sichtweisen anderer – Englisch-Übersetzung – Keybot-Wörterbuch

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Français English Spacer Help
Ausgangssprachen Zielsprachen
Keybot      12 Ergebnisse   8 Domänen
  www.aiducation.org  
Um wirklich in Beziehung mit anderen zu sein, müssen wir uns bewusst sein, dass es viele mögliche Quasi Reale gibt. Dies ist erforderlich, um die Sichtweisen anderer wirklich zu respektieren und uns selbst die Erfahrung zu ermöglichen, dass es nicht nur „Eine Realität“ gibt.
In order to truly be in relationship with others, we must be aware that there are many possible Quasi Reales. This is needed in order to not only respect other’s perspectives but to allow ourselves to experience the possibility that there is no such thing as “one reality.” Each subjective reality is neither right nor wrong; they reflect the thousands of nuances that define the differences among individuals from various cultures around the world.
  www.hotelsantacaterina.it  
Barrieren, die eher in der Unternehmensstruktur liegen, sind mangelnde Unterstützung durch die Geschäftsführung und der massive Druck des Tagesgeschäfts. Besondere Bedeutung erlangen persönliche Barrieren wie unzureichende Kommunikation und die Ausblendung der Sichtweisen anderer Akteure.
The internal barriers are more diverse: They include barriers on the strategic level such as very high return (ROI) expectations and little willingness to bear the performance risks of IPP projects. Barriers which lie more within the corporate structure are insufficient support from the management and the massive pressure of day-to-day business. Personal barriers such as insufficient communication and suppressing the points of view of other players are particularly important.
  www.royalview.com.hk  
Indem die Ausstellung die einzigartige Verbindung wissenschaftlich-technischer und religiöser Wunder im Abendland mit den Sichtweisen anderer Kulturen in Beziehung setzt, stellt sie unsere fragile Fähigkeit zur Sinngebung zur Diskussion.
Artist: Francis Alÿs, Kader Attia, Joseph Beuys, Dara Birnbaum, Cosima von Bonin, Olga Chernysheva, Nathan Coley, Björn Dahlem, Ceal Floyer, Ellen Gallagher, Andreas Gursky, Susan Hefuna, Susan Hiller, Jonathan Horowitz, Sven Johne, Martin Kippenberger, Albert Oehlen, Julia Kissina, Terence Koh, Igor & Svetlana Kopystiansky, Dieter Krieg, Philipp Lachenmann, Mark Leckey, Armin Linke, Ingeborg Lüscher, Melanie Manchot, Kris Martin, Hiroyuki Masuyama, Henri Michaux, Eric Duvivier, Julia Montilla, Timo Nasseri, Reto Pulfer, Julien Prévieux, Walid Raad, Thomas Schütte, Shirana Shahbazi, Katharina Sieverding, Roman Signer, Thomas Struth, Alina Szapocznikow, Fiona Tan, Javier Téllez, Susan MacWilliam, Mike Mandel, Larry Sultan, James Turrell, Timm Ulrichs, Ryan Trecartin, Jalal Toufic, Franz West, Erwin Wurm, Helmut & Johanna Kandl, Johann von Schraudolph, Paul Nougé
  www.mzes.uni-mannheim.de  
Wenn europäische Bürger deliberieren, gewinnen sie wichtige Informationen, sie werden offener gegenüber den Sichtweisen anderer, sie neigen dann auch politischen Lösungen zu, die kurzfristig erhebliche Opfer erfordern (wie in der Debatte über die Erderwärmung), und sie sehen sich eher als Bürger Europas denn als Bürger ihres Nationalstaates.
EuroPolis explored the forms of democratic deficit that are directly affecting EU citizens. It tests the hypothesis that citizen involvement in inclusive, informed, and thoughtful deliberation about the EU increases access to politically relevant information, citizens' political engagement in EU public affairs, perceptions of the legitimacy of EU institutions, a sense of belonging to the EU, and voter turnout in EU parliamentary elections. We draw our hypothesis from the theory of deliberative democracy that suggests that democratic legitimacy rests on open deliberation, and prescribes that citizens should become involved in politics. EuroPolis assess the political outcomes of deliberative democratic practices by experimenting what would happen if EU citizens became substantially more informed about EU institutional arrangements, decision-making processes, and policy issues, as well as more aware of the policy preferences of other EU citizens. The project showed that substantive and informed pan European deliberation is possible among ordinary citizens (at least in a quasi-experimental situation as the one created by the project). Second it showed coherent connections between policy attitudes and electoral choices When Europeans deliberate together they become more informed, more open to the views of others, more willing to subscribe to policy alternatives that may require substantial short term sacrifices (as in the climate change discussion) and more greatly identified as Europeans rather than just citizens of their own countries. Euro Polis shows what the European project could evolve into, if the barriers of language and nationality are overcome. More specifically, it shows that EU citizens are capable of dealing with complex issues on a pan European scale.