objectivement impossible – English Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot      12 Results   10 Domains
  3 Hits www.guichet.public.lu  
soit, si l’aménagement est techniquement ou objectivement impossible, affecter la salariée à un autre poste de travail avec maintien du salaire antérieur ;
or, if it is technically or objectively impossible, transfer the employee to another position with the same salary as in her former position;
  www.cns.public.lu  
Pour ce genre de travaux, l'employeur est tenu d'aménager provisoirement les conditions ou le temps de travail. Si un tel aménagement s'avère techniquement ou objectivement impossible, la femme enceinte doit être affectée à un autre poste de travail avec maintien de son salaire.
In these situations, the employer is obliged to make appropriate temporary arrangements concerning working conditions or working hours. Should new arrangements prove to be technically impossible or not feasible, the pregnant woman must be allocated to another post without prejudice to her salary.
  www.ger.ethique.gc.ca  
Il faudrait s'en remettre exclusivement à une évaluation par un comité d'éthique américain seulement s'il est objectivement impossible d'arriver à une entente avec un CÉR canadien compétent et expérimenté tel que mentionné ci-dessus et si les normes de la règle 1.14 sont respectées.
6. We interpret the logic of article 1.14 to further guide our response to your question. Exclusive reliance should be placed on US-based review only if arrangements with a competent and experienced Canadian REB of the kinds noted above are objectively impracticable, and then only if the standards of article 1.14 are maintained. For instance, post-approval monitoring duties may prove difficult if the committee is based in the US.
  scc.lexum.org  
Toutefois, même si ces deux concepts diffèrent parfois en partie, deux autres aspects de la défense de commentaire loyal protègent le droit à la réputation contre un commentaire qu’il est objectivement impossible de croire.
[95] Even though, in principle, I do not consider it appropriate to exclude from fair comment that which no honest person could believe, it is nevertheless true that in practice, such speech will rarely, if ever, be protected as fair comment even without an honest belief requirement.  This is because in defamation law, reputation is already protected in three ways from comments that are not “fair” in the sense of being objectively capable of belief on the relevant facts.
  csc.lexum.org  
Toutefois, même si ces deux concepts diffèrent parfois en partie, deux autres aspects de la défense de commentaire loyal protègent le droit à la réputation contre un commentaire qu’il est objectivement impossible de croire.
[95] Even though, in principle, I do not consider it appropriate to exclude from fair comment that which no honest person could believe, it is nevertheless true that in practice, such speech will rarely, if ever, be protected as fair comment even without an honest belief requirement.  This is because in defamation law, reputation is already protected in three ways from comments that are not “fair” in the sense of being objectively capable of belief on the relevant facts.
  www.epo.org  
La chambre a poursuivi en déclarant que si l'exposé d'une invention est insuffisant, il n'est pas nécessaire de savoir s'il était objectivement impossible de combler cette lacune à la date de priorité, c'est-à-dire de déterminer si personne n'aurait pu obtenir l'effet technique recherché et revendiqué.
The board went on to state that if an invention is insufficiently disclosed, it is of no relevance whether it was objectively impossible to provide the missing information on the date of priority, i.e. whether nobody could have achieved the intended and claimed technical effect. The decisive issue is whether the invention is disclosed in a manner sufficiently complete for it to be carried out by an average person skilled in the art on the date of priority, with knowledge of the patent and on the basis of that person’s common general knowledge.
  www.haydn.it  
Les fabricants de LED sont tenus de déclarer les paramètres utilisés pour estimer le laps de temps après lequel le ux d’une source lumineuse à LED descend en dessous de ce pourcentage, étant donné qu’il est objectivement impossible de tester la LED jusqu’à son extinction totale.
As opposed to conventional light sources, LEDs do not “burn out”, rather, in time, the intensity of the light emitted declines. Although there is as yet no standard de ning the life of a LED, its life is generally deemed terminated when the light emitted declines to 80% of the initial level. Since it is not possible to test a LED until total extinction, LED manufacturers are required to state the parameters used to estimate time before the luminous ux of a LED light source falls below that percentage. The life of a LED is generally counted in hours; however, this always depends on the type of use: continuous (typical of a business where the lamp remains on all the time) or occasional (as in households where the lamp is on for a few hours a day). For example: if a LED guaranteed for approximately 30,000 hours remains on 24 hours a day, it will last 3 years while, if it is only on for 3 hours a day, it could last up to 40 years.