ne doit pas négliger – English Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot      16 Results   11 Domains
  www.xn--plaadebous-q6a.es  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Afin que l’entreprise soit pérenne, elle ne doit pas négliger les aspects du recrutement :
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine akka-technologies.com as primary domain
A well functioning organization takes care about all the employement aspects:
  scalingupnutrition.org  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
The Guardian : Le G8 ne doit pas négliger les personnes âgées dans les négociations sur la Nutrition
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scalingupnutrition.org as primary domain
The Telegraph: David Cameron: aid spending makes me proud to be British
  2 Hits www.atelier.net  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Parmi ses outils, le recrutement ne doit pas négliger les réseaux sociaux
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine atelier.net as primary domain
Companies’ Social Media Use Not Limited to ...
  agritrade.cta.int  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Le fait que les cafés de bonne qualité soient moins sujets à la volatilité des prix et qu’ils obtiennent des prix plus élevés est une opportunité que la nouvelle stratégie du café de la Tanzanie ne doit pas négliger.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine agritrade.cta.int as primary domain
The fact that good quality coffees are less subject to price volatility and fetch higher prices is an important window of opportunity that needs particular emphasis in Tanzania’s new coffee strategy. Emphasising quality rather than volume is likely to yield higher net gains for producers, since, proportionally, export costs will be lower.
  2 Hits parl.gc.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
M. Paul Szabo: Vous parlez des REER. Selon vous, le travail non rémunéré est tout de même du travail; il mérite d'être reconnu et on ne doit pas négliger la pension. Le montant qu'on peut verser dans un REER est établi en fonction du salaire des années précédentes.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine parl.gc.ca as primary domain
Mr. Paul Szabo: You're talking about RRSPs. What you're really saying is that unpaid work is still work; it deserves to be recognized, and how about a little consideration on the pension side. RRSPs are obviously based on prior years' income to determine how much you can contribute. The real value of them is to defer taxes, and that's why you really need earned income to have the dollar of an RRSP. So pragmatically, I think RRSPs for stay-at-home moms probably is not a more efficient thing.
  www.canadainternational.gc.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Le Canada estime que la communauté internationale ne doit pas négliger la menace sécuritaire que pose une accumulation excessive et déstabilisante d’armes classiques. Celles ci englobent les mines terrestres et les armes légères et même les véhicules blindés ainsi que les navires de guerre.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine canadainternational.gc.ca as primary domain
Canada believes the international community must not neglect the threats to security arising from excessive and destabilizing accumulations of conventional weapons, which include landmines, small arms and light weapons, and even armoured vehicles and naval ships. Canada played a leading role in the development of the 1997 Ottawa mine ban treaty (formally the Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction) which is deposited at the United Nations and is upheld by annual General Assembly Resolutions. Canada is also a signatory to the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, which seeks to prohibit or restrict the use of conventional weapons such as mines, booby traps, or incendiary weapons.
  2 Hits scc.lexum.org  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
La Commission ne doit pas négliger des preuves dignes de foi apportées en vue d’établir l’existence de motifs raisonnables de croire que, si l’on procède à l’exécution de l’ordonnance d’expulsion, la personne intéressée sera punie pour des activités d’un caractère politique ou soumise à de graves tribulations.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
The Board must not disregard credible evidence offered to prove the existence of reasonable grounds for believing that if execution of the deportation order is carried out the person concerned will be punished for activities of a political character or will suffer unusual hardship. However, this Court’s appellate jurisdiction in relation to a decision of the Board under s. 15(1)(b)(i) does not extend to the point of interference with the weight assigned by the Board to evidence where, either taken by itself or in relation to conflicting or modifying evidence, the Board must decide on its force in meeting the standards fixed by s. 15(1)(b)(i). The Parliament of Canada has made it clear that the granting of asylum should not rest on random or arbitrary discretion under s. 15(1)(b)(i), but rather that a claim to the Board’s favourable interference may be realized through evidence upon the relevance and cogency of which the Board is to pronounce as a judicial tribunal.
  2 Hits csc.lexum.org  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
La Commission ne doit pas négliger des preuves dignes de foi apportées en vue d’établir l’existence de motifs raisonnables de croire que, si l’on procède à l’exécution de l’ordonnance d’expulsion, la personne intéressée sera punie pour des activités d’un caractère politique ou soumise à de graves tribulations.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine csc.lexum.org as primary domain
The Board must not disregard credible evidence offered to prove the existence of reasonable grounds for believing that if execution of the deportation order is carried out the person concerned will be punished for activities of a political character or will suffer unusual hardship. However, this Court’s appellate jurisdiction in relation to a decision of the Board under s. 15(1)(b)(i) does not extend to the point of interference with the weight assigned by the Board to evidence where, either taken by itself or in relation to conflicting or modifying evidence, the Board must decide on its force in meeting the standards fixed by s. 15(1)(b)(i). The Parliament of Canada has made it clear that the granting of asylum should not rest on random or arbitrary discretion under s. 15(1)(b)(i), but rather that a claim to the Board’s favourable interference may be realized through evidence upon the relevance and cogency of which the Board is to pronounce as a judicial tribunal.