rusé – English Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot 5 Results  scc.lexum.org
  Cour suprême du Canada ...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
La preuve de la captation ou de la suggestion suffi­sante pour vicier le consentement d’un testateur n’est pas une entreprise facile, car il est rare que l’auteur des manoeuvres employées, qui doit bénéficier de la libéra-lité, agisse directement et ouvertement; il préfère, s’il est rusé, prendre des voies obliques et dissimulées qui le conduiront plus sûrement et plus discrètement à ses fins.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
[TRANSLATION] Proof of undue influence or sugges­tion sufficient to vitiate the consent of a testator is not an easy undertaking, for it is rare that the perpetrator of the manoeuvres employed, who stands to benefit from the gift, operates directly and openly; if he is smart, he prefers to use oblique and covert methods, which will enable him to achieve his objectives with geater certain­ty and discretion.
  Cour suprême du Canada ...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
L'exclusion de la seconde déclaration causait un préjudice à Simpson, car le jury restait sous l'impression que Simpson était un menteur rusé, qu'il avait menti la première fois et avait persisté dans ses mensonges jusqu'au moment du procès où une histoire fabriquée était alors présentée au jury.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
He saw as well a further objection to the exclusion of the second statement. Crown counsel, he said, had vigorously attacked the evidence given by Simpson, Ochs and L'Ortye, partly on the basis that they had recently fabricated their defences. By excluding the second statement, prejudice resulted to Simpson because the jury was left with the suggestion that Simpson was a calculating liar, that he had lied in the first statement and had persisted in the lies to the date of trial when a recently fabricated story was then presented to the jury. In these circumstances, ordinary justice required that the second statement, made only two hours after the first, which he considered was largely consistent with the evidence given by Simpson at trial, should be admitted. He said, at p. 540:
  Cour suprême du Canada ...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Ce n’est pas le moment d’être trop rusé ou formaliste en matière d’oppositions soit au titre ou au mémoire descriptif puisque, comme le dit le juge en chef Duff, au nom de la Cour, dans l’arrêt Western Electric Company, Incorporated, et Northern Electric Company c.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
We must look to the whole of the disclosure and the claims to ascertain the nature of the invention and methods of its performance, . . ., being neither benevolent nor harsh, but rather seeking a construction which is reasonable and fair to both patentee and public. There is no occasion for being too astute or technical in the matter of objections to either title or specification for, as Duff C.J.C. said, giving the judgment of the Court in Western Electric Company, Incorporated, and Northern Electric Company v. Baldwin International Radio of Canada [[1934] S.C.R. 570], at p. 574, “where the language of the specification, upon a reasonable view of it, can be so read as to afford the inventor protection for that which he has actually in good faith invented, the court, as a rule, will endeavour to give effect to that construction”. Sir George Jessel spoke to like effect at a much earlier date in Hinks & Son v. Safety Lighting Company [(1876), 4 Ch. D. 607]. He said the patent should be approached “with a judicial anxiety to support a really useful invention”.