Dictionary in more than hundred languages and with over one billion example translations

Source Languages	Target Languages

Keybot 244 Results csc.lexum.org

document

Show text Show cached source Open source URL

€€Bien€quð ðelle€aitÐ ” 0 Ðtraditionnellement€adopt €une€approche€lib rale€en€la€mati re,€la€Cour€tient€compteÐ , È Ðdð ðun€certain€nombre€de€facteurs€dans€lð ðexercice€de€ce€pouvoir€discr tionnaire,€dont€:Ý ƒ Ñýè0 1 ÝŒÐ Ä ` ÐŒÝ ÝÌà œ à1.à0 ø àla€question€de€savoir€si€le€demandeur€avait€v ritablement€lð ðintentionÐ ô Ðde€demander€lð ðautorisation€dð ðappel€et€sð ðil€a€fait€part€de€cette€intentionÐ Œ ( Ð €la€partie€adverse€dans€le€d lai€prescrit;Ð $ À ø Ð ø Ð ÐÌà œ à2.à0 ø àla€question€de€savoir€si€lð ðavocat€a€pr sent €la€demande€de€mani reÐ T ð Ðdiligente;Ð ì ˆ ø Ð ø Ð ÐÌà œ à3.à0 ø àla€question€de€savoir€si€Ô # † X a¼ X X X a¼ù1 # ÔÔ ‡ X a¼ X X X a¼ Ôle€retard€a€fait€lð ðobjet€dð ðune€explicationÐ ¸ Ðsatisfaisante;Ð ´ P ø Ð ø Ð ÐÌà œ à4.à0 ø àla€longueur€du€retard;Ð ä € ø Ð ø Ð ÐÌà œ à5.à0 ø àla€question€de€savoir€si€Ô # † X a¼ X X X a¼Ì5 # ÔÔ ‡ X a¼ X X X a¼ Ôla€d cision€dð ðaccorder€ou€de€refuser€laÐ #° $ Ðprorogation€de€d lai€causera€un€pr judice€indu€ €lð ðune€ou€lð ðautre€desÐ ¬$H & Ðparties;Ð D&à ( ø Ð ø Ð ÐÌà œ à6.à0 ø àle€bien„fond €de€la€demande€dð ðautorisation€dð ðappel.Ð t) #, ø Ð ø Ð ÐÌEn€d finitive,€il€faut€toujours€se€demander€si,€eu€ gard€aux€circonstances€et€compteÐ ¤,@&0 Ðtenu€des€facteurs€susmentionn s,€la€prorogation€de€d lai€sð ðimpose€pour€que€justiceÐ

Compare text pages Compare HTM pages Open source URL Open target URL Define csc.lexum.org as primary domain

ÐÝ ‚ Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ Ñýs) Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú6Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àÔ # † X h¼ X X X h¼-) # ÔÔ ‡ X h¼ X X X h¼ ÔÔ CE. , US. , L) ÔThe€power€to€extend€time€under€special€circumstances€in€s.€59(1)€of€the€ActÐ d Ðâ âis€a€discretionary€one.€€Although€the€Court€has€traditionally€adopted€a€generous€approachÐ ü ˜ Ðin€granting€extensions€of€time,€a€number€of€factors€guide€it€in€the€exercise€of€itsÐ ” 0 Ðdiscretion,€including:Ý ƒ Ñýs) Ž) ÝŒÐ , È ÐŒÝ ÝÌà œ à1.à0 ø àWhether€the€applicant€formed€a€ò òbona€fideó ó€intention€to€seek€leave€toÐ \ ø Ðappeal€and€communicated€that€intention€to€the€opposing€party€within€theÐ ô Ðprescribed€time;Ð Œ ( ø Ð ø Ð ÐÌà œ à2.à0 ø àWhether€counsel€moved€diligently;Ð ¼ X ø Ð ø Ð ÐÌà œ à3.à0 ø àWhether€a€proper€explanation€for€the€delay€has€been€offered;Ð ì ˆ ø Ð ø Ð ÐÌà œ à4.à0 ø àThe€extent€of€the€delay;Ð ¸ ø Ð ø Ð ÐÌà œ à5.à0 ø àWhether€granting€or€denying€the€extension€of€time€will€unduly€prejudiceÐ L è Ðone€or€the€other€of€the€parties;€andÐ ä € ø Ð ø Ð ÐÌà œ à6.à0 ø àThe€merits€of€the€application€for€leave€to€appeal.Ð #° $ ø Ð ø Ð ÐÌThe€ultimate€question€is€always€whether,€in€all€the€circumstances€and€considering€theÐ D&à ( Ðfactors€referred€to€above,€the€justice€of€the€case€requires€that€an€extension€of€time€beÐ Ü'x!* Ðgranted.Ð t) #, ÐÔ # † X h¼ X X X h¼%* # ÔÔ ‡ X h¼ X X X h¼ ÔÔ USCE. , ÔÌÝ ‚ Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ Ñý„0 Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú7Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àÔ # † X h¼ X X X h¼R0 # ÔÔ ‡ X h¼ X X X h¼ ÔÔ CE. , US. , q0 ÔNotwithstanding€our€sympathy€for€the€difficulties€experienced€by€counsel€forÐ ¤,@&0 Ðthe€applicantð ðs€colleagues,€we€are€all€of€the€view€that€this€is€not€a€case€in€which€anÐ

document

Show text Show cached source Open source URL

44,€exc de-t-elle€dans€son€ensemble€laÐ „ Ðcomp tence€de€la€l gislature€du€Manitoba€du€fait€quð ðelle€porte€sur€uneÐ Ô P Ðmati re€qui€rel ve€de€la€comp tence€exclusive€du€Parlement€du€CanadaÐ Ðen€vertu€du€par.

Compare text pages Compare HTM pages Open source URL Open target URL Define csc.lexum.org as primary domain

Ðof€requesting€a€ban€on€VLTs.€€In€response€to€the€plebiscite,€the€Town€of€Winkler€passedÐ Ô P Ða€resolution€in€December€1998€to€forward€the€results€to€the€Government€of€Manitoba.€Ð l è ÐSie„Cor€Properties€Inc.,€in€turn,€filed€an€application€in€the€Court€of€Queenð ðs€BenchÐ "€ Ðseeking€a€declaration€that€the€resolution€was€invalid€and€an€order€of€ò òcertiorarió ó€quashingÐ œ# " Ðit.Ð 4%° $ ÐÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % ÑýÇP Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú6Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àIn€July€1999,€while€Sie„Corð ðs€application€was€proceeding€to€a€hearing,€theÐ d(à ( ÐManitoba€Government€passed€theò ò€VLT€Actó ó.€€The€Act€permits€municipalities€to€holdÐ ü)x!* Ðbinding€plebiscites€regarding€the€prohibition€of€VLTs€within€their€jurisdictions.€€InÐ ”+ #, Ðaddition,€the€government€used€the€new€legislation€as€an€opportunity€to€give€effect€to€theÐ ,-¨$. Ðplebiscite€that€had€already€been€held€in€Winkler.€€Specifically,€s.€16€of€the€Act€seeks€toÐ Ä.@&0 Ðterminate€the€siteholder€agreements€in€Winkler€and€deems€that€a€resolution€prohibitingÐ \0Ø'2 ÐVLTs€was€passed€in€accordance€with€the€Act.€€Pursuant€to€this€legislation,€the€siteholderÐ „ Ðagreement€with€The€Winkler€Inn€was€terminated€effective€December€1,€1999.€€Ý ƒ % ÑýÇP âP ÝŒÐ ˜ ÐŒÝ ÝÌIII.€€ò òRelevant€Statutory€ProvisionsÐ L È ÐÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ Ýó óÝ ‚ % Ñý U Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú7Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýò òThe€Gaming€Control€Local€Option€(VLT)€Actó ó,€S.M.€1999,€c.€44Ý ƒ % Ñý U !U ÝŒÐ | ø ÐŒÝ ÝÌÓ Óà0 œ àò ò1ó ó€€In€this€Act,Ð ¬ ( œ Ð œ Ð ÐÌà@ Ù Ù ' V à.€.€.ˆÐ D À ÐÌà0 œ àà0 ø œ Ð œ Ð àò òð ðplebisciteð ðó ó€means€a€vote€by€the€electors€of€a€municipality€on€aÐ Ü X Ðresolution€approved€by€the€council€or€stated€on€a€petitionÐ ¨ $ ø Ð ø Ð ÐÌà0 œ àà0 ø œ Ð œ Ð àà0 Ü ø Ð ø Ð à(a)€to€prohibit€video€lottery€gaming€within€the€municipality,€orÐ @ ¼ Ü Ð Ü Ð ÐÌà0 œ àà0 ø œ Ð œ Ð àà0 Ü ø Ð ø Ð à(b)€where€video€lottery€gaming€within€the€municipality€is€prohibitedÐ Ø T Ðbecause€of€a€plebiscite,€to€permit€video€lottery€gaming€within€theÐ ¤ Ðmunicipality;Ð p ì Ü Ð Ü Ð ÐÌà@ Ù Ù ' V à.€.€.ˆÐ „ ÐÌò òà0 œ àà0 ø œ Ð œ Ð àð ðvideo€lottery€gamingð ðó ó€means€the€operation€of€a€lottery€scheme,€asÐ Ðdefined€in€the€ò òCriminal€Codeó ó€(Canada),€that€involves€the€use€of€a€videoÐ l è Ðlottery€terminal.Ð 8!´ ø Ð ø Ð ÐÌà0 œ àò ò3(1)ó ó€Notwithstanding€section€3€of€ò òThe€Manitoba€Lotteries€Corporation€Actó ó,Ð Ð"L ! Ðno€person€shall€carry€on€any€video€lottery€gaming,€under€a€siteholderÐ œ# " Ðagreement€or€otherwise,€within€a€municipality€while€a€resolution€prohibitingÐ h$ä # Ðvideo€lott

document

Show text Show cached source Open source URL

« ! àLð ðarticle16€de€la€ò òLoi€sur€les€options€locales€en€mati re€de€jeu€(appareilsÐ 4%° $ Ðde€loterie€vid o)ó ó€est-il€incompatible€avec€lð ðal. 2ò òbó ó)€de€la€ò òCharteÐ &| % Ðcanadienne€des€droits€et€libert só ó?

Compare text pages Compare HTM pages Open source URL Open target URL Define csc.lexum.org as primary domain

œ Ð œ Ð ÐÌAlthough€the€Court€in€ò òHaigó ó€left€it€open€for€residence€to€be€established€as€an€analogousÐ l è Ðground€in€the€appropriate€case,€I€share€the€trial€judgeð ðs€view€here€that€this€is€not€such€aÐ "€ Ðcase.€€Nothing€suggests€that€Winkler€residents€are€historically€disadvantaged€or€that€theyÐ œ# " Ðsuffer€from€any€sort€of€prejudice.Ð 4%° $ ÐÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % ÑýKE Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú49Ú ÚÛ € z 1 Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àHowever,€putting€the€appellantsð ð€case€at€its€best€and€assuming€that€they€couldÐ d(à ( Ðestablish€a€distinction€based€on€an€analogous€ground,€the€legislation€does€notÐ ü)x!* Ðdiscriminate€against€them€in€any€substantive€sense.€€It€is€not€necessary€to€proceedÐ ”+ #, Ðthrough€all€the€contextual€factors€listed€by€Iacobucci€J.€in€ò òLawó ó,€ò òsupraó ó,€because€it€is€clearÐ ,-¨$. Ðthat€the€ò òVLT€Actó ó€directly€corresponds€to€the€circumstances€of€Winkler€residents.€€TheÐ Ä.@&0 ÐTown€of€Winkler€was€singled€out€in€s.€16€of€the€ò òVLT€Actó ó€because€it€was€the€ò òonlyÐ \0Ø'2 Ðmunicipalityó ó€to€have€held€a€plebiscite€on€the€issue€of€VLTs.€€The€very€purpose€of€thatÐ „ Ðsection€was€to€respect€the€will€of€Winkler€residents,€as€expressed€in€their€1998€plebiscite.€Ð ˜ ÐViewed€in€the€context€of€that€plebiscite,€I€am€not€convinced€that€any€reasonable€residentÐ ´ 0 Ðof€Winkler€would€feel€that€he€or€she€has€been€marginalized,€devalued€or€ignored€as€aÐ L È Ðmember€of€Canadian€society€(see€ò òLawó ó,ò ò€supraó ó,€at€para.€53).€€There€is€no€harm€to€dignity,Ð ä ` Ðand€no€violation€of€s.€15(1).Ý ƒ % ÑýKE fE ÝŒÐ | ø ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % ÑýìJ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú50Ú ÚÛ € z 2 Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àIt€was€noted€above€in€the€s.€2(ò òbó ó)€claim€that€s.€15(1)€might€be€implicatedÐ ¬ ( Ðwhere€the€opportunity€to€vote€in€a€plebiscite€is€extended€to€some€and€withheld€fromÐ D À Ðothers€based€on€a€prohibited€ground€of€discrimination.€€This€would€be€the€case€if€a€lawÐ Ü X Ðprohibited€members€of€a€certain€race€or€religion€from€voting€in€a€plebiscite.€€However,Ð t ð Ðthat€is€not€the€case€in€this€appeal.€€First,€as€previously€noted,€the€distinction€in€s.€16€ofÐ ˆ Ðthe€ò òVLT€Actó ó€is€not€based€on€an€analogous€ground.€€Second,€the€distinction€does€not€affectÐ ¤ Ðthe€qualification€and€ability€of€Winkler€residents€to€vote€in€a€VLT€plebiscite€under€theÐ

document

Show text Show cached source Open source URL

Compare text pages Compare HTM pages Open source URL Open target URL Define csc.lexum.org as primary domain

document

Show text Show cached source Open source URL

Ðm canisme€exclusif€et€global€de€r glement€des€diff rends€en€mati re€deÐ )x! * Ðtravail,€particuli rement€dans€le€contexte€du€pr sent€pourvoi.Ó Zâ ÓÐ Ô)D"+ « Ð « Ð ÐÌÝ ‚ Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ Ñýkê Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú50Ú ÚÛ € z 2 Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àEn€Ô_ Ôlð ðesp ce,Ô_ Ô€je€Ô_ Ônð ðaiÔ_ Ô€aucun€doute€que€nous€sommes€en€pr sence€Ô_ Ôdð ðunÔ_ Ô€ð ðr gimeÐ -t%/ Ðl gislatif€complet€destin € €r gir€tous€les€aspects€du€rapport€entre€les€parties€dans€le€cadreÐ œ.

Compare text pages Compare HTM pages Open source URL Open target URL Define csc.lexum.org as primary domain

Ðdispute€resolution€and€the€jurisdiction€of€the€ordinary€courts,€not€theÐ )x!* Ðrelationship€between€statutory€dispute€resolution€and€the€courts.€€TheÐ Ô)D"+ Ðconcern€that€recourse€to€the€ordinary€courts€may€jeopardize€theÐ * #, Ðcomprehensive€dispute€resolution€process€contained€in€Ô_ ÔlabourÔ_ Ô€relationsÐ l+Ü#- Ðlegislation€is€one€that€arises€in€this€latter€situation€as€well.€€Allowing€partiesÐ 8,¨$. Ðto€disputes€which,€by€their€very€nature,€are€those€contemplated€and€regulatedÐ -t%/ Ðby€Ô_ ÔlabourÔ_ Ô€legislation,€to€have€recourse€to€the€ordinary€courts€would€fly€in€theÐ Ð-@&0 Ðface€of€the€demonstrated€intention€of€Parliament€to€provide€an€exclusive€andÐ œ. '1 Ðcomprehensive€mechanism€for€Ô_ ÔlabourÔ_ Ô€dispute€resolution,€particularly€in€theÐ h/Ø'2 Ðcontext€of€the€present€case.Ó ;I ÓÐ 40¤(3 « Ð « Ð Ð‡Ý ‚ Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ Ñý‡P Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú50Ú ÚÛ € z 2 Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àIn€this€case,€I€have€no€doubt€that€we€are€dealing€with€a€ð ðcomprehensiveÐ Ðstatutory€scheme€designed€to€govern€all€aspects€of€the€relationship€of€the€parties€in€aÐ ( ˜ ÐÔ_ ÔlabourÔ_ Ô€relations€settingð ð:€€see€ò òSt.€Anne€Nackawicó ó,€ò òsupraó ó,€at€p.721.€€It€is€clear€that€theÐ À 0 Ðò òÔ_ ÔLabourÔ_ Ô€Codeó ó€creates€an€exclusive€and€comprehensive€mechanism€for€the€settlement€ofÐ X È Ðdisputes€in€Ô_ ÔlabourÔ_ Ô€relations€cases€by€requiring€that€all€grievances€be€submitted€toÐ ð ` Ðarbitration€exclusively.€€Adopting€a€model€other€than€the€exclusive€jurisdiction€model€inÐ ˆ ø Ðthis€case€would€undermine€the€comprehensiveness€of€the€scheme,€and€would€be€contraryÐ Ðto€the€Ô_ Ôlegislatureð ðsÔ_ Ô€intention.Ý ƒ Ñý‡P ¢P ÝŒÐ ¸ ( ÐŒÝ ÝÌÔ& È Ôà « à(iii)ò òTrend€in€the€Case€Lawó óÐ è X ÐÌÝ ‚ Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ Ñý8U Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú51Ú ÚÛ € z 3 Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àIn€thiÔ' È è èT Ôs€case,€where€there€is€an€exclusivity€clause€and€a€comprehensive€andÐ ˆ Ðexclusive€scheme€for€the€settlement€of€disputes,€adopting€the€exclusive€jurisdictionÐ ° Ðmodel€is€consistent€with€the€decisions€of€this€Court€in€ò òRegina€Policeó ó,€ò òsupraó ó,€ò òWeberó ó,Ð H ¸ Ðò òsupraó ó,€and€ò òSt.€Anne€Nackawicó ó,€ò òsupraó ó.€€The€Quebec€Court€of€Appeal,€too,€has€onÐ à P Ðnumerous€occasions€applied€the€exclusive€jurisdiction€model€to€collective€agreementsÐ x è Ðsubject€to€Ô_ ÔQuebecð ðsÔ_ Ô€ò òÔ_ ÔLabourÔ_ Ô€Codeó ó:€see,€for€example,€ò òÔ_ ÔLatulippeÔ_ Ô€v.€Commission€Ô_ ÔscolaireÔ_ ÔÐ !€ Ðde€la€Jeune„Loretteó ó,€[2001]€Ô_ ÔR.J.D.T.Ô_ Ô€26;€ò òÔ_ ÔMayvilleÔ_ Ô€v.€Union€Ô_ ÔcanadienneÔ_ Ô€des€Ô_ ÔtravailleursÔ_ ÔÐ ¨" " Ðen€communication€

document

Show text Show cached source Open source URL

Compare text pages Compare HTM pages Open source URL Open target URL Define csc.lexum.org as primary domain

document

Show text Show cached source Open source URL

Compare text pages Compare HTM pages Open source URL Open target URL Define csc.lexum.org as primary domain

document

Show text Show cached source Open source URL

Ðappelants€ont€soutenu€que€la€ò òLoi€sur€les€ALVó ó€a€ t €adopt e€pour€r glementer€la€moralit Ð Ä. @&0 Ðpublique€et€quð ðelle€repr sentait,€de€ce€fait,€une€tentative€de€l gif rer€en€mati re€criminelle.

Compare text pages Compare HTM pages Open source URL Open target URL Define csc.lexum.org as primary domain

ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý‚Ý Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú29Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àSecond,€the€province€and€individual€municipalities€may€have€any€number€ofÐ l è Ðreasons€for€restricting€gaming€to€certain€locations.€€Some€may€concern€the€localÐ "€ Ðeconomy,€and€others€may€be€purely€aesthetic€or€cultural.€€There€is€no€basis€on€which€toÐ œ# " Ðassume€that€the€dominant€purpose€for€prohibiting€VLTs€in€certain€locations€is€to€regulateÐ 4%° $ Ðpublic€morality.€€Indeed,€the€fact€that€theò ò€VLT€Actó ó€does€not€affect€VLTs€located€atÐ Ì&H & Ðracetracks€or€other€ð ðpremises€dedicated€to€gaming€activityð ð€suggests€that€the€governmentÐ d(à ( Ðwas€not€attempting€to€condemn€VLTs€on€any€moral€basis.€€See€ò òGaming€Control€Actó ó,Ð ü)x!* ÐS.M.€1996,€c.€74,€s.€1.€€Rather,€it€supports€the€interpretation€that€the€ò òVLT€Actó ó€wasÐ ”+ #, Ðdesigned€merely€to€limit€more€ð ðincidentalð ð€contact€with€VLTs€ð" ð€in€taverns,€for€exampleÐ ,-¨$. Ðð" ð€in€municipalities€that€wish€to€do€so.Ý ƒ % Ñý‚Ý Ý ÝŒÐ Ä.@&0 ÐŒÝ ÝÐ \0Ø'2 ÐÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % ÑýUâ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú30Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThird,€the€presence€of€moral€considerations€does€not€ò òper€seó ó€render€a€law€ò òultraÐ „ Ðviresó ó€the€provincial€legislature.€€In€giving€Parliament€exclusive€jurisdiction€over€criminalÐ ˜ Ðlaw,€the€ò òConstitution€Act,€1867ó ó€did€not€intend€to€remove€all€morality€from€provincialÐ ´ 0 Ðlegislation.€€In€many€instances,€it€will€be€impossible€for€the€provincial€legislature€toÐ L È Ðdisentangle€moral€considerations€from€other€issues.€€For€example,€in€the€present€case,€itÐ ä ` Ðis€difficult€to€ignore€the€various€social€costs€associated€with€gambling€and€VLTs.€€As€theÐ | ø ÐDesjardins€Report,€ò òsupraó ó,€examined€in€detail,€government„run€gambling€can€haveÐ Ðadverse€social€consequences,€including€addiction,€crime,€bankruptcy,€and€reductions€inÐ ¬ ( Ðcharitable€gaming.€€The€provincial€government€can€legitimately€consider€these€socialÐ D À Ðcosts€when€deciding€how€to€regulate€gaming€in€the€province.€€The€fact€that€some€of€theseÐ Ü X Ðconsiderations€have€a€moral€aspect€does€not€invalidate€an€otherwise€legitimate€provincialÐ t ð Ðlaw.Ý ƒ % ÑýUâ pâ ÝŒÐ ˆ ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % ÑýÕç Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú31Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThe€dominant€purpose€of€the€ò òVLT€Actó ó€is€to€regulate€gaming€in€the€province.€Ð

document

Show text Show cached source Open source URL

€€NotreÐ d(à ( ÐCour€a€n anmoins€conclu€ €la€validit €de€la€loi€en€question€ tant€donn €que,€de€par€sonÐ ü)x! * Ðcaract re€v ritable,€elle€touchait€ €lð ðattribution€de€permis,€ €des€mati res€dð ðune€natureÐ ”+ #, Ðlocale,€ainsi€quð ð €la€propri t €et€aux€droits€civils.Ý ƒ % Ñý— ² ÝŒÐ ,-¨$.

Compare text pages Compare HTM pages Open source URL Open target URL Define csc.lexum.org as primary domain

ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñýÿó Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú34Ú ÚÛ € z " Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThe€Attorney€General€of€Canadað ðs€intervention€in€support€of€the€provincialÐ l è Ðgovernment€creates€a€situation€of€attempted€federal„provincial€cooperation.€€TheÐ "€ Ðgovernments,€in€the€absence€of€jurisdiction,€cannot€by€simple€agreement€lend€legitimacyÐ œ# " Ðto€a€claim€that€the€ò òVLT€Actó ó€is€ò òintra€viresó ó.€€However,€given€that€both€federal€andÐ 4%° $ Ðprovincial€governments€guard€their€legislative€powers€carefully,€when€they€do€agree€toÐ Ì&H & Ðshared€jurisdiction,€that€fact€should€be€given€careful€consideration€by€the€courts:€€ò òOPSEUÐ d(à ( Ðv.€Ontario€(Attorney€General)ó ó,€[1987]€2€S.C.R.€2,€at€pp.€19„20;€ò òKitkatla€Bandó ó,ò ò€supraó ó,ò ò€ó óatÐ ü)x!* Ðparas.€72„73.Ý ƒ % Ñýÿó ô ÝŒÐ ”+ #, ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % ÑýÚ÷ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú35Ú ÚÛ € z # Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThis€principle€is€further€bolstered€in€the€present€case€by€the€explicitÐ Ä.@&0 Ðinteraction€of€the€ò òCriminal€Codeó ó€and€provincial€gaming€legislation.€€Section€207(1)(ò òaó ó)Ð \0Ø'2 Ðof€the€ò òCriminal€Codeó ó€specifically€creates€an€exception€to€the€gaming€and€betting€offencesÐ „ Ðwhere€a€lottery€scheme€has€been€established€by€a€province.€€It€was€first€enacted€in€1969Ð ˜ Ðfor€the€purpose€of€decriminalizing€lotteries€and€allowing€each€province€to€determineÐ ´ 0 Ðwhether€it€wished€to€establish€a€lottery€scheme.€€Where€no€such€scheme€exists,€theÐ L È Ðò òCriminal€Codeó ó€offences€still€apply.€€Parliament€has€intentionally€designed€a€structure€forÐ ä ` Ðgaming€offences€that€affirms€the€double€aspect€of€gaming€and€promotes€federal„Ð | ø Ðprovincial€cooperation€in€this€area.€€Section€207(1)(ò òaó ó)€removes€the€possibility€ofÐ Ðoperational€conflict,€and€with€it,€any€question€of€paramountcy.Ý ƒ % ÑýÚ÷ õ÷ ÝŒÐ ¬ ( ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý¬ü Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú36Ú ÚÛ € z $ Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àI€conclude€that€the€ò òVLT€Actó ó€in€its€entirety,€and€s.€16€in€particular,€are€ò òintraÐ Ü X Ðviresó ó€the€provincial€legislature.€€The€Actð ðs€purposes€are€to€regulate€gaming€in€theÐ t ð Ðprovince€and€to€allow€for€local€input€on€the€issue€of€VLTs,€both€of€which€fall€under€theÐ ˆ Ðpowers€enumerated€in€s.€92€of€the€ò òConstitution€Act,€1867ó ó.€€It€is€not€an€attempt€to€legislateÐ ¤ Ðcriminal€law,€as€it€has€neither€penal€consequences€nor€a€criminal€law€purpose.€€Finally,Ð

document

Show text Show cached source Open source URL

* Ðgouvernement€passe€sous€silence€le€fait€que€les€traitements€des€juges€dð ðautresÐ Ô)D"+ Ðprovinces€et€ceux€des€juges€f d raux€ont€augment €depuis€lð ðapplication€deÐ * #, Ðla€recommandation€de€la€Commission€de€1998€en€mati re€de€traitement.€Ð l+Ü#- ÐCela€dit,€je€dois€admettre€que€la€r ponse€de€la€Commission€ €cet€argumentÐ 8,¨$. Ðest€insuffisante.€[par.138]Ó 6ä ÓÐ -t%/ œ Ð œ Ð Ðâ âÐ œ. '1 ÐÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 Ñý,è Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú57Ú ÚÛ € z 9 Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àLa€Cour€dð ðappel€a€ensuite€signal €des€probl mes€majeurs€dans€le€rapport€deÐ Ðâ âla€Commission,€en€particulier€lorsque€cette€derni re€conclut€que€le€refus€dð ðaccorder€uneÐ ( ˜ Ðhausse€irait€ €lð ðencontre€du€ò òRenvoió ó.€€La€cour€a€fait€remarquer€que€le€Gouvernement€auraitÐ À 0 Ðpu,€dans€sa€r ponse,€invoquer€comme€motifs€les€erreurs€de€droit€commises€par€laÐ X È ÐCommission€(par.141).€€Elle€a€soulign €que€ces€erreurs€auraient€pu€ tre€ vit es€si€laÐ ð ` ÐCommission,€qui€nð ðest€pas€form €de€juristes,€avait€pu€b n ficier€des€services€dð ðunÐ ˆ ø Ðconseiller€juridique€ind pendant€charg €de€lð ðaider€dans€ses€d lib rations.€€La€CourÐ Ðdð ðappel€a€aussi€examin €la€pr tention€du€Gouvernement€que€le€redressement€salarialÐ ¸ ( Ðrecommand €est€excessif,€en€particulier€si€on€le€compare€avec€les€hausses€accord es€auxÐ P À Ðfonctionnaires.€€Elle€a€conclu€que€cette€comparaison€nð ð tait€pas€appropri e€et€que€laÐ è X Ðr ponse,€ €cet€ gard,€ne€satisfaisait€pas€ €la€norme€de€la€rationalit .€€Elle€a€ensuiteÐ € ð Ðexamin €lð ðargument€fond €sur€la€parit €avec€les€juges€de€nomination€f d rale€et€elle€aÐ ˆ Ðjug €que€le€Gouvernement€avait€eu€raison€de€nier€lð ðexistence€dð ðun€lien€entre€lesÐ ° Ðtraitements€des€juges€de€nomination€f d rale€et€ceux€des€juges€de€la€Cour€provinciale.€Ð H ¸ ÐLa€cour€a€alors€analys €si€les€traitements€ taient€suffisants€pour€attirer€des€candidatsÐ à P Ðcomp tents.€€Elle€a€conclu€que€la€position€du€Gouvernement€ tait€rationnelle€et€quð ðelleÐ x è Ðpouvait€ tre€r it r e€dans€la€r ponse€parce€que€la€Commission€ne€lð ðavait€pasÐ !€ Ðconvenablement€analys e.Ý ƒ 0 Ñý,è Gè ÝŒÐ ¨" " ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 Ñý

Compare text pages Compare HTM pages Open source URL Open target URL Define csc.lexum.org as primary domain

Ðfurther€5%€in€the€succeeding€two€years€to€keep€them€in€reasonableÐ )x!* Ðrelationship€to€judges€of€the€Court€of€Queenð ðs€Bench.€Ð Ô)D"+ œ Ð œ Ð ÐÌà0 œ àà ø àThis€would€result€in€an€annual€salary€as€follows,€beginning€January€1,Ð l+Ü#- Ð2001€and€effective€on€the€same€date€in€the€succeeding€two€years:Ð 8,¨$. œ Ð œ Ð ÐÌà œ àà0 ø à2001€Ô_ Ôð! ðÔ_ Ô€$154,018Ð Ð-@&0 ø Ð ø Ð Ðà0 œ àà ø à2002€Ô_ Ôð! ðÔ US. , CE. , +Ð ÔÔ CE. , US. , ÔÔ_ Ô€$161,709Ð œ. '1 œ Ð œ Ð Ðà œ àà0 ø à2003€Ô_ Ôð! ðÔ US. , CE. , òš ÔÔ CE. , US. , ÔÔ_ Ô€$169,805Ð h/Ø'2 ø Ð ø Ð ÐÐ 40¤(3 Ðà0 œ àà ø àIn€addition,€the€Commission€recommends€that€the€Province€apply€toÐ Ðthese€annual€salary€amounts,€the€New€Brunswick€Industrial€AggregateÐ \ Ì ÐIndex.€.€.€.Ð ( ˜ œ Ð œ Ð ÐÌà0 œ àà ø àIn€this€third€year,€the€annual€salaries€of€PCJ€would€be€approximatelyÐ À 0 Ð$30,000€less€than€the€salaries€of€judges€of€the€Court€of€Queenð ðs€Bench,€andÐ Œ ü Ðmarginally€lower€than€the€percentage€that€New€Brunswickð ðs€personalÐ X È Ðincome€per€capita€was€in€1999€of€the€national€average.Ó ÓÐ $ ” œ Ð œ Ð ÐÌÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 Ñýwž Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú51Ú ÚÛ € z 3 Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThe€Commission€also€made€a€number€of€recommendations€with€respect€toÐ T Ä Ðpensions,€vacations,€health€care€and€life€insurance.Ý ƒ 0 Ñýwž ’ž ÝŒÐ ì \ ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 ÑýÎŸ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú52Ú ÚÛ € z 4 Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThe€Government€rejected€all€the€Commissionð ðs€recommendations€withÐ Œ Ðregard€to€remuneration€except€for€the€increase€based€on€the€provinceð ðs€IndustrialÐ ´ $ ÐAggregate€Index.€€The€Governmentð ðs€response€took€the€form€of€recitals,€which€areÐ L ¼ Ðreproduced€in€the€appendix€and€will€be€dealt€with€at€greater€length€below.€€These€29Ð ä T Ðrecitals€can€be€€condensed€into€three€main€reasons:€€in€the€Governmentð ðs€view,€(1)€theÐ | ì ÐCommission€misunderstood€its€mandate,€(2)€it€is€inappropriate€to€link€the€ProvincialÐ „ ÐCourt€judgesð ð€salary€to€that€of€federally€appointed€judges,€and€(3)€the€judgesð ð€existingÐ ¬ Ðsalary€is€adequate.Ý ƒ 0 ÑýÎŸ éŸ ÝŒÐ D ´ ÐŒÝ ÝÌà œ à(1)à ø àò òJudicial€HistoryÐ t#ä # Ðó óÌÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 ÑýÏ£ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú53Ú ÚÛ € z 5 Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThe€reviewing€judge€found€the€Governmentð ðs€reasons€for€rejecting€theÐ ¤& ' ÐCommissionð ðs€salary€recommendations€to€be€rational,€but€held€that€its€reasons€forÐ

document

Show text Show cached source Open source URL

103,€la€r gle€du€ð ðdouble€aspectð ð€sð ðappliqueÐ Ì&H & Ðau€jeu. €€En€cons quence,€tant€le€gouvernement€f d ral€que€les€gouvernements€provinciauxÐ d(à ( Ðpeuvent€l gif rer€en€la€mati re:Ý ƒ % Ñý Ñ ;Ñ ÝŒÐ ü)x!

Compare text pages Compare HTM pages Open source URL Open target URL Define csc.lexum.org as primary domain

Ðit€does€not€create€a€provincial€offence.€€Nor€does€it€impose€a€penalty€for€operating€VLTsÐ Ô P Ðin€those€municipalities.€€If€VLT€operators€were€to€be€charged€with€any€offence,€it€wouldÐ l è Ðbe€under€the€gaming€provisions€in€the€ò òCriminal€Codeó ó,€which€prohibit€gambling€ò òexceptó óÐ "€ Ðin€accordance€with€lottery€schemes€conducted€and€managed€by€the€provinces.€€The€effectÐ œ# " Ðof€s.€3(1)€of€the€ò òVLT€Actó ó€is€simply€to€remove€the€exception€and€give€full€effect€to€theÐ 4%° $ Ðexisting€federal€offences.Ý ƒ % Ñý Æ (Æ ÝŒÐ Ì&H & ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý~É Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú25Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àHowever,€even€if€the€ò òVLT€Actó ó€did€create€a€provincial€offence€or€impose€aÐ ü)x!* Ðfine,€that€would€not€necessarily€make€it€an€attempt€to€legislate€criminal€law.€€SectionÐ ”+ #, Ð92(15)€of€the€ò òConstitution€Act,€1867ó ó€allows€the€provincial€legislatures€to€impose€finesÐ ,-¨$. Ðor€other€punishments€as€a€means€of€enforcing€valid€provincial€law,€and€the€provincesÐ Ä.@&0 Ðhave€enacted€countless€punishable€offences€within€their€legislative€spheres.€€MotorÐ \0Ø'2 Ðvehicle€offences€are€the€classic€example,€and€they€have€been€declared€constitutionallyÐ „ Ðvalid€in,€ò òinter€aliaó ó,€ò òOð ðGrady€v.€Sparlingó ó,€[1960]€S.C.R.€804€(careless€driving);€andò ò€RossÐ ˜ Ðv.€Registrar€of€Motor€Vehiclesó ó,€[1975]€1€S.C.R.€5€(provincial€licence€suspension€uponÐ ´ 0 Ðconviction€for€ò òCriminal€Codeó ó€impaired€driving€offence).€€The€mere€presence€of€aÐ L È Ðprohibition€and€a€penalty€does€not€invalidate€an€otherwise€acceptable€use€of€provincialÐ ä ` Ðlegislative€power.€€Ý ƒ % Ñý~É ™É ÝŒÐ | ø ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % ÑýœÎ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú26Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThe€appellants€submitted€that€the€ò òVLT€Actó ó€contains€penal€consequencesÐ ¬ ( Ðbecause€it€terminates€all€siteholder€agreements€in€municipalities€that€have€voted€toÐ D À Ðprohibit€VLTs€in€accordance€with€the€Act.€€Relying€on€this€Courtð ðs€decision€in€ò òJohnsonÐ Ü X Ðv.€Attorney€General€of€Albertaó ó,€[1954]€S.C.R.€127,€they€argued€that€the€provisions€of€theÐ t ð Ðò òVLT€Actó ó€result€in€the€forfeiture€of€VLTs,€which€can€be€characterized€as€a€penalty.€Ð ˆ ÐHowever,€the€termination€of€siteholder€agreements€cannot€be€characterized€as€a€forfeitureÐ ¤ Ðwithin€the€meaning€of€the€criminal€law.€€At€all€times€during€a€siteholder€agreement,€theÐ

document

Show text Show cached source Open source URL

ø Ð ø Ð ÐÌÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 Ñý ¤ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú95Ú ÚÛ € z _ Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àComme€nous€lð ðavons€indiqu €pr c demment,€la€province€dð ðOntario€a€rejet Ô' Ä @$Ú¢ ÔÐ l+Ü#- Ðtoutes€les€recommandations€facultatives€de€la€Commission€en€mati re€de€pensions.

Compare text pages Compare HTM pages Open source URL Open target URL Define csc.lexum.org as primary domain

Ðthe€Peace.€€He€then€examined€Albertað ðs€reasons€for€rejecting€the€Commissionð ðsÐ Ô)D"+ Ðrecommendations€and€found€that€they€did€not€pass€the€test€of€simple€rationality.€€HeÐ l+Ü#- Ðfound€that,€apart€from€the€alleged€errors€made€by€the€Commission,€there€were€noÐ -t%/ Ðâ ârational€reasons€for€the€rejection.€€The€trial€judge€declared€ss.€2(a),€2(f)€and€2(g)€of€theÐ œ. '1 ÐOrder€to€be€unconstitutional.€€As€a€remedy,€it€was€ordered€that€the€Commissionð ðsÐ Ðreport€be€binding€and€that€solicitor„client€costs€be€paid€to€the€respondents.€Ý ƒ 0 ÑýpÁ ‹Á ÝŒÐ ( ˜ Ðâ âŒÝ ÝÌà œ à(b)à0 ø àò òCourt€of€Appeal€ó ó((2002),€16€Alta.€L.R.€(4th)€244,€2002€ABCA€274)Ð X È ø Ð ø Ð ÐÌà œ à(i)à ø àò òMajority€(Paperny€and€Picard€JJ.A.)ó óÐ ˆ ø ÐÌÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 Ñý)Ç Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú118Ú ÚÛ € z v Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThe€majority€of€the€Alberta€Court€of€Appeal€agreed€with€the€trial€judge€andÐ ¸ ( Ðdismissed€Albertað ðs€appeal.€€Paperny€J.A.€emphasized€the€constitutional€nature€of€theÐ P À Ðcommission€process.€€She€held€that€the€reasons€did€not€withstand€scrutiny€under€theÐ è X Ðð ðconstitutional€microscopeð ð€(para.€81).€€On€her€interpretation€of€the€ò òReferenceó ó,€theÐ € ð Ðstandard€of€simple€rationality€is€a€high€standard.€€It€demands€ð ða€thorough€and€searchingÐ ˆ Ðexamination€of€the€reasons€profferedð ð€(para.€108).€€Her€interpretation€of€theò ò€ó óprinciplesÐ ° Ðset€out€in€the€ò òReference€ó óis€at€paras.€111„15.€€Paperny€J.A.€found€(at€para.€149)€thatÐ H ¸ ÐAlberta€failed€to€demonstrate€the€ð ðextraordinary€circumstancesð ð€she€thought€wereÐ à P Ðrequired€to€justify€the€rejection€of€any€portion€of€the€Commissionð ðs€report.€€She€heldÐ x è Ðthat€Albertað ðs€reasons€did€not€meet€the€test€of€simple€rationality.€€The€appeal€wasÐ !€ Ðdismissed€with€solicitor„client€costs€throughout.Ý ƒ 0 Ñý)Ç DÇ ÝŒÐ ¨" " ÐŒÝ ÝÌà œ à(ii)à ø àò òCð= ðt €J.A.€(Dissenting€in€Part)ó óÐ Ø%H & ÐÌÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 ÑýÂÌ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú119Ú ÚÛ € z w Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àCð= ðt €J.A.,€dissenting€in€part,€stated€that€the€standard€of€review€is€a€fairlyÐ )x!* Ðlax€one,€€Ô_ Ôi.e.,Ô_ Ô€that€of€simple€rationality.€€He€examined€each€of€the€Governmentð ðsÐ * #, Ðreasons€for€rejecting€the€recommended€salary€increase€and€identified€(a)€GovernmentÐ 8,¨$. Ðreasons€for€rejection€which€recognize€demonstrable€errors€made€by€the€Commission;Ð Ð-@&0 Ð(b)€Government€reasons€for€rejection€which,€although€not€alleging€demonstrable€errorÐ h/Ø'2 Ðby€the€Commission,€pass€the€test€of€simple€rationality;€and€(c)€Government€reasons€forÐ Ðr

document

Show text Show cached source Open source URL

* Ðprovinciale€en€raison€de€la€seule€existence€de€consid rations€morales. €€En€accordant€auÐ ”+ #, ÐParlement€la€comp tence€exclusive€en€mati re€de€droit€criminel,€la€ò òLoi€constitutionnelleÐ ,-¨$. Ðde€1867ó ó€ne€visait€pas€ €exclure€de€la€comp tence€l gislative€provinciale€toute€mati reÐ Ä.

Compare text pages Compare HTM pages Open source URL Open target URL Define csc.lexum.org as primary domain

ÐAny€moral€aspects€of€the€ò òVLT€Actó ó€fall€within€the€doctrine€of€ð ðincidental€effectsð ð,€recentlyÐ Ô P Ðaffirmed€by€this€Court€in€ò òKitkatla€Bandó ó,ò ò€supraó ó,€at€para.€54;€and€ò òGlobal€Securities€Corp.Ð l è Ðv.€British€Columbia€(Securities€Commission)ó ó,€[2000]€1€S.C.R.€494,€€2000€SCC€21,€atÐ "€ Ðpara.€23.€€Where€a€law€is€in€pith€and€substance€related€to€the€provincial€legislative€sphere,Ð œ# " Ðit€will€not€be€struck€down€merely€because€it€has€incidental€effects€on€a€federal€head€ofÐ 4%° $ Ðpower.€€For€instance,€in€ò òRio€Hotel€Ltd.€v.€New€Brunswick€(Liquor€Licensing€Board)ó ó,Ð Ì&H & Ð[1987]€2€S.C.R.€59,€it€was€held€that€a€provincial€law€restricting€nude€entertainment€atÐ d(à ( Ðlicensed€taverns€was€valid.€€It€is€reasonable€to€assume€that€such€a€law€would€have€hadÐ ü)x!* Ðsome€incidental€effects€on€public€morality.€€Yet,€the€Court€found€that€the€law€was€validlyÐ ”+ #, Ðenacted€because€in€pith€and€substance€it€dealt€with€licensing,€local€matters,€and€propertyÐ ,-¨$. Ðand€civil€rights.€€€Ý ƒ % ÑýÕç ðç ÝŒÐ Ä.@&0 ÐŒÝ ÝÐ \0Ø'2 ÐÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñýí Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú32Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àIn€the€present€appeal,€the€provincial€government€passed€a€law€that€was€ò òó óÐ „ Ðwithin€a€provincial€head€of€legislative€authority.€€Although€there€is€a€possibility€that€localÐ ˜ Ðmorality€may€affect€which€municipalities€choose€to€ban€VLTs€through€bindingÐ ´ 0 Ðplebiscites,€the€dominant€purpose€of€the€ò òVLT€Actó ó€is€not€to€express€moral€disapproval€ofÐ L È ÐVLTs.€€In€as€much€as€there€is€a€moral€aspect€to€the€ò òVLT€Actó ó,€this€effect€is€incidental€toÐ ä ` Ðthe€overall€regulatory€scheme,€and€does€not€infringe€on€Parliamentð ðs€exclusive€authorityÐ | ø Ðto€legislate€criminal€law.Ý ƒ % Ñýí «í ÝŒÐ ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñýÿð Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú33Ú ÚÛ € z ! Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àIn€making€this€determination,€I€am€mindful€of€the€presumption€ofÐ D À Ðconstitutionality€recognized€in€ò òReference€re€The€Farm€Products€Marketing€Actó ó,ò ò€ó ó[1957]Ð Ü X ÐS.C.R.€198,€at€p.€255;€ò òNova€Scotia€Board€of€Censors€v.€McNeiló ó,ò ò€ó ó[1978]€2€S.C.R.€662,€atÐ t ð Ðpp.€687„88;€ò òRe€Firearms€Actó ó,€ò òsupraó ó,€at€para.€25.€€When€faced€with€two€plausibleÐ ˆ Ðcharacterizations€of€a€law,€we€should€normally€choose€that€which€supports€the€lawð ðsÐ ¤ Ðconstitutional€validity.€€Ý ƒ % Ñýÿð ñ ÝŒÐ

document

Show text Show cached source Open source URL

@&0 ÐÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý˜ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú35Ú ÚÛ € z # Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àEn€lð ðesp ce,€ce€principe€est€ galement€ tay €par€lð ðinteraction€explicite€entreÐ „ Ðâ âle€ò òCode€crimineló ó€et€la€l gislation€provinciale€en€mati re€de€jeu.

Compare text pages Compare HTM pages Open source URL Open target URL Define csc.lexum.org as primary domain

Ðthe€issues€of€interjurisdictional€immunity€and€paramountcy€do€not€arise€in€this€case,€andÐ Ô P Ðthey€need€not€be€discussed€beyond€what€has€already€been€stated.€Ý ƒ % Ñý¬ü Çü ÝŒÐ l è ÐŒÝ ÝÌC.€€ò òThe€Claim€of€Improper€Delegationó óÐ œ# " ÐÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú37Ú ÚÛ € z % Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àBefore€turning€to€the€various€ò òCharteró ó€claims,€a€brief€comment€is€warrantedÐ Ì&H & Ðon€the€argument€raised€by€the€intervening€group€of€Alberta€merchants.€€They€challengedÐ d(à ( Ðthe€entire€ò òVLT€Actó ó€on€the€ground€that€it€constitutes€an€improper€abdication€of€theÐ ü)x!* Ðlegislatureð ðs€law„making€powers€and€usurps€the€authority€of€the€Lieutenant€Governor.€Ð ”+ #, ÐThese€interveners€submit€that,€by€allowing€municipalities€to€hold€binding€plebiscites,€theÐ ,-¨$. Ðâ âprovincial€government€has€given€them€the€power€to€make€and€repeal€law.€€This,€theyÐ Ä.@&0 Ðargue,€violates€the€provincial€legislatureð ðs€exclusive€authority€to€make€laws€for€theÐ „ Ðprovince.Ý ƒ % Ñý « ÝŒÐ ˜ Ðâ âŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñýd Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú38Ú ÚÛ € z & Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThis€submission€fails,€as€the€intervenersð ð€argument€rests€on€an€incorrectÐ L È Ðcharacterization€of€the€impugned€legislation.€€The€ò òVLT€Actó ó€does€not,€in€any€way,Ð ä ` Ðempower€municipal€voters€to€enact€legislation.€€The€Act€has€been€wholly€drafted,Ð | ø Ðdebated€and€enacted€by€the€provincial€legislature,€and€has€been€given€Royal€Assent€byÐ Ðthe€Lieutenant€Governor.€€It€sets€out€how€the€municipal€plebiscites€will€take€place€andÐ ¬ ( Ðwhat€their€effects€will€be€in€the€relevant€municipalities.€€The€only€role€played€byÐ D À Ðmunicipal€electors€is€in€initiating€and€voting€in€a€plebiscite.€€The€results€of€the€plebisciteÐ Ü X Ðdetermine€whether€the€prohibition€in€s.€3€of€the€ò òVLT€Actó ó€will€apply€in€the€municipality.€Ð t ð ÐIn€other€words,€the€application€of€the€statutory€VLT€prohibition€is€conditional€upon€thereÐ ˆ Ðbeing€a€certain€plebiscite€result.€€Consequently,€the€ò òVLT€Actó ó€falls€within€the€category€ofÐ ¤ Ðð ðconditional€legislationð ð€which€was€upheld€by€the€Privy€Council€in€ò òRussell€v.€The€Queenó óÐ

document

Show text Show cached source Open source URL

3£Äÿ ÝÔ2 # ÔÚ Ú80Ú Ú.Ô3 Ôà0 Ü àÝ Ýà « àLe€juge€Flinn€a€fait€remarquer€quð ðen€mati re€de€proc dure€sommaire,€leÔ' ø T øþ ÔÐ ´ P Ðminist re€public€ne€pouvait€interjeter€appel€dð ðun€acquittement€que€sur€une€question€deÐ L è Ðdroit€avec€lð ðautorisation€de€la€cour.

Compare text pages Compare HTM pages Open source URL Open target URL Define csc.lexum.org as primary domain

Ðthe€accused,€R.D.S.,€came€towards€Constable€Stienburg€on€his€bicycle.€€ConstableÐ Ô/p)4 ÐStienburg€testified€that€R.D.S.€ran€into€his€legs,€and€while€still€on€the€bicycle,€yelledÐ d Ðat€him€and€pushed€him.€€R.D.S.€was€then€arrested€for€interfering€with€the€arrest€ofÐ ü ˜ ÐN.R.,€and€Constable€Stienburg€called€for€back-up.€€Constable€Stienburg€stated€that€heÐ ” 0 Ðput€both€R.D.S.€and€N.R.€in€ð ða€neck€restraintð ð.€€When€R.D.S.€was€finally€brought€toÐ , È Ðthe€police€station,€he€was€read€his€rights,€and€charged€with€the€three€offences.Ý ƒ Ñývx ‘x ÝŒÐ Ä ` ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ Ñýs| Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú66Ú ÚÛ € z B Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àIn€cross-examination,€it€was€suggested€to€Constable€Stienburg€that€R.D.S.Ð ô Ðhad€been€overcharged.€€It€was€pointed€out€that€R.D.S.€had€no€prior€record€and€it€wasÐ Œ ( Ðsuggested,€although€not€particularly€clearly,€that€R.D.S.€had€been€singled€out€becauseÐ $ À Ðhe€was€black.Ý ƒ Ñýs| Ž| ÝŒÐ ¼ X ÐŒÝ ÝÌÔ& È ÔB.ò òTestimony€of€R.D.S.ó óÐ ì ˆ ÐÌÝ ‚ Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ Ñý»~ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú67Ú ÚÛ € z C Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àR.D.S.€testified€that€he€remembered€that€the€weather€on€the€particular€dayÔ' È ì |~ ÔÐ ¸ Ðwas€misty€and€humid.€€While€riding€his€bike€from€his€grandmotherð ðs€to€his€motherð ðsÐ ´ P Ðhouse€he€saw€the€police€car€and€the€crowd€standing€beside€it.€€A€friend€told€him€thatÐ L è Ðhis€cousin€N.R.€had€been€arrested.€R.D.S.€approached€the€crowd,€and€stopped€his€bikeÐ ä € Ðwhen€he€saw€N.R.€and€the€officer.€R.D.S.€then€tried€to€talk€to€N.R.€to€ask€him€whatÐ |! " Ðhad€happened€and€to€find€out€if€he€should€tell€N.R.ð ðs€mother.€€Constable€StienburgÐ #° $ Ðtold€him:€€ð ðShut€up,€shut€up,€or€youð ðll€be€under€arrest€tooð ð.€€When€R.D.S.€continued€toÐ ¬$H & Ðask€N.R.€if€he€should€call€his€mother,€Constable€Stienburg€arrested€R.D.S.€and€putÐ D&à ( Ðhim€in€a€choke€hold.€€R.D.S.€indicated€that€he€could€not€breathe,€and€that€he€heard€aÐ Ü'x!* Ðwoman€tell€the€officer€to€ð ðLet€that€kid€go€...€.ð ð€€He€also€heard€her€ask€for€his€phoneÐ t) #, Ðnumber.€€He€could€not€talk€so€N.R.€gave€the€number€to€her.€R.D.S.€indicated€that€theÐ +¨$. Ðcrowd€standing€around€were€all€ð ðlittle€kidsð ð€under€the€age€of€12.€€He€denied€that€heÐ ¤,@&0 Ðran€into€anyone€or€that€he€intended€to€run€into€anyone€on€his€bike.€€He€also€testifiedÐ

document

Show text Show cached source Open source URL

'1 œ Ð œ Ð ÐÐ 40¤(3 ÐÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý£? Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú39Ú ÚÛ € z ' Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àComme€nous€lð ðexpliquons€dans€les€affaires€ò òÔ_ ÔMalmoÔ_ Ô-Ô_ ÔLevineÔ_ Ôó ó€et€ò òÔ_ ÔCaineÔ_ Ôó ó,€leÐ Ðdegr €appropri €de€d f rence€ voqu €dans€ò òÔ_ ÔHeywoodÔ_ Ôó ó€est€int gr € €la€norme€applicableÐ ( ˜ Ðen€mati re€de€ð ðdisproportion€exag r eð ð.

Compare text pages Compare HTM pages Open source URL Open target URL Define csc.lexum.org as primary domain

ž Ð ž Ð ÐÓ @ Ü , ‚X œ ø Ü 8 ¼ Ü , ‚X ž ø Ü 8 ¼ B™ @ ÓÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñýcš Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú20Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àOn€the€issue€of€harm€associated€with€the€use€of€marihuana€for€non„medicalÐ l+Ü#- Ðpurposes,€Rosenberg€Ô_ ÔJ.A.Ô_ Ô€summarized€his€view€of€the€evidence€in€this€case€as€follows:Ý ƒ % Ñýcš ~š ÝŒÐ -t%/ Ðâ âŒÝ ÝÐ œ. '1 ÐÓ Óà0 œ àà ø àIn€the€companion€case€of€ò òR.€v.€Clayó ó,€I€have€reviewed€at€greater€lengthÐ Ðâ âthe€stateð ðs€objectives€in€prohibiting€marihuana.€€First,€the€state€has€anÐ \ Ì Ðinterest€in€protecting€against€the€harmful€effects€of€use€of€that€drug.€€ThoseÐ ( ˜ Ðinclude€bronchial€pulmonary€harm€to€humans;€psychomotor€impairmentÐ ô d Ðfrom€marihuana€use€leading€to€a€risk€of€automobile€accidents€and€noÐ À 0 Ðsimple€screening€device€for€detection;€possible€precipitation€of€relapse€inÐ Œ ü Ðpersons€with€schizophrenia;€possible€negative€effects€on€[the]€immuneÐ X È Ðsystem;€possible€long„term€negative€cognitive€effects€in€children€whoseÐ $ ” Ðmothers€used€marihuana€while€pregnant;€possible€long„term€negativeÐ ð ` Ðcognitive€effects€in€long„term€users;€and€some€evidence€that€some€heavyÐ ¼ , Ðusers€may€develop€a€dependency.€€The€other€objectives€are:€to€satisfyÐ ˆ ø ÐCanadað ðs€international€treaty€obligations€and€to€control€the€domestic€andÐ T Ä Ðinternational€trade€in€illicit€drugs.€€Ð œ Ð œ Ð ÐÌà œ à(ò òR.€v.€Parkeró ó€(2000),€146€Ô_ ÔC.C.C.Ô_ Ô€Ô_ Ô(3d)Ô_ Ô€193€(Ont.€Ô_ ÔC.A.Ô_ Ô),€at€para.143)Ó ÓÐ ¸ ( ÐÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % ÑýÏ¡ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú21Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýò òó óà œ àThe€Ontario€Court€of€Appeal€was€of€the€view€that€the€use€of€intoxicants,Ð è X Ðincluding€marihuana,€in€the€privacy€of€oneð ðs€home€is€not€a€fundamental€aspect€ofÐ € ð Ðpersonal€autonomy€and€human€dignity€such€as€to€engage€the€liberty€or€security€interestsÐ ˆ Ðprotected€by€s.€7€of€the€ò òCharteró ó.€€As€to€the€potential€deprivation€of€liberty€throughÐ ° Ðimprisonment,€Rosenberg€Ô_ ÔJ.A.Ô_ Ô€accepted€for€the€purpose€of€the€appeal€that€there€was€aÐ H ¸ Ðharm€principle€to€the€effect€that€prohibited€activities€must€present€at€least€a€reasonedÐ à P Ðapprehension€of€harm€to€other€individuals€or€society€before€they€can€be€the€subject€ofÐ x è Ða€criminal€prohibition.€€Nevertheless,€even€on€that€basis,€the€Crown€had€established€aÐ !€ Ðreasoned€apprehension€of€harm€associated€with€marihuana€use€that€was€neitherÐ ¨" " Ðinsignificant€nor€trivial.€€In€light€of€the€findings€of€fact€of€the€trial€judge€it€could€notÐ @$° $ Ðbe€said€that€Parliament€lacked€a€rational€basis€for€

document

Show text Show cached source Open source URL

ÐÌò òen€appel€de€la€cour€dð ðappel€de€lð ðÔ_ ÔontarioÔ_ Ôó óÐ %P # ÐÌà p àò òResponsabilit €Ô_ Ôd lictuelleÔ_ Ô€ð" ð€Diffamation€ð" ð€Moyens€de€d fense€ð" ð€CommunicationÐ Ø&("% Ðresponsable€concernant€des€questions€dð ðint r t€public€ð" ð€Action€en€libelle€diffamatoire€par€unÐ Ä' #& Ðagent€de€police€contre€un€journal€et€des€journalistes€ayant€publi €des€articles€all guant€quð ðilÐ °( ð€Cour€dð ðappel€€reconnaissant€un€nouveau€moyen€de€d fense€de€journalismeÐ ˆ*Ø%) Ðresponsable,€mais€emp chant€les€d fendeurs€de€sð ðen€pr valoir€parce€quð ðils€ne€lð ðont€pas€invoqu Ð t+Ä&* Ðau€proc s€ð" ð€Y€a-t-il€lieu€de€modifier€les€r gles€de€Ô_ ÔcommonÔ_ Ô€Ô_ ÔlawÔ_ Ô€en€mati re€de€diffamation€afinÐ `,°'+ Ðdð ðoffrir€une€plus€grande€protection€aux€ nonc s€de€fait€diffamatoires€publi s€de€fa onÐ L-œ(, ÐÔ_ Ôresponsable?€ð" ð€Si€oui,€les€d fendeurs€devraient-ils€pouvoir€invoquer€le€nouveau€moyen€deÐ ° Ðd fense€de€communication€responsable€concernant€des€questions€dð ðint r t€public€dans€le€cadreÐ œ ì Ðdð ðun€nouveau€proc s?Ð ˆ Ø Ðó óÌà p àC,€un€agent€de€la€police€ontarienne,€sð ðest€rendu€ €New€York€peu€apr s€lesÐ ` ° Ð v nements€du€11septembre€2001€ð" ð€sans€autorisation€de€son€employeur€ð" ð€pour€participer€auxÐ L œ Ðop rations€de€recherche€et€de€sauvetage€ €Ground€Zero.€€Un€quotidien€a€publi €des€articlesÐ 8 ˆ Ðindiquant€que€C€sð ð tait€pr sent €sous€un€faux€jour€aux€autorit s€new-yorkaises€et€quð ðil€avaitÐ $ t Ðpossiblement€nui€aux€op rations€de€sauvetage.€€C€a€entam €une€action€en€libelle€diffamatoireÐ ` Ðcontre€le€journal€et€les€journalistes.€€Au€proc s,€les€d fendeurs€ont€invoqu €la€d fense€dð ðimmunit Ð ü L Ðrelative,€mais€ne€se€sont€pas€appuy s€sur€la€d fense€reconnue€en€Angleterre€comme€la€d fense€deÐ è 8 Ðð ðjournalisme€responsableð ð,€laquelle€nð ðavait€pas€encore€ t €reconnue€comme€moyen€de€d fenseÐ Ô $ Ðdistinct€par€les€tribunaux€canadiens.€€Le€juge€de€premi re€instance€a€rejet €la€d fense€dð ðimmunit Ð À Ðrelative€oppos e€par€les€d fendeurs€et€a€soumis€lð ðaffaire€ €lð ðappr ciation€du€jury€pour€quð ðilÐ ¬ ü Ðd termine€si€la€d fense€de€v racit €devait€ tre€retenue.€€Le€jury€a€conclu€que€la€v racit €deÐ ˜ è Ðplusieurs,€mais€pas€de€la€totalit ,€des€imputations€factuelles€dans€les€articles€avait€ t € tablie€et€aÐ „ Ô Ðaccord €des€dommages-int r ts€g n r

Compare text pages Compare HTM pages Open source URL Open target URL Define csc.lexum.org as primary domain

ÐCromwellÔ_ ÔJJ.Ô_ ÔÐ (#x ! ÐÔ_ ÔÌò òon€appeal€from€the€court€of€appeal€for€ontarioó óÐ %P # ÐÌò òà p àTorts€ð" ð€Defamation€ð" ð€Defences€ð" ð€Responsible€communication€on€matters€of€publicÐ Ø&("% Ðinterest€ð" ð€Police€constable€suing€newspaper€and€reporters€for€libel€after€articles€were€publishedÐ Ä' #& Ðalleging€that€he€had€misrepresented€himself€and€possibly€interfered€with€rescue€operations€atÐ °( $' ÐGround€Zero€ð" ð€Court€of€Appeal€recognizing€new€responsible€journalism€defence€but€denying€Ð œ)ì$( Ðdefendants€its€protection€because€they€had€not€advanced€it€at€trial€ð" ð€Whether€common€law€ofÐ ˆ*Ø%) Ðdefamation€should€be€modified€to€accord€stronger€protection€to€defamatory€statements€of€factÐ t+Ä&* Ðpublished€responsibly€ð" ð€If€so,€whether€defendants€should€be€able€to€avail€themselves€of€new€defenceÐ `,°'+ Ðof€responsible€communication€on€matters€of€public€interest€at€a€new€trial.Ð L-œ(, Ðó óÌà p àC€was€an€Ontario€police€constable€who,€shortly€after€the€events€of€September11,€2001Ð œ ì Ðand€without€permission€from€his€employer,€travelled€to€New€York€City€to€assist€with€the€search€andÐ ˆ Ø Ðrescue€effort€at€Ground€Zero.€€A€newspaper€published€articles€alleging€that€C€had€misrepresentedÐ t Ä Ðhimself€to€the€authorities€in€New€York€and€possibly€interfered€with€the€rescue€operation.€€C€broughtÐ ` ° Ða€libel€action€against€the€newspaper€and€the€reporters.€€At€trial,€the€defendants€pleaded€qualifiedÐ L œ Ðprivilege€and€did€not€rely€on€the€defence€known€in€England€as€ð ðresponsible€journalismð ð€which,€atÐ 8 ˆ Ðthe€time,€had€not€yet€been€recognized€as€a€distinct€defence€by€any€Canadian€court.€€The€trial€judgeÐ $ t Ðrejected€the€defendantsð ð€claim€of€qualified€privilege€and€put€the€case€to€the€jury€to€decide€whetherÐ ` Ðthe€defence€of€truth€had€been€made€out.€€The€jury€found€that€many€but€not€all€of€the€factualÐ ü L Ðimputations€in€the€articles€had€been€proven€true,€and€awarded€C€general€damages.€€The€Court€ofÐ è 8 ÐAppeal€upheld€that€decision.€€The€court€took€the€opportunity€to€establish€a€responsible€journalismÐ Ô $ Ðdefence€in€Ontario€law,€but€held€that€the€defendants€were€not€entitled€to€a€new€trial€and€theÐ À Ðprotection€of€the€new€defence€because€they€had€not€advanced€the€defence€at€trial.Ð ¬ ü ÐÌà p àò òHeldó ó:€€The€appeal€should€be€allowed€and€a€new€trial€ordered.Ð „ Ô ÐÌà p àò òPeró ó€McLachlinC.J.€and€Binnie,€LeBel,€Deschamps,€Fish,€Charron,€Rothstein€andÐ \ ¬ ÐCromwellJJ.:€€The€defence€of€responsible€communication€on€matters€of€public€inte

document

Show text Show cached source Open source URL

« ! àLa€ò òLoi€sur€les€options€locales€en€mati re€de€jeu€(appareils€de€loterieÐ Ðvid o)ó ó,€L.M.€1999,€ch. 44,€exc de-t-elle€dans€son€ensemble€laÐ à \ Ðcomp tence€de€la€l gislature€du€Manitoba€du€fait€quð ðelle€porte€sur€uneÐ ¬ ( Ðmati re€qui€rel ve€de€la€comp tence€exclusive€du€Parlement€du€CanadaÐ x ô Ðen€vertu€du€par.

Compare text pages Compare HTM pages Open source URL Open target URL Define csc.lexum.org as primary domain

ø Ð ø Ð ÐÌà0 œ à(C)à0 ø œ Ð œ Ð àwhether€the€law€in€question€has€a€purpose€or€effect€that€isÐ Ô P Ðdiscriminatory€within€the€meaning€of€the€equality€guarantee.Ó b6 ÓÐ ø Ð ø Ð ÐÌThe€appellants€submitted€that€part€(A)€of€the€test€was€met€because€s.€16€of€the€ò òVLT€Actó óÐ Ð"L ! Ðdistinguished€between€residents€of€Winkler€and€all€other€residents€of€Manitoba.€€TheyÐ h$ä # Ðfurther€argued€that€this€distinction€was€based€on€the€analogous€ground€of€residence,€andÐ &| % Ðwas€discriminatory€because€it€denied€them€the€opportunity€to€vote€in€a€binding€plebisciteÐ ˜' ' Ðon€the€issue€of€VLTs.€€€€Ð 0)¬ ) ÐÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % ÑýÇ: Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú48Ú ÚÛ € z 0 Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThere€is€no€merit€in€this€ground€of€appeal.€€First,€although€s.€16€of€the€ò òVLTÐ `,Ü#- ÐActó ó€clearly€makes€a€distinction€between€Winkler€and€other€municipalities,€it€isÐ ø-t%/ Ðimplausible€that€residence€in€Winkler€constitutes€an€analogous€ground€of€discrimination.€Ð / '1 ÐResidence€was€rejected€as€an€analogous€ground€in€both€ò òHaigó ó,ò ò€supraó ó,€and€ò òR.€v.€Turpinó ó,Ð „ Ð[1989]€1€S.C.R.€1296.€€Further,€the€majority€in€ò òCorbiere€v.€Canada€(Minister€of€IndianÐ ˜ Ðand€Northern€Affairs)ó ó,€[1999]€2€S.C.R.€203,€clearly€stated€that€the€analogous€groundÐ ´ 0 Ðrecognized€in€that€case€was€ð ðAboriginality„residenceð ð,€and€that€ð ðno€new€water€is€charted,Ð L È Ðin€the€sense€of€finding€residence,€in€the€generalized€abstract,€to€be€an€analogous€groundð ðÐ ä ` Ð(para.€15).€€In€rejecting€the€claimantð ðs€s.€15€argument€in€ò òHaigó ó,€the€majority€explained,€atÐ | ø Ðp.€1044,€why€residence€is€an€unlikely€analogous€ground:Ý ƒ % ÑýÇ: â: ÝŒÐ ÐŒÝ ÝÌÓ Óà0 œ àIt€would€require€a€serious€stretch€of€the€imagination€to€find€that€ò òpersonsÐ D À Ðmoving€to€Quebec€less€than€six€months€before€a€referendum€dateó ó€areÐ Œ Ðanalogous€to€persons€suffering€discrimination€on€the€basis€of€race,€religionÐ Ü X Ðor€gender.€€People€moving€to€Quebec€less€than€six€months€before€aÐ ¨ $ Ðreferendum€date€do€not€suffer€from€stereotyping,€or€social€prejudice.€Ð t ð ÐThough€its€members€were€unable€to€cast€a€ballot€in€the€Quebec€referendum,Ð @ ¼ Ðthe€group€is€not€one€which€has€suffered€historical€disadvantage,€or€politicalÐ ˆ Ðprejudice.€€Nor€does€the€group€appear€to€be€ð ðdiscrete€and€insularð ð.€Ð Ø T ÐMembership€in€the€group€is€highly€fluid,€with€people€constantly€flowing€inÐ ¤ Ðor€out€once€they€meet€Quebecð ðs€residency€requirements.€€[Emphasis€inÐ p ì Ðoriginal.]Ó ¹? ÓÐ

document

Show text Show cached source Open source URL

Ðrevanche,€m me€si€le€testament€ordonne€la€vente€du€bien€immobilier,€le€b n ficiaireÐ Ó " Ðviager,€en€Angleterre,€a€le€droit€de€recevoir€tous€les€revenus€tir s€de€ce€bien€jusquð ð €laÐ ¹ Ðvente€de€ce€dernier.€Dans€lð ðun€ou€lð ðautre€cas,€il€nð ðy€a€pas€de€r partition.€Mò òe€ó óSheard€nousÐ Ÿ î Ða€cependant€renvoy s€ €un€certain€nombre€de€d cisions€de€tribunaux€ontariens€qui€ontÐ … Ô Ðconclu€ €lð ðapplication€de€la€r gle€en€mati re€de€biens€immobiliers€improductifs:€ò òIn€reÐ k º ÐCameron€ó ó(1901),€2€O.L.R.€756;€ò òRe€Clarke€ó ó(1903),€6€O.L.R.€551;€ò òRe€Prime€ó ó(1924),€25Ð Q ! ÐO.W.N.€522;€ò òRe€Pears€(No.€1)€ó ó(1926),€31€O.W.N.€235;€ò òRe€Rutherford€ó ó[1933]€O.R.€707,Ð 7 † " Ð[1933]€4€D.L.R.€222€(C.A.).

Compare text pages Compare HTM pages Open source URL Open target URL Define csc.lexum.org as primary domain

%/B Ì ! %/B ! %/B L ! %/B Œ ! %/B Ì ! %/B ! – – Z Z ÷ Á Á E E ª ª * * ‘ ‘ ¿ … … Â í *" >% Ñ% Ñ% Ï* Ï* ³3 ³3 W4 W4 f5 f5 e6 e6 y6 y6 ¬6 ¬6 47 47 $ $ X X fX fX ¡X ¡X «X «X *Y *Y 0Z 0Z EZ EZ aZ ! " # $ % & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 : ; = Ÿ Ÿ & & a a Ä Ä N N ± ± 0 0 ˜ ˜ Ì 1 1 — — É þ :" K% Ø% Ø% Ö* Ö* º3 º3 ^4 ^4 j5 j5 k6 k6 €6 €6 °6 °6 :7 :7 0 0 X X mX mX ©X ©X ²X ²X -Y -Y 3Z 3Z HZ HZ aZ ! " # $ % & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 : ; = : ) *€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags €Street €9 7 *€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags €State €8 ; *€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags €City €8 6 *€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags €date €; * *€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags €address €9 > *€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags €place €B = *€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags €country-region € €12 €13 €1972 €1975 €1977 €2 €3 €31 €6 €9 €Day €Month €Year> = > ; > ; > 7 6 > = > ; > 7 > = > 7 6 * ) * ) > 6 6 6 > 7 > 7 > = > 7 > = > = > = > ; > = > ; > ; > ; > ; > ; > = > = > = P h o y ‚ ª ² Å Ì $ ) ’ • Á Ë ¶ ¿ ˆ ” Ñ Ù ú F P E Q í ò Y \ C H Ù á c j ‹ “ ² ¹ ú Ý æ „ Ž A H ú ¬ ¶ û ! ! „" ‹" •" ž" ¤" °" M% U% °& »& 0( 9( ®, ¶, ×, ã, Õ. á. P0 X0 u0 0 ÷1 2 +4 14 ¿6 Ì6 ±7 »7 0: 8: Y: e: Û: å: ¹ Å M? R? HA RA WJ ]J XQ ZQ ÿS T =T BT LX TX VX \X ^X dX ’X ™X µX îX ñX ^Y cY RZ RZ TZ TZ UZ UZ WZ XZ ZZ [Z ]Z ^Z aZ ' ( ’ ; j Ä Ì ? F 5 ] 2 ] † Æ Ç 1 i m X \ – ™ }& ®& ×' Ú' ¨8 «8 > > †> Š> M M ûP þP µX ·X ÊX ÍX áX äX òX óX Y Y Y Y 5Y —Y ¬Y ¯Y ÄY ÇY ÝY àY öY ùY Z Z "Z %Z ;Z >Z PZ RZ RZ TZ TZ UZ UZ WZ XZ ZZ [Z ]Z ^Z aZ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 µX RZ RZ TZ TZ UZ UZ WZ XZ ZZ [Z ]Z ^Z aZ µX RZ RZ TZ TZ UZ UZ WZ XZ ZZ [Z ]Z ^Z aZ |ÿÿÿR÷Ö¹ÿ }ÿÿÿV;º/ÿ ~ÿÿÿR ÿ ÿÿÿÌ žŒÿ €ÿÿÿž–À ÿ ÿÿÿŒæ´Ïÿ ‚ÿÿÿº0ò(ÿ ƒÿÿÿrØþ¦ÿ ˆÿÿÿVY>Ûÿ ‰ÿÿÿÌÅ ‚ÿ d€ ˜UÉ ÿ t:GR æ8ÿ Á6tWö| u ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ „ „˜þ Æ ^„ `„˜þ . „ „˜þ Æ ^„ `„˜þ . „8 „˜þ Æ 8 ^„8 `„˜þ . „Ð „˜þ Æ Ð ^„Ð `„˜þ . „ „˜þ Æ ^„ `„˜þOJ QJ o( ·ð „ „˜þ Æ ^„ `„˜þOJ QJ o( ·ð „8 „˜þ Æ 8 ^„8 `„˜þOJ QJ o( ·ð „Ð „˜þ Æ Ð ^„Ð `„˜þOJ QJ o( ·ð „h „˜þ Æ h ^„h `„˜þ . „h „˜þ Æ h ^„h `„˜þOJ QJ o( ·ð „ˆ „àþ Æ ˆ ^„ˆ `„àþB* ph ( ) „ˆ „àþ Æ ˆ ^„ˆ `„àþB* ph ( ) „q „þ Æ q ^„q `„þ‡h ˆH [ ] „ „˜þ Æ ^„ `„˜þ‡h ˆH . ’ „p „Lÿ Æ p ^„p `„Lÿ‡h ˆH . „@ „˜þ Æ @ ^„@ `„˜þ‡h ˆH . „ „˜þ Æ ^„ `„˜þ‡h ˆH . ’ „à „Lÿ Æ à ^„à `„Lÿ‡h ˆH . „° „˜þ Æ ° ^„° `„˜þ‡h ˆH . „€ „˜þ Æ € ^„€ `„˜þ‡h ˆH . ’ „P „Lÿ Æ P ^„P `„Lÿ‡h ˆH . Á6tW t:GR d€ ˆÿÿÿ ÿÿÿ ~ÿÿÿ }ÿÿÿ |ÿÿÿ ‰ÿÿÿ ƒÿÿÿ ‚

document

Show text Show cached source Open source URL

€€Pour€leur€part,€les€intim esÐ ˆ ø Ðpr tendent€que€la€Cour€dð ðappel€f d rale€a€eu€raison€de€recourir€ €lð ðanalyse€en€trois€ tapesÐ Ð tablie€en€mati re€dð ðinjonctions€interlocutoires€dans€ò òAmerican€Cyanamid€Co.

Compare text pages Compare HTM pages Open source URL Open target URL Define csc.lexum.org as primary domain

8 ÿÿ ÿÿ ÿÿ ÿÿ ÿÿ C ÿÿ H K K K K J i a n S . A . F . C . M o r g u a r d A m c h e m S e a p e a r l A n r a j N . R . S a r a b i a M i n d o r o B . C . L . R . D . L . R . N . B . R . T r e n d t e x A . C . U . S . N . Z . L . R . V i m a r S e g u r o s R e a s e g u r o s M a c k e n d e r F e l d i a A . G . S y n c r u d e I n c r e m o n a M a r m i A f f i n i S i c i l i a n i I . S . M . A . S . s . n . c . R . S . C . S . C . M i c h e l l Z . I . I n d u s t r i e N . V . C a n m a r L . J . L . M . C . L . Q . Y v o n B l a i s F . C . J . F . T . R . H a r g r a v e F o n t a i n e B a s t a r a c h e E l e f t h e r i a E t h i c o n P o l y f i b r o n E l l e h a m m e r m e s s a g e r i e s n a t i o n a l e s S . L . M . N . t h e r f r o m T h e T h e T e t l e y C . A . M a c G u i g a n J . A . D ) c a r y S a v o y e c o n v e n i e n s P r a t t e L a l a n d e D . J . F . C . A . N . S . C . A . D i p l o c k O . R . H . C . L a s k i n W ] h e t h e r C . J . p r o t h o n o t a r y V i n e b e r g t ] h e i R J R ( _ 3ÌÕ$ © © Ý ƒ ù ! ÝÔ CEUS. , ÔÔ € X !É X X X ÔÔ CECE. , ÔÝ Ý F J Ñý6 1 , 2 , 3 , A N u m b e r s à X àÚ ƒ z Ú1Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà ° à d 0 ÿÿ. N o r m a l üÿ P P d ( _ 3ÌÕ$ £ £ Ý ƒ ù ! ÝÔ CEUS. , ÔÔ € X !É X X X ÔÔ CECE. , ÔÝ Ý L e v e l 1 L e v e l 2 L e v e l 3 L e v e l 4 L e v e l 5 ' È È È È d x d ( ±þ$ ’ ’ ò òFigure€Ú Ú1Ú Úó ó1 , 2 , 3 , L e v e l 1 L e v e l 2 L e v e l 3 L e v e l 4 L e v e l 5 B 1 sf2 1 , 2 , 3 , N u m b e r s Ú ƒ z ÚÚ Ú.Û € z Ûà0 à @ ( p > p a r . 1 0 . 5 p t X , p n i > p a r . 1 0 . 5 p t a l l f l u s h ` * p i > p a r . 1 0 . 5 p t . a l l i n d e n t 1 m b 4 / f n o t e f > e n f o f f r e n c h f o o t n o t e x 2 a p p e a l > p a r a g i n 1 0 p t s w i t h o u t p a g i n a t i o n d , r h c > r u n . h e a d f o r c . ( f r e n c h ) V . r h c 1 > r u n . h e a d w i t h 2 c . V , r h o > r u n . h e a d w i t h o u t c . b , r h v > r u n . h e a d f o r v . ( e n g l i s h ) V . r h v 1 > r u n . h e a d w i t h 2 v . V , r h e > r u n . h e a d w i t h o u t v . r * h 1 > t i t l e i n b o l d , f l u s h l e f t n o i n d e n t ˆ * h 2 > t i t l e i n 1 0 . 5 p t r e g u l a r , f l u s h l e f t , n o i n d e n t Œ , i n d > ( i n d e x e d o r r e p e r t o i r e ) , t e x t 7 . 5 p t , f l u s h l e f t Š . i n d 1 > ( i n d e x e d o r r ) p e r t o i r e ) , ( n o v . o r c . i n s i d e ) . i n d 2 > ( i n d e x e d o r r ) p e r t o i r e ) w i t h 2 v . o r 2 c . i n s i

document

Show text Show cached source Open source URL

Compare text pages Compare HTM pages Open source URL Open target URL Define csc.lexum.org as primary domain

document

Show text Show cached source Open source URL

€Lð ðintim e€nð ða€pasÐ ˆ Ðinterjet €appel€devant€la€commission€dð ðappel€en€mati re€d'am nagement€(ð ðcommissionð ð)Ð ¸ Ðet,€bien€quð ðelle€ait€cess €lð ðexploitation€litigieuse,€elle€a€n glig €de€remettre€les€lieux€dansÏleur€ tat€original,€ce€qui€lui€aurait€occasionn €une€d pense€dð ðenviron€45€500€$Ô # † X ½ X X X ½c # Ô.

Compare text pages Compare HTM pages Open source URL Open target URL Define csc.lexum.org as primary domain

âSð F›ÎÂL* ?eê8É [½£s)u]MÕ'aì‚öãÚÏ¨‡‘ó„ž¯Ä€¶þ6ˆ™¾ë™rNvÚf¼S>EóOw ¿ öaJ Œ «þómÑ ±r£AÐT÷È £þ ÉóÔk )„1ò…9Heà ¥¢ãÉ!á†=© w¤ ® >WK· :ë ý+øW~dwOÍ¿ ý3#úâ$dë;´ S!N²…4ð0`¦¦°ø«‹HÀ [’• GßoñU\ ì! DâåfC²3f• µ$•&’5™$ˆ Þr $þuc Ý¥À,·Le‘Y$ ÉÍ€Ë6ù { U N º % 0 m 0 j { 0 @ å 0 X % 0 ` } 0 b Ý 0 x ? 0 d · 0 V 0 V q 0 b Ç 0 V ) 0 V 0 r Õ 0 ˆ G 0 Œ Ï 0 Š [ 0 å 0 d u 0 H Ù 0 ˜ ! 0 Š ¹ 0 „ C 0 V Ç 0 š 0 v · 0 ˜ - 0 œ Å 0 z a 0 ˜ Û 0 † s 0 œ ù 0 Ž • 0 Z # 0 V } 0 T Ó 0 H ' 0 j o 0 Z Ù 0 h 3 0 „ › 0 Ž 0 x 0 b % 0 d ‡ 0 T ë 0 h ? 0 Œ § 0 † 3 0 x ¹ 0 ˜ 1 0 n É 0 € 7 0 t · 0 r +! 0 X ! 0 ` õ! 0 n U" 0 ‚ Ã" 0 j E# 0 t ¯# 0 r #$ 0 j •$ 0 f ÿ$ 0 d e% 0 Œ É% 0 p U& 0 p Å& 0 ” 5' 0 ” É' 0 j ]( 0 l Ç( 0 l 3) 0 p Ÿ) 0 r * 0 j * 0 l ë* 0 l W+ 0 p Ã+ 0 r 3, 0 t ¥, 0 z - 0 | “- 0 ~ . 0 t . 0 z / 0 | {/ 0 ~ ÷/ 0 P u0 0 H Å0 0 b 1 0 ` o1 0 ` Ï1 0 b /2 p ‘2 0 4 Ž4 0 r ž4 5 w @ 5 4 X5 n l5 1 m Ú5 G6 0Z c O6 1 Ç ²6 0 Ž y7 B 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Æ $8 ( È h H Z ‹ 6 T i m e s N e w R o m a n R e g u l a r X F ' ÿÿ6 1 , 2 , 3 , A N u m b e r s à X . . X à1à . . à B ( ÿÿ2 1 , 2 , 3 , N u m b e r s Ìà X . . X à2à . . à @ ÿÿ( p > p a r . 1 0 . 5 p t X ÿÿ, p n i > p a r . 1 0 . 5 p t a l l f l u s h ` ÿÿ* p i > p a r . 1 0 . 5 p t . a l l i n d e n t 1 m b ÿÿ4 / f n o t e f > e n f o f f r e n c h f o o t n o t e x ÿÿ2 a p p e a l > p a r a g i n 1 0 p t s w i t h o u t p a g i n a t i o n d ÿÿ, r h c > r u n . h e a d f o r c . ( f r e n c h ) V ÿÿ. r h c 1 > r u n . h e a d w i t h 2 c . V ÿÿ, r h o > r u n . h e a d w i t h o u t c . b ÿÿ, r h v > r u n . h e a d f o r v . ( e n g l i s h ) V ÿÿ. r h v 1 > r u n . h e a d w i t h 2 v . V ÿÿ, r h e > r u n . h e a d w i t h o u t v . r ÿÿ* h 1 > t i t l e i n b o l d , f l u s h l e f t n o i n d e n t ˆ ÿÿ* h 2 > t i t l e i n 1 0 . 5 p t r e g u l a r , f l u s h l e f t , n o i n d e n t Œ ÿÿ, i n d > ( i n d e x e d o r r e p e r t o i r e ) , t e x t 7 . 5 p t , f l u s h l e f t Š ÿÿ. i n d 1 > ( i n d e x e d o r r ) p e r t o i r e ) , ( n o v . o r c . i n s i d e ) ÿÿ. i n d 2 > ( i n d e x e d o r r ) p e r t o i r e ) w i t h 2 v . o r 2 c . i n s i d e d ÿÿ4 / f t n o t e > e n d o f e n g l i s h f o o t n o t e H ÿÿ* 3 p > 3 . . . c e n t e r ˜ ÿÿ. p r e s > t e x t i n 9 . 5 p t . j u s t . , n o i n d e n t e x . : P r e s e n t : L a m e r Š ÿÿ. f i l e > t e x t i n 9 . 5 p t j u s t . , n o i n d e n t e x . : F i l e N o s : „ ÿÿ. d a t e > t e x t i n 9 . 5 p t . j u s t . , n o i n d e n t e x . : 1 9 9 2 : V ÿÿ*

document

Show text Show cached source Open source URL

Ðdð ðaccusations€dð ðinfraction€en€mati re€de€drogue€port es€contre€lð ðaccus €--€Minist reÏpublic€invoquant€le€privil ge€relatif€aux€indicateurs€de€police€pour€refuser€de€faire€droitÏ €la€requ te€de€lð ðaccus €visant€ €obtenir€la€production€de€la€fiche€de€lð ðinformationÏcommuniqu e€--€Le€juge€du€proc s€a„t„il€commis€une€erreur€en€ordonnant€la€productionÏde€la€fiche€r vis e€de€lð ðinformation€communiqu e€par€lð ðindicateur?

Compare text pages Compare HTM pages Open source URL Open target URL Define csc.lexum.org as primary domain

U N ^ % ¬ 0 Y ² n n y y w @ ç 4 ' ; 1 m J ~ · 0 u 5 0 c ª 1 m U N ‚ U N Ð Ð Ð Ð Ð Ð Ð Ð Ð Ð 0 u “ 0 ™ ™ ™ ™ ™ ™ ™ ™ ™ ™ ™ ™ ™ ™ ™ ™ ™ ™ ™ ™ ™ ™ ™ U N ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) U N w w w w B Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å B â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â Æ ÿ 0 Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å Å 0 @ R 0 X ’ 0 ` ê 0 b J 0 x ¬ 0 d $ 0 V ˆ 0 V Þ 0 b 4 0 V – 0 V ì 0 r B 0 ˆ ´ 0 Œ 0 Š È 0 R 0 d â 0 H F 0 ˜ Ž 0 Š &! 0 „ °! 0 V 4" 0 š Š" 0 v $# 0 ˜ š# 0 œ 2$ 0 z Î$ 0 ˜ H% 0 † à% 0 œ f& 0 Ž ' 0 Z ' 0 V ê' 0 T @( 0 H ”( 0 j Ü( 0 Z F) 0 h ) 0 „ * 0 Ž Œ* 0 x + 0 b ’+ 0 d ô+ 0 T X, 0 h ¬, 0 Œ - 0 † - 0 x &. 0 ˜ ž. 0 n 6/ 0 € ¤/ 0 j $0 0 t Ž0 0 r 1 0 X t1 0 ` Ì1 0 n ,2 0 ‚ š2 0 j 3 0 t †3 0 r ú3 0 j l4 0 f Ö4 0 d 0 Œ 5 0 p ,6 0 p œ6 0 ” 7 0 ” 7 0 j 48 0 l ž8 0 l 9 0 p v9 0 r æ9 0 j X: 0 l Â: 0 l .; 0 p š; 0 r 0 t | 0 z ð 0 | j= 0 ~ æ= 0 t d> 0 z Ø> 0 | R? 0 ~ Î? 0 P L@ 0 H œ@ 0 b ä@ 0 ` FA 0 ` ¦A 0 b B ( È h H Z ‹ 6 T i m e s N e w R o m a n R e g u l a r X ( 1 É $ ¡ ¡ Ô € X ]ú X X X ÔÔ CEUS. , Ôg : \ w i n a p p s \ w p w i n 6 1 e \ w p w i n \ t e m p l a t e \ r e p o r t s \ h e a d e n g . w p t g : \ w i n a p p s \ w p w i n 6 1 e \ w p w i n \ t e m p l a t e \ r e p o r t s \ r e a s e n g . w p t E D D D |r"õÅ"ð ð ñ ñ 3| x #-e 3 7 = C I Q Y a g 1 . a . i . ( 1 ) ( a ) ( i ) 1 ) a ) t Ý ƒ ýÜ' ÝÔ € X %Õ X X X ÔÔ CEUS. , ÔÝ ÝÓ Ó„€Ú Ú1Ú Ú€„ ( M 3ýÜ$ § § Ý ƒ É ! ÝÔ € X %Õ X X X ÔÔ CEUS. , ÔÝ Ý ( ; 3»$ ´ ´ Ô2 -e ÔÚ Ú0Ú Ú.Ô3 Ôà0 à & Y 3 7 ; A G O W _ e ³ ³ 1 a . i . ( 1 ) ( a ) ( i ) 1 ) a ) ( @ ø Ð Z ‹ 6 T i m e s N e w R o m a n R e g u l a r ( È h H Z ‹ 6 T i m e s N e w R o m a n R e g u l a r ( M 3ýÜ$ © © Ý ƒ É ! ÝÔ € X %Õ X X X ÔÔ CEUS. , ÔÝ Ý H F J Ñý6 1 , 2 , 3 , A N u m b e r s à X àÚ ƒ z Ú1Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà ° à( È h H Z ‹ 6 T i m e s N e w R o m a n R e g u l a r ( È h H Z ‹ 6 T i m e s N e w R o m a n R e g u l a r d üÿ P P d 1 , 2 , 3 , L e v e l 1 L e v e l 2 L e v e l 3 L e v e l 4 L e v e l 5 B J Ž2 1 , 2 , 3 , N u m b e r s Ìà X àÚ ƒ z Ú2Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà ° à @ ( p > p a r . 1 0 . 5 p t X , p n i > p a r . 1 0 . 5 p t a l l f l u s h ` * p i > p a r . 1 0 . 5 p t . a l l i n d e n t 1 m b 4 / f n o t e f > e n f o f f r e n c h f o o t n o t e x 2 a p p e a l > p a r a g i n 1 0 p t s w i t h o u t p a g i n a t i o n d , r h c > r u n . h e a d f o r c . ( f r e n c h ) V . r h c 1 > r u n . h e a d w i t h 2 c . V , r h o

document

Show text Show cached source Open source URL

Ý ƒ % ÑýûC ^D ÝŒÐ "€ ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý I Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú2Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àLa€Cour€du€Banc€de€la€Reine€et€la€Cour€dð ðappel€du€Manitoba€ont€toutes€lesÐ 4%° $ Ðdeux€conclu€que€la€ò òLoi€sur€les€options€locales€en€mati re€de€jeu€(appareils€de€loterieÐ Ì&H & Ðvid o)ó ó,€L.M.€1999,€ch.44€(ð ð€ò òLoi€sur€les€ALVó ó€ð ð),€dans€lð ðensemble,€et€son€art.€16,€enÐ d(à ( Ðparticulier,€nð ðexc daient€pas€la€comp tence€de€la€l gislature€de€la€province€et€ne€violaientÐ ü)x!* Ðpas€non€plus€la€ò òCharte€canadienne€des€droits€et€libert só ó.€€Les€appelants€ont,€par€la€suite,Ð ”+ #, Ðcontest €la€Loi€devant€notre€Cour€en€faisant€valoir€que€lð ðart.€16,€qui€vise€express ment€laÐ ,-¨$. Ðville€de€Winkler,€viole€lð ðal.2ò òbó ó),€lð ðart.7€et€le€par.15(1)€de€la€ò òCharteó ó.€€Ils€ont€aussi€pr tenduÐ Ä.@&0 Ðque€cette€loi€exc de€la€comp tence€du€gouvernement€provincial€du€fait€quð ðelle€empi teÐ \0Ø'2 Ðsur€la€comp tence€exclusive€du€Parlement€en€mati re€de€droit€criminel.€€LeÐ „ Ð31octobre2002,€la€Cour€a€rejet €leur€pourvoi€dans€une€d cision€unanime,€dont€voici€lesÐ ˜ Ðmotifs.Ý ƒ % Ñý I 7I ÝŒÐ ´ 0 ÐŒÝ ÝÌÔ& ` ÔII.ò òLes€faitsÐ ä ` Ðó óÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý‹N Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú3Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àLa€Corporation€des€loteries€du€Manitoba€(ð ðCLMð ð)€est€lð ðorganismeÐ Ðresponsable€de€Ô' ` ä UN Ôlð ðexploitation€des€loteries€ð" ð€y€compris€les€ALV€ð" ð€dans€la€province.€€ElleÐ ¬ ( Ðconclut€avec€des€ð ð€exploitants€de€site€ð ð€des€accords€visant€lð ðinstallation€dð ðALV€dans€leursÐ D À Ð tablissements.€€Lð ðexploitant€du€site€touche€alors€un€pourcentage€des€recettes€g n r es€parÐ Ü X Ðles€ALV.€€Les€ALV€demeurent,€cependant,€la€propri t €de€la€CLM€qui,€aux€termes€deÐ t ð Ðlð ðaccord€dð ðexploitation€de€site,€peut€les€retirer€ €tout€moment€sans€avoir€ €justifier€sonÐ ˆ Ðgeste.Ý ƒ % Ñý‹N ¦N ÝŒÐ ¤ ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý R Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú4Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àLes€appelants,€David€et€EloisaSiemens,€sont€les€seuls€actionnaires€de€Sie-CorÐ Ô P ÐProperties€Inc.,€qui€a€acquis€le€Winkler€Inn€en€1993.€€Ils€ont€d pens €une€sommeÐ l è Ðconsid rable€pour€r nover€et€agrandir€cet€ tablissement,€et€ont€fait€valoir€que€la€pr senceÐ "€ Ðdes€ALV€avait€jou €un€rð= ðle€important€dans€leur€d cision€dð ðinvestir.

Compare text pages Compare HTM pages Open source URL Open target URL Define csc.lexum.org as primary domain

ÐResidence€in€Winkler€is€not€an€analogous€ground,€as€there€is€nothing€to€suggest€thatÐ Ô P Ðresidents€there€are€historically€disadvantaged€or€that€they€suffer€from€any€sort€ofÐ l è Ðprejudice.€€Moreover,€the€legislation€does€not€discriminate€against€the€appellants€in€anyÐ "€ Ðsubstantive€sense.€€Winkler€residents€were€singled€out€in€s.16€because€theirs€was€theÐ œ# " Ðonly€municipality€to€have€already€held€a€plebiscite.€€There€was€no€harm€to€dignity.€€TheÐ 4%° $ Ðpurpose€of€s.16€was€to€respect€the€will€of€the€Winkler€residents€as€expressed€in€thatÐ Ì&H & Ðplebiscite.€€The€section€does€not€affect€the€right€of€Winkler€residents€to€vote€in€a€VLTÐ d(à ( Ðplebiscite€under€the€Act€and€they€may€initiate€a€plebiscite€to€reinstate€VLTs€in€theirÐ ü)x!* Ðcommunity.Ð ”+ #, Ðâ âÐ ,-¨$. Ðò òÔ& È Ôâ âCases€Citedó óÐ „ ÐÌà œ àò òApplied:ó óò òR.€v.€Furtneyó ó,€[1991]€3€S.C.R.€89;ò òó óÔ' È „ ú$ Ô€ò òLaw€v.€Canada€(Minister€ofÐ ´ 0 ÐEmployment€and€Immigration)ó ó,€[1999]€1€S.C.R.€497;€ò òó óò òRussell€v.€The€Queenó ó€(1882),€7Ð L È ÐApp.€Cas.€829;ò ò€ó óò òAttorney-General€for€Ontario€v.€Canada€Temperance€Federationó ó,€[1946]Ð ä ` ÐA.C.€193;€ò òó óò òHaig€v.€Canadaó ó,€[1993]€2€S.C.R.€995;ò òó óò ò€distinguished:€€ó óò òJohnson€v.€AttorneyÐ | ø ÐGeneral€of€Albertaó ó,€[1954]€S.C.R.€127;ò ò€Re€The€Initiative€and€Referendum€Actó ó€(1916),€27Ð ÐMan.€R.€1;ò ò€referred€to:€€ó óò òR.€v.€Big€M€Drug€Mart€Ltd.ó ó,ò ò€ó ó[1985]€1€S.C.R.€295;€ò òEdmontonÐ ¬ ( ÐJournal€v.€Albertaó ó€ò ò(Attorney€General)ó ó,€[1989]€2€S.C.R.€1326ò òó ó;€ò òR.€v.€Wholesale€TravelÐ D À ÐGroup€Inc.ó ó,€[1991]€3€S.C.R.€154ò òó ó;€ò òThomson€Newspapers€Co.€v.€Canada€(AttorneyÐ Ü X ÐGeneral)ó ó,€[1998]€1€S.C.R.€877ò òó ó;€ò ò€Kitkatla€Band€v.€British€Columbia€(Minister€of€SmallÐ t ð ÐBusiness,€Tourism€and€Culture)ó ó,€[2002]€2€S.C.R.€146,€2002€SCC€31;ò òó ó€ò òOð ðGrady€v.Ð ˆ ÐSparlingó ó,€[1960]€S.C.R.€804;€ò òRoss€v.€Registrar€of€Motor€Vehiclesó ó,€[1975]€1€S.C.R.€5;ò òó óÐ ¤ Ðò òGlobal€Securities€Corp.€v.€British€Columbia€(Securities€Commission)ó ó,€[2000]€1€S.C.R.Ð

document

Show text Show cached source Open source URL

Compare text pages Compare HTM pages Open source URL Open target URL Define csc.lexum.org as primary domain

document

Show text Show cached source Open source URL

92€de€la€ò òLoi€constitutionnelle€de€1867ó ó. €€La€Loi€ne€repr sente€pas€une€tentative€deÐ "€ Ðl gif rer€en€mati re€criminelle€ tant€donn €quð ðelle€ne€comporte€aucune€cons quenceÐ œ# " Ðp nale€ni€aucun€objet€relevant€du€droit€criminel.

Compare text pages Compare HTM pages Open source URL Open target URL Define csc.lexum.org as primary domain

Ð(1882),€7€App.€Cas.€829,€at€p.€835:Ý ƒ % Ñýd ÝŒÐ Ô P ÐŒÝ ÝÌÓ Óà0 œ à.€.€.€the€Act€does€not€delegate€any€legislative€powers€whatever.€€It€containsÐ "€ Ðwithin€itself€the€whole€legislation€on€the€matters€with€which€it€deals.€€TheÐ Ð"L ! Ðprovision€that€certain€parts€of€the€Act€shall€come€into€operation€only€on€theÐ œ# " Ðpetition€of€a€majority€of€electors€does€not€confer€on€these€persons€power€toÐ h$ä # Ðlegislate.€€Parliament€itself€enacts€the€condition€and€everything€which€is€toÐ 4%° $ Ðfollow€upon€the€condition€being€fulfilled.€€Conditional€legislation€of€thisÐ &| % Ðkind€is€in€many€cases€convenient,€and€is€certainly€not€unusual,€and€the€powerÐ Ì&H & Ðso€to€legislate€cannot€be€denied€to€the€Parliament€of€Canada,€when€theÐ ˜' ' Ðsubject€of€legislation€is€within€its€competency.Ó ÓÐ d(à ( œ Ð œ Ð ÐÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % ÑýŒ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú39Ú ÚÛ € z ' Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThrough€the€ò òVLT€Actó ó,€the€Manitoba€Government€has€employed€a€statutoryÐ ”+ #, Ðinstrument€to€bind€itself€to€respect€local€opinion.€€Nowhere€does€the€Act,€in€purpose€orÐ ,-¨$. Ðeffect,€give€municipal€voters€the€power€to€legislate.€€This€case€is€distinguishable€from€ò òReÐ Ä.@&0 ÐThe€Initiative€and€Referendum€Actó ó€(1916),€27€Man.€R.€1€(C.A.),€upon€which€theÐ \0Ø'2 Ðinterveners€based€their€argument.€€There,€the€impugned€legislation€allowed€voters€toÐ „ Ðsubmit€laws€for€approval€by€ballot€and,€if€approved,€the€proposed€law€would€be€deemedÐ ˜ Ðan€Act€of€the€provincial€legislature.€€Here,€there€has€been€no€attempt€to€bypass€theÐ ´ 0 ÐLegislative€Assembly€or€to€usurp€its€law„making€function.€€The€Act€merely€allowsÐ L È Ðmunicipalities€to€decide€on€the€applicability€of€the€Act€to€their€communities.€€Ý ƒ % ÑýŒ § ÝŒÐ ä ` ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñýì Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú40Ú ÚÛ € z ( Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àFinally,€I€would€add€that€the€intervenersð ð€argument€would€severely€restrictÐ ÐParliament€and€the€provincial€legislatures€from€enacting€ð ðlocal€optionð ð€legislation,€whichÐ ¬ ( Ðwas€upheld€over€a€century€ago€by€the€Privy€Council€in€ò òRusselló ó,€ò òsupraó ó,€with€respect€to€theÐ D À Ðò òCanada€Temperance€Actó ó.€€That€decision€was€affirmed€by€the€Privy€Council€in€ò òAttorney„Ð Ü X ÐGeneral€for€Ontario€v.€Canada€Temperance€Federationó ó,€[1946]€A.C.€193,€and€there€isÐ t ð Ðno€need€to€question€its€continued€validity€as€authority€on€this€issue.€€€Ý ƒ % Ñýì ÝŒÐ ˆ ÐŒÝ ÝÌD.€€ò òThe€Claim€under€Section€2(b)€of€the€CharterÐ

document

Show text Show cached source Open source URL

Ðdoit€ tre€saisie€dð ðune€demande€de€suspension€aussitð= ðt€que€possible€apr s€le€d but€deÐ Ô)D"+ Ðlð ðinstance;€pour€cette€raison,€chaque€partie€connað3 ðt€tr s€peu€les€forces€et€les€faiblesses€deÐ l+Ü#- Ðla€preuve€de€lð ðautre.€€La€question€de€savoir€si,€par€exemple,€il€y€a€eu€d routementÐ -t%/ Ðd raisonnable€soul ve€des€questions€de€fait€complexes€qui€exigent€lð ðexamen€de€toutesÐ œ. '1 Ðles€circonstances€ €lð ðorigine€du€d routement€all gu .Ý ƒ % Ñý™> ´> ÝŒÐ 40¤(3 ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý¸A Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú36Ú ÚÛ € z $ Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àVu€mes€conclusions,€je€ne€crois€pas€n cessaire€dð ðexaminer€la€question€du€lienÐ ( ˜ Ðentre€le€d routement€et€Ô_ Ôlð ðinex cutionÔ_ Ô€fondamentale.€€Il€suffit€de€dire€en€lð ðesp ce€que€lð ðuneÐ À 0 Ðou€lð ðautre€des€all gations€concerne€un€diff rend€qui€d coule€du€connaissement€ou€qui€sð ðyÐ X È Ðrapporte.€€Point€nð ðest€besoin€de€d cider€si€le€principe€de€la€divisibilit €sð ðapplique.Ý ƒ % Ñý¸A ÓA ÝŒÐ ð ` ÐŒÝ ÝÓ Ü , ‚X ž ø Ü 8 ô Ü , ‚X œ ø Ü 8 ¼ ÓÌD.à0 ž àò òLð ðarticle€46€de€la€Loi€sur€la€responsabilit €en€mati re€maritimeó óÐ ž Ð ž Ð ÐÓ @ Ü , ‚X œ ø Ü 8 ¼ Ü , ‚X ž ø Ü 8 ¼ OD @ ÓÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % ÑýCE Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú37Ú ÚÛ € z % Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àEntr €en€vigueur€le€8aoðE ðt2001,€le€par.46(1)€de€la€ò òLoi€sur€la€responsabilit Ð P À Ðen€mati re€maritimeó ó€prive€la€Cour€f d rale,€en€pr sence€de€lð ðune€ou€lð ðautre€des€conditionsÐ è X Ð nonc es€aux€al.46(1)ò òaó ó),€ò òbó ó)€ou€ò òcó ó),€du€pouvoir€discr tionnaire€que€lui€conf re€lð ðart.50€deÐ € ð Ðla€ò òLoi€sur€la€Cour€f d raleó ó€de€suspendre€les€proc dures€pour€donner€effet€ €une€clauseÐ ˆ Ðdð ð lection€de€for.€€Le€fait€que€le€port€de€chargement€ou€de€d chargement€effectif€est€situ Ð ° Ðau€Canada€fait€partie€des€conditions€ nonc es.€Dans€la€pr sente€affaire,€nul€neÐ H ¸ Ðcontesterait€que€la€Cour€f d rale€a€comp tence€pour€connað3 ðtre€de€la€demande€desÐ à P Ðintim es€si€ce€nð ð tait€que€lð ðart.46€ne€sð ðapplique€pas€aux€proc dures€engag es€avant€sonÐ x è Ðentr e€en€vigueur:€ò òIncremona-Salerno€Marmi€Affini€Siciliani€(I.S.M.A.S.)€s.n.c.€c.ó ó€ò òCastorÐ !€ Ð(Le)ó ó,€[2002]€A.C.F.€nò òoó ó€1699€(QL),€2002€CAF€479,€par.13-24.€€Lð ðarticle46€de€la€ò òLoi€surÐ ¨" " Ðla€responsabilit €en€mati re€maritimeó ó€nð ðest€donc€pas€pertinent€en€lð ðesp ce.Ý ƒ % ÑýCE ^E ÝŒÐ @$° $ ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % ÑýàJ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú38Ú ÚÛ € z & Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àEn€fait,€il€semblerait,€ €la€lecture€du€par.

Compare text pages Compare HTM pages Open source URL Open target URL Define csc.lexum.org as primary domain

ÐFederal€Court,€but€also€of€provincial€courts,€and€those€of€other€jurisdictions.€€See€forÐ Ô)D"+ Ðinstance:€ò òThe€ð ðSeapearlð ð€v.ó ó€ò òSeven€Seas€Dry€Cargo€Shipping€Corp.ó ó,€[1983]€2€F.C.€161Ð l+Ü#- Ð(C.A.),€ò òperó ó€Pratte€J.A.,€at€pp.€176„77,€and€ò òper€ó óLalande€D.J.,€at€p.€180;€ò òAnraj€FishÐ -t%/ ÐProducts€Industries€Ltd.€v.€Hyundai€Merchant€Marine€Co.ó ó€(2000),€262€N.R.€270Ð œ. '1 Ð(F.C.A.),€at€para.€5;€ò òSarabia€v.€ð ðOceanic€Mindoroð ð€(The)€ó ó(1996),€26€B.C.L.R.€(3d)€143Ð 40¤(3 Ð(C.A.),€at€paras.€37„38,€leave€to€appeal€refused,€[1997]€2€S.C.R.€xiv;€ò òMaritime€TelegraphÐ Ðand€Telephone€Co.€v.ó ó€ò òPre€Print€Inc.ó ó€(1996),€131€D.L.R.€(4th)€471€(N.S.C.A.),€at€p.€483;Ð ( ˜ Ðò òMorrison€v.ó ó€ò òSociety€of€Lloydð ðsó ó€(2000),€224€N.B.R.€(2d)€1€(C.A.),€at€para.€14,€leaves€toÐ À 0 Ðappeal€refused,€[2000]€2€S.C.R.€viii€and€xi;€ò òTrendtex€Trading€Corp.€v.ó ó€ò òCredit€Suisseó ó,Ð X È Ð[1982]€A.C.€679€(H.L.);€ò òThe€Bremen€v.ó ó€ò òZapata€Off„Shore€Co.ó ó,€407€U.S.€1€(1972),€at€p.Ð ð ` Ð15;€ò òAdvanced€Cardiovascular€Systems€Inc.€v.ó ó€ò òUniversal€Specialties€Ltd.ó ó,€[1997]€1Ð ˆ ø ÐN.Z.L.R.€186€(C.A.),€at€p.190.Ð ÐÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % ÑýØÕ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú25Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThere€are€also€compelling€public€policy€reasons€in€favour€of€upholding€theÐ P À Ðð ðstrong€causeð ð€test.€€If€the€tripartite€test€were€employed€to€deal€with€situations€like€theÐ è X Ðcase€at€bar,€most€forum€selection€clauses€would€be€rendered€unenforceable,€creatingÐ € ð Ðcommercial€uncertainty€by€unduly€minimizing€the€importance€of€contractualÐ ˆ Ðundertakings.€€Instead€of€requiring€a€plaintiff€to€demonstrate€a€ð ðstrong€causeð ð€to€notÐ ° Ðenforce€a€forum€selection€clause,€the€burden€would€be€on€the€applicant€to€establish€theÐ H ¸ Ðelements€of€the€tripartite€test.€€The€ð ðstrong€causeð ð€test€rightly€places€the€onus€on€theÐ à P Ðplaintiff€who€commences€suit€contrary€to€the€terms€of€a€forum€selection€clause.Ý ƒ % ÑýØÕ óÕ ÝŒÐ x è ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % ÑýÜÙ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú26Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àApplying€the€tripartite€test€to€a€situation€of€this€nature€is€also€problematicÐ ¨" " Ðbecause€the€first€part€of€the€test€requires€the€court€to€evaluate€the€likelihood€of€successÐ @$° $ Ðon€the€merits€of€the€case.€€This€part€of€the€test€is€designed€to€allow€a€motions€judge€theÐ Ø%H & Ðopportunity€to€deal€with€legal€issues€in€preliminary€proceedings€without€prejudice€to€theÐ p'à ( Ðfinal€adjudication€of€their€merits.€€In€the€case€of€motions€to€stay€proceedings€based€on€a

document

Show text Show cached source Open source URL

8:Ð h/Ø'2 Ð‡Ó Óà0 œ àLð ðinjonction€provisoire€obtenue€dans€le€cadre€dð ðune€demande€interlocutoire,Ð Ðlaquelle€exige€que€lð ðon€sð ðinterroge€sur€la€solidit €des€arguments€invoqu s,Ð \ Ì Ðsur€le€pr judice€subi€et€sur€la€pr pond rance€des€inconv nients,€estÐ ( ˜ Ðcomparable€au€rejet€dð ðune€requ te€en€suspension€en€raison€de€la€solidit €desÐ ô d Ðarguments€invoqu s€par€les€demandeurs€pour€faire€valoir€que€la€clause€deÐ À 0 Ðcomp tence€ne€sð ðapplique€pas€en€lð ðoccurrence.Ó { ÓÐ Œ ü œ Ð œ Ð ÐÌLa€Cour€dð ðappel€a€conclu€que,€vu€lð ð volution€de€la€jurisprudence€britannique€etÐ ¼ , Ðcanadienne,€le€crit re€quð ðil€convient€dð ðappliquer€en€mati re€de€suspension€est€lð ðanalyseÐ T Ä Ðen€trois€ tapes€utilis e€pour€statuer€sur€les€demandes€dð ðinjonctions€interlocutoires.Ð ì \ ÐÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý6¤ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú16Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àLa€Cour€dð ðappel€a€rejet €lð ðappel€avec€d pens.Ý ƒ % Ñý6¤ Q¤ ÝŒÐ Œ ÐŒÝ ÝÌÓ Ü , ‚X ž ø Ü 8 ô Ü , ‚X œ ø Ü 8 ¼ ÓIV.à0 ž àò òLes€questions€en€litigeó óò òÐ L ¼ ž Ð ž Ð Ðó óÓ @ Ü , ‚X œ ø Ü 8 ¼ Ü , ‚X ž ø Ü 8 ¼ 3¥ @ ÓÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÓ Ü , ‚X ž ø Ü 8 ô Ü , ‚X œ ø Ü 8 ¼ ÓÝ ‚ % Ñý ¦ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú17Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ý1.à0 ž àQuel€crit re€sð ðapplique€ €la€demande€de€suspension€des€proc dures€visant€ €donnerÐ | ì Ðeffet€ €la€clause€dð ð lection€de€for€dð ðun€connaissement?Ý ƒ % Ñý ¦ X¦ ÝŒÐ „ ž Ð ž Ð ÐŒÝ ÝÌ2.€à0 ž àCe€crit re€englobe-t-il€la€question€de€savoir€sð ðil€y€a€eu€ou€non€inex cutionÐ D ´ Ðfondamentale€ou€Ô ‡ X %± X X X %± ÔÔ USCF. , ÔÔ_ Ôd rogationÔ_ ÔÔ # † X %± X X X %± # ÔÔ CF. , US. , [¨ Ô,€ou€cette€d cision€appartient„elle€ €lð ðinstanceÐ Ü!L ! ÐÔ_ Ôd cisionnelleÔ_ ÔÔ_ ÔÔ_ Ô€du€ressort€dont€ont€convenu€les€parties?Ð t#ä # ž Ð ž Ð ÐÓ @ Ü , ‚X œ ø Ü 8 ¼ Ü , ‚X ž ø Ü 8 ¼ ¦ @ ÓÌÓ Ü , ‚X ž ø Ü 8 ô Ü , ‚X œ ø Ü 8 ¼ ÓV.à0 ž àò òAnalyseó óÐ ¤& ' ž Ð ž Ð ÐÓ @ Ü , ‚X œ ø Ü 8 ¼ Ü , ‚X ž ø Ü 8 ¼ ò© @ ÓÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý©ª Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú18Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àLe€juge€des€requ tes€ne€doit€modifier€lð ðordonnance€discr tionnaire€dð ðunÐ Ô)D"+ Ðprotonotaire€que€dans€les€cas€suivants:€a)€lð ðordonnance€est€entach e€dð ðune€erreurÐ l+Ü#- Ðflagrante,€en€ce€sens€que€le€protonotaire€a€exerc €son€pouvoir€discr tionnaire€sur€leÐ -t%/ Ðfonde

Compare text pages Compare HTM pages Open source URL Open target URL Define csc.lexum.org as primary domain

ÐÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % ÑýÎr Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú10Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThe€court€concluded€that€the€prothonotary€was€obliged€to€take€into€accountÐ l+Ü#- Ðall€the€circumstances€of€the€case€in€determining€whether€the€respondent€had€demonstratedÐ -t%/ Ða€ð ðstrong€causeð ð€in€favour€of€denying€a€stay,€pursuant€to€the€test€set€out€in€ò òTheÐ œ. '1 Ðð ðEleftheriað ðó ó,€an€inquiry€that€did€not€preclude€him€from€concluding€that€the€bill€of€ladingÐ 40¤(3 Ðended€in€Montr al€and€that€its€forum€selection€clause€did€not€apply€thereafter.€€The€courtÐ Ðadded€that€in€any€event€the€appellant€would€have€the€opportunity€to€raise€its€argumentsÐ ( ˜ Ðregarding€the€existence€of€the€bill€of€lading€and€its€forum€selection€clause€before€a€trialÐ À 0 Ðjudge.Ý ƒ % ÑýÎr ér ÝŒÐ X È ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñýœv Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú11Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThe€court€dismissed€with€costs€the€motion€to€set€aside€the€order€of€theÐ ˆ ø Ðprothonotary.Ý ƒ % Ñýœv ·v ÝŒÐ ÐŒÝ ÝÌÓ Ü , ‚X ž ø Ü 8 ô Ü , ‚X œ ø Ü 8 ¼ ÓC.à0 ž àò òFederal€Court€of€Appealó ó€(2001),€268€N.R.€364Ð P À ž Õ ž Õ ÐÓ @ Ü , ‚X œ ø Ü 8 ¼ Ü , ‚X ž ø Ü 8 ¼ Ïw @ ÓÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý«x Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú12Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà „ àà0 Ü àà œ àThe€Court€of€Appeal€held€that€the€test€for€reviewing€decisions€of€aÐ € ð Ðprothonotary€is€whether€the€prothonotaryð ðs€exercise€of€discretion€was€clearly€wrong€andÐ ˆ Ðthat€the€test€for€reviewing€the€exercise€of€discretion€of€a€motions€judge€is€whetherÐ ° Ðsufficient€weight€was€given€to€all€relevant€considerations.Ý ƒ % Ñý«x Æx ÝŒÐ H ¸ Ü Õ Ü Õ ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý { Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú13Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThe€Court€of€Appeal€concluded€thatò ò€The€ð ðEleftheriað ðó ó€did€not€govern€theÐ x è Ðcase,€stating,€at€para.€27:Ý ƒ % Ñý { { ÝŒÐ !€ ÐŒÝ ÝÓ ÓÌÌà0 œ àà ø àThe€burden€of€the€appellantð ðs€submission€is€that€when,€as€here,€aÐ @$° $ Ðcontract€contains€a€jurisdiction€clause€requiring€that€all€disputes,€whereverÐ %| % Ðthey€arise,€are€to€be€dealt€with€by€the€Courts€of€a€particular€jurisdiction,Ð Ø%H & ÐAnglo„American€and€Anglo„Canadian€jurisprudence€both€conclude€that€theÐ ¤& ' Ðdispute€must€be€dealt€with€by€the€Courts€of€the€jurisdiction€the€parties€haveÐ p'à ( Ðagreed€to.€€The€appellant€says€that€since€ò òThe€Eleftheriaó ó€no€case€in€Anglo„Ð

document

Show text Show cached source Open source URL

Compare text pages Compare HTM pages Open source URL Open target URL Define csc.lexum.org as primary domain

document

Show text Show cached source Open source URL

Ðdroit€en€mati re€dð ðadmissibilit €de€la€preuve€obtenue€par€ coute€ lectronique€ taitÐ Ô)D"+ Ðdevenu,€selon€les€termes€du€jugeSopinka,€un€ð ðfouillis€proc duralð ð€(ò òGarofolió ó,Ð l+Ü#- Ðp.1445).€€Les€diverses€proc dures,€dont€chacune€concernait€une€contestationÐ -t%/ Ðâ âproc durale€distincte€et€reposait€sur€des€assises€juridictionnelles€diff rentes,€portaientÐ œ. '1 Ðg n ralement€le€nom€des€affaires€dans€lesquelles€elles€avaient€ t €engag es.€€IlÐ Ðsð ðagissait€des€proc dures€suivantes:Ý ƒ 0 Ñý4o Oo ÝŒÐ ( ˜ Ðâ âŒÝ ÝÌ(1)à0 œ àun€voir-dire€de€type€ò òParsonsó ó€devant€le€juge€du€proc s€pour€d terminer€si,Ð X È Ð €la€lecture€de€son€texte,€lð ðautorisation€est€valide,€si€lð ðinterception€a€ t Ð ð ` Ðeffectu e€conform ment€aux€modalit s€pr vues€et€si€les€conditionsÐ ˆ ø Ðprescrites€par€la€loi€ont€ t €respect es,€la€r paration€en€cas€de€manquementÐ Ð tant€lð ðexclusion€en€vertu€de€lð ðancien€art.178.16€du€ò òCode€crimineló ó€(ò òR.€c.Ð ¸ ( ÐParsonsó ó€(1977),€37C.C.C.€(2d)497€(C.A.€Ont.),€conf.€par€[1980]Ð P À Ð1R.C.S.785€(ò òsub€nom.ó ó€ò òCharette€c.€La€Reineó ó));Ð è X œ Ð œ Ð ÐÌ(2)à0 œ àune€demande€de€typeò òWilsonó ó€devant€le€tribunal€ayant€accord €lð ðautorisationÐ ˆ Ðpour€d terminer€si€lð ðaffidavit€est€valide€quant€au€fond,€la€r paration€ tantÐ ° Ðlð ðannulation€de€lð ðautorisation€(ò òWilson€c.€La€Reineó ó,€[1983]€2R.C.S.594);Ð H ¸ œ Ð œ Ð ÐÌ(3)à0 œ àune€audience€de€type€ò òGarofolió ó€devant€le€juge€du€proc s€pour€d terminer€siÐ x è Ðlð ðautorisation€est€conforme€ €lð ðart.8€de€la€ò òCharte€canadienne€des€droits€etÐ !€ Ðlibert só ó,€la€r paration€ tant€une€d cision€concernant€lð ðopportunit €dð ðexclureÐ ¨" " Ðla€preuve€en€vertu€du€par.

Compare text pages Compare HTM pages Open source URL Open target URL Define csc.lexum.org as primary domain

Ðwide€or€too€vague.€€The€authorizing€judge€should€grant€the€authorizationÐ )x!* Ðonly€as€far€as€need€is€demonstrated€by€the€material€submitted€by€theÐ Ô)D"+ Ðapplicant.€€[para.€29]Ó Ð ÓÐ * #, « Ð « Ð ÐÌÓ 9 Ü , ƒX ø Ü 8 ô Ü , ‚X « ø Ü 8 ¼ 9 ÓÓ Ó3.1.3à0 4 àò òIs€the€ò òGarofoli€ó óLeave€Requirement€Consistent€With€Subsequent€€ò òCharterÐ Ð-@&0 Ðó óJurisprudence?ó óÓ ¢Ó ÓÐ œ. '1 4 Ð 4 Ð ÐÓ 9 Ü , ‚X « ø Ü 8 ô Ü , ƒX ø Ü 8 ¼ 9 ÓÐ 40¤(3 ÐÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 ÑýÂÔ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú23Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àThird,€the€appellants€submit€that€three€importantò òó ó€principles,€repeatedlyÐ Ðenforced€by€this€Court€in€its€ò òCharter€ó ójurisprudence,€favour€the€abolishment,€orÐ ( ˜ Ðalternatively,€the€relaxation€of€the€ò òGarofoli€ó óleave€requirement.€€These€principles€are:Ð À 0 Ðthe€ò òó órecognized€importance€of€a€broad€right€to€cross„examination;€the€lower€standardÐ X È Ðgenerally€applicable€to€the€admissibility€of€defence€evidence;€and€the€need€to€ensureÐ ð ` Ðaccess€to€the€remedial€scheme€in€the€ò òCharteró ó.€Ý ƒ 0 ÑýÂÔ ÝÔ ÝŒÐ ˆ ø ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 Ñý×× Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú24Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àThere€is€no€debate€that€these€important€principles€are€relevant€both€in€theÐ ¸ ( Ðformulation€of€an€appropriate€standard€for€allowing€cross„examination€and€in€itsÐ P À Ðapplication.€€However,€the€accusedð ðs€right€to€an€evidentiary€hearing€must€be€consideredÐ è X Ðin€context.€€It€must€also€be€balanced€against€countervailing€interests,€including€the€needÐ € ð Ðto€ensure€that€the€criminal€trial€process€is€not€plagued€by€lengthy€proceedings€that€doÐ ˆ Ðnot€assist€in€the€determination€of€the€relevant€issues.€€As€I€will€explain,€the€appellantsð ðÐ ° Ðargument€ignores€important€contextual€factors.€€When€the€proposed€cross„examinationÐ H ¸ Ðof€an€affiant€is€considered€in€the€context€of€the€review€hearing€and€its€narrow€scope,Ð à P Ðit€is€my€view€that€the€ò òGarofoli€ó óleave€requirement€strikes€an€appropriate€balanceÐ x è Ðbetween€these€competing€interests.Ý ƒ 0 Ñý×× ò× ÝŒÐ !€ ÐŒÝ ÝÌÓ Ü , ƒX « ø Ü 8 ô Ü , ‚X « ø Ü 8 ¼ Ó3.2à0 4 àò òRelevant€Contextual€Factorsó óÐ @$° $ 4 Ð 4 Ð ÐÓ Ü , ‚X « ø Ü 8 ô Ü , ƒX « ø Ü 8 ¼ ÓÌÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÔ # † X ú¸ X X X ú¸jÌ # ÔÔ ‡ X ú¸ X X X ú¸ ÔÝ ‚ 0 ÑýKÝ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú25Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àThe€first€contextual€factor€that€is€ignored€by€the€appellantsð ð€argument€hasÐ p'à ( Ðalready€been€mentionedÔ # † X ú¸ X X X ú¸‰Ý # ÔÔ ‡ X ú¸ X X X ú¸ Ô€ð" ð€the€right€to€full€disclosure.€€Under€s.€187(1.4)€of€theÐ )x!* Ðò òCriminal€Codeó ó,€the€defence€has€a

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

mati – -Translation – Keybot Dictionary