ht – -Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot 5 Results  scc.lexum.org
  document  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Átitle 9.5pt align after . ex.: III.[ind] U j’ РРX ÂÆ(# Æ Ð Ðûÿ 2 õT V ‚ ×R W ‚ YS X  ÛS Y  hT
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
Átitle 9.5pt align after . ex.: III.[ind] S j’ Ð ÐÂ X ÂÆ(# Æ Ð Ð
  document  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Ápar. 9.5pt ex.: [ind][ind][ind]1.[ind] o8 Äû ‘‡ РРX  X ` `  X ¸ ¸  X % ÂÆ(# Æ Ð Ðûÿ 2 HT Ñ # o ô \ PŽ ÂC ª¡X P# ÑÐ Ì ÐÐ ÐÐ ° ° Ü ÐÐ Ð X ° ` ¸ h À p È x Ð (#€%Ø'0*ˆ,à.813è5@8˜:ð
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
Ápar. 9.5pt ex.: [ind][ind][ind]1.[ind] m8 Äû ‘‡ РРX  X ` `  X ¸ ¸  X % ÂÆ(# Æ Ð Ðûÿ 2 åP Ñ # o ô \ PŽ ÂC ª¡X P# ÑÐ Ì ÐÐ ÐÐ ° ° Ü ÐÐ Ð X ° ` ¸ h À p È x Ð (#€%Ø'0*ˆ,à.813è5@8˜:ð
  Cour suprême du Canada ...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
La Cour, par la voix du juge Rinfret, il n’était pas encore Juge en chef, souligne que cette indemnité «paraît avoir été calculée en vertu d’un principe erroné» (à la p. 391). Ht M. le juge Rinfret ajoute (à la p. 393):
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
At least a partial answer to the question raised by the second proposition has, however, been given in two decisions of this Court. In the first of these, City of Montreal v. J.A. Maucotel et al.[5], the City had converted a lane belonging to respondents’ predecessors into a street. This lane, which was twenty feet wide and seven hundred feet long, had been assigned a value of $7,000 by the Court of Appeal. Rinfret J., as he then was, speaking for the Court, noted that this indemnity [TRANSLATION] “appears to have been calculated on the basis of an erroneous principle” (at p. 391), and added (at p. 393):
  document  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
€€Au€cours€de€lð ðaltercation€avec€M. Charlie,€un€coupÐ 4 À Ðde€feu€est€parti€accidentellement.Ý ƒ % ÑýMT hT ÝŒÐ Ì X ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % ÑýÌX Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú2Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àM. Gunning€a€subi€son€proc s€devant€un€juge€et€un€jury.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain
Ðneck.€In€defence€to€the€charge,€Mr.€Gunning€denied€that€he€intended€to€kill€Mr.€Charlie.Ð Ô/p)4 ÐAlthough€his€memory€of€the€events€was€sketchy€due€to€his€consumption€of€alcohol,€Mr.Ð d ÐGunning€testified€that,€after€Mr.€Charlie€had€assaulted€him€and€refused€to€leave,€he€hadÐ ü ˜ Ðtaken€out€and€loaded€the€shotgun€so€as€to€intimidate€or€scare€him€into€leaving.€In€theÐ ” 0 Ðcourse€of€confronting€Mr.€Charlie,€the€gun€discharged€accidentally.€Ý ƒ % Ñýª* Å* ݌Р, È ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñýš. Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú2Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àMr.€Gunning€was€tried€before€a€judge€and€a€jury.€The€focus€of€the€entire€trialÐ \ ø Ðwas€on€the€question€of€whether€the€shooting€was€an€intentional€killing€or€a€tragic€accident.Ð ô  ÐThe€trial€judge€instructed€the€jury€on€the€defences€of€intoxication€and€provocation€butÐ Œ ( Ðrefused€to€leave€the€defence€of€property€for€their€consideration.€The€trial€judge€furtherÐ $ À Ðinstructed€the€jury€that€the€underlying€offence€of€careless€use€of€a€firearm€had€been€madeÐ ¼ X Ðout,€thereby€precluding€any€possible€verdict€of€acquittal.€Later€in€his€charge,€the€trial€judgeÐ T ð Ðpurported€to€correct€the€latter€instruction.€Mr.€Gunning€was€convicted€of€second€degreeÐ ì ˆ Ðmurder.Ý ƒ % Ñýš. µ. ݌Р„ ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñýg2 Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú3Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àOn€appeal€to€the€British€Columbia€Court€of€Appeal,€Mr.€Gunning,€amongÐ ´ P Ðother€grounds,€contended€that€the€trial€judge€erred€by€failing€to€instruct€the€jury€on€theÐ L è Ðdefence€of€property.€He€argued€further€that€the€trial€judge€overstepped€his€role€byÐ ä € Ðeffectively€instructing€the€jury€that€there€were€no€defences€to€the€underlying€offence€ofÐ |! " Ðcareless€use€of€a€firearm,€thereby€wrongfully€depriving€him€of€the€only€avenue€to€anÐ #° $ Ðacquittal.Ý ƒ % Ñýg2 ‚2 ݌Р¬$H & ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % ÑýB5 Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú4Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ à€The€British€Columbia€Court€of€Appeal€rejected€Mr.€Gunningð ðs€arguments€onÐ Ü'x!* Ðthe€basis€that€none€of€the€alleged€errors€would€have€affected€the€verdict€of€guilty€on€theÐ t) #, Ðcharge€of€murder:€(2003),€186€B.C.A.C.€225,€2003€BCCA€477.€In€essence,€the€courtÐ +¨$. Ðreasoned€that,€on€the€evidence,€a€jury€could€not€avoid€the€conclusion€that€the€underlyingÐ ¤,@&0 Ðoffence€of€careless€use€of€a€firearm€had€been€made€out.€The€court€was€further€of€the€viewÐ