nommer de nouveau – English Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot      20 Results   10 Domains
  3 Hits www.psc-cfp.gc.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Une mesure consiste à nommer de nouveau la personne au poste qu'elle occupait immédiatement avant la nomination qui a été contestée avec succès. Ainsi, la personne occupera le poste qu'elle occupait avant que l'erreur ait eu lieu.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine psc-cfp.gc.ca as primary domain
One approach is to reappoint the person to the position he or she occupied immediately prior to the appointment that was successfully challenged. In this way, the person will be placed in the position he or she was occupying when the error took place. However, this approach is not always possible. This situation emphasizes the importance of taking corrective action as soon as possible, which will increase the chances that the appointee's former position will still be vacant.
  2 Hits parl.gc.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Pourriez-vous nommer de nouveau rapidement ces pays?
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine parl.gc.ca as primary domain
Could you just quickly rename those countries?
  www.omaf.gov.on.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Ce travail comprenait une demande au ministre de nommer de nouveau le président, afin d'assurer la continuité de la Commission, et d'engager un secrétaire pour la prestation de services de soutien au secrétariat et à la procédure de règlement.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine omaf.gov.on.ca as primary domain
Seventy four (74) of the 338 claims received in 2011/12 fiscal were at various stages of the adjudication process at the end of the fiscal year and were carried forward to the 2012/13 fiscal. Despite the fact that 18 hearings were held and a very large volume of claims were processed, the Board took an average of 61 days to make a decision. This was just one day more than the goal set in the business plan. The Board benefited from work done in 2009/10 to streamline the claims adjudication process. This included a request to the Minister to re-appoint the Chair to ensure board continuity and hiring a secretary for the provision of secretariat and adjudication support.
  4 Hits scc.lexum.org  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
59 La décision de restructurer la Commission et la décision subséquente de ne pas nommer de nouveau l’intimé étaient des décisions valables prises de bonne foi. La décision de restructurer la Commission était délibérée et a été adoptée par la législature élue de la province de Terre-Neuve.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
59 Both the decision to restructure the Board, and the subsequent decision not to re-appoint the respondent, were bona fide decisions.  The decision to restructure the Board was deliberated and enacted by the elected legislature of the Province of Newfoundland.  This is fatal to the respondent’s argument on bad faith, as legislative decision making is not subject to any known duty of fairness.  Legislatures are subject to constitutional requirements for valid law-making, but within their constitutional boundaries, they can do as they see fit.  The wisdom and value of legislative decisions are subject only to review by the electorate.  The judgment in Reference re Canada Assistance Plan, supra, at p. 558, was conclusive on this point in stating that: “the rules governing procedural fairness do not apply to a body exercising purely legislative functions”.  See also Martineau v. Matsqui Institution Disciplinary Board, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 602, per Dickson J., at p. 628.
  4 Hits csc.lexum.org  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
59 La décision de restructurer la Commission et la décision subséquente de ne pas nommer de nouveau l’intimé étaient des décisions valables prises de bonne foi. La décision de restructurer la Commission était délibérée et a été adoptée par la législature élue de la province de Terre-Neuve.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine csc.lexum.org as primary domain
59 Both the decision to restructure the Board, and the subsequent decision not to re-appoint the respondent, were bona fide decisions.  The decision to restructure the Board was deliberated and enacted by the elected legislature of the Province of Newfoundland.  This is fatal to the respondent’s argument on bad faith, as legislative decision making is not subject to any known duty of fairness.  Legislatures are subject to constitutional requirements for valid law-making, but within their constitutional boundaries, they can do as they see fit.  The wisdom and value of legislative decisions are subject only to review by the electorate.  The judgment in Reference re Canada Assistance Plan, supra, at p. 558, was conclusive on this point in stating that: “the rules governing procedural fairness do not apply to a body exercising purely legislative functions”.  See also Martineau v. Matsqui Institution Disciplinary Board, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 602, per Dickson J., at p. 628.