ne pas imputer – English Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot      16 Results   7 Domains
  parl.gc.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Le président: Nous dites-vous que nous pourrions ne pas imputer un loyer à ceux qui occupent des locaux appartenant au gouvernement?
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine parl.gc.ca as primary domain
The Chairman: You mean there's a possibility we wouldn't be charging imputed rents to those people occupying properties fully owned by the government?
  3 Hits scc.lexum.org  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Je pense donc que la Cour d’appel de la Colombie‑Britannique a eu raison de ne pas imputer la responsabilité sans faute du fait d’autrui en l’espèce et je rejetterais le pourvoi sur ce point, sous réserve du droit des appelants de poursuivre les procédures devant la Cour suprême de la Colombie‑Britannique, si cela leur est conseillé, relativement aux questions de la responsabilité potentielle du Club, fondée sur la faute.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
In my view, the case law, reflecting policy judgments by various courts over many years and across many different jurisdictions, “clearly” suggests that the imposition of no-fault liability in this case would overshoot the existing judicial consensus about appropriate limits of an employer’s no-fault liability.  This same conclusion is reached under the second step of the analysis in which the “broader policy rationales” are confronted directly.  I therefore think the British Columbia Court of Appeal correctly denied vicarious no-fault liability in this case and I would dismiss the appeal on that point, without prejudice to the appellants’ right to continue proceedings in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, if so advised, on the issues of the Club’s potential fault-based liability.
  4 Hits www.wto.int  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Pour fournir une telle explication motivée et adéquate, l’autorité compétente doit expliquer comment elle a fait en sorte de ne pas imputer les effets dommageables des facteurs autres qu’un accroissement des importations — qui englobent les “importations exclues” — aux importations incluses dans la mesure.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine wto.int as primary domain
In order to provide such a reasoned and adequate explanation, the competent authority must explain how it ensured that it did not attribute the injurious effects of factors other than included imports — which subsume “excluded imports” — to the imports included in the measure. As we explained in US — Line Pipe in the context of Article 3.1 and “unforeseen developments” in this Report, if the competent authority does not provide such an explanation, a panel is not in a position to find that the competent authority ensured compliance with the clear and express requirement of non-attribution under Article 4.2(b) of the Agreement on Safeguards.
  3 Hits csc.lexum.org  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Je pense donc que la Cour d’appel de la Colombie‑Britannique a eu raison de ne pas imputer la responsabilité sans faute du fait d’autrui en l’espèce et je rejetterais le pourvoi sur ce point, sous réserve du droit des appelants de poursuivre les procédures devant la Cour suprême de la Colombie‑Britannique, si cela leur est conseillé, relativement aux questions de la responsabilité potentielle du Club, fondée sur la faute.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine csc.lexum.org as primary domain
In my view, the case law, reflecting policy judgments by various courts over many years and across many different jurisdictions, “clearly” suggests that the imposition of no-fault liability in this case would overshoot the existing judicial consensus about appropriate limits of an employer’s no-fault liability.  This same conclusion is reached under the second step of the analysis in which the “broader policy rationales” are confronted directly.  I therefore think the British Columbia Court of Appeal correctly denied vicarious no-fault liability in this case and I would dismiss the appeal on that point, without prejudice to the appellants’ right to continue proceedings in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, if so advised, on the issues of the Club’s potential fault-based liability.