nature du jugement – English Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot      10 Results   4 Domains
  osfi-bsif.gc.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
L’ampleur des rajustements doit être fonction de facteurs comme la pertinence et la qualité des données d’échantillon, la précision des estimations statistiques, et le degré et la nature du jugement dont a fait preuve l’institution pendant tout le processus.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine osfi-bsif.gc.ca as primary domain
Institutions should estimate values of PD, LGD, and EAD as precisely and accurately as possible. However, such estimates are subject to uncertainty and, therefore, potential errors. In order to avoid over-optimism, an institution may need to adjust its estimates by adding a margin of conservatism. The extent of such adjustments should be related to factors such as the relevance and the quality of the sample data, the precision of the statistical estimates, and the amount and nature of judgment used throughout the process. For example, institutions could produce loss distribution curves and confidence intervals of estimates with different confidence levels.
  4 Hits scc.lexum.org  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Quant à la nature du jugement de M. le Juge Riley, je dois dire, en toute déférence pour l’avis de la majorité de la Chambre d’appel, que je souscris respectueusement à la conclusion de M. le Juge Kane.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
As to the nature of the judgment of Riley J., I must say, with deference to the opinion expressed by the majority in the Appellate Division, that I am in respectful agreement with the conclusion reached by Kane, J.A. The grounds upon which Riley J. proceeded to maintain the motion to quash are not founded on procedural or technical defects in the indictment, such as duplicity and misjoinder or the omission of an essential allegation. On the contrary, his judgment is predicated on the interpretation he gave to the provisions of s. 103 under which respondent was charged. Thus, in his view, the accused—who, as indicated in the judgment of first instance, was conceded to be an elected municipal official,—could not, as such, be validy charged under these provisions which, properly interpreted, are referable only to an office involved with either the Federal or a Provincial Government.
  4 Hits csc.lexum.org  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Quant à la nature du jugement de M. le Juge Riley, je dois dire, en toute déférence pour l’avis de la majorité de la Chambre d’appel, que je souscris respectueusement à la conclusion de M. le Juge Kane.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine csc.lexum.org as primary domain
As to the nature of the judgment of Riley J., I must say, with deference to the opinion expressed by the majority in the Appellate Division, that I am in respectful agreement with the conclusion reached by Kane, J.A. The grounds upon which Riley J. proceeded to maintain the motion to quash are not founded on procedural or technical defects in the indictment, such as duplicity and misjoinder or the omission of an essential allegation. On the contrary, his judgment is predicated on the interpretation he gave to the provisions of s. 103 under which respondent was charged. Thus, in his view, the accused—who, as indicated in the judgment of first instance, was conceded to be an elected municipal official,—could not, as such, be validy charged under these provisions which, properly interpreted, are referable only to an office involved with either the Federal or a Provincial Government.