rated requirement – French Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot      45 Results   6 Domains
  www.citt-tcce.gc.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
5. In response to MKTG’s submissions, the PHAC denied that there was any justification for departing from the principle that costs should be awarded to the PHAC, as the successful party. In so arguing, the PHAC asserted that MKTG had, in its own submissions, admitted that its proposal did not meet the second point-rated requirement (PR2) contained in the RFSO.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine citt-tcce.gc.ca as primary domain
5. En réponse aux observations de GTMK, l’ASPC a affirmé qu’il n’y a aucune justification de déroger au principe de lui accorder une indemnisation en tant que partie gagnante. Dans son argumentation, l’ASPC soutient que GTMK a admis, dans ses propres observations, que sa proposition ne respectait pas la seconde exigence cotée de la demande d’offre à commandes (DOC).
  www.citt.gc.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
5. In response to MKTG’s submissions, the PHAC denied that there was any justification for departing from the principle that costs should be awarded to the PHAC, as the successful party. In so arguing, the PHAC asserted that MKTG had, in its own submissions, admitted that its proposal did not meet the second point-rated requirement (PR2) contained in the RFSO.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine citt.gc.ca as primary domain
5. En réponse aux observations de GTMK, l’ASPC a affirmé qu’il n’y a aucune justification de déroger au principe de lui accorder une indemnisation en tant que partie gagnante. Dans son argumentation, l’ASPC soutient que GTMK a admis, dans ses propres observations, que sa proposition ne respectait pas la seconde exigence cotée de la demande d’offre à commandes (DOC).
  5 Hits www.tcce-citt.gc.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
5. In response to MKTG’s submissions, the PHAC denied that there was any justification for departing from the principle that costs should be awarded to the PHAC, as the successful party. In so arguing, the PHAC asserted that MKTG had, in its own submissions, admitted that its proposal did not meet the second point-rated requirement (PR2) contained in the RFSO.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine tcce-citt.gc.ca as primary domain
5. En réponse aux observations de GTMK, l’ASPC a affirmé qu’il n’y a aucune justification de déroger au principe de lui accorder une indemnisation en tant que partie gagnante. Dans son argumentation, l’ASPC soutient que GTMK a admis, dans ses propres observations, que sa proposition ne respectait pas la seconde exigence cotée de la demande d’offre à commandes (DOC).
  29 Hits www.tcce.gc.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
5. In response to MKTG’s submissions, the PHAC denied that there was any justification for departing from the principle that costs should be awarded to the PHAC, as the successful party. In so arguing, the PHAC asserted that MKTG had, in its own submissions, admitted that its proposal did not meet the second point-rated requirement (PR2) contained in the RFSO.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine tcce.gc.ca as primary domain
5. En réponse aux observations de GTMK, l’ASPC a affirmé qu’il n’y a aucune justification de déroger au principe de lui accorder une indemnisation en tant que partie gagnante. Dans son argumentation, l’ASPC soutient que GTMK a admis, dans ses propres observations, que sa proposition ne respectait pas la seconde exigence cotée de la demande d’offre à commandes (DOC).