on doit apprécier – English Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot      10 Results   4 Domains
  3 Hits www.epo.org  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Il convient de se fonder sur le même niveau de connaissances lorsque, pour la même invention, on doit apprécier à la fois la question du caractère suffisant de l'exposé et celle de l'activité inventive (T 60/89, JO 1992, 268 ; T 694/92, T 187/93, T 412/93).
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine epo.org as primary domain
The same level of skill has to be applied when, for the same invention, the two questions of sufficient disclosure and inventive step are being considered (T 60/89, OJ 1992, 268; T 694/92, T 187/93, T 412/93). However, the standard of disclosure required for amendments by Art. 123(2) EPC 1973, namely that of being directly and unambiguously derivable, is inappropriate, the criterion being that it must be possible to reproduce the invention on the basis of the original application documents without any inventive effort and undue burden (T 629/05).
  parl.gc.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
S'agissant de l'expertise du Québec, où cette présomption n'a pas reçu l'appui des témoins provenant du Québec qui se sont présentés devant le Comité mixte parlementaire, nous croyons, encore une fois, qu'il faut placer l'intérêt des enfants au centre de nos préoccupations. Qu'est-ce que l'on doit apprécier quand on parle de la notion de «l'intérêt des enfants au centre de nos préoccupations»?
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine parl.gc.ca as primary domain
As for the expertise of Quebec, where this assumption did not have the support of witnesses from Quebec who appeared before the joint parliamentary committee, we believe, once again, that the interest of the children must be our primary concern. What do we mean by “the interest of the children must be our primary concern”. There are apparently four considerations. The first is recognized in law. We could without any trouble find cases in which common law judges relied on this concern, making it part of the jurisprudence. We are saying that, in so far as possible, the child must remain in an economic situation comparable to the one that existed prior to the divorce.
  3 Hits scc.lexum.org  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Il incombe à la poursuite de soumettre à la cour une preuve relativement à la question du "caractère indu". La norme sociale en fonction de laquelle on doit apprécier le matériel prétendument obscène ne peut être déterminée sans cette preuve.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
There is an onus on the Crown to put evidence before the court on the issue of "undueness". The community standard against which the allegedly obscene matter must be measured cannot be identified without it. Indeed, it is naive to think that a judge, drawing on his own experience alone, can determine the objective standard against which impugned conduct is to be measured. Moreover, it is wrong in principle. It leaves the accused with no way of knowing the case to be met, or the level of acceptability imposed by any particular judge.
  3 Hits csc.lexum.org  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Il incombe à la poursuite de soumettre à la cour une preuve relativement à la question du "caractère indu". La norme sociale en fonction de laquelle on doit apprécier le matériel prétendument obscène ne peut être déterminée sans cette preuve.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine csc.lexum.org as primary domain
There is an onus on the Crown to put evidence before the court on the issue of "undueness". The community standard against which the allegedly obscene matter must be measured cannot be identified without it. Indeed, it is naive to think that a judge, drawing on his own experience alone, can determine the objective standard against which impugned conduct is to be measured. Moreover, it is wrong in principle. It leaves the accused with no way of knowing the case to be met, or the level of acceptability imposed by any particular judge.