|
De plus, une différence significative existe entre les répondant des 25 à 34 ans qui les connaissent mieux (83,2 %) que ceux du groupe des 20 à 24 ans (72,6 %). Les répondants des zones non rurales sont moins bien informés que les répondants des zones rurales (82,3 % contre 85,9 %).
|
|
In terms of the characteristics associated with Canadians who had heard about NEP (Table 7.12), there were significant differences in age, household location, province, education and user-type. There was a significant linear relation between age and knowledge, as age increased, so too does knowledge of NEP. In addition, there was a spike in opinion at age 25; respondents aged 25-34 were more likely than those aged 20-24 to have heard about NEP (83.2% vs. 72.6%). In terms of household location, those from non-rural areas were less likely than those from rural areas to have heard about NEP (82.3% vs. 85.9%). Residents from British Columbia (92.8%) were more likely than residents from the rest of Canada (82.8%) to have heard about NEP, and residents from Newfoundland and Labrador (65.0%) and Ontario (78.8%) were less likely. In terms of education, as education level increases, respondents' knowledge of NEP also increases. Respondents with some post-secondary education (90.7%) or a university degree (87.6%) were more likely than those who had not completed high school (69.9%) to have heard about such programs. Knowledge of NEP increased with user-type. Respondents who had used at-least-cannabis were more likely than those who had used only alcohol to have heard about NEP (86.9% vs. 81.1%), and those who had used alcohol were more likely to have heard about such programs than non-users (81.1% vs. 57.4%).
|