polemisieren – English Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot      13 Results   12 Domains
  www.rancho-hunting.com  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Ohne zu polemisieren und unter Verzicht auf vorschnelle Schuldzuweisungen, eröffnet dieser Film eine neue, unmittelbare und menschliche Perspektive auf den Nahost-Konflikt.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine razor-film.de as primary domain
By avoiding polemics and overhasty allocations of blame the film opens up a new, immediate and human perspective on the conflict in the Middle East.
  www.akeuropa.eu  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Das Urheberrecht ist mit der Digitalisierung unserer Welt von einer Spezialmaterie in das Zentrum der Alltagsdiskussion gerückt: Die einen polemisieren gegen die "Gratiskultur im Netz", die anderen halten die Freiheit, die das Internet bietet dagegen.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine akeuropa.eu as primary domain
The digitalization of our surrounding world caused the shift of copyright from an exotic legal matter to the center of everyday consideration. Some argue against the "culture of free in the net", others counter with the freedom of internet. These are principally cultural, social and economic disputes undertaken on the basis of a rather dry legal subject.
  www.basf-coatings.com  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Denn die Populisten in ganz Europa betreiben ihr politisches Geschäft auf der Grundlage von Ängsten. Sie polemisieren gegen Glaubensgemeinschaften und gegen Andersdenkende. Mich haben die geschmacklosen antisemitischen Ausfälle in der letzten Zeit sehr erschreckt.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine m100potsdam.org as primary domain
This is also true when it comes to defending freedom in our own societies. Do not allow us to sit back, relax and do nothing. Populists across Europe conduct their political business on the basis of fear. They wage polemics against religious communities and those who think differently. I myself am appalled by the tasteless, anti-Semitic breakdowns of late. The fact that synagogues in Germany need to be guarded is shameful, and not only in light of our history. Nor should we ever permit the burning of mosques.
  www.eurotopics.net  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Eduard Steiner und Wojciech Czaja polemisieren gegen einen rund 300 Meter hohen Turm, der im russischen St. Petersburg zum Wahrzeichen einer neuen Gasprom-City am rechten Newa-Ufer werden soll. "Der Osten greift nach dem Westen. Bukarest, Sofia, Warschau, Kiew und allen voran Moskau ziehen ihre Immobilien-Projekte wie die Schwammerln hoch. Fesche Architektur wird zum neuen Aushängeschild ehemals kommunistischer Länder, über Ethik und Geschmack braucht man nicht zu diskutieren. Was zählt, ist Gigantomanie."
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine eurotopics.net as primary domain
Eduard Steiner and Wojciech Czaja rail against a 300-odd meter tower which is to be erected in St. Petersburg, Russia - an emblem of the new Gasprom City on the right bank of the Newa River. "The east reaches for the west. In Bucharest, Sofia, Warsaw, Kiev and most of all Moscow development projects are springing up like mushrooms. Swanky architecture has become the latest poster-child for the former communist countries. There's no point talking ethics and good taste. Megalomania is what counts." In Petersburg, the British firm RMJM won the competition with its high-rise design. "With its 77 stories, the tower on the Newa will reach into the clouds. The architects proclaim that the pentagonal floor plan and elegant torsion are derived from the changing character of the water, from the play of light, refractions and reflections...'Of course there are debates and a lot of resistance,' say the architects, but - comparing themselves right away with Monsieur Gustave Eiffel - 'just think of Paris! The Eiffel Tower, 324 meters high, made wonderful Paris even more wonderful.' The boundaries between culture and turbo-capitalism appear to be blurred."
  www.astro.com  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Die Einführung des Lahiri-Standards hat denn auch erbitterte Streitereien nach sich gezogen. Noch heute polemisieren Anhänger der verschiedenen Ayanāṃśas heftig gegeneinander. Und nicht zu Unrecht, denn für die astrologische Arbeit sind Unsicherheiten in der Größenordnung von bis zu 4° natürlich intolerabel.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine astro.com as primary domain
It was only around the year 500 CE that Indian sky watchers began to notice the precession of the equinoxes. Varāhamihira notes that, according to ancient sources, the summer solstice was in the middle of the lunar mansion Āśleṣā (23°20’ Cancer) whereas in his own time it was at the beginning of Cancer.[54] Now, this formulation seems to insinuate that Varāhamihira already opted for a sidereal definition of the zodiac. In fact, we find in this text the first timid attempt to untie the zodiac from the cardinal points of the year. Varāhamihira explicitly says that the summer solstice is not precisely at the beginning of Cancer, but a little bit earlier.[55] However, he does not give any reasons why he gives preference to the sidereal zodiac. Similar to Hellenistic astrologers, Varāhamihira does not discuss the sidereal-tropical problem. Why? Did he not know how to treat it?[56]
  transversal.at  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Zugunsten Europas zu sprechen, an der Gründung einer konstitutierenden Macht zu arbeiten, die ihm einen sozialen Charakter und eine demokratische Eignung in einer föderalistischen Perspektive gibt, bedeutet heute schmerzlicherweise, gegen einen Großteil der Linken in Europa zu polemisieren.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine transversal.at as primary domain
There are components of foreign, legal and economic policy that lay the foundation for this constituent necessity – to which must correspond a political decision that takes its flesh form in the movements. The foreign policy aspects arise from a reflection on Europe’s position in the global environment. Today, Europe is part of a block of forces gathered in the North Atlantic Treaty, which orients, in an irresponsible manner, the foreign policy of the countries of the Union. The interests of the European populations are completely subordinated to Atlantic power. In this arena, we witness daily the unjust paradoxes and unjustifiable entanglements, among which we recently observed the European financing of the Ukrainian war at the same time that the refinancing of the Greek debt was blocked. But the confusion of the passivity of the people and the opacity of the decisions, of the compromises and the vileness in foreign policy of each of the countries and of the Union is indescribable: Enough is enough! The irresponsibility of this strategic and military relation represents, in this age of global instability, an extremely dangerous condition that any constituent initiative will have to consider a primary concern. (And this is also an issue of stopping the violence and the murder of people in the external borders of the Union.)
  www.pac10.co.jp  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Während also Charly Außerhalbs politisch links stehender Kramer-Diskurs verschwiegen wird, gibt der Katalog dem Schriftsteller Martin Mosebach unter dem Titel „Aus diesem Philosophicum weht mich der pure Nihilismus an“ auf sechs Seiten Platz, gegen die konstruktive Moderne Kramers zu polemisieren und die Universität im IG-Farben-Haus, das bei Mosebach geschichtsvergessen und universitätskonform Poelzig-Bau heißt, zu feiern.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine form.de as primary domain
Yet, in spite of many successful representations and new research results – in which the faculty of law was attributed to Kramer, as Fabian Wurm correctly noted at the press conference is more than questionable – the DAM’s Kramer project is problematic. For while the previous monographic presentations of Ernst May, Mart Stam and Martin Elsaesser filled the DAM’s ground floor, only the first floor – not to mention the “Bel Étage” – has been made available to Kramer. And in the catalogue, the title of “the structures” rather than “the buildings” is remarkable in that emphasis is not given to the construction, to what has been made. The bibliography is also annoying where the essay “Humor eines Funktionlisten” [Humour of a Functionalist] by Charly Außerhalb (Diskus 1/2014) is missing and also the catalogue published by the Kunsthistorisches Institut on the Frankfurt University buildings of the same year has not been mentioned; both evidence of a discussion of the young generation with Kramer. So while Charly Außerhalb’s Kramer discourse on the political left is kept secret, the catalogue gives six pages of space to the author Martin Mosebach on the title “Aus diesem Philosophicum weht mich der pure Nihilismus an” [From the Philosophicum wafts pure Nihilism], polemiscising against Kramer’s constructive modernism and celebrating the university in the IG-Farben-Haus, that Mosebach calls Poelzig Bau, ignoring history and being university compliant. The editors want to see this as a contribution to the discussion. Anyone who is versed in the history of architecture books feels themselves reminded of something else: of the meanness with which Arthur Niggli included a letter from Walter Gropius as an afterword in the Hannes Meyer book by Claude Schnaidt in 1965, to which the editor was only able to react with a copied account from his point of view, that he sent to acquaintances. But thankfully there are other contributions in this volume that are fair to Kramer.
  seoulsolution.kr  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Während also Charly Außerhalbs politisch links stehender Kramer-Diskurs verschwiegen wird, gibt der Katalog dem Schriftsteller Martin Mosebach unter dem Titel „Aus diesem Philosophicum weht mich der pure Nihilismus an“ auf sechs Seiten Platz, gegen die konstruktive Moderne Kramers zu polemisieren und die Universität im IG-Farben-Haus, das bei Mosebach geschichtsvergessen und universitätskonform Poelzig-Bau heißt, zu feiern.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine form.de as primary domain
Yet, in spite of many successful representations and new research results – in which the faculty of law was attributed to Kramer, as Fabian Wurm correctly noted at the press conference is more than questionable – the DAM’s Kramer project is problematic. For while the previous monographic presentations of Ernst May, Mart Stam and Martin Elsaesser filled the DAM’s ground floor, only the first floor – not to mention the “Bel Étage” – has been made available to Kramer. And in the catalogue, the title of “the structures” rather than “the buildings” is remarkable in that emphasis is not given to the construction, to what has been made. The bibliography is also annoying where the essay “Humor eines Funktionlisten” [Humour of a Functionalist] by Charly Außerhalb (Diskus 1/2014) is missing and also the catalogue published by the Kunsthistorisches Institut on the Frankfurt University buildings of the same year has not been mentioned; both evidence of a discussion of the young generation with Kramer. So while Charly Außerhalb’s Kramer discourse on the political left is kept secret, the catalogue gives six pages of space to the author Martin Mosebach on the title “Aus diesem Philosophicum weht mich der pure Nihilismus an” [From the Philosophicum wafts pure Nihilism], polemiscising against Kramer’s constructive modernism and celebrating the university in the IG-Farben-Haus, that Mosebach calls Poelzig Bau, ignoring history and being university compliant. The editors want to see this as a contribution to the discussion. Anyone who is versed in the history of architecture books feels themselves reminded of something else: of the meanness with which Arthur Niggli included a letter from Walter Gropius as an afterword in the Hannes Meyer book by Claude Schnaidt in 1965, to which the editor was only able to react with a copied account from his point of view, that he sent to acquaintances. But thankfully there are other contributions in this volume that are fair to Kramer.