|
|
Enfin, après avoir examiné les politiques sur la réinstallation des employés de la GRC et de la fonction publique, le Comité a mentionné que les FC semblaient avoir les règles les plus restrictives concernant le remboursement des frais d’hébergement et repas en cours de déplacements et faux frais engagés lors de jours supplémentaires, même si les membres des FC sont plus souvent appelés à déménager et ce, à court préavis.
|
|
|
Given the apparent conflict between the CF IRP and the CANFORGEN, the Board found that the standard that must be applied was that of the CF IRP, where reimbursement is possible if a door-to-door move is unsuccessful due to reasons beyond the member’s control. However, the Board found that this standard, as applied, was too onerous and almost impossible to meet. Further, the Board found that this standard did not allow for sufficient flexibility to accommodate individual circumstances where members have done their best to achieve a door-to-door move. Finally, having reviewed the RCMP and Public Service employees policies on relocation, the Board observed that the CF appears to have the most restrictive rules regarding the granting of additional ILM&M, even though members of the CF are subjected to more frequent and short notice relocations.
|
