|
|
Concerning CSG's proposal that the sole restriction be a ratio, set by the Commission, of dedicated to dial-up local access facilities for each customer, Bell replied that this would result in significant MTS/WATS revenue erosion. Bell submitted that interconnected voice networks that do not dedicate interexchange facilities to individual customers are MTS equivalents. B.C. Tel agreed but also argued that, regardless of whether dial-up facilities provide access to dedicated or switched interexchange facilities, the resultant service would be the equivalent of MTS.
|