ne précisant pas – English Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot      24 Results   13 Domains
  www.mo-lin.ch  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Tarifs correspondants à des pages on-line opaques (pages Internet ne précisant pas le nom de l’hôtel, l’adresse exacte ou la disponibilité de chambres tant que l’utilisateur n’a pas payé la réservation de la/des chambre/s).
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine hotelpyrenees.com as primary domain
The Pyrénées Hotel will not be responsible, in any case, for penalties or other costs that could apper caused by cancellations or mistakes in the published rates of other websites.
  www.cra-arc.gc.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
ne précisant pas la date à laquelle le « principal » doit être établi, cette date d'établissement dépend donc du contexte dans lequel s'inscrit le libellé d'une disposition donnée et de l'objet de cette disposition.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine cra-arc.gc.ca as primary domain
(ii) in any other case, ½ of the lesser of the amount so paid and the amount by which the lesser of the principal amount of the obligation and all amounts paid in the year or in any preceding taxation year in satisfaction of its principal amount exceeds the amount for which obligation was issued:"
  6 Hits scc.lexum.org  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Après examen, les juges Brooke et Labrosse ont rejeté l'argument voulant que le juge du procès ait commis une erreur en ne précisant pas, dans ses directives au jury, que la preuve du casier judiciaire de Semester et son lien avec l'agression à coups de couteau commise contre Day au cours de la demi‑heure qui avait précédé celle dont Heffern avait été victime pouvaient avoir une valeur probante aux fins d'établir que Semester était susceptible d'avoir poignardé Heffern.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
A majority of the Court of Appeal for Ontario dismissed the appeal: (1993), 18 W.C.B. (2d) 270.  Brooke and Labrosse JJ.A. considered but rejected the submission that the trial judge erred in not instructing the jury that the evidence of Semester's criminal record and his connection with the stabbing of Day within the half hour of the stabbing of Heffern could have probative value to show that he was likely to have stabbed Heffern.  The majority noted that no objection had been taken to the charge at trial, and stated that it was implicit in the jury's verdict that they accepted the evidence of Semester denying involvement and rejected the evidence of the appellant.  They concluded that the jury would not have reached a different verdict had they been charged as now requested by the appellant.
  www.cces.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Le principal problème repose sur le fait que le gouvernement a édicté peu de règlements sur l’industrie des suppléments. Certains fabricants de suppléments étiquettent mal leurs produits, en ne précisant pas leur contenu et la quantité relative de chaque ingrédient par dose.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine cces.ca as primary domain
Supplements may intentionally contain prohibited substances or may be inadvertently contaminated with prohibited substances. The key issue is that there is little government regulation on the supplement industry. Some supplement manufacturers mislabel their products by not accurately specifying the contents or the relative amounts of each ingredient per dose. It is not uncommon for supplements to be cross-contaminated with banned substances during the manufacturing process if the manufacturer produces other products that contain prohibited substances. Many ingredients are sourced outside of Canada and may be contaminated.
  www.ombudsman.forces.gc.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
En fait, ce grief n'avait donné lieu à aucune enquête et n'avait pas été soumis au chef d'état-major de la Défense, parce qu'il ne satisfaisait pas aux exigences techniques de la procédure de grief des Forces canadiennes, en ne précisant pas le redressement demandé.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine ombudsman.forces.gc.ca as primary domain
I am also not satisfied, based on the evidence collected by my investigators, including the information contained in the grievance file, that the issue of rank influenced the handling of Captain Poulin's grievance. Captain Poulin's grievance was not in fact investigated and was not submitted to the Chief of the Defence Staff for adjudication because it failed to specify the specific redress which was sought, and meet a technical requirement set out in the CF grievance procedures. The memorandum authored by Major Morrissey on behalf of the Director CF Grievance Administration clearly left the door open for Captain Poulin to resubmit his application for redress of grievance, specifying the redress sought as required by the procedures.
  2 Hits www.epo.org  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Dans l'affaire T 980/95 également, la chambre a estimé que la règle 29(1)a) CBE 1973 n'exigeait pas explicitement qu'une revendication formulée en deux parties parte de l'état de la technique "le plus proche", cette règle ne précisant pas s'il est nécessaire ou souhaitable de présenter l'activité inventive dans la partie caractérisante de la revendication.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine epo.org as primary domain
Likewise, in T 850/90, it was confirmed that examination for inventive step should also take account of the features in the preamble, since the invention was defined by the claims as a whole. Likewise, in T 980/95 it was held that there was no explicit requirement in R. 29(1)(a) EPC 1973 that a claim in two‑part form be set up on the basis of the "closest" prior art, since the rule made no reference to the necessity or desirability for the characterising portion of the claim to set out the inventive step. Thus the mere fact that a particular state of the art turned out, in later proceedings, not to be the "closest" state of the art for the assessment of inventive step did not in itself result in a two‑part form based on that art contravening R. 29(1)(a) EPC 1973.
  6 Hits csc.lexum.org  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Après examen, les juges Brooke et Labrosse ont rejeté l'argument voulant que le juge du procès ait commis une erreur en ne précisant pas, dans ses directives au jury, que la preuve du casier judiciaire de Semester et son lien avec l'agression à coups de couteau commise contre Day au cours de la demi‑heure qui avait précédé celle dont Heffern avait été victime pouvaient avoir une valeur probante aux fins d'établir que Semester était susceptible d'avoir poignardé Heffern.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine csc.lexum.org as primary domain
A majority of the Court of Appeal for Ontario dismissed the appeal: (1993), 18 W.C.B. (2d) 270.  Brooke and Labrosse JJ.A. considered but rejected the submission that the trial judge erred in not instructing the jury that the evidence of Semester's criminal record and his connection with the stabbing of Day within the half hour of the stabbing of Heffern could have probative value to show that he was likely to have stabbed Heffern.  The majority noted that no objection had been taken to the charge at trial, and stated that it was implicit in the jury's verdict that they accepted the evidence of Semester denying involvement and rejected the evidence of the appellant.  They concluded that the jury would not have reached a different verdict had they been charged as now requested by the appellant.