ne signifie plus – English Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot      20 Results   14 Domains
  www.tonnievanderzouwen.nl  
La Société comprend que le fait d’offrir un environnement de travail sain et sécuritaire pour les employés ne signifie plus une simple prévention des blessures physiques et une simple protection contre celles-ci en milieu de travail; le bien-être affectif et mental des employés doit être également protégé et soutenu.
Canada Lands Company is vitally interested in the ongoing health and safety of employees, which includes mental health and stress management, and detection and awareness of mental health indicators. The Company understands that providing a safe and healthy work environment for employees no longer means the simple prevention and protection from physical injury in the workplace; the emotional and mental well-being of employees must be protected and supported as well.
  3 Hits parl.gc.ca  
Je trouve que c'est une recommandation importante, car beaucoup de représentants de la fonction publique fédérale, notamment les syndicats, et surtout l'Alliance de la fonction publique—se sentent terriblement lésés lorsqu'un conflit surgit à cause de la procédure de désignation des employés et qu'ils ont l'impressions que leur droit de grève ne signifie plus rien.
I think our committee had recommended that the provisions used in determining “essential services” be the same as those used in the Canada Labour Code. I would think that was important, because a lot of people in the federal public service—especially the unions, and especially the Public Service Alliance—feel very damaged if a dispute arises by the designation process that, to them, seems to just take away the effectiveness of their right to strike.
  www.deleguescommerciaux.gc.ca  
Les lésions médullaires sont des blessures débilitantes qui peuvent changer le cours d’une vie. Cependant, grâce au travail d’organisations comme l’Institut Rick Hansen, une lésion médullaire ne signifie plus que l’avenir est sans espoir.
Spinal cord injuries are debilitating and life-changing—but through work of organizations like the Rick Hansen Institute, a spinal cord injury no longer means a hopeless future. The Canadian-based not-for-profit organization accelerates the translation of discoveries into real applied treatments, by leading the collaboration of researchers, healthcare professionals and service providers across Canada and around the world. The institute supports the development of new therapies like ReJoyce, a portable rehabilitation unit that restores hand function, helping people with spinal cord injuries live more independently. This Canadian innovation is now being sold throughout North America, Europe, and will soon be offered in Asia.
  ottawa.ca  
Figure 3 : La norme de service « à l’heure » a été modifiée dernièrement et ne signifie plus désormais ne pas être plus de 2 minutes à l’avance et plus de 3 minutes en retard mais bien ne pas arriver à l’avance et ne pas être plus de 5 minutes en retard.
Figure 3: The service standard for “on-time” service has recently been changed from running no more than 2 minutes early and no more than 3 minutes late to not running early at all and no more than 5 minutes late. This new standard is in line with industry practice. Beginning in Q1 2009, this service standard was measured continually on all routes using global positioning technology instead of periodically, at time points. The graph shows that the previous service standard was met 77% of the time during the first quarter while the revised standard was met 52% of the time. As Q1 2009 was the first quarter the new standard and technology was used, no comparative data from earlier quarters is presented and Q1 will serve as the baseline against which improvements will be measured as operational staff adopt the new standards.
  www.cantalamessa.org  
Se convertir ne signifie plus revenir en arrière, à la vieille alliance et à l’observance de la loi ; mais plutôt faire un bond en avant, entrer dans la nouvelle alliance, attraper ce Royaume qui est apparu, entrer dedans.
When Jesus said, “repent, and believe the gospel,” he was thus already teaching justification by faith. Before him, “to repent” always meant “to turn back,” as indicated by the Hebrew word shub; it meant to turn back, through a renewed observance of the law, to the covenant that had been broken. “To repent,” consequently, had a meaning that was mainly ascetic, moral, and penitential, and it was implemented by changing one’s behavior. Repentance was seen as a condition for salvation; it meant “repent and you will be saved; repent and salvation will come to you.” This was the meaning of “repent” up to this point, including on the lips of John the Baptist.
  2 Hits republicart.net  
Dans les écrits politiques de Kant, "monde" ne signifie plus seulement (comme dans la "Critique de la raison pure") "l'ensemble de tous les phénomènes" ou la "totalité de leur synthèse [objectif]", mais devient la dimension dans laquelle se situent les considérations de Kant, surtout en ce qui concerne la citoyenneté mondiale: la sphère de l'intérêt général.[17]
7. It is primarily in Kant's political philosophy that this political concept of world takes shape. In Kant's political writing, world no longer means only (as in the "Critique of Pure Reason") the "embodiment of all phenomena" or the "totality of their [objective] synthesis", but rather becomes a dimension, in which Kant's reflections, particularly in relation to "world citizenship" are located; it becomes the sphere of general interest.[17] Nevertheless, it appears that reading Kant will not take us far, to begin with, since this concept of world is hardly given an explicit definition, but rather is characterized by its reference to "mankind" as a species, to which Kant's argumentations in his philosophies of law and history refer. The concept of the species of mankind thus seems to assert "world" as a dimension of the political, but as a dimension that has always already been given - naturally and through "moral law", which is, for Kant, innate to man as a free being, so to speak. In this way, the question, which is central here, of the becoming of this dimension is obscured.
  2 Hits www.republicart.net  
Dans les écrits politiques de Kant, "monde" ne signifie plus seulement (comme dans la "Critique de la raison pure") "l'ensemble de tous les phénomènes" ou la "totalité de leur synthèse [objectif]", mais devient la dimension dans laquelle se situent les considérations de Kant, surtout en ce qui concerne la citoyenneté mondiale: la sphère de l'intérêt général.[17]
7. It is primarily in Kant's political philosophy that this political concept of world takes shape. In Kant's political writing, world no longer means only (as in the "Critique of Pure Reason") the "embodiment of all phenomena" or the "totality of their [objective] synthesis", but rather becomes a dimension, in which Kant's reflections, particularly in relation to "world citizenship" are located; it becomes the sphere of general interest.[17] Nevertheless, it appears that reading Kant will not take us far, to begin with, since this concept of world is hardly given an explicit definition, but rather is characterized by its reference to "mankind" as a species, to which Kant's argumentations in his philosophies of law and history refer. The concept of the species of mankind thus seems to assert "world" as a dimension of the political, but as a dimension that has always already been given - naturally and through "moral law", which is, for Kant, innate to man as a free being, so to speak. In this way, the question, which is central here, of the becoming of this dimension is obscured.
  www.elections.ca  
Dans un tel contexte, le plafond de 1 000 $ imposé aux particuliers quant au total des contributions qu'ils peuvent verser à l'ensemble des entités locales d'un parti enregistré dans une année donnée ne signifie plus grand-chose.
It would be unmanageable for campaigns to account for every such transaction as a non-monetary contribution and an election expense; to this extent, the provision in question is logical in its intent. However, the wording of subsection 2(2) does not accomplish the intended goal. Indeed, as currently drafted, the provision would allow an individual to offer a good or a service of substantial value, but to have it deemed to be of no value under this provision, simply because the amount charged by the individual was $200 or less. For example, an individual who is not in the business of selling furniture could provide the campaign with all of its required furniture, but the transaction would be deemed as having no commercial value because the price asked was $200 or less even if the real value was well in excess of that individual's contribution limit. Clearly, a literal application of the provision would be problematic and not in keeping with the intent of Parliament as it could allow the circumvention of the rules on disclosure and on contribution limits, as well as spending limits.
  2 Hits eipcp.net  
Dans les écrits politiques de Kant, "monde" ne signifie plus seulement (comme dans la "Critique de la raison pure") "l'ensemble de tous les phénomènes" ou la "totalité de leur synthèse [objectif]", mais devient la dimension dans laquelle se situent les considérations de Kant, surtout en ce qui concerne la citoyenneté mondiale: la sphère de l'intérêt général.[17]
7. It is primarily in Kant's political philosophy that this political concept of world takes shape. In Kant's political writing, world no longer means only (as in the "Critique of Pure Reason") the "embodiment of all phenomena" or the "totality of their [objective] synthesis", but rather becomes a dimension, in which Kant's reflections, particularly in relation to "world citizenship" are located; it becomes the sphere of general interest.[17] Nevertheless, it appears that reading Kant will not take us far, to begin with, since this concept of world is hardly given an explicit definition, but rather is characterized by its reference to "mankind" as a species, to which Kant's argumentations in his philosophies of law and history refer. The concept of the species of mankind thus seems to assert "world" as a dimension of the political, but as a dimension that has always already been given - naturally and through "moral law", which is, for Kant, innate to man as a free being, so to speak. In this way, the question, which is central here, of the becoming of this dimension is obscured.
  2 Hits transversal.at  
Dans les écrits politiques de Kant, "monde" ne signifie plus seulement (comme dans la "Critique de la raison pure") "l'ensemble de tous les phénomènes" ou la "totalité de leur synthèse [objectif]", mais devient la dimension dans laquelle se situent les considérations de Kant, surtout en ce qui concerne la citoyenneté mondiale: la sphère de l'intérêt général.[17]
7. It is primarily in Kant's political philosophy that this political concept of world takes shape. In Kant's political writing, world no longer means only (as in the "Critique of Pure Reason") the "embodiment of all phenomena" or the "totality of their [objective] synthesis", but rather becomes a dimension, in which Kant's reflections, particularly in relation to "world citizenship" are located; it becomes the sphere of general interest.[17] Nevertheless, it appears that reading Kant will not take us far, to begin with, since this concept of world is hardly given an explicit definition, but rather is characterized by its reference to "mankind" as a species, to which Kant's argumentations in his philosophies of law and history refer. The concept of the species of mankind thus seems to assert "world" as a dimension of the political, but as a dimension that has always already been given - naturally and through "moral law", which is, for Kant, innate to man as a free being, so to speak. In this way, the question, which is central here, of the becoming of this dimension is obscured.
  www.oas.org  
De même, la doctrine prévoit ailleurs que, en raison des dispositions de l’article 163 de la Constitution, quatre interprétations permettant de connaître la portée et le but de l’article en question ont été formulées, à savoir une première interprétation selon laquelle « la Constitution établit une catégorie prédominante de lois formelles en consacrant le concept des lois organiques (... ). La spécialité des lois ne signifie plus pour celles-ci qu’elles doivent être appliquées de préférence à d’autres lois, parce que si celles-là sont organiques, elles ont le pouvoir d’y déroger ».
Another doctrinal sector maintains that, based on Article 163 of the Constitution, four interpretations have arisen, which elucidate the scope and purpose of the article. The first interpretation states that “the Constitution establishes a supercategory of formal laws by enshrining the figure of leyes orgánicas (…) Special laws are not entitled to preference in application over other laws, and leyes orgánicas have the power to override them”; a second interpretation is that “the Constitution has limited itself to establishing a rule for legislative policy, ordering the legislator when he has to legislate on matters governed by leyes orgánicas, to subject those matters to the general provisions established therein, and to their spirit and intent”; the third interpretation, which refers to rank rather than the content of the law and is closely linked to the first interpretation, maintains that “leyes orgánicas do constitute a supercategory of laws and, accordingly, special laws must be subject to them, but only in the matters dealt with in the ley orgánica”; the fourth and last interpretation “identifies leyes orgánicas with fundamental laws, and considers that they are applied preferentially over special laws in all matters in them that constitute the development of express constitutional rules, such as rules relating to the guarantees established in the constitution and the rules of organization for the essential structures of the State”.