étant une condition – English Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot 3 Results  scc.lexum.org
  Cour suprême du Canada ...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Elle s’est engagée, son engagement étant une condition du prêt, à ce qu’un immeuble soit construit sur le terrain, mais elle l’a construit non à titre d’entrepreneur pour la Manufacturers, mais pour elle-même en qualité de propriétaire titulaire du droit de tenure à bail.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
ment and the lease, that it would construct a building, but this was not a contract “for the doing of work or service or placing or furnishing materials”. Those words are apt to describe a building contractor who undertakes to construct a building for another person. In the present case Metropolitan did not undertake to do the work of construction for Manufacturers. It contracted, as a condition of the loan, that a building would be constructed on the land, but it constructed that building, not as a contractor for Manufacturers, but for itself as owner of the leasehold interest. In my opinion, Metropolitan was not a contractor within s. 1(a), and, therefore, the materials supplied by Northern were furnished for Metropolitan as owner, and not as a contractor for Manufacturers. That being so, s. 5 does not give to Northern a lien as against the interest of Manufacturers in the land.
  Cour suprême du Canada ...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Bien sûr, s’il y avait une véritable condition suspensive qui n’était pas accomplie, il n’était pas nécessaire d’examiner le caractère raisonnable d’une prorogation de délai si l’autre partie était d’avis que le marché avait pris fin le jour de la date limite, la date étant une condition essentielle du contrat.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
Of course, if there was a true condition precedent that was not met, there was no need to consider the reasonableness of an extension of time if the other party took the position that the deal was off when the date for completion, time being of the essence, passed. That, however, is, as I have already said, not this case. I think the proper principle to be applied here is that expressed by Rose J. in Danforth Heights Ltd. v. McDermid Bros.[4] at p. 426, as follows:
  Cour suprême du Canada ...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Devant cette Cour, le ministère public ne prétend pas que la preuve d’une condamnation antérieure est un élément de l’infraction mais que, tout en étant une condition préalable, son existence doit être présumée du seul fait de la mise en accusation et qu’il incombe à l’accusé d’apporter la preuve contraire.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
The Crown’s position in this Court was not that proof of a previous conviction was an element of the offence but that, although it was a pre-condition, its existence was to be presumed from the mere laying of the indictment and that it was for the accused to prove otherwise. I cannot agree with this view. It is clear from the mandatory words of s. 133(7), “he shall not be prosecuted by indictment unless” etc., that proof of a previous conviction is a precondition of proceeding by indictment and is jurisdictional in that respect. This does not mean that proof of a previous conviction must be offered before the indictment is laid but, rather, that the actual trial cannot proceed as the trial of an indictable offence until the Crown has provided proof of a previous conviction under s. 133. The situation here lies outside of Criminal Code, s. 591 which is concerned with a reference to previous convictions in an indictment and not to an a priori condition of trial if the Crown chooses to proceed by indictment.