on nous accuse – Traduction en Anglais – Dictionnaire Keybot

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch English Spacer Help
Langues sources Langues cibles
Keybot      18 Résultats   7 Domaines
  www.lexilogos.com  
Montrer texteMontrer source en cacheMontrer URL avec texte source
Déesse de l'ordre, image de la stabilité céleste, on était coupable pour t'aimer, et, aujourd'hui qu'à force de consciencieux travail nous avons réussi à nous rapprocher de toi, on nous accuse d'avoir commis un crime contre l'esprit humain en rompant des chaînes dont se passait Platon.
Comparer pages textesComparer pages HTMMontrer URL avec texte sourceMontrer URL avec langue cibleDéfinir lexilogos.com comme domaine prioritaire
"Dost thou remember the day when, Dionysodorus being archon, an ugly little Jew, speaking the Greek of the Syrians, came hither, passed beneath thy porch without understanding thee, misread thy inscriptions, and imagined that he had discovered within thy walls an altar dedicated to what he called the Unknown God? Well, this little Jew was believed; for a thousand years thou hast been treated as an idol, O Truth! for a thousand years the world has been a desert in which no flower bloomed. And all this time thou wert silent, O Salpinx, clarion of thought. Goddess of order, image of celestial stability, those who loved thee were regarded, as culprits, and now, when by force of conscientious labour we have succeeded in drawing near to thee, we are accused of committing a crime against human intelligence because we have burst the chains which Plato knew not.
  www.eskiz.uz  
Montrer texteMontrer source en cacheMontrer URL avec texte source
Certes, alors que l'annexion des Pays Catalans à l'Espagne se maintient, il est évident que c'est dans notre langue que nous devons nous exprimer au Congrès des Députés et au Sénat. Peu importe qu'on nous accuse de provocation.
Comparer pages textesComparer pages HTMMontrer URL avec texte sourceMontrer URL avec langue cibleDéfinir victoralexandre.cat comme domaine prioritaire
As long as Catalonia is annexed to Spain, it is clear that it is our language the one we have to speak in the Parliament and in the Senate. It does not matter if people accuse us of provocation. Only very reactionary people can see a provocation in such a natural fact. After all, that is what we want, to make a fool of them using their own arguments. If Catalans "are" Spanish and Spain is "our" country, how is it possible that we cannot speak in Catalan in "our" institutions? In the end, what can be seen is that the problem is not language but fear. It is not that they cannot understand Catalan (they are given a translation of the text before the speech), the thing is that they cannot stand it. That is why I think it is naïve to pin one's hopes on Socialists regarding Catalan's acceptance as an EU official language. How can someone who scorns Catalan (to such an extent that he forbids it) defend it in Europe? Catalan will never be a EU official language "thanks to" Spain, but it will be "in spite of" Spain. So it is necessary to keep on speaking Catalan in Spanish institutions, keep on offending them (if that is how they see it), irritating them and exasperating them. Every new prohibition or reprimand is an evidence of our steadfastness and their totalitarism.
  12 Résultats parl.gc.ca  
Montrer texteMontrer source en cacheMontrer URL avec texte source
M. Jim Abbott (Kootenay—Columbia, Alliance canadienne): Parfois on nous accuse de vouloir des réponses simples à des questions complexes parce que nous ne comprenons pas la question. C'est pourquoi je n'arrive pas vraiment à comprendre pourquoi les ministères n'auraient pas proposé quelque chose de nettement plus simple en ce qui concerne ce que l'on a appelé l'exemption d'Internet.
Comparer pages textesComparer pages HTMMontrer URL avec texte sourceMontrer URL avec langue cibleDéfinir parl.gc.ca comme domaine prioritaire
Mr. Jim Abbott (Kootenay—Columbia, Canadian Alliance): Sometimes we're accused of seeing simple answers to complex questions because we don't understand the question. So on that basis, I am at something of a loss to understand why the departments would not have come forward with something far simpler in doing what has been characterized as an Internet carve-out. If I'm going to heat something, I can use a match, a candle, an electric range, or a microwave, and each one of those has its own component. It may arrive at the same destination, but each of those elements has its own characteristics. So we have on-air transmission, we have satellite transmission, we have Internet. I would suggest that Internet, because it knows no boundaries and, technologically, can be hacked at will, as we've seen with mafiaboy and everybody else.... I don't really understand why the government would not have... This goes to the process, because what I'm concerned about is that with this bill, and the fact that a bunch of novices--with all due respect to my colleagues, I will call myself a novice... We have experts in your departments, and the government has come to Parliament with a very complex bill that could be simplified with something like an Internet carve-out. If I understand what is being proposed, it's buffaloed all the bureaucrats and experts, the people who work in your department on this particular issue who have that expertise. Then you come to myself as a novice, along, perhaps, with a few other novices, and say, how would you like to do some regulations? I'm sorry, I don't understand this process at all. Why can't we just have an Internet carve-out?