|
|
Zum einen weist das Prüfmaterial nicht immer die gleichen Eigenschaften auf, da die Härten von Bleistiften in keiner Norm eindeutig festgelegt sind und es zwischen den Herstellern eindeutige Unterschiede gibt.
|
|
|
The shortcomings of this procedure lie in the poor reproducibility of the measurements. For one, the material under test will not always manifest the same properties, since pencil hardness is not clearly defined in any standard and there are distinct differences between individual manufacturers. Furthermore, the operator influence is significant. Thus, it is often impossible to interpret the results unambiguously.
|
|
|
The shortcomings of this procedure lie in the poor reproducibility of the measurements. For one, the material under test will not always manifest the same properties, since pencil hardness is not clearly defined in any standard and there are distinct differences between individual manufacturers. Furthermore, the operator influence is significant. Thus, it is often impossible to interpret the results unambiguously.
|
|
|
The shortcomings of this procedure lie in the poor reproducibility of the measurements. For one, the material under test will not always manifest the same properties, since pencil hardness is not clearly defined in any standard and there are distinct differences between individual manufacturers. Furthermore, the operator influence is significant. Thus, it is often impossible to interpret the results unambiguously.
|
|
|
The shortcomings of this procedure lie in the poor reproducibility of the measurements. For one, the material under test will not always manifest the same properties, since pencil hardness is not clearly defined in any standard and there are distinct differences between individual manufacturers. Furthermore, the operator influence is significant. Thus, it is often impossible to interpret the results unambiguously.
|
|
|
The shortcomings of this procedure lie in the poor reproducibility of the measurements. For one, the material under test will not always manifest the same properties, since pencil hardness is not clearly defined in any standard and there are distinct differences between individual manufacturers. Furthermore, the operator influence is significant. Thus, it is often impossible to interpret the results unambiguously.
|
|
|
The shortcomings of this procedure lie in the poor reproducibility of the measurements. For one, the material under test will not always manifest the same properties, since pencil hardness is not clearly defined in any standard and there are distinct differences between individual manufacturers. Furthermore, the operator influence is significant. Thus, it is often impossible to interpret the results unambiguously.
|
|
|
The shortcomings of this procedure lie in the poor reproducibility of the measurements. For one, the material under test will not always manifest the same properties, since pencil hardness is not clearly defined in any standard and there are distinct differences between individual manufacturers. Furthermore, the operator influence is significant. Thus, it is often impossible to interpret the results unambiguously.
|
|
|
The shortcomings of this procedure lie in the poor reproducibility of the measurements. For one, the material under test will not always manifest the same properties, since pencil hardness is not clearly defined in any standard and there are distinct differences between individual manufacturers. Furthermore, the operator influence is significant. Thus, it is often impossible to interpret the results unambiguously.
|
|
|
The shortcomings of this procedure lie in the poor reproducibility of the measurements. For one, the material under test will not always manifest the same properties, since pencil hardness is not clearly defined in any standard and there are distinct differences between individual manufacturers. Furthermore, the operator influence is significant. Thus, it is often impossible to interpret the results unambiguously.
|
