|
|
L’appelant, un praticien inscrit au collège intimé, a reçu deux avis l’informant: (1) qu’on avait signalé au conseil de discipline du Collège qu’il était soupçonné d’être coupable de conduite inconvenante sous quatre chefs différents et que le conseil de discipline se réunirait le 11 juillet 1973; (2) que, suivant les instructions du comité exécutif du Conseil du collège, il était suspendu de l’exercice de la profession médicale en attendant l’enquête du conseil de discipline.
|
|
|
The appellant, a medical practitioner registered with the respondent College, was served with two notices: (1) that it had been reported to the discipline committee of the College that he might have been guilty of unbecoming conduct under four different headings and that a meeting of the discipline committee would be held on July 11, 1973; (2) that on the instruction of the executive committee of the council of the College, he was suspended from the privileges of a medical practitioner pending investigation by the discipline committee. On June 5, 1973, the Supreme Court of Alberta quashed the purported suspension. Following the hearings of the discipline committee, it recommended to the council that the appellant be suspended for one year.
|