ne le dispense pas – English Translation – Keybot Dictionary
TTN Translation Network
TTN
TTN
Login
Deutsch
Français
Source Languages
Target Languages
Select
Select
Keybot
12
Results
9
Domains
2 Hits
scc.lexum.org
Show text
Show cached source
Open source URL
A ce sujet il me faut faire observer avec déférence pour le juge qui a autorisé la délivrance du bref d’assignation, que la difficulté de la question de droit
ne le dispense pas
de l’obligation de la trancher.
Compare text pages
Compare HTM pages
Open source URL
Open target URL
Define
scc.lexum.org
as primary domain
On this point I must observe, with all due respect for the judge who authorized the issuance of the writ of summons, that the difficulty of a question of law does not dispense him from the obligation of deciding it. This obligation is imposed upon him by the explicit words of art. 847 C.P. in conformity with recent authority: (City of Montreal v. Benjamin News[6]). As is apparent in the present case, the suspension of proceedings is not without serious inconvenience; it often frustrates plaintiff’s recourse.
placesofpeace.eu
Show text
Show cached source
Open source URL
c. Le fait que le luminaire DEL soit alimenté en basse tension
ne le dispense pas
d’une approbation.
Compare text pages
Compare HTM pages
Open source URL
Open target URL
Define
natechindustrie.com
as primary domain
b. A modified luminaire or component must be re-approved (by certification for special inspection).
www.epo.org
Show text
Show cached source
Open source URL
L'article 7(3) RRT et l'article 7(4) RRT protège le demandeur, en cas de retard de paiement, des conséquences découlant sur le plan juridique de l'expiration du délai de paiement, mais
ne le dispense pas
de verser le montant de la différence résultant de l'augmentation de la taxe intervenue entre-temps.
Compare text pages
Compare HTM pages
Open source URL
Open target URL
Define
epo.org
as primary domain
As noted in A-X, 5.1.2, the amount of fee payable is always that applying on the date of payment (see also the transitional provisions in the Administrative Council decisions revising fees). The payer cannot therefore in this respect seek to rely on the ten-day fail-safe arrangement in order to benefit from an old amount, arguing that he gave instructions for payment before the entry into force of the new amount of fee (see J 18/85); Art. 7(3) RFees and Art. 7(4) RFees protects the applicant in the event of late payment from the legal consequences of expiry of the payment period, but not from the obligation to make up any differences resulting from an increase in the amount of fee in the meantime.
2 Hits
csc.lexum.org
Show text
Show cached source
Open source URL
A ce sujet il me faut faire observer avec déférence pour le juge qui a autorisé la délivrance du bref d’assignation, que la difficulté de la question de droit
ne le dispense pas
de l’obligation de la trancher.
Compare text pages
Compare HTM pages
Open source URL
Open target URL
Define
csc.lexum.org
as primary domain
On this point I must observe, with all due respect for the judge who authorized the issuance of the writ of summons, that the difficulty of a question of law does not dispense him from the obligation of deciding it. This obligation is imposed upon him by the explicit words of art. 847 C.P. in conformity with recent authority: (City of Montreal v. Benjamin News[6]). As is apparent in the present case, the suspension of proceedings is not without serious inconvenience; it often frustrates plaintiff’s recourse.
parl.gc.ca
Show text
Show cached source
Open source URL
Aussi, avec toute la déférence que j'ai pour M. Shapiro, je crois que son souci de respecter les dispositions de la loi est compréhensible mais que cela
ne le dispense pas
de répondre aux questions que lui a posées ce comité à la dernière réunion ou que pourrait lui poser aujourd'hui ce comité.
Compare text pages
Compare HTM pages
Open source URL
Open target URL
Define
parl.gc.ca
as primary domain
So with the greatest of respect for Dr. Shapiro, I think his concern about his duty under the statute is understandable. It's my view, however, that it is not a duty of a kind that pre-empts him from answering the questions that he was asked by this committee at the previous meeting or that he might be asked later today.