et non vers – English Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot 4 Results  scc.lexum.org
  Cour suprême du Canada ...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Si le défendeur mineur avait, lorsqu’il a entendu le bruit du gravier sous l’aile droite de sa voiture, viré de façon très graduelle vers la gauche, il n’y aurait pas eu de dérapage ou, s’il y en avait eu, inévitablement c’est l’arrière de la voiture qui aurait dérapé vers la droite et non vers la gauche comme il l’a déclaré.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
It is very difficult to follow the infant defendant’s description of this occurrence. If the infant defendant had, when he heard the gravel beneath the right fender of his vehicle, turned very gradually to the left, there would have been no skid or even if the skid had occurred it is inevitable that the skid would have been with the rear of the vehicle going to the right and not to the left as he testified. Then, when a person took the natural action to correct that skid by turning the steering wheel to the right, if such an action were sudden or too extensive, the tendency would be to throw the vehicle into the clock-wise movement which the infant defendant describes.
  Cour suprême du Canada ...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
139(1) et (2) de la LSCMLSC en liaison avec les peines consécutives est de totaliser, aux fins de l’admissibilité à la libération conditionnelle, les périodes d’emprisonnement correspondant à toutes les peines consécutives, de sorte que l’admissibilité à la libération conditionnelle soit déterminée en fonction de la durée totale des peines fusionnées. L’intention sous‑jacente à ces dispositions et leur portée  tendent vers ce résultat, et non vers la réalisation d’un objectif plus large.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
In my view, the combined effect of ss. 139(1) and (2) of the CCRA in connection with consecutive sentences is to ensure, for parole eligibility purposes, that the term of imprisonment of each consecutive sentence is totalled and parole eligibility is calculated based on the total term of the merged sentence. The intent and ambit of the sections are directed to that outcome, and to no broader purpose. [para. 49]
  Cour suprême du Canada ...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
La deuxième question tente d’orienter la réflexion vers la distinction constitutionnelle fondamentale entre la compétence en matière de droit criminel et les autres domaines de compétence mentionnés à l’art. 91 de l’Acte de l’Amérique du Nord britannique et non vers la distinction artificielle «Code/non-Code» de l’art.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
The first question directs attention not to the Attorney General of Canada acting as a private prosecutor in narcotics cases, but to his acting as principal public prosecutor similar to the provincial Attorney General and exercising the same powers of intervention, control and appeal. The second question attempts to direct the inquiry not to the artificial “Code/non‑Code” distinction found in s. 2 of the Criminal Code but to the fundamental constitutional distinction between the criminal law power and the other heads of power found in s. 91 of the British North America Act.
  Cour suprême du Canada ...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Les questions en litige dans ce pourvoi sont toutefois plus larges et peuvent être énoncées (1) en visant le procureur général du Canada non pas à titre de poursuivant privé dans les affaires de stupéfiants, mais à titre de principal poursuivant public, comme l’est le procureur général d’une province, avec les mêmes pouvoirs d’intervention, de direction et avec les mêmes droits d’appel, et (2) en orientant la réflexion vers la distinction constitutionnelle fondamentale entre la compétence en matière de droit criminel et les autres domaines de compétence mentionnés à l’art. 91 de l’Acte de l’Amérique du Nord britannique et non vers la distinction artificielle «Code/non-Code» de l’art.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
Per Dickson and Pratte JJ., dissenting: Section 2(2) of the Code is not simply a law specifying who may prefer indictments. If it were so limited, no difficulty would be experienced. There is no question but that the Attorney General of Canada, if he wishes, like any other person, may prefer indictments and conduct proceedings with respect to offences under federal enactments other than the Criminal Code or, for that matter, under the Code itself, subject of course to the same limitations as those applying to any private prosecutor. The issues in this case, however, were broader and they could be more precisely put by (1) directing attention not to the Attorney General of Canada acting as a private prosecutor in narcotic cases, but to his acting as principal public prosecutor similar to the provincial Attorney General and exercising the same powers of intervention, control and appeal, and (2) directing the inquiry not to the artificial “Code/non-Code” distinction found in s. 2 of the Criminal Code but to the fundamental constitutional distinction between the criminal law power and the other heads of power found in s. 91 of the British North America Act.