|
وفي أيّ مرحلة من الزمن عندما يقرّر أيّ متهم أو المتهمون المشاركة في الإجراءات، فإنّ الإجراءات الغيابية تتوقّف وهذا حقّ من حقوق المتهمين، أيّ أنّ الإجراءات الغيابية تتوقّف حالما يقرّر المتهمون أن يشاركوا وطبعاً لا بدّ لأيّ متهم قبل أن يتخذ هذا القرار من استشارة محام لكي يعرف ما هي حقوقه.
|
|
A: If the accusation is solely based on political causes, it is better, as this means that the defense counsels will prove that there is no evidence against the defendants who shall consequently be discharged, as the tribunal may not condemn persons accused based on political grounds only. The tribunal definitely needs evidence proving criminal acts committed. We have to be very clear: if a crime is committed and the prosecutor says that this person is involved, the defense counsels will ask him to prove it. Such debate is not political but purely related to justice which builds its decisions on evidence and leads; if there is no such evidence, the alternative will be to acquit the accused.
|
|
A: If the accusation is solely based on political causes, it is better, as this means that the defense counsels will prove that there is no evidence against the defendants who shall consequently be discharged, as the tribunal may not condemn persons accused based on political grounds only. The tribunal definitely needs evidence proving criminal acts committed. We have to be very clear: if a crime is committed and the prosecutor says that this person is involved, the defense counsels will ask him to prove it. Such debate is not political but purely related to justice which builds its decisions on evidence and leads; if there is no such evidence, the alternative will be to acquit the accused.
|