sheoladh – English Translation – Keybot Dictionary

  Cóid Iompair | Data Pro...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL	Féadtar cód iompair a sheoladh chuig an CCS tríd an seoladh ríomhphoist seo a leanas: consultation@dataprotection.ie
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine dataprotection.ie as primary domain	A code of conduct may be submitted to the DPC via the following email address: consultation@dataprotection.ie

  Data Protection Commiss...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL	Is féidir aighneachtaí i scríbhinn a sheoladh le ríomhphost chuig childrensconsultation@dataprotection.ie. De rogha air sin, is féidir aighneachtaí a chur sa phost chuig: Comhairliúchán Leanaí, An Coimisiún um Chosaint Sonraí, 21 Cearnóg Mhic Liam, Baile Átha Cliath 2.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine dataprotection.ie as primary domain	Written submissions can be made by email to childrensconsultation@dataprotection.ie . Alternatively, submissions can be posted to: Children’s Consultation, Data Protection Commission, 21 Fitzwilliam Square, Dublin 2.

  Láimhseáil gearán, Imsc...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL	is cúis leis an bhfiosrúchán sin is cuí leis an DPC a sheoladh i leith an ábhair
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine dataprotection.ie as primary domain	(e) causing such inquiry as the DPC thinks fit to be conducted in respect of the matter

  Cás Staidéar | Data Pro...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL	Baineann teip ar sheoladh custaiméara a nuashonrú de rúndacht sonraí pearsanta
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine dataprotection.ie as primary domain	Failure to update customer’s address compromises the confidentiality of personal data

  Cás Staidéar | Data Pro...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL	Chuir Eircom in iúl dár n-imscrúduithe nár nuashonraigh na gníomhairí ina Fhoireann Riaracháin Chúram do Chustaiméirí a láimhseáil na hiarratais um roghnú gan bheith páirteach an córas chun an rogha nua margaíochta a chur i gcuntas i ndiaidh an ríomhphost freagartha a sheoladh chuig na daoine aonair a bhí i gceist.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine dataprotection.ie as primary domain	Eircom informed our investigations that the agents in its Customer Care Administration Team who handled the opt-out requests had not updated the system to record the new marketing preference after sending out the replying email to the individuals concerned. It undertook to provide the necessary refresher training to the agents concerned.

  For Organisations | Dat...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL	Tuigimid go bhfuil cosaint sonraí riachtanach do cháil eagraíochtaí, agus go bhfuil an fhaisnéis sna leathanaigh seo a leanas deartha chun tacú leat chun do ghnó a sheoladh ar bhealach trédhearcach agus comhlíontach.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine dataprotection.ie as primary domain	We understand that data protection is essential to an organisation's reputation and the information in the following pages is designed to support you in conducting your business in a transparent and compliant manner. While we endeavour to keep our guidance as clear as possible, you may find our Key Terms section of value.

  Cás Staidéar | Data Pro...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL

Phléadáil Coopers Marquees Limited ciontach i gcúis amháin de sheoladh ríomhphoist mhargaíochta gan iarraidh gan toiliú ag Cúirt Dúiche Achadh an Iúir an 7 Meitheamh 2016. D’ordaigh an Chúirt ranníocaíocht arbh ionann agus €300 í mar dheonú carthanachta le Trúpa Gasóg Mhullaigh, agus thug le fios go gcuirfeadh sí An tAcht um Promhadh Ciontóirí i bhfeidhm in ionad ciontaithe.

Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine dataprotection.ie as primary domain

At Virginia District Court on 7 June, 2016 Coopers Marquees Limited pleaded guilty to one charge of sending an unsolicited email without consent. The Court ordered a contribution in the amount of €300 as a charitable donation to Mullagh Scout Troop and it indicated that it would apply the Probation of Offenders Act in lieu of a conviction. The defendant company agreed to make a contribution towards the prosecution costs of the Data Protection Commissioner.

  Cás Staidéar | Data Pro...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL

Má theipeann orthu amhlaidh a dhéanamh, d’fhéadfaí sonraí pearsanta a nochtadh do dhaoine neamhúdaraithe anuas ar bheith ina údar le suaitheadh agus buairt neamhriachtanach ar ábhair shonraí a nuashonraigh an rialaitheoir sonraí leis an bhfaisnéis is cruinne, seachas nach raibh na cosaintí riachtanacha i bhfeidhm chun cosc a chur ar chomhghéilleadh a dhéanamh ar a sonraí pearsanta trí iar-sheoladh a úsáid, faoi mar a tharla sa chás seo.

Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine dataprotection.ie as primary domain

This case demonstrates the need for all data controllers to ensure that personal data is kept accurate and up-to-date at all times. Failure to do so may result in the disclosure of personal data to unauthorised persons as well as unnecessary distress and worry for data subjects who have updated the data controller with the most accurate information, only to find that the necessary safeguards were not in place to prevent their personal data being compromised by use, as in this case, of a previous address.

  Cás Staidéar | Data Pro...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL

Phléadáil Trailfinders Ireland Limited ciontach in dá chúis de sheoladh ríomhphoist mhargaíochta gan iarraidh gan toiliú ag Cúirt Dúiche Chathrach Bhaile Átha Cliath an 28 Samhain 2016. In ionad ciontaithe agus fíneála, d’ordaigh an Chúirt don chosantóir ranníocaíocht €500 a thabhairt do Chlann Shíomóin faoi 12 Nollaig 2016, agus chuir sí an t-ábhar ar athlá ar feadh coicíse.

Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine dataprotection.ie as primary domain

At Dublin Metropolitan District Court on 28 November, 2016 Trailfinders Ireland Limited pleaded guilty to two charges of sending unsolicited marketing emails without consent. In lieu of a conviction and fine, the Court ordered the defendant to contribute €500 to the Simon Community by 12 December 2016 and it adjourned the matter for two weeks. The company agreed to discharge the prosecution costs incurred by the Data Protection Commissioner. At the adjourned hearing the defendant produced proof of payment of the charitable donation and the Court struck out the charges.

  Cás Staidéar | Data Pro...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL

Ina cinneadh, bhí an Coimisinéir faoin tuairim gur sháraigh AIB Alt 2(1)(b) de na hAchtanna um Chosaint Sonraí, 1988 agus 2003 mar gheall gur theip orthu sonraí pearsanta an ghearánaí a choimeád cothrom le dáta. Tharla an sárú seo nuair a theip ar AIB iarsheoladh an ghearánaí a bhaint óna chuntas in ainneoin gur chuir sé in iúl amhlaidh a dhéanamh.

Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine dataprotection.ie as primary domain

Efforts to resolve the complaint by means of an amicable resolution were unsuccessful and the complainant sought a formal decision. In her decision, the Commissioner formed the opinion that AIB contravened Section 2(1)(b) of the Data Protection Acts 1988 and 2003 by failing to keep the complainant’s personal data up to date. This contravention occurred when AIB failed to remove the complainant’s previous address from his account despite notification from him to do so. The Commissioner also formed the opinion that AIB contravened Section 2(1)(d) by failing to take appropriate security measures against unauthorised access to the complainant’s personal data by sending correspondence by post and by hand delivery to an address at which he no longer resided, while knowing that this was no longer his residential address.

  Cás Staidéar | Data Pro...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL

Rinne sé gearán linn roimhe sin i mí na Samhna 2015 faoi theachtaireachtaí téacs margaíochta a sheol an chuideachta dó gan a thoiliú, agus chuir sé in iúl dúinn in ainneoin iarracht chun díliostáil ach freagra ‘Stop’ a sheoladh go raibh sé ag fáil a thuilleadh teachtaireachtaí téacs.

Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine dataprotection.ie as primary domain

In July 2016 an individual complained to us about an unsolicited marketing telephone call which he received on his mobile telephone from Topaz (Local Fuels) Limited. He had previously complained to us in November 2015 about marketing text messages which the company sent him without his consent and he informed us that despite attempting to opt out by replying ‘Stop’ he continued to receive more text messages. In its response to our first investigation, the company said that the inclusion of the complainant’s mobile telephone number in its promotional campaign was as a result of a human error and it acknowledged the failure of its system to register his opt out attempts. It informed us in February 2016 that it had removed the mobile phone number concerned from its marketing database. We concluded that complaint at the time with a warning to Topaz (Local Fuels) Limited.

  Cás Staidéar | Data Pro...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL

Phléadáil Topaz (Local Fuels) ciontach i gcúis amháin de sheoladh teachtaireachta téacs margaíochta gan iarraidh gan toiliú, agus i gcúis amháin gan bealach bailí a thabhairt don fhaighteoir chun díliostáil óna thuilleadh teachtaireachtaí margaíochta ag Cúirt Dúiche Chathrach Bhaile Átha Cliath an 28 Samhain 2016.

Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine dataprotection.ie as primary domain

At Dublin Metropolitan District Court on 28 November, 2016 Topaz (Local Fuels) Limited pleaded guilty to one charge of sending an unsolicited marketing text message without consent and one charge of not providing the recipient with a valid means of opting out of the receipt of further marketing messages. In lieu of a conviction and fine, the Court ordered the defendant to contribute €500 to Our Lady’s Children’s’ Hospital Crumlin by 12 December, 2016 and it adjourned the matter for two weeks. The company agreed to discharge the prosecution costs incurred by the Data Protection Commissioner. At the adjourned hearing the defendant produced proof of payment of the charitable donation and the Court struck out the charges.

  Cás Staidéar | Data Pro...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL

Ag Cúirt Dúiche Chathair Bhaile Átha Cliath an 2 Samhain 2015, phléadáil Eircom Limited ciontach i leith sé chúiseamh inar cuireadh glaonna margaíochta gan iarraidh gan toiliú agus phléadáil sé ciontach i leith cúiseamh amháin inar seoladh teachtaireacht téacs margaíochta gan seoladh bailí go bhféadfadh an faighteoir iarratas um roghnú gan bheith páirteach a sheoladh chuige.

Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine dataprotection.ie as primary domain

We proceeded to prosecute the offences identified on foot of the complaints received in the aforementioned cases. At Dublin Metropolitan District Court on 2 November 2015, Eircom Limited pleaded guilty to six charges of making unsolicited marketing calls without consent and it pleaded guilty to one charge of sending a marketing SMS without a valid address to which the recipient may send an opt-out request. The Court applied Section 1(1) of the Probation of Offenders Act conditional on the defendant making donations amounting to €35,000 as follows: €15,000 to Pieta House, €10,000 to LauraLynn (Children’s Hospice) and €10,000 to Our Lady’s Children’s Hospital, Crumlin. The company agreed to pay the prosecution costs incurred by this Office.

  Cás Staidéar | Data Pro...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL

Phléadáil Paddy Power Betfair Plc ciontach i gcúis amháin de sheoladh teachtaireachta téacs margaíochta gan iarraidh gan toiliú, agus i gcúis amháin gan bealach bailí a thabhairt don fhaighteoir chun díliostáil óna thuilleadh teachtaireachtaí margaíochta ag Cúirt Dúiche Chathrach Bhaile Átha Cliath an 28 Samhain 2016.

Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine dataprotection.ie as primary domain

At Dublin Metropolitan District Court on 28 November2016 Paddy Power Betfair Plc pleaded guilty to one charge of sending an unsolicited marketing text message without consent and one charge of not providing the recipient with a valid means of opting out of the receipt of further marketing messages. In lieu of a conviction and fine, the Court ordered the defendant to contribute €500 to the Simon Community by 12 December 2016 and it adjourned the matter for two weeks. The company agreed to discharge the prosecution costs incurred by the Data Protection Commissioner. At the adjourned hearing the defendant produced proof of payment of the charitable donation and the Court struck out the charges.

  Cás Staidéar | Data Pro...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL

Ar a shon sin, tháinig ár n-imscrúdú ar dhóthain fianaise lena shásamh dó féin go raibh MTS Property Management Limited freagrach as na teachtaireachtaí margaíochta téacs a sheoladh chuig an ngearánaí.

Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine dataprotection.ie as primary domain

Our investigation of this complaint became protracted as the company denied knowledge of the mobile number to which the SMS messages were sent and it denied knowledge of the account holder of the sending phone number. However, our investigation established sufficient evidence to satisfy itself that MTS Property Management Limited was responsible for the sending of the marketing SMS messages to the complainant. We decided to prosecute the offences.

  Cás Staidéar | Data Pro...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL

Tar éis di faisnéis faoi sheoladh reatha a fháil nó seoltaí reatha na gcustaiméirí bainc i gceist a dheimhniú ó na taifid i seilbh na Roinne Coimirce Sóisialaí, thaisc an chuideachta ba chosantóir tuairiscí lorgtha ina bhfuarthas an fhaisnéis sin leis an gcuideachta aturnaetha a d’fheidhmigh thar ceann na mbanc.

Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine dataprotection.ie as primary domain

During the investigation of the 2015 complaints the solicitors acting for Littlewoods Ireland informed us that, following the conclusion of the previous complaint in December 2014, Littlewoods Ireland carried out a review of the customer’s account. It found that while she was correctly opted out of email marketing, she was not opted out of third party marketing. It then took steps to opt the customer out of third party marketing. When the update to the third party marketing preference was applied to the customer’s account in January 2015 a null value was applied to the email marketing field. The intention in applying this null value was to signify that no change was to be made to this field. However, the application of this value had the unintended consequence of opting the customer back into email marketing. Subsequently, as a result of this incorrect update, two marketing emails were sent to the customer in January 2015 and March 2015.

  Cás Staidéar | Data Pro...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL

Ar an gcuma chéanna, is ríthábhachtach go gcuirtear toirmeasc ar fhostaithe ó chomhaid oifigiúla a sheoladh ar ríomhphoist óna gcuntas ríomhphoist áit oibre chuig a gcuntas ríomhphoist pearsanta chun tabhairt faoi obair i ndiaidh uaireanta oibre nó ar chúis ar bith eile.

Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine dataprotection.ie as primary domain

There are many workplace scenarios where staff and managers, in particular, may need to take files, including personal data, home with them. Extreme caution should always be exercised in such cases to ensure that there is no risk to the security of personal data either in the transit of the files or while the files are in the employee’s home. Data controllers must ensure that employees act in a responsible manner with regard to the safe custody and handling of workplace files. This demands a proper system that records the taking of and returning of files and the following of prescribed procedures for the safe keeping of personal data while the files concerned are absent from the workplace. Likewise, it is critical that employees are prohibited from emailing official files from their workplace email account to their personal email account for afterhours work or for any other reason. In such situations, data controllers lose control of personal data that they are obliged by law to protect.

  Cás Staidéar | Data Pro...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL

Phléadáil Dermaface Limited ciontach i gcúis amháin de sheoladh ríomhphoist mhargaíochta gan iarraidh gan toiliú ag Cúirt Dúiche Chathrach Bhaile Átha Cliath an 28 Samhain 2016. In ionad ciontaithe agus fíneála, d’ordaigh an Chúirt don chosantóir ranníocaíocht €300 a thabhairt d’Ospidéal Naomh Muire um Leanaí Breoite faoi 12 Nollaig 2016.

Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine dataprotection.ie as primary domain

At Dublin Metropolitan District Court on 28 November 2016 Dermaface Limited pleaded guilty to one charge of sending an unsolicited marketing email without consent. In lieu of a conviction and fine, the Court ordered the defendant to contribute €300 to Our Lady’s Children’s’ Hospital Crumlin by 12 December, 2016. The Court also indicated that it expected the company to discharge the prosecution costs incurred by the Data Protection Commissioner and it adjourned the matter for two weeks. At the adjourned hearing the defendant produced proof of payment of the charitable donation and the Data Protection Commissioner’s costs. The Court struck out the charge.

  Cás Staidéar | Data Pro...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL

Chinn an Coimisinéir Cosanta Sonraí chun an chuideachta a ionchúiseamh. Phléadáil The Irish Times Limited ciontach i gcúis amháin de sheoladh ríomhphoist mhargaíochta gan iarraidh gan toiliú ag Cúirt Dúiche Chathrach Bhaile Átha Cliath an 4 Aibreán 2016.

Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine dataprotection.ie as primary domain

The Data Protection Commissioner decided to prosecute the company. At Dublin Metropolitan District Court on 4 April 2016, The Irish Times Limited pleaded guilty to one charge of sending an unsolicited marketing email without consent. The Court ordered the payment of €3,000 in the form of a charitable donation to Pieta House and it adjourned the matter for seven weeks. The defendant agreed to cover the prosecution costs of the Data Protection Commissioner. At the adjourned hearing the defendant produced proof of payment of the charitable donation and the Court struck out the charge.

  Cás Staidéar | Data Pro...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL

Ina cinneadh, bhí an Coimisinéir faoin tuairim gur sháraigh AIB Alt 2(1)(b) de na hAchtanna um Chosaint Sonraí, 1988 agus 2003 mar gheall gur theip orthu sonraí pearsanta an ghearánaí a choimeád cothrom le dáta. Tharla an sárú seo nuair a theip ar AIB iarsheoladh an ghearánaí a bhaint óna chuntas in ainneoin gur chuir sé in iúl amhlaidh a dhéanamh.

Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine dataprotection.ie as primary domain

Efforts to resolve the complaint by means of an amicable resolution were unsuccessful and the complainant sought a formal decision. In her decision, the Commissioner formed the opinion that AIB contravened Section 2(1)(b) of the Data Protection Acts 1988 and 2003 by failing to keep the complainant’s personal data up to date. This contravention occurred when AIB failed to remove the complainant’s previous address from his account despite notification from him to do so. The Commissioner also formed the opinion that AIB contravened Section 2(1)(d) by failing to take appropriate security measures against unauthorised access to the complainant’s personal data by sending correspondence by post and by hand delivery to an address at which he no longer resided, while knowing that this was no longer his residential address.