favoriser une partie – English Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot      13 Results   9 Domains
  www.epo.org  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Il importe de noter que cette règle est la plupart du temps invoquée alors que la partialité n'a pas été établie et que seule a été faite une déduction selon laquelle un ou plusieurs membres d'un organe de décision pourraient avoir eu des raisons de favoriser une partie en particulier.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine epo.org as primary domain
In T 900/02 the board observed that it was well-established in the case law of the boards of appeal that a suspicion of partiality or bias could be sufficient to invalidate a first instance decision (see "Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO", 4th edition 2001, p. 378 et seq.). This reflected a basic principle of procedural law in the contracting states of the EPC (see Art. 125 EPC 1973), namely that all the members of a tribunal had to be above any suspicion of bias. Although often referred to as the rule against bias (or sometimes as a rule of natural justice), it was important to note that, in the majority of cases in which it was invoked, no actual bias or partiality was established and all that occurred was an inference that one or more persons in a decision-making capacity might have had reasons to favour a particular party.
  3 Hits www.doyouknowyourrights.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Le décideur ne doit pas avoir de parti pris. Autrement dit, il ne doit avoir aucune raison personnelle, politique, commerciale ou autre de favoriser une partie plutôt qu’une autre. Le décideur doit être capable de prendre une décision indépendante; il ne doit donc pas être indûment influencé par une personne mise en cause.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine doyouknowyourrights.ca as primary domain
The decision-maker must not be biased. This means they should have no personal, political, business or other reason to favour one party over the other. The decisionmaker should be able to make an independent decision. This means they should not be influenced improperly by anyone involved in the dispute. Everyone involved should approve the choice of the decision-maker.
  scc.lexum.org  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Toutefois, dissociée de sa raison d’être qu’est la nécessité de préserver les intérêts autochtones, l’obligation de consulter viserait seulement à favoriser une partie par rapport à une autre dans le processus de négociation.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
[50] Nor does the definition of what constitutes an adverse effect extend to adverse impacts on the negotiating position of an Aboriginal group. The duty to consult, grounded in the need to protect Aboriginal rights and to preserve the future use of the resources claimed by Aboriginal peoples while balancing countervailing Crown interests, no doubt may have the ulterior effect of delaying ongoing development.  The duty may thus serve not only as a tool to settle interim resource issues but also, and incidentally, as a tool to achieve longer term compensatory goals.  Thus conceived, the duty to consult may be seen as a necessary element in the overall scheme of satisfying the Crown’s constitutional duties to Canada’s First Nations.  However, cut off from its roots in the need to preserve Aboriginal interests, its purpose would be reduced to giving one side in the negotiation process an advantage over the other.
  3 Hits doyouknowyourrights.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Le décideur ne doit pas avoir de parti pris. Autrement dit, il ne doit avoir aucune raison personnelle, politique, commerciale ou autre de favoriser une partie plutôt qu’une autre. Le décideur doit être capable de prendre une décision indépendante; il ne doit donc pas être indûment influencé par une personne mise en cause.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine doyouknowyourrights.ca as primary domain
The decision-maker must not be biased. This means they should have no personal, political, business or other reason to favour one party over the other. The decisionmaker should be able to make an independent decision. This means they should not be influenced improperly by anyone involved in the dispute. Everyone involved should approve the choice of the decision-maker.
  csc.lexum.org  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Toutefois, dissociée de sa raison d’être qu’est la nécessité de préserver les intérêts autochtones, l’obligation de consulter viserait seulement à favoriser une partie par rapport à une autre dans le processus de négociation.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine csc.lexum.org as primary domain
[50] Nor does the definition of what constitutes an adverse effect extend to adverse impacts on the negotiating position of an Aboriginal group. The duty to consult, grounded in the need to protect Aboriginal rights and to preserve the future use of the resources claimed by Aboriginal peoples while balancing countervailing Crown interests, no doubt may have the ulterior effect of delaying ongoing development.  The duty may thus serve not only as a tool to settle interim resource issues but also, and incidentally, as a tool to achieve longer term compensatory goals.  Thus conceived, the duty to consult may be seen as a necessary element in the overall scheme of satisfying the Crown’s constitutional duties to Canada’s First Nations.  However, cut off from its roots in the need to preserve Aboriginal interests, its purpose would be reduced to giving one side in the negotiation process an advantage over the other.