établir la compétence – English Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot      87 Results   18 Domains
  23 Hits scc.lexum.org  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Majesté et ce jugement serait une déclaration de «droit fédéral». A mon avis, cela constitue un fondement suffisant pour établir la compétence de la Cour fédérale à connaître de la demande de mise en cause en vertu de l’al.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
law”. In my opinion that is a sufficient basis on which to found a jurisdiction in the Federal Court to deal with the third party claim pursuant to para. 17(4)(a) of the Federal Court Act, which provides as follows:
  2 Hits parl.gc.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Je me demande quel objectif vous poursuivez en mettant sur pied une telle commission et comment on va pouvoir établir la compétence de ces gens qui vont décider qu'une telle personne handicapée ou une telle autre aura droit au crédit d'impôt.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine parl.gc.ca as primary domain
I was wondering what it is that you aim to do by introducing such a committee and, how you are going to determine whether those responsible for deciding whether a disabled person is indeed eligible for the tax credit have the necessary skills to do so. How are you going to go about that?
  6 Hits www.icj-cij.org  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
La Cour constate que pour établir la compétence de la Cour, le Pakistan s'est fondé, dans son mémoire, sur l'article 17 de l'Acte général pour le règlement pacifique des différends internationaux signé à Genève le 26 septembre 1928, sur les déclarations d'acceptation de la juridiction obligatoire de la Cour faites par les Parties et sur le paragraphe 1 de l'article 36 du Statut de la Cour.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine icj-cij.org as primary domain
The Court notes that to found the jurisdiction of the Court in this case, Pakistan relied in its Memorial on Article 17 of the General Act for Pacific Settlement of International Disputes, signed in Geneva on 26 September 1928, on the declarations of acceptance of the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court made by the Parties and on paragraph 1 of Article 36 of the Statute of the Court. The Court examines these bases of jurisdiction in turn.
  23 Hits csc.lexum.org  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Majesté et ce jugement serait une déclaration de «droit fédéral». A mon avis, cela constitue un fondement suffisant pour établir la compétence de la Cour fédérale à connaître de la demande de mise en cause en vertu de l’al.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine csc.lexum.org as primary domain
law”. In my opinion that is a sufficient basis on which to found a jurisdiction in the Federal Court to deal with the third party claim pursuant to para. 17(4)(a) of the Federal Court Act, which provides as follows:
  www.commonlaw.uottawa.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
La professeure Pavlovic entreprendra une étude globale et systématique de l'évolution et du développement du critère du « lien réel et substantiel » pour établir la compétence judiciaire, depuis qu'il a été articulé par la Cour suprême du Canada dans Morguard Investments Ltd. c.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine commonlaw.uottawa.ca as primary domain
Prof. Pavlovic will make a comprehensive and systematic study of the evolution and development of the real and substantial connection test for adjudicative jurisdiction since it was articulated by the Supreme Court of Canada in Morguard Investments Ltd. v. De Savoye in 1990. She intends to analyze and assess the courts' approaches to the test and its implementation, and suggest prospects for law reform.
  www2.ohchr.org  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
17. Fournir des informations sur les mesures prises pour établir la compétence de l’État partie pour les actes de torture lorsque l’auteur présumé se trouve sur tout territoire sous sa juridiction, que ce soit aux fins de l’extrader ou de le poursuivre, conformément aux dispositions de la Convention.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine www2.ohchr.org as primary domain
16. Regarding paragraph 63 of the State party’s periodic report, please describe the steps taken to ensure that torture is made punishable by the appropriate penalties which take into account its grave nature, in accordance with the requirements of article 4, paragraph 2, of the Convention. In addition, please provide detailed information on the criminal provisions concerning offences such as attempted acts of torture, commission of torture or order to commit torture by a person in authority, and the exact penalties imposed for any of these offences, including disciplinary measures. Please provide information on the number, the nature and the outcome of the cases in which such legal provisions were applied, including the penalties that were imposed or the reasons for acquittal. Articles 5, 6 and 7
  12 Hits www.conventions.coe.int  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Ce type de compétence est très utile lorsque le navire ou l’aéronef ne se trouvent pas sur le territoire de la Partie au moment où l’infraction est commise, le paragraphe 1.a ne pouvant alors servir à établir la compétence.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine conventions.coe.int as primary domain
160 This obligation is already implemented as a general matter in the laws of many States, since such ships and aircraft are frequently considered to be an extension of the territory of the State. This type of jurisdiction is most useful where the ship or aircraft is not located in its territory at the time of the commission of the crime, as a result of which paragraph 1.a would not be available as a basis to assert jurisdiction. If the crime is committed on a ship or aircraft that is beyond the territory of the flag Party, there may be no other State that would be able to exercise jurisdiction. In addition, if a crime is committed aboard a ship or aircraft which is merely passing through the waters or airspace of another State, the latter State may face significant practical impediments to the exercise of its jurisdiction, and it is therefore useful for the State of registry to also have jurisdiction.
  6 Hits conventions.coe.int  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Ce type de compétence est très utile lorsque le navire ou l’aéronef ne se trouvent pas sur le territoire de la Partie au moment où l’infraction est commise, le paragraphe 1.a ne pouvant alors servir à établir la compétence.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine conventions.coe.int as primary domain
160 This obligation is already implemented as a general matter in the laws of many States, since such ships and aircraft are frequently considered to be an extension of the territory of the State. This type of jurisdiction is most useful where the ship or aircraft is not located in its territory at the time of the commission of the crime, as a result of which paragraph 1.a would not be available as a basis to assert jurisdiction. If the crime is committed on a ship or aircraft that is beyond the territory of the flag Party, there may be no other State that would be able to exercise jurisdiction. In addition, if a crime is committed aboard a ship or aircraft which is merely passing through the waters or airspace of another State, the latter State may face significant practical impediments to the exercise of its jurisdiction, and it is therefore useful for the State of registry to also have jurisdiction.