pas compatible avec – Übersetzung – Keybot-Wörterbuch

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Français English Spacer Help
Ausgangssprachen Zielsprachen
Keybot 8 Ergebnisse  agritrade.cta.int
  Publications / Accueil ...  
D’après des rapports d’ECDPM, la Commission soutient qu’une « libéralisation des échanges inférieure à 80% n’est pas compatible avec les règles de... 28/11/2008
A recent article by the Chinese government news agency Xinhua, also published on DRC’s La Conscience website, explores the difficulties faced by ce... 02/03/2010
  Conclusions du Conseil ...  
L’ICTSD a suggéré que si le déploiement temporaire des préférences commerciales au titre de Cotonou n’était pas compatible avec les dispositions prises par l’OMC et qu’il pourrait donner lieu à un différend, les pays en développement pourraient s’abstenir de contester l’arrangement concerné s’ils étaient raisonnablement certains qu’un accord à long terme en matière d’APE pouvait être conclu dans un délai de 12 ou 18 mois.
Since it is acknowledged that the negotiations have fallen behind the agreed schedule, a common enough occurrence in international trade negotiations, the question arises: why should not more flexibility be shown in the end-of-year deadline? The ICTSD suggested that while a temporary rolling-over of Cotonou trade preferences would be WTO-incompatible and possibly subject to challenge, it believed that developing countries might not challenge this arrangement if they ‘were reasonably sure that a long-term EPA deal would be reached within a year or 18 months.
  Un rapport d’ActionAid ...  
Dans un nouveau rapport sur les négociations des APE, ActionAid cite l’avis juridique selon lequel la position intransigeante du commissaire Mandelson n’est pas compatible avec les dispositions de l’accord de Cotonou concernant les obligations envers les pays africains, caribéens et du Pacifique, et notamment la possibilité de trouver des solutions de remplacement aux APE.
In its new report on EPA negations ActionAid cites legal opinion that Commissioner Mandelson’s ‘uncompromising position on EPAs breaches treaty obligations to African, Caribbean and Pacific nations’, which may oblige the EU to consider alternatives to EPAs. The report claims that its findings will increase pressure on Commissioner Mandelson to give ACP countries more than one option in the EPA negotiations, and highlights criticisms of the EPA process from the UK House of Commons International Development Committee, Prime Minister Blair’s Africa Commission, UN secretary-general Kofi Annan, and a range of African leaders. It gives voice to the concern that ‘Mr Mandelson will bully poor African countries into accepting EPAs through fear they will otherwise lose aid and access to European markets’.
  à‰mergence d’une straté...  
Cependant, on sait que la CE s’oppose à ces mouvements, tout en veillant à s’assurer du bon fonctionnement du marché unique qui ‘n’est pas compatible avec l’introduction d’une plus grande flexibilité dans les règles communes ou les aides nationales.’
Press reports note that even if the overall CAP budget is not cut, ‘it is inevitable that the main recipients now will see their funding decrease as the EU puts an end to inequalities that see famers in Latvia and Estonia receive about a third of what their counterparts in France and Germany get.’ This, it is argued, may lead to pressure to relax rules on national aid payments to agriculture from those EU governments whose farmers are currently the major recipients of direct aid payments. The EC, however, is understood to oppose such moves, taking the view that ensuring the proper functioning of the single market ‘is not compatible with introducing greater flexibility into common rules or national aids.’
  Le combat d'éléphants c...  
Le Commissaire européen à l'Agriculture, M. Fischler, a fustigé le nouveau projet de loi américain sur l'agriculture : "cela ne me semble pas compatible avec ce que les États-Unis disent dans les négociations sur l'agriculture à Genève", a t-il regretté.
In the run up to the Doha WTO Ministerial meeting, the EU-US public discussion on farm support intensified. EU Agriculture Commissioner criticized the new US Farm Bill maintaining "it doesn't seem to fit with what the US has been saying in the agricultural negotiations in Geneva". Commissioner Fischler contrasted this with the EU's WTO position which he maintained was "consistent with EU farm policy". Fischler highlighted the explosion in US agricultural expenditures. In 1997 expenditures had been predicted to fall to just US $ 1.2 billion by 2000 but instead had risen from US $ 4.6 billion in 1996 to US $ 32.3 billion in the 2001 financial year.
  n°4 : Le secteur du su...  
La CE a souligné que « pour que le nouvel accord entre en vigueur, notre accord actuel pour le sucre doit être modifié », car si les accords relatifs au commerce du sucre devaient être intégrés dans des APE régionaux, « il serait illogique de maintenir un système discriminatoire envers les membres d'un certain groupement d’APE ». La Commission a ajouté que le protocole sucre n’est « pas compatible avec la réforme du régime sucrier de l’UE, qui met un terme aux prix garantis pour les producteurs de l'UE ».
On September 29th 2007 the EU Council of Ministers took the decision to unilaterally denounce the sugar protocol. The EU Council held the ‘denunciation does not prejudge a subsequent mutual agreement between the Community and the ACP states on the treatment of sugar in the context of comprehensive EPAs’. The EC sought to highlight that ‘for the new arrangement to come into legal effect, our current arrangement for sugar must change’, since if sugar-trading arrangements were to be taken into regional EPAs, discrimination could not be maintained between members of an EPA grouping. The Commission further argued that the sugar protocol is ‘not compatible with the reform of the EU’s sugar regime, which is bringing an end to guaranteed prices for the EU’s own producers’. Therefore the EU ‘cannot justify paying guaranteed prices for Caribbean (and ACP) producers when we are no longer guaranteeing prices for our own producers’.
  La plus grande firme th...  
D'autre part, StarKist estime qu'entrer dans un processus d'éco-labellisation de ses produits ne serait pas compatible avec cette approche basée sur des faits, et l’entreprise ne fera pas cette démarche: ‘Je m’inquiète de ce que, si on prend les écolabels, tout le monde va avoir sa propre interprétation, et cela va diluer nos efforts et mettre à mal ce que nous essayons de mettre en place’ a dit le représentant de la firme.
In the latest issue of Intrafish, a representative of StarKist states that the company is working with other tuna industry leaders to create an organisation to provide factual and scientific information about tuna fisheries to be used by regional fisheries-management organisations (RFMOs) when establishing catching quotas. On the other hand, Starkist feels that seeking an eco-label certification would not be in line with this fact-based approach and the company is not planning anything along these lines: ‘I’m concerned if you start getting into eco-labels that everyone will have their own bias, and that dilutes the thrust and the efforts of what we’re trying to put together’, said its representative. StarKist is now owned by the South Korean food company Dongwon, which owns the world’s largest tuna-fishing fleet.
  Le protocole sucre en v...  
Dans le cadre de l’APE actuellement en cours de négociation, l’UE a offert un accès en franchise de droits et de quota pour le sucre et toutes les exportations des Caraïbes et un tel accord « n’est pas compatible avec un accord fournissant un prix spécial et des volumes garantis pour le sucre à certains pays caribéens mais pas à tous ».
According to Caribbean press reports the EC has formally taken the decision to renounce the sugar protocol at the end of September 2007 in line with its proposals for market access for ACP exports set out in its April 4th 2007 statement. The EC holds that it is ‘committed to safeguarding the benefits of the sugar protocol’, but that ‘preserving these benefits does not necessarily mean preserving the protocol itself’. It further maintains ‘the most important part of the protocol … preferential treatment in the EU market’, will be retained, through the removal of all tariffs on ACP sugar exports by 2015. In this context the EC sees the move as enhancing the trading relationship with ACP regions by creating ‘a system that is viable in the world of today’. The EC rejected suggestions that the renunciation of the sugar protocol was ‘reneging on the development goals set out in the Cotonou Agreement’, emphasising that the EPAs would help in building regional markets and competitiveness. As part of the EPA currently being negotiated, the EU has offered to provide tariff- and quota-free access for sugar and all exports from the Caribbean and such an arrangement ‘is not compatible with an agreement that provides special price and volume guarantees to some Caribbean countries on sugar but not all’. Therefore if new regional EPAs are to come into effect ‘our current arrangements for sugar must be changed’. The EC also pointed out that the current arrangement was not compatible with the reformed EU sugar regime which was dismantling guaranteed prices for the EC’s own producers. Senior EC officials claimed that ‘we cannot justify paying guaranteed prices for Caribbean producers when we no longer guarantee prices for our own producers’. It is claimed by the EC that the package it is putting together for ACP countries, which includes unlimited duty-free market access (subject to a safeguard clause), a floor price for a number of years and financial assistance to invest in new technologies and measures to enhance competitiveness, are all intended to smooth the transition.