (ii) it is well-settled law (as acknowledged by Justice Newbould) that a CCAA plan can provide for post-filing interest; (iii) whether or not post-filing interest would be provided for in a plan should be the subject of negotiations between the interested parties not pre-determination by the court; and (iv) therefore, it was “entirely premature and inappropriate” for the Ontario Court to insert itself into the process at this stage of the proceedings and to dictate in advance what the parties’ CCAA plan negotiations should or should not include. Further, the Bondholders asserted that such negotiations cannot meaningfully take place until the Allocation Dispute is settled and each of the Canadian, U.S. and EMEA Debtors determine what proceeds they have for distribution to their particular creditors.