étoffer le dossier – English Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot      12 Results   6 Domains
  www.icrc.org  
Quand il est évident que des actes de torture et d’autres formes de mauvais traitements ont été subis, les médecins du CICR documentent les situations individuelles de manière à étoffer le dossier en vue de démarches officielles de l’organisation.
When torture and other forms of ill-treatment are evident, ICRC physicians document individual situations to strengthen the case for formal intervention by the organization. This documentation is not in itself part of any judicial investigation, but aims to trigger such action by the relevant authority.
  www.cicr.org  
Quand il est évident que des actes de torture et d’autres formes de mauvais traitements ont été subis, les médecins du CICR documentent les situations individuelles de manière à étoffer le dossier en vue de démarches officielles de l’organisation.
When torture and other forms of ill-treatment are evident, ICRC physicians document individual situations to strengthen the case for formal intervention by the organization. This documentation is not in itself part of any judicial investigation, but aims to trigger such action by the relevant authority.
  www.wcoomd.org  
Dans son discours d’ouverture devant les participants à l’atelier, le secrétaire général de l’OMD a présenté le nouveau Recueil sur le CAP qui est venu étoffer le Dossier Recettes cette année.
Separately, Secretary General Mikuriya had a round table session with FRCA middle managers to discuss the priorities and direction of Customs in Fiji. He also visited the OCO Secretariat to discuss regional needs and the way forward to enhance cooperation.
  4 Hits scc.lexum.org  
L’alinéa 683(1)d) du Code reconnaît que le rôle des cours d’appel peut être élargi dans des cas exceptionnels, mais le processus d’appel ne peut être utilisé couramment pour étoffer le dossier constitué au procès.
While the failure to exercise due diligence is not determinative, it cannot be ignored in deciding whether to admit “fresh” evidence.  The interests of justice referred to in s. 683 of the Criminal Code encompass not only an accused’s interest in having his or her guilt determined upon all of the available evidence, but also the integrity of the criminal process.  Finality and order are essential to that integrity.  The criminal justice system is arranged so that the trial will provide the opportunity to the parties to present their respective cases and the appeal will provide the opportunity to challenge the correctness of what happened at the trial. Section 683(1)(d) of the Code recognizes that the appellate function can be expanded in exceptional cases, but it cannot be that the appellate process should be used routinely to augment the trial record.  Were it otherwise, the finality of the trial process would be lost and cases would be retried on appeal whenever more evidence was secured by a party prior to the hearing of the appeal. For this reason, the exceptional nature of the admission of “fresh” evidence on appeal has been stressed: McMartin v. The Queen, supra, at p. 148.
  4 Hits csc.lexum.org  
L’alinéa 683(1)d) du Code reconnaît que le rôle des cours d’appel peut être élargi dans des cas exceptionnels, mais le processus d’appel ne peut être utilisé couramment pour étoffer le dossier constitué au procès.
While the failure to exercise due diligence is not determinative, it cannot be ignored in deciding whether to admit “fresh” evidence.  The interests of justice referred to in s. 683 of the Criminal Code encompass not only an accused’s interest in having his or her guilt determined upon all of the available evidence, but also the integrity of the criminal process.  Finality and order are essential to that integrity.  The criminal justice system is arranged so that the trial will provide the opportunity to the parties to present their respective cases and the appeal will provide the opportunity to challenge the correctness of what happened at the trial. Section 683(1)(d) of the Code recognizes that the appellate function can be expanded in exceptional cases, but it cannot be that the appellate process should be used routinely to augment the trial record.  Were it otherwise, the finality of the trial process would be lost and cases would be retried on appeal whenever more evidence was secured by a party prior to the hearing of the appeal. For this reason, the exceptional nature of the admission of “fresh” evidence on appeal has been stressed: McMartin v. The Queen, supra, at p. 148.