il va accepter – English Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot      17 Results   9 Domains
  5 Hits parl.gc.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
C'est une décision du gouvernement du jour, à savoir s'il va accepter ou refuser les recommandations de l'Examen périodique universel. Notre rôle au ministère est de préparer — comme pour toutes les autres décisions du genre — des analyses et des recommandations qui s'inscrivent dans le processus du Cabinet.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine parl.gc.ca as primary domain
It is the government of the day that decides whether it will accept or reject the Universal Periodic Review recommendations. Our role in the department is to prepare—as for all similar decisions—studies and recommendations as part of the cabinet process.
  scc.lexum.org  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
La somme obtenue est de $93,100. Elle ne représente cependant pas tous les frais dont le propriétaire exproprié devra tenir compte pour décider s’il va accepter la valeur marchande du terrain et se réinstaller ailleurs.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
The learned arbitrator then proceeded to find other costs which would be entailed in the relocation of the claimant’s industry. All parties were in agreement with two figures given for certain costs, a cost of replacement of concrete foundations at $10,600, and the cost of certain electrical installations at $21,500. The learned arbitrator added these two figures to the $10,000. The learned arbitrator accepted the valuation of the building on the land expropriated after allowing depreciation of $51,000. He also added that amount to the relocation costs on the basis that the claimant was entitled to have a like building in the replacement premises. Those amounts total $93,100. They do not, however, represent all of the costs which the expropriated owner would have to consider when he was determining whether he would accept the market value of the lands and relocate elsewhere. Those other costs may be generally characterized as business disturbance. Locke J. expressed them very accurately in Drew v. The Queen[6], at p. 625:
  www.pep-muenchen.de  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Il n'a jamais compris l'amour de Dieu ni laissé le Saint-Esprit appliquer cet amour à son âme. Il va accepter la condamnation, mais il ne laissera pas l'Esprit le baigner dans l'amour de Dieu. Le résultat c'est qu'il ne se sent jamais aimé, et il vit sous l'esclavage constant de devoir prouver son amour pour le Seigneur !
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine worldchallenge.org as primary domain
Yet when I share about the sweetness and love of Jesus, I receive letters saying, "You're not preaching the truth anymore!" It is as though these people are saying, "If you're not reproving, then what you're saying can't be the gospel." Such believers have never entered into the great love-mission of the Holy Spirit!
  csc.lexum.org  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
La somme obtenue est de $93,100. Elle ne représente cependant pas tous les frais dont le propriétaire exproprié devra tenir compte pour décider s’il va accepter la valeur marchande du terrain et se réinstaller ailleurs.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine csc.lexum.org as primary domain
The learned arbitrator then proceeded to find other costs which would be entailed in the relocation of the claimant’s industry. All parties were in agreement with two figures given for certain costs, a cost of replacement of concrete foundations at $10,600, and the cost of certain electrical installations at $21,500. The learned arbitrator added these two figures to the $10,000. The learned arbitrator accepted the valuation of the building on the land expropriated after allowing depreciation of $51,000. He also added that amount to the relocation costs on the basis that the claimant was entitled to have a like building in the replacement premises. Those amounts total $93,100. They do not, however, represent all of the costs which the expropriated owner would have to consider when he was determining whether he would accept the market value of the lands and relocate elsewhere. Those other costs may be generally characterized as business disturbance. Locke J. expressed them very accurately in Drew v. The Queen[6], at p. 625: