ovule – -Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot 50 Results  parl.gc.ca  Page 3
  Comités de la Chambre d...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
J'ai parlé à l'interprète, qui employait la méthode de Stanislavski. Je lui ai demandé si ça aurait fait une différence, s'il s'était agi de l'ovule d'une autre femme, avec le sperme. Elle y a réfléchi quelque temps et ensuite elle a dit que non, c'est l'expérience des neuf mois qui comptait.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine parl.gc.ca as primary domain
There's also the situation that my colleague Dr. Jeff Nisker, who teaches medical ethics at the University of Western Ontario, put into a play last year, A Child on Her Mind. In it the story is a true one. There's a Kosovo refugee. Her employer wants a traditional surrogacy—it isn't true that it isn't done in Canada, because this one was. The woman was told, if you don't do this for us, we'll see that you get sent back. She came from a war-torn country, her boyfriend had died, she was in an impossible situation. She felt that the insertion of the syringe—the play shows you this—was a violation of her body and her person. As the pregnancy went on—she was a method actor, and I actually talked with her—she found that she identified with this baby. I asked her whether, if it was just another woman's egg and her sperm, it would make any difference to her. She spent quite a while thinking about it. She said, no, because it's the nine months experience.
  Comités de la Chambre d...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Ce qu'il faut, c'est définir un acte clair, c'est-à-dire... On dit à la première ligne «manipuler un ovule, un zygote ou un embryon». Il faut ensuite définir la mens rea, dans ce cas-ci «en vue d'obtenir un zygote ou un embryon», etc.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine parl.gc.ca as primary domain
The third thing is with respect to proposed section 286.1. The question Dr. Carter is really raising is whether this is too vague to be either valid criminal legislation or able to be implemented. I would suggest to you that under normal rules of criminal statutory interpretation it certainly is not too vague. What you require is that a clear act is raised, which is.... The first line says “manipulate an ovum, zygote or embryo”; you require a defined mens rea, which is here: “for the purpose of producing a zygote or embryo”, etc. So it wouldn't cover your cell lines that have identical cells providing you didn't create those through manipulating an ovum, zygote, or embryo for this purpose. So it's very clear. I don't think there's a problem with vagueness in that.
  Comités de la Chambre d...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
La maternité comprend à la fois une composante génétique, soit la femme qui a fourni l'ovule, et une composante gestationnelle, la femme qui est enceinte. Depuis le début de l'histoire de l'humanité jusqu'à il y a 20 ans, ces deux mères étaient évidemment la même personne.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine parl.gc.ca as primary domain
Motherhood has those genetic components—the person who provided the ovum—and also a gestational component—the woman who's pregnant. For all of human history until 20 years ago, these two mothers were always, undoubtedly, the same person. That's not true any more. Who's the real mother? If you take Mary's ovum and put it in Susan's body, whose name goes on the birth certificate? Right now, it depends. If Mary is an egg donor and Susan is an infertility patient, then Susan gets to be the mother. If Mary is the infertility patient, and Susan is hired as a contract surrogate mother, then Mary gets to be the mother.
  Comités de la Chambre d...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Par contre, à l'heure actuelle, la technique ne permet pas d'utiliser ce tissu pour induire une grossesse, de sorte que pour l'instant, il n'est pas possible d'induire une grossesse chez mon épouse à partir de son propre ovule.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine parl.gc.ca as primary domain
Mr. Alex Hunter: During my wife's second surgery, when she had her second ovary removed, a small amount of healthy tissue was saved. It has been frozen; however, no technique exists yet to use that ovum to get pregnant, so until there is a technique I don't think we can use our own ovum. It's possible that others can, but not us. We would like it if one day that happens, so we can have genetically “our own child”, but until that happens, the only option we have is donation from someone else.
  Comités de la Chambre d...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
La maternité comprend à la fois une composante génétique, soit la femme qui a fourni l'ovule, et une composante gestationnelle, la femme qui est enceinte. Depuis le début de l'histoire de l'humanité jusqu'à il y a 20 ans, ces deux mères étaient évidemment la même personne.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine parl.gc.ca as primary domain
Motherhood has those genetic components—the person who provided the ovum—and also a gestational component—the woman who's pregnant. For all of human history until 20 years ago, these two mothers were always, undoubtedly, the same person. That's not true any more. Who's the real mother? If you take Mary's ovum and put it in Susan's body, whose name goes on the birth certificate? Right now, it depends. If Mary is an egg donor and Susan is an infertility patient, then Susan gets to be the mother. If Mary is the infertility patient, and Susan is hired as a contract surrogate mother, then Mary gets to be the mother.
  Comités de la Chambre d...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Dernièrement, j'ai demandé à notre garçon de sept ans s'il pourrait me raconter son histoire. Il a déclaré: «Le sperme de mon père ne pouvait pas faire de bébé avec l'ovule de ma mère, alors nous avons utilisé le sperme d'un autre homme qui voulait nous aider».
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine parl.gc.ca as primary domain
Recently I asked our seven-year-old if he could tell me his story. He said, “My Dad's sperm couldn't make a baby with my mom's egg, so we used the sperm from another man who wanted to help us.” I asked him what he called the other man, and he replied, “A friend.” I said, “A friend? Why would you call him that?” He replied, “Because he helped us, and that's what friends do.” I told him that because we didn't know him and never would, we couldn't really call him a friend, and that was why we called him a donor. Then I asked him if it was okay to call him that. He said, “I know that we don't know him, but if someone was in a building, that building was burning, and someone from another floor came down and helped him, he would still be a friend, even if he didn't know him and even if he never saw him again, because he helped him. That's what friends do, they help people.”
  Comités de la Chambre d...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Ce qu'il faut, c'est définir un acte clair, c'est-à-dire... On dit à la première ligne «manipuler un ovule, un zygote ou un embryon». Il faut ensuite définir la mens rea, dans ce cas-ci «en vue d'obtenir un zygote ou un embryon», etc.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine parl.gc.ca as primary domain
The third thing is with respect to proposed section 286.1. The question Dr. Carter is really raising is whether this is too vague to be either valid criminal legislation or able to be implemented. I would suggest to you that under normal rules of criminal statutory interpretation it certainly is not too vague. What you require is that a clear act is raised, which is.... The first line says “manipulate an ovum, zygote or embryo”; you require a defined mens rea, which is here: “for the purpose of producing a zygote or embryo”, etc. So it wouldn't cover your cell lines that have identical cells providing you didn't create those through manipulating an ovum, zygote, or embryo for this purpose. So it's very clear. I don't think there's a problem with vagueness in that.
  Comités de la Chambre d...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Je veux regarder avec vous la constitution d'un registre, pour que ce soit très clair. Supposons que je me présente à une clinique de fertilité et que je fais don d'un gamète, soit ovule, soit spermatozoïde.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine parl.gc.ca as primary domain
I'd like to look at how to make up a register, just for it to be very clear. Say I show up at a fertility clinic and I donate a gamete, either an egg or sperm. I'll have to sign a form that will contain information of a medical nature which eventually must be given to the future child. This information will be updated in a register but it will be confidential. We agree on that. In other words, it will be divulged to no one other than the child.
  Comités de la Chambre d...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Je pense que les chercheurs devront être très prudents et très conscients que s'ils appliquent une procédure visant à produire un bébé, mais en utilisant une nouvelle technologie faisant peut-être appel à la congélation ou à la maturation de l'ovule in vitro, il y a toujours la possibilité que, premièrement, leur comité de déontologie de l'hôpital leur dise «Vous enfreignez la loi», ou bien qu'ils s'exposent à des poursuites au criminel pour avoir appliqué une procédure qui, bien qu'elle vise à produire un bébé, mettait en cause de la recherche au sens strict.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine parl.gc.ca as primary domain
Now, what is the boundary between doing embryo research and creating research embryos and doing a clinical trial to produce a baby? I think researchers are going to be very cautious and very aware that if they're carrying out a procedure, one aimed at producing a baby but using a new technology—perhaps involving freezing or egg maturation or ripening in vitro—there is the possibility that, first of all, their hospital ethics committee will say, “You're contravening the act”, or there will be criminal repercussions from carrying out a procedure that, although intended to produce a baby, actually was involving research in a strict sense. Because when you do something new, you are collecting eggs, and need to observe fertilization, to to check that the embryo has undergone appropriate divisions, reached the right stage, before transferring it to the woman. You wouldn't do it otherwise. So that, in my mind, constitutes research. I think the committee has to be aware of this very grey area that we're working within.
  Comités de la Chambre d...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Par exemple, on sait qu'il existe de graves troubles humains causés par des anomalies des gènes qui sont dans les mitochondries, qui ne sont pas dans le génome nucléaire. Il est possible qu'un ovule fertilisé, un zygote, ne puisse en fait s'implanter et se développer parce qu'il y a des anomalies dans les mitochondries et le cytoplasme.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine parl.gc.ca as primary domain
Dr. Patricia Baird: This illustrates how complex this area is and how very dangerous it is to do legal wording for things. For example, there are now known to be some serious human disorders due to defects in the genes that are in the mitochondria, which are not in the nuclear genome. It's possible that a fertilized ovum, a zygote, may not in fact implant and grow because there are defects in the mitochondria and the cytoplasm. There is some theoretical and research evidence that if that cytoplasm were supplemented with additional cytoplasm from a normal cell, it would enable that zygote to grow. So I see no need to tamper with nuclear genes, but there may be a place for supplementation of mitochondrial genes in some instances.
Arrow 1 2 3 4 5 Arrow