dfi – Übersetzung – Keybot-Wörterbuch

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Français English Spacer Help
Ausgangssprachen Zielsprachen
Keybot 38 Ergebnisse  www.citt.gc.ca
  NQ-2012-002 TCCE - Du...  
13. Le 14 septembre 2012, P&P a déposé une lettre en réponse à la lettre de DFI.
13. On September 14, 2012, P&P filed a letter in response to DFI’s letter.
  NQ-2012-002 TCCE - Du...  
15. Le Tribunal est également d’accord avec l’argument de P&P selon lequel, en l’espèce, les intérêts de DFI sont opposés à ceux de P&P. Même si la présente enquête n’est pas, à strictement parler, un litige opposant P&P et DFI, il n’en demeure pas moins que DFI appuie l’imposition de droits antidumping et compensateurs sur les importations de tubes en acier pour pilotis provenant de la Chine, ce qui est opposé aux intérêts commerciaux de P&P.
, the fact remains that DFI is supporting the imposition of anti-dumping and countervailing duties against imports of steel piling pipe from China, a result which is adverse to P&P’s commercial interest. Indeed, P&P is an importer of steel piling pipe from China and, as such, is one of DFI’s competitors in the marketplace. It is clear that the cost of P&P’s imports could increase significantly, should the Tribunal make a positive injury finding as is requested by DFI. Thus, the motion cannot be dismissed on the grounds that there is no “adversity” in the interest of P&P and DFI in this inquiry.
  NQ-2012-002 TCCE - Du...  
33. Sur la foi des éléments de preuve limités dont il dispose, le Tribunal n’est pas non plus convaincu qu’il existe en l’espèce un risque sérieux que la représentation de DFI par MT puisse avoir une incidence négative ou grave sur sa capacité de continuer de représenter P&P relativement à d’autres dossiers.
33. In view of the limited evidence before it, the Tribunal is also not persuaded that there is a serious risk that MT’s representation of DFI in these proceedings will materially or adversely affect its ongoing representation of P&P in respect of other matters. In this regard, the Tribunal notes that P&P has not explained how MT’s representation of DFI in these proceedings would impair its representation of P&P in other current matters. In these circumstances, the Tribunal is unable to find that MT’s representation of DFI in this inquiry impairs its ability to properly represent P&P in other matters. Thus, the Tribunal finds that there is insufficient evidence to establish the existence of a breach of MT’s duty of loyalty towards P&P.
  NQ-2012-002 TCCE - Du...  
33. Sur la foi des éléments de preuve limités dont il dispose, le Tribunal n’est pas non plus convaincu qu’il existe en l’espèce un risque sérieux que la représentation de DFI par MT puisse avoir une incidence négative ou grave sur sa capacité de continuer de représenter P&P relativement à d’autres dossiers.
33. In view of the limited evidence before it, the Tribunal is also not persuaded that there is a serious risk that MT’s representation of DFI in these proceedings will materially or adversely affect its ongoing representation of P&P in respect of other matters. In this regard, the Tribunal notes that P&P has not explained how MT’s representation of DFI in these proceedings would impair its representation of P&P in other current matters. In these circumstances, the Tribunal is unable to find that MT’s representation of DFI in this inquiry impairs its ability to properly represent P&P in other matters. Thus, the Tribunal finds that there is insufficient evidence to establish the existence of a breach of MT’s duty of loyalty towards P&P.
  NQ-2012-002 TCCE - Du...  
Le Tribunal est d’avis que s’il privait DFI de son droit de retenir les services du conseiller juridique de son choix à ce stade-ci de la procédure, cela aurait pour effet de compromettre sérieusement sa capacité de participer au processus d’enquête.
, which must underline its analysis: maintain the high standard of the legal profession; the importance of a litigant’s choice of counsel; and permitting reasonable mobility within the legal profession.8 A party’s choice of counsel is a particularly important consideration in the context of these proceedings, given the short time frame within which the Tribunal must make its finding and the advanced stage of the inquiry process when this motion was brought. The Tribunal is of the view that depriving DFI of its counsel of choice at this stage of the proceedings would significantly impair its ability to participate in the inquiry process.
  NQ-2012-002 TCCE - Du...  
15. Le Tribunal est également d’accord avec l’argument de P&P selon lequel, en l’espèce, les intérêts de DFI sont opposés à ceux de P&P. Même si la présente enquête n’est pas, à strictement parler, un litige opposant P&P et DFI, il n’en demeure pas moins que DFI appuie l’imposition de droits antidumping et compensateurs sur les importations de tubes en acier pour pilotis provenant de la Chine, ce qui est opposé aux intérêts commerciaux de P&P.
, the fact remains that DFI is supporting the imposition of anti-dumping and countervailing duties against imports of steel piling pipe from China, a result which is adverse to P&P’s commercial interest. Indeed, P&P is an importer of steel piling pipe from China and, as such, is one of DFI’s competitors in the marketplace. It is clear that the cost of P&P’s imports could increase significantly, should the Tribunal make a positive injury finding as is requested by DFI. Thus, the motion cannot be dismissed on the grounds that there is no “adversity” in the interest of P&P and DFI in this inquiry.
  NQ-2012-002 TCCE - Du...  
15. Le Tribunal est également d’accord avec l’argument de P&P selon lequel, en l’espèce, les intérêts de DFI sont opposés à ceux de P&P. Même si la présente enquête n’est pas, à strictement parler, un litige opposant P&P et DFI, il n’en demeure pas moins que DFI appuie l’imposition de droits antidumping et compensateurs sur les importations de tubes en acier pour pilotis provenant de la Chine, ce qui est opposé aux intérêts commerciaux de P&P.
, the fact remains that DFI is supporting the imposition of anti-dumping and countervailing duties against imports of steel piling pipe from China, a result which is adverse to P&P’s commercial interest. Indeed, P&P is an importer of steel piling pipe from China and, as such, is one of DFI’s competitors in the marketplace. It is clear that the cost of P&P’s imports could increase significantly, should the Tribunal make a positive injury finding as is requested by DFI. Thus, the motion cannot be dismissed on the grounds that there is no “adversity” in the interest of P&P and DFI in this inquiry.
  NQ-2012-002 TCCE - Du...  
33. Sur la foi des éléments de preuve limités dont il dispose, le Tribunal n’est pas non plus convaincu qu’il existe en l’espèce un risque sérieux que la représentation de DFI par MT puisse avoir une incidence négative ou grave sur sa capacité de continuer de représenter P&P relativement à d’autres dossiers.
33. In view of the limited evidence before it, the Tribunal is also not persuaded that there is a serious risk that MT’s representation of DFI in these proceedings will materially or adversely affect its ongoing representation of P&P in respect of other matters. In this regard, the Tribunal notes that P&P has not explained how MT’s representation of DFI in these proceedings would impair its representation of P&P in other current matters. In these circumstances, the Tribunal is unable to find that MT’s representation of DFI in this inquiry impairs its ability to properly represent P&P in other matters. Thus, the Tribunal finds that there is insufficient evidence to establish the existence of a breach of MT’s duty of loyalty towards P&P.
  NQ-2012-002 TCCE - Du...  
15. Le Tribunal est également d’accord avec l’argument de P&P selon lequel, en l’espèce, les intérêts de DFI sont opposés à ceux de P&P. Même si la présente enquête n’est pas, à strictement parler, un litige opposant P&P et DFI, il n’en demeure pas moins que DFI appuie l’imposition de droits antidumping et compensateurs sur les importations de tubes en acier pour pilotis provenant de la Chine, ce qui est opposé aux intérêts commerciaux de P&P.
, the fact remains that DFI is supporting the imposition of anti-dumping and countervailing duties against imports of steel piling pipe from China, a result which is adverse to P&P’s commercial interest. Indeed, P&P is an importer of steel piling pipe from China and, as such, is one of DFI’s competitors in the marketplace. It is clear that the cost of P&P’s imports could increase significantly, should the Tribunal make a positive injury finding as is requested by DFI. Thus, the motion cannot be dismissed on the grounds that there is no “adversity” in the interest of P&P and DFI in this inquiry.
  NQ-2012-002 TCCE - Du...  
15. Le Tribunal est également d’accord avec l’argument de P&P selon lequel, en l’espèce, les intérêts de DFI sont opposés à ceux de P&P. Même si la présente enquête n’est pas, à strictement parler, un litige opposant P&P et DFI, il n’en demeure pas moins que DFI appuie l’imposition de droits antidumping et compensateurs sur les importations de tubes en acier pour pilotis provenant de la Chine, ce qui est opposé aux intérêts commerciaux de P&P.
, the fact remains that DFI is supporting the imposition of anti-dumping and countervailing duties against imports of steel piling pipe from China, a result which is adverse to P&P’s commercial interest. Indeed, P&P is an importer of steel piling pipe from China and, as such, is one of DFI’s competitors in the marketplace. It is clear that the cost of P&P’s imports could increase significantly, should the Tribunal make a positive injury finding as is requested by DFI. Thus, the motion cannot be dismissed on the grounds that there is no “adversity” in the interest of P&P and DFI in this inquiry.
  NQ-2012-002 TCCE - Du...  
12. Le 13 septembre 2012, DFI a déposé une lettre en réponse à la réplique de P&P, dans laquelle elle soutient qu’en mentionnant dans sa réplique le travail de MT relativement à l’entente commerciale pour la fourniture d’importations pertinentes, P&P se trouve à présenter de nouveaux éléments de preuve qui auraient dû être soulevés dans l’avis de requête.
12. On September 13, 2012, DFI filed a letter in response to P&P’s reply, arguing that the reference in P&P’s reply to MT’s work on a commercial agreement for the supply of relevant imports introduced new evidence that should have been raised in the notice of motion. DFI also restated its concern that P&P has failed to properly substantiate the grounds of its motion or to demonstrate how confidential information relating to the commercial agreement is relevant and prejudicial to P&P in these proceedings.
  NQ-2012-002 TCCE - Du...  
15. Le Tribunal est également d’accord avec l’argument de P&P selon lequel, en l’espèce, les intérêts de DFI sont opposés à ceux de P&P. Même si la présente enquête n’est pas, à strictement parler, un litige opposant P&P et DFI, il n’en demeure pas moins que DFI appuie l’imposition de droits antidumping et compensateurs sur les importations de tubes en acier pour pilotis provenant de la Chine, ce qui est opposé aux intérêts commerciaux de P&P.
, the fact remains that DFI is supporting the imposition of anti-dumping and countervailing duties against imports of steel piling pipe from China, a result which is adverse to P&P’s commercial interest. Indeed, P&P is an importer of steel piling pipe from China and, as such, is one of DFI’s competitors in the marketplace. It is clear that the cost of P&P’s imports could increase significantly, should the Tribunal make a positive injury finding as is requested by DFI. Thus, the motion cannot be dismissed on the grounds that there is no “adversity” in the interest of P&P and DFI in this inquiry.
  NQ-2012-002 TCCE - Du...  
12. Le 13 septembre 2012, DFI a déposé une lettre en réponse à la réplique de P&P, dans laquelle elle soutient qu’en mentionnant dans sa réplique le travail de MT relativement à l’entente commerciale pour la fourniture d’importations pertinentes, P&P se trouve à présenter de nouveaux éléments de preuve qui auraient dû être soulevés dans l’avis de requête.
12. On September 13, 2012, DFI filed a letter in response to P&P’s reply, arguing that the reference in P&P’s reply to MT’s work on a commercial agreement for the supply of relevant imports introduced new evidence that should have been raised in the notice of motion. DFI also restated its concern that P&P has failed to properly substantiate the grounds of its motion or to demonstrate how confidential information relating to the commercial agreement is relevant and prejudicial to P&P in these proceedings.
  NQ-2012-002 TCCE - Du...  
Le Tribunal examinera si la représentation de DFI par MT en l’espèce donne lieu à un conflit d’intérêts réel ou raisonnablement perçu eu égard à sa représentation passée ou actuelle de P&P relativement à d’autres dossiers.
16. The existence of a long-standing relationship between MT, as legal counsel, and P&P, as its client, in respect of other matters is admitted. The Tribunal will examine whether MT’s representation of DFI in this inquiry gives rise to a real or reasonably perceived conflict of interest in view of its previous or current representation of P&P in respect of other matters.
  NQ-2012-002 TCCE - Du...  
5, décision qui, selon DFI, modifie le critère énoncé dans
. DFI also stressed its right to be represented by its chosen counsel.
  NQ-2012-002 TCCE - Du...  
Si le Tribunal conclut que les dossiers ne sont pas suffisamment connexes et qu’il n’y a pas de risque que des renseignements confidentiels pertinents soient utilisés au détriment de P&P, le Tribunal doit évaluer s’il existe un risque sérieux que la représentation de DFI par MT compromette sa capacité de représenter P&P dans d’autres dossiers.
28. To summarize, in disposing of the motion, the Tribunal must first determine whether P&P has established that this inquiry is sufficiently related to other MT retainers with P&P such that the Tribunal should infer that relevant confidential information was imparted and disqualify MT on that basis. If the Tribunal finds that the matters are not sufficiently related and that there is no risk of relevant confidential information being used to prejudice P&P, the Tribunal must then assess whether there is a substantial risk that MT’s representation of DFI will impair its ability to represent P&P in respect of other matters.
  NQ-2012-002 TCCE - Du...  
Cela est particulièrement vrai dans une situation comme celle dont il est question ici, où la représentation de DFI et de P&P par MT est assurée par deux avocats différents, exerçant dans des domaines différents et établis dans des villes différentes.
, the Supreme Court observed that an unnecessary expansion of the duty of loyalty may be inimical to the proper functioning of the legal system. The issue is always to achieve an appropriate balance among the competing interests. For this reason, a stringent application of the bright-line test in situations where the same law firm is concurrently acting for two parties with adverse interests, but in unrelated matters, would pose significant problems for clients seeking to be represented by the counsel of their choice. This is particularly true in a situation such as this case, where MT’s representation of both DFI and P&P is handled by different lawyers, in different practice areas and in different cities. In such circumstances, the Tribunal considers that each client’s confidential information or right to proper representation is not necessarily compromised.