risque afférent – English Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot      19 Results   9 Domains
  osfi-bsif.gc.ca  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
le type de placement et le niveau de risque afférent;
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine osfi-bsif.gc.ca as primary domain
4.10 Marriage or common-law partnership breakdown
  csc.lexum.org  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
[traduction] Une prime de risque ne cadre pas avec les facteurs de la règle 49, et elle est injuste pour le défendeur. À la date de l’offre de transaction, le risque afférent au refus concerne les dépens à intervenir, que l’expérience permet d’évaluer.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine csc.lexum.org as primary domain
A premium fee does not fit with rule 49 concerns and is unfair to a defendant.  On the date of an offer to settle, the risk of refusal is of future costs which can be measured against general experience.  A defendant has no knowledge of private arrangements between the plaintiff and her counsel, and thus has no means of measuring the risk of refusing the plaintiff’s offer. . . . To inflict [a risk premium] upon the defendant under rule 49 turns the rule from one that induces and encourages settlements, to a rule that penalizes a defendant for not accepting an offer by imposing what may be a totally unexpected obligation in an unknown amount. It also introduces the added difficulty presented by typical plaintiffs who would happily agree to any amount of premium that an insurer pays to counsel.
  scc.lexum.org  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
[traduction] Une prime de risque ne cadre pas avec les facteurs de la règle 49, et elle est injuste pour le défendeur. À la date de l’offre de transaction, le risque afférent au refus concerne les dépens à intervenir, que l’expérience permet d’évaluer.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
A premium fee does not fit with rule 49 concerns and is unfair to a defendant.  On the date of an offer to settle, the risk of refusal is of future costs which can be measured against general experience.  A defendant has no knowledge of private arrangements between the plaintiff and her counsel, and thus has no means of measuring the risk of refusing the plaintiff’s offer. . . . To inflict [a risk premium] upon the defendant under rule 49 turns the rule from one that induces and encourages settlements, to a rule that penalizes a defendant for not accepting an offer by imposing what may be a totally unexpected obligation in an unknown amount. It also introduces the added difficulty presented by typical plaintiffs who would happily agree to any amount of premium that an insurer pays to counsel.
  www.wto.int  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
38. Le représentant des Etats-Unis a attaqué le fait que toute société d'exportation qui accorde un crédit à l'exportation à moyen terme a droit à la déduction spéciale des provisions constituées pour risque afférent à l'octroi d'un crédit à l'étranger, et il a fait observer que, si ce crédit est remboursé par tranches, la société française aura, pendant très longtemps, la libre disposition des montants cumulés du chef du report d'impôt.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine wto.int as primary domain
35. The representative of the United States argued that French tax law provided special incentives to establish a foreign branch for export sales as opposed to a domestic branch. A French company was, for instance, entitled to deduct the cost of marketing studies, legal studies, travel and salaries of personnel investigating the establishment of a foreign sales office, representative office or liaison or information office. By permitting these costs to be deducted against domestic income, the expenses incurred in generating export sales income produced a disproportionate tax benefit as compared to comparable domestic expenses. The representative of the United States added that certain overhead expenses incurred in the operation of such an office for its first three fiscal years could be deducted and that, while the general rule was that this deduction resulted only in deferral, there was a provision by which the deferral could become permanent remission if a special authorization was granted by the Ministry of Finance.