infractions de terrorisme – English Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot      88 Results   14 Domains
  9 Hits www.zenithnet.com  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
afin de prévenir des déplacements pour commettre certaines infractions de terrorisme et menaces pour la sécurité des transports; ou annuler, refuser ou révoquer des passeports;
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine passengerprotect-protectiondespassagers.gc.ca as primary domain
to prevent travel to commit terrorism offences and threats to transportation security; and/or cancelling, refusing or revoking passports.
  2 Hits www.rcmp.gc.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
décrit les infractions de terrorisme .
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine rcmp.gc.ca as primary domain
spells out terrorism offences .
  www.international.gc.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
des infractions de terrorisme;
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine international.gc.ca as primary domain
Terrorism offences;
  www.grc.gc.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Personne arrêtée par la GRC en C.-B. pour infractions de terrorisme
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine grc.gc.ca as primary domain
Man Arrested by RCMP in B.C. for Terrorism Offences
  4 Hits www.vrpp.ru  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
La CSILC appuie l’appel du comité pour la création d’un organisme d’examen plus que nécessaire pour l’Agence des services frontaliers du Canada, pour l’élimination du terme vague et trop large des « infractions de terrorisme en général » et pour la mise en place d’un organisme intégré d’examen de la sécurité nationale qui coordonnerait les organismes existants et examinerait tous les autres départements impliqués dans les activités de sécurité nationale.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine iclmg.ca as primary domain
It is important to note, though, that Bill C-22 has not yet passed, and to be effective will still need important changes. This includes removing the government’s ability to block committee members’ access to important information or to outright limit the committee’s work based on national security concerns.
  13 Hits parl.gc.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Par contre, il s'agit uniquement d'exceptions très contrôlées. On parle ici d'infractions reliées à la drogue, d'infractions de terrorisme, d'organisations criminelles ou de blanchiment d'argent relié à la drogue.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine parl.gc.ca as primary domain
As you know, section 462.48 of the Criminal Code allows us to obtain tax information on individuals. However, these are very limited exceptions, relating to drug offences, terrorism, criminal organizations or the laundering of drug money. Also there is corruption, fraud, and all other profit-generating crimes we would like to investigate, in particular to establish a person's lifestyle in relation to the acquisition of goods resulting from other offences. During an investigation, we do not have the tools we need to obtain this federal tax information.
  voices-voix.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Le projet de loi C-51 introduit de nouvelles inculpations pour toute personne qui « sciemment préconise ou fomente la perpétration d’infractions de terrorisme » en étant consciente que quelqu’un « pourrait » commettre une infraction.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine voices-voix.ca as primary domain
Bill C-51 brought in new charges for anyone who knowingly advocates or promotes “terrorism offences in general” while aware that someone “may” carry out an offence. The problem? The broad definition of terrorism in the Act and the vagueness of the wording of this particular provision leaves reporters, academics and everyday people open to possible charges when they are commenting on politics or expressing dissent. Even if no one is ever charged, the fact such uncertainty exists is enough for people to self-censor in order to avoid legal trouble.
  12 Hits www.publicsafety.gc.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
En plus de ces questions, une autre ressource utile est le Plan d'action de la Commission d'enquête sur l'affaire Air India qui couvre des domaines tels que la sécurité aérienne, la lutte contre le financement du terrorisme, la poursuite des infractions de terrorisme ainsi que l'utilisation et le partage de renseignements.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine securitepublique.gc.ca as primary domain
You are invited to read the full Kanishka Project Research Themes for an in depth look at the research areas. In addition to those questions another useful resource is the Air India Inquiry Action Plan which covers areas such as aviation security, combating terrorist financing, prosecution of terrorism offences and the use and sharing of intelligence.
  15 Hits scc.lexum.org  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
1749 (QL), 2003 BCSC 1172, [traduction] « [l]es procédures portent sur l’interprétation, l’application et la constitutionnalité du nouvel art. 83.28 du Code criminel, lequel prévoit la tenue d’investigations relativement à des infractions de terrorisme, maintenant définies à l’art. 2 du Code » (par. 1).
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
16 The synopsis of reasons for judgment dated July 21, 2003, [2003] B.C.J. No. 1749 (QL), 2003 BCSC 1172, set out that “[t]he proceedings concerned the interpretation, application, and constitutionality of the new s. 83.28 of the Criminal Code, which provides for investigative hearings in relation to terrorism offences, as now defined in s. 2 of the Code” (para. 1).  Holmes J. then explained that an order had been issued under s. 83.28 for a judicial investigative hearing as part of the ongoing Air India Investigation but that the Named Person who was required to attend was neither a suspect nor an accused.  She summarized her findings that the order was validly issued and constitutionally sound; that counsel for Mr. Malik and Mr. Bagri would participate in the investigative hearing because of the unusual circumstance that the Air India Trial was underway; the hearing might have an incidental effect on the Air India Trial but the predominant purpose of the hearing is to further the ongoing investigation; the hearing is subject to restrictions protecting the privacy and other rights and interests of the Named Person and the integrity of the investigation.
  15 Hits csc.lexum.org  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
1749 (QL), 2003 BCSC 1172, [traduction] « [l]es procédures portent sur l’interprétation, l’application et la constitutionnalité du nouvel art. 83.28 du Code criminel, lequel prévoit la tenue d’investigations relativement à des infractions de terrorisme, maintenant définies à l’art. 2 du Code » (par. 1).
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine csc.lexum.org as primary domain
16 The synopsis of reasons for judgment dated July 21, 2003, [2003] B.C.J. No. 1749 (QL), 2003 BCSC 1172, set out that “[t]he proceedings concerned the interpretation, application, and constitutionality of the new s. 83.28 of the Criminal Code, which provides for investigative hearings in relation to terrorism offences, as now defined in s. 2 of the Code” (para. 1).  Holmes J. then explained that an order had been issued under s. 83.28 for a judicial investigative hearing as part of the ongoing Air India Investigation but that the Named Person who was required to attend was neither a suspect nor an accused.  She summarized her findings that the order was validly issued and constitutionally sound; that counsel for Mr. Malik and Mr. Bagri would participate in the investigative hearing because of the unusual circumstance that the Air India Trial was underway; the hearing might have an incidental effect on the Air India Trial but the predominant purpose of the hearing is to further the ongoing investigation; the hearing is subject to restrictions protecting the privacy and other rights and interests of the Named Person and the integrity of the investigation.