on le qualifie de – English Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot      18 Results   13 Domains
  www.omafra.gov.on.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Le radis à graine oléagineuse peut absorber une grande quantité d'azote excédentaire, mais parce qu'il est rapidement détruit par l'arrivée de conditions hivernales, l'azote sera libéré au début du printemps au fur et à mesure que le sol se réchauffera; on le qualifie de culture-abri "qui fuit."
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine omafra.gov.on.ca as primary domain
One method of controlling volunteer cereals and other annual weeds is to disc or cultivate immediately after harvest and then till the soil again just before seeding the cover crop (stale seedbed).
  www.klassbols.se  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Mozart a débuté en 1991, dans le projet européen ACCLAIM et a été développé dans un effort de coopération, sous une licence de type X11. Bien que sa licence ne soit pas optimale, on le qualifie de logiciel libre.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine gnu.msn.by as primary domain
Mozart was started 1991 in the European ACCLAIM project and has been developed with cooperative efforts under a X11-like license. Although the license is certainly not optimal, it does qualify as Free Software.
  www.omaf.gov.on.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Le radis à graine oléagineuse peut absorber une grande quantité d'azote excédentaire, mais parce qu'il est rapidement détruit par l'arrivée de conditions hivernales, l'azote sera libéré au début du printemps au fur et à mesure que le sol se réchauffera; on le qualifie de culture-abri "qui fuit."
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine omaf.gov.on.ca as primary domain
Oilseed radish can take up a lot of excess nitrogen, but because it winterkills early in the winter, the nitrogen will be released early in the spring as the ground warms. It has been referred to as a "leaky" cover crop.
  www.aere-egke.be  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
On le qualifie de photographe de mode et pourtant il a publié plusieurs livres comme Cyclops en 1995 et Maroc en 1998 qui sont des hymnes à la création pure bien éloignée des strasses et des paillettes.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine finearttv.tv as primary domain
The list is incredibly long of advertising campaigns and celebrities photographs. Albert Waston was published, not only in Vogue but also in Rolling Stone, Life, Newsweek... The celebrity photographs are numerous and from all over the world; Michael Jackson, Al Pacino, Mike Tyson and also the official photos of the marriage of Prince Andrew and Sarah Fergusson. They qualify him as a photographer of fashion, but he has also published several books like Cyclops in 1995 and Morocco in 1998 that are hymns to creation far removed from the stars and the dazzle of show business.
  csc.lexum.org  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
3, dans sa portée limitée, viole la précepte constitutionnel de l'indépendance judiciaire. Il suffit de dire que peu importe qu'on le qualifie de règle de common law ou de norme constitutionnelle fondamentale, le principe de l'indépendance judiciaire n'est pas absolu.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine csc.lexum.org as primary domain
McLachlin J. expressly refrained from assessing the constitutionality of s. 3 of the Public Inquiries Act as a result of her decision that the testimony of the justices could not be compelled as a matter of statutory construction.  My interpretation of the same statute lead me to conclude that there is a limited power within s. 3 to compel the justices to testify on the very narrow issue of the composition of the record and of the panel.  As a result, it is not necessary to undertake a detailed examination of the question of whether s. 3, in its limited scope, would violate the constitutional precept of judicial independence.  It is sufficient to state that whether it is described as a rule of common law or as a fundamental constitutional norm, the principle of judicial independence is not absolute.  As noted earlier, the adjudicative privilege of judicial immunity must be distinguished from the privilege as to the administration of the courts.  While the first is absolute, the second is qualified and must give way albeit only in rare and special circumstances such as those which exist in this case.  This qualified administrative privilege must be regarded as a necessary qualification to any constitutional expression of the principle of judicial independence.  As a result, I would conclude that s. 3 does not violate the constitutional principle of judicial independence.
  scc.lexum.org  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
3, dans sa portée limitée, viole la précepte constitutionnel de l'indépendance judiciaire. Il suffit de dire que peu importe qu'on le qualifie de règle de common law ou de norme constitutionnelle fondamentale, le principe de l'indépendance judiciaire n'est pas absolu.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
McLachlin J. expressly refrained from assessing the constitutionality of s. 3 of the Public Inquiries Act as a result of her decision that the testimony of the justices could not be compelled as a matter of statutory construction.  My interpretation of the same statute lead me to conclude that there is a limited power within s. 3 to compel the justices to testify on the very narrow issue of the composition of the record and of the panel.  As a result, it is not necessary to undertake a detailed examination of the question of whether s. 3, in its limited scope, would violate the constitutional precept of judicial independence.  It is sufficient to state that whether it is described as a rule of common law or as a fundamental constitutional norm, the principle of judicial independence is not absolute.  As noted earlier, the adjudicative privilege of judicial immunity must be distinguished from the privilege as to the administration of the courts.  While the first is absolute, the second is qualified and must give way albeit only in rare and special circumstances such as those which exist in this case.  This qualified administrative privilege must be regarded as a necessary qualification to any constitutional expression of the principle of judicial independence.  As a result, I would conclude that s. 3 does not violate the constitutional principle of judicial independence.