Wörterbuch in über hundert Sprachen und mit mehr als einer Milliarde Übersetzungsbeispielen

Ausgangssprachen	Zielsprachen

Keybot 12 Ergebnisse csc.lexum.org Seite 6

Cour suprême du Canada ...

Text zeigen Zeige Ausgangstext im Cache URL mit Ausgangstext zeigen	Le savant juge de la Cour d’appel s’est quant à lui attaché à la gravité de l’opération et à l’omission de l’appelant de donner des détails sur les risques probables ou possibles. Voici les commentaires du juge Morrow sur les divers points soulevés relativement au consentement éclairé:
Textseiten vergleichen HTM-Seiten vergleichen URL mit Ausgangstext zeigen URL mit Zielsprache zeigen csc.lexum.org als Prioritätsdomäne definieren	What the learned Appellate Court judge fastened on was the seriousness of the operation and the failure of the appellant to go into some detail about the risks, whether probable or possible. This is what Morrow J.A. said on the various points raised in respect of informed consent:

Cour suprême du Canada ...

Text zeigen Zeige Ausgangstext im Cache URL mit Ausgangstext zeigen	Enfin, il faut souffler mot de la question soulevée devant les Cours d’instance inférieure, à savoir si la décision du syndicat que relate le par. (8) ci-dessus a été communiquée ou non d’une certaine façon à l’appelante avant la réunion que ses administrateurs ont tenue le 4 mars?
Textseiten vergleichen HTM-Seiten vergleichen URL mit Ausgangstext zeigen URL mit Zielsprache zeigen csc.lexum.org als Prioritätsdomäne definieren	(10) on March 4th, the directors of the company, in the light of the economic situation and of the fact that in a perishable goods business a clientele is lost rapidly, decided it could do nothing else but close its plant;

Cour suprême du Canada ...

Text zeigen Zeige Ausgangstext im Cache URL mit Ausgangstext zeigen	POURVOI interjeté à l’encontre d’un arrêt de la Division d’appel de la Cour suprême de la Nouvelle-Écosse[1] qui a confirmé le jugement du juge Hart[2] sur des objections préliminaires soulevées à l’occasion d’une requête visant à faire déclarer ultra vires de la législature provinciale le Theatres and Amusements Act, R.S.N.S. 1967, c.
Textseiten vergleichen HTM-Seiten vergleichen URL mit Ausgangstext zeigen URL mit Zielsprache zeigen csc.lexum.org als Prioritätsdomäne definieren	APPEAL from a judgment of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, Appeal Division[1], affirming the judgment of Hart J.[2] on preliminary objections on an application for a declaration that the Theatres and Amusements Act, R.S.N.S. 1967, c. 304, and some of the Regulations thereunder, were ultra vires the provincial legislature. Appeal dismissed.

Cour suprême du Canada ...

Text zeigen Zeige Ausgangstext im Cache URL mit Ausgangstext zeigen

838, mais la disposition actuelle prévoit plus explicitement (si tant est, en fait, que le texte initial traite de la question) qu’aucune ordonnance ne sera rendue si des réclamants autres que l’accusé contestent la propriété des biens. Cette question n’est pas soulevée en l’espèce et, comme je l’ai déjà dit, l’ordonnance de restitution doit être maintenue.

Textseiten vergleichen HTM-Seiten vergleichen URL mit Ausgangstext zeigen URL mit Zielsprache zeigen csc.lexum.org als Prioritätsdomäne definieren

It appears to me that ss. 653, 654 and 655, historically and currently, reflect a scheme of criminal law administration under which property, taken or destroyed or damaged in the commission of a crime, is brought into account following the disposition of culpability, and may be ordered by the criminal court to be returned to the victimized owner if it is under the control of the court and its ownership is not in dispute or that reparation be made by the offender, either in whole or in part out of money found in his possession when arrested if it is indisputably his and otherwise under an order for compensation, where the property has been destroyed or damaged.

Cour suprême du Canada ...

Text zeigen Zeige Ausgangstext im Cache URL mit Ausgangstext zeigen

Dans la recherche de la vérité, le jury avait le droit de prendre en considération tous les témoignages, des professionnels et des profanes, et de les accepter ou de les rejeter en tout ou en partie. Le ministère public, comme l’accusé, peut se servir des témoignages non-médicaux et, dans la présente affaire, la preuve ordinaire était vitale pour la défense soule-

Textseiten vergleichen HTM-Seiten vergleichen URL mit Ausgangstext zeigen URL mit Zielsprache zeigen csc.lexum.org als Prioritätsdomäne definieren

In the case at bar, the Crown had the burden of showing factual causation, that beyond a reasonable doubt the kick caused the death. In my view, the trial judge did not err in failing to instruct the jury that in determining that issue they could consider only the medical evidence. The issue of causation is for the jury and not the experts. The weight to be given to the evidence of the experts was entirely for the jury. In the search for truth, the jury was entitled to consider all of the evidence, expert and lay, and accept or reject any part of it. Non-medical testimony is available to both the Crown and the accused, and in the instant case, lay evidence was vital to the defence raised by the appellant. That evidence tended to show that all the circumstances preceding the kick were such as to create in the deceased boy a highly

Cour suprême du Canada ...

Text zeigen Zeige Ausgangstext im Cache URL mit Ausgangstext zeigen

Si la preuve prima facie consiste en celle de faits dont on peut déduire par présomption de fait la culpabilité de l’accusé, la jurisprudence est clairement à l’effet que, puisqu’en fin de compte la preuve à charge doit être établie au-delà de tout doute raisonnable, il n’est pas nécessaire que l’accusé démontre son innocence, il lui suffit de soulever un doute raisonnable.

Textseiten vergleichen HTM-Seiten vergleichen URL mit Ausgangstext zeigen URL mit Zielsprache zeigen csc.lexum.org als Prioritätsdomäne definieren

If the prima facie case is made up by the proof of facts from which guilt may be inferred by presumption of fact, the law is clear on the authorities that, because the case in the end must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt, it is not necessary for the accused to establish his innocence, but only to raise a reasonable doubt. This he may do by giving evidence of an explanation that may reasonably be true, and it will be sufficient unless he is disbelieved by the trier of fact, in which case his testimony is no evidence. In any case, the evidence given by himself or otherwise, has to be such as will at least raise a reasonable doubt as to his guilt; if it does not meet this test the prima facie case remains and conviction will ensue.

Cour suprême du Canada ...

Text zeigen Zeige Ausgangstext im Cache URL mit Ausgangstext zeigen

Elle a sans aucun doute subi une perte financière; et la principale question soulevée ici et sur laquelle les cours d’instance inférieure se sont prononcées à l’encontre de la demanderesse-appelante, est celle de savoir si celle-ci peut recouvrer une partie de cette perte qui serait attribuable à une faute délictuelle de la défenderesse.

Textseiten vergleichen HTM-Seiten vergleichen URL mit Ausgangstext zeigen URL mit Zielsprache zeigen csc.lexum.org als Prioritätsdomäne definieren

LASKIN J.—This appeal arises out of an action of tort for damages founded on negligence. As pleaded and argued, it involves the applicability of the principles of law canvassed in Hedley Byrne & Co. Ltd. v. Heller & Partners Ltd.[2] to a municipal corporation in certain circumstances of alleged reliance on the validity of a zoning by-law which, in litigation terminating in this Court, was declared to be invalid. The plaintiff-appellant in the present proceedings was not a party to the action which attacked the by-law, but in the result it abandoned plans for and work in progress on a multi-storey apartment building. There is no doubt that it suffered monetary loss; and the principal question presented here, which was decided adversely to the plaintiff-appellant in the Courts below, is whether any portion of the loss may properly be recovered from the defendant as being attributable to its actionable fault.

Cour suprême du Canada ...

Text zeigen Zeige Ausgangstext im Cache URL mit Ausgangstext zeigen

(1) de l’art. 621 du Code criminel. Toutefois, le ministère public a demandé l’autorisation d’en appeler, indiquant qu’il désirait soulever pour la première fois l’applicabilité du par. (2) de l’art.

Textseiten vergleichen HTM-Seiten vergleichen URL mit Ausgangstext zeigen URL mit Zielsprache zeigen csc.lexum.org als Prioritätsdomäne definieren

THE CHIEF JUSTICE (dissenting)—It is of central importance in this Crown appeal to appreciate how this case got to this Court and what were the issues that brought it here. The accused, having been convicted on a charge of resisting a peace officer, one Dorion, in the execution of his duty at a certain place on a certain date, successfully appealed his conviction and was acquitted by the Quebec Court of Appeal, Deschênes J.A. (as he then was) dissenting. If the dissent was on a question of law, the Crown had an appeal as of right under s. 621(1)(a) of the Criminal Code. The Crown, however, sought leave to appeal, indicating it wished to raise for the first time the applicability of s. 31(2) of the Criminal Code. Leave was granted without limitation, but on condition of the Crown paying the costs of the appeal in any event. Even the unrestricted leave could not of course enlarge the scope of the appeal beyond questions of law, as s. 621(1)(b) makes abundantly clear.

Cour suprême du Canada ...

Text zeigen Zeige Ausgangstext im Cache URL mit Ausgangstext zeigen

Transit in rem judicatam ... Mais dans le cadre d’un seul litige, il est possible de soulever plusieurs questions déterminantes du sort de toute la cause. Il convient alors d’appliquer la règle selon laquelle, d’ordinaire, les parties ne sont pas autorisées à débattre à nouveau une question litigieuse qu’elles ont déjà soulevée et débattue.

Textseiten vergleichen HTM-Seiten vergleichen URL mit Ausgangstext zeigen URL mit Zielsprache zeigen csc.lexum.org als Prioritätsdomäne definieren

The law, as I understand it, is this: if one party brings an action against another for a particular cause and judgment is given on it, there is a strict rule of law that he cannot bring another action against the same party for the same cause. Transit in rem judicatam ... But within one cause of action, there may be several issues raised which are necessary for the determination of the whole case. The rule then is that, once an issue has been raised and distinctly determined between the parties, then, as a general rule, neither party can be allowed to fight that issue all over again. The same issue cannot be raised by either of them again in the same or subsequent proceedings except in special circumstances... And within one issue, there may be several points available which go to aid one party or the other in his efforts to secure a determination of the issue in his favour. The rule then is that each party must use reasonable diligence to bring forward every point which he thinks would help him. If he omits to raise any particular point, from negligence, inadvertence, or even accident (which would or might have decided the issue in his favour), he may find himself shut out from raising that point again, at any rate in any case where the selfsame issue arises in the same or subsequent proceedings. But this again is not an inflexible rule. It can be departed from in special circumstances.

soule – Übersetzung – Keybot-Wörterbuch