ont explosé – English Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot 5 Results  parl.gc.ca
  Comités de la Chambre d...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Quels progrès réalisons-nous dans le repérage des EEI avant qu'ils n'explosent? Quelle expertise acquérons-nous à ce sujet? Les statistiques sur ceux qui ont explosé et ceux que nous avons repérés avant qu'ils n'explosent montrent-elles que nous avons fait des progrès?
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine parl.gc.ca as primary domain
What progress are we making in identifying the IEDs before they actually go off? What kind of expertise are we developing there? What statistical progress have we made of the ones that went off versus the ones we identified?
  Comités de la Chambre d...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Comme vous le disiez très bien, une catastrophe dans un réacteur CANDU, c'est bien pire qu'une tempête de verglas au Québec, avec Hydro-Québec. Pour les gens, le nucléaire est très dangereux, mais la seule image qu'ils en ont, c'est celle des deux bombes qui ont explosé au Japon lors de la Deuxième Guerre mondiale.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine parl.gc.ca as primary domain
But, still today, as I said, before the Canadian government adopts a position, we have to be certain that people clearly understand the difference between nuclear energy and nuclear weapons; and I'm telling you people generally don't know the difference. As you clearly pointed out, a disaster at a CANDU reactor would be much worse than an ice storm in Quebec with Hydro- Québec. In people's minds, nuclear power is very dangerous, but the only image they have is that of the two bombs that exploded over Japan during the Second World War. That was 52 years ago, but people still view nuclear energy as destructive.
  Comités de la Chambre d...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
D'après les estimations de l'armée américaine, il y a eu 139 attentats suicides en 2006, contre 27 l'année précédente. Le nombre de bombes qui ont explosé en bordure de la route a doublé, et le nombre d'attaques des insurgés, au moyen d'armes légères, de grenades et d'autres armes, a augmenté et atteint 4 542.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine parl.gc.ca as primary domain
Second, we keep hearing that we're winning, we're winning, we're winning. But I just want to put forward statistics provided by the International Crisis Group that would indicate that in the first nine months of 2006 there were over 3,700 deaths—that includes militants, security personnel, and civilians—which is a fourfold increase. According to U.S. military estimates, there were 139 suicide attacks in that full year of 2006, up from 27 the year before. Roadside bombs doubled, and direct attacks by insurgents using small arms, grenades, and other weapons increased to 4,542, which is almost a fourfold increase.
  Comités de la Chambre d...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Devrions-nous vraiment nous comparer aux États-Unis, particulièrement pour cette période? C'est dans les années 90 que les investissements en télécommunications et en haute technologie y ont explosé, mais la bulle a éclaté depuis.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine parl.gc.ca as primary domain
The first question I have would relate to the chart again on page 9. As Mr. Crête pointed out, the OECD green line includes the U.S. I'm curious as to why this chart was included, because if you take the period from, say, 1994 until 2002, and then you take from 2000--and it will be interesting to see where the 2002 figures are--we're dealing with an anomaly there. Should we really be comparing ourselves to the United States, particularly during that period? It was during the nineties that they had the explosion in investments in telecom and in high technology, but it was a bubble that burst. I certainly hope the industry department is not suggesting that's a pattern we want to follow here in Canada. Why was this chart chosen, when you basically show an anomaly during a period we should certainly not want to emulate?