sa propre action – English Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot 2 Results  scc.lexum.org
  Cour suprême du Canada ...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
79 Le juge de première instance et la Cour d’appel considèrent que l’appelant, lorsqu’il a témoigné sous protection policière à l’enquête de la Commission de police et à l’enquête préliminaire des deux intimés Beaumont et Thireault, n’était plus alors dans l’impossibilité absolue en fait d’agir. Or, il est à noter que l’appelant ne témoignait pas dans le cadre de sa propre action en dommages.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
79                      The trial judge and the Court of Appeal felt that once the appellant had testified under police protection at the Police Commission’s inquiry and at the preliminary inquiry of the two respondents Beaumont and Thireault, it was no longer absolutely impossible in fact for him to act.  However, it should be noted that the appellant was not testifying in his own action for damages.  In both proceedings, he was compelled by way of subpoena to testify and was under police protection.  It was only once the defendants had been convicted and sent to prison that he was sufficiently free of his fear to be able to act.  Dr. Béliveau explained the psychological impact of the guilty verdicts on the appellant as follows:
  Cour suprême du Canada ...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Chaque membre du groupe conservera le contrôle sur sa propre action, et l’indemnité éventuellement touchée dépendra de l’issue de l’instance individuelle relativement au préjudice et au lien de causalité (à supposer aussi que la question commune soit tranchée en faveur du groupe).
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
37 The second factor is “whether a significant number of the members of the class have a valid interest in individually controlling the prosecution of separate actions”, and the third is “whether the class proceeding would involve claims that are or have been the subject of any other proceedings”: s. 4(2)(b), (c).  On these factors I would note again that no class member will be able to prevail without making an individual showing of injury and causation.  Thus it cannot be said that allowing this suit to proceed as a class action will force complainants into a passive role.  Each class member will retain control over his or her individual action, and his or her ultimate recovery will be determined by the outcome of the individual proceedings on injury and causation (assuming, again, that the common issue is resolved in favour of the class).  Further there is little evidence here to suggest that any significant number of class members would prefer to proceed individually.