|
|
Mais si demain matin, insatisfaits de cette législation, les juges vont en Cour fédérale et, subséquemment, en Cour suprême, dans un dossier comme celui-ci, j'ai beaucoup de difficulté à concevoir comment on pourrait considérer que le gouvernement est inconstitutionnel, en ce sens que sa réponse n'est pas conforme à la rationalité simple qui a été exigée par la Cour suprême.
|
|
|
Finally, as a democrat, I am inclined to say that this decision is one for parliamentarians to make. If they believe that the rationale provided is not adequate, they should do what the Canadian Bar Association has done. The next time, give us more information, or more to go on with respect to your rationale. If the judges ended up being dissatisfied with this legislation and decided to go to the Federal Court, and then on to the Supreme Court, on an issue like this, I have a hard time believing that the actions of this government would be deemed to be unconstitutional, in the sense that its answer was not consistent with the rationality test demanded by the Supreme Court. That, at least, is how I see it.
|