kcl – Übersetzung – Keybot-Wörterbuch

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Français English Spacer Help
Ausgangssprachen Zielsprachen
Keybot      214 Ergebnisse   41 Domänen   Seite 2
  5 Treffer explorative.shop  
Sauf dans la limite prévue plus généralement dans le présent Contrat, tout amendement doit être notifié par écrit, signé par GIL, GCL et le Participant, et doit stipuler expressément qu'il modifie le présent Contrat.
17.8 Ergänzungen. Mit Ausnahme der in dieser Vereinbarung anderweitig aufgeführten Regelungen müssen Ergänzungen schriftlich erfolgen, von GIL, GCL und dem Teilnehmer unterschrieben werden und es muss ausdrücklich angegeben sein, dass es sich um eine Ergänzung zur vorliegenden Vereinbarung handelt.
17.8 Enmiendas. Excepto que se indique lo contrario en este Acuerdo, toda enmienda deberá hacerse por escrito, estar firmada por GIL, por GCL y por el Participante, e indicar expresamente que se trata de una enmienda a este Acuerdo.
17.8 Modifiche. Fatta eccezione per quanto espressamente e diversamente specificato dal presente Contratto, qualsiasi modifica deve essere formulata per iscritto e firmata da GIL, GCL e dal Partecipante e deve dichiarare espressamente la propria natura di modifica del Contratto.
17.8 Wijzigingen. Behalve voor zover anders bepaald in deze Overeenkomst moeten alle wijzigingen schriftelijk zijn, zijn ondertekend door GIL, GCL en de Deelnemer, en uitdrukkelijk vermelden dat deze Overeenkomst hierdoor wordt gewijzigd.
10. 秘密保持 本参加者は、本プログラムの非開示の側面を有する条項、条件または存在を第三者に開示してはなりませんが、厳格な秘密保持義務に基づき専門的アドバイザーに対して行う場合、または法律を遵守するために必要である場合は、この限りではありません。
  3 Treffer www.agr.ca  
En 2007, 2008 et 2009, on a réalisé dans le nord-est de la Chine des expériences par parcelle afin de comparer l’écoulement de surface, la perte de sol, la croissance des cultures, le rendement des cultures et les marges de rentabilité pour le soja et le maïs dans des conditions de gestion classique (GCL), de travail profond du sol (TPS) et de gestion de conservation (GCV).
Mollisols (called black soil in China) are fertile and productive soils covering an area of 5,900,000 ha in northeastern China, but food production in the area is threatened by soil erosion. The objective of this study was to generate scientifically-based comparative information that can be used to help farmers improve their field management practices in order to reduce soil loss while at the same time decreasing input costs and increasing crop yields. Plot experiments to compare runoff, soil loss, crop growth, crop yield and economic margins for soybeans and corn under conventional management (CVM), deep-till management (DTM) and conservation management (CSM) were carried out in northeastern China in 2007, 2008, and 2009. Dry matter (measured aboveground) accumulation in DTM deep-till management was consistently higher than in CVM or CSM before early September, while the highest aboveground dry matter (DM) over all was obtained in CSM at maturity, which was 11.1% more than DTM or CVM. Compared to the conventional management, runoff in soybean in 2007 and 2008 was 71% and 98% less, respectively, under conservation management, and 12% less and 1% greater under deep tillage treatment. Similarly, sediment loss was 89%, 99%, and 97% less, respectively, under conservation management than under conventional management and 75% less, 72% greater, and 13% greater under deep tillage management than under conventional management. There was no significant difference in yield between deep-till management and conventional management in any year, but it was 19% (soybean, 2007) and 12.6% (soybean, 2008) higher under conservation management than under either of the other two treatments. Economic margin was 34%, and 27% higher under CSM than under CVM in 2007 and 2008 when the plots were cropped to soybean, respectively, but showed no significant difference between CVM and DTM in 2007 and 2008, or no significant difference between all treatments when corn was planted in 2009. It is apparent that conservation management can reduce soil loss, increase soybean yield and improve its profit margin on sloping fields in the black soil landscape of northeastern China.
  3 Treffer www5.agr.gc.ca  
En 2007, 2008 et 2009, on a réalisé dans le nord-est de la Chine des expériences par parcelle afin de comparer l’écoulement de surface, la perte de sol, la croissance des cultures, le rendement des cultures et les marges de rentabilité pour le soja et le maïs dans des conditions de gestion classique (GCL), de travail profond du sol (TPS) et de gestion de conservation (GCV).
Mollisols (called black soil in China) are fertile and productive soils covering an area of 5,900,000 ha in northeastern China, but food production in the area is threatened by soil erosion. The objective of this study was to generate scientifically-based comparative information that can be used to help farmers improve their field management practices in order to reduce soil loss while at the same time decreasing input costs and increasing crop yields. Plot experiments to compare runoff, soil loss, crop growth, crop yield and economic margins for soybeans and corn under conventional management (CVM), deep-till management (DTM) and conservation management (CSM) were carried out in northeastern China in 2007, 2008, and 2009. Dry matter (measured aboveground) accumulation in DTM deep-till management was consistently higher than in CVM or CSM before early September, while the highest aboveground dry matter (DM) over all was obtained in CSM at maturity, which was 11.1% more than DTM or CVM. Compared to the conventional management, runoff in soybean in 2007 and 2008 was 71% and 98% less, respectively, under conservation management, and 12% less and 1% greater under deep tillage treatment. Similarly, sediment loss was 89%, 99%, and 97% less, respectively, under conservation management than under conventional management and 75% less, 72% greater, and 13% greater under deep tillage management than under conventional management. There was no significant difference in yield between deep-till management and conventional management in any year, but it was 19% (soybean, 2007) and 12.6% (soybean, 2008) higher under conservation management than under either of the other two treatments. Economic margin was 34%, and 27% higher under CSM than under CVM in 2007 and 2008 when the plots were cropped to soybean, respectively, but showed no significant difference between CVM and DTM in 2007 and 2008, or no significant difference between all treatments when corn was planted in 2009. It is apparent that conservation management can reduce soil loss, increase soybean yield and improve its profit margin on sloping fields in the black soil landscape of northeastern China.
  3 Treffer www.listeriosis-listeriose.investigation-enquete.gc.ca  
En 2007, 2008 et 2009, on a réalisé dans le nord-est de la Chine des expériences par parcelle afin de comparer l’écoulement de surface, la perte de sol, la croissance des cultures, le rendement des cultures et les marges de rentabilité pour le soja et le maïs dans des conditions de gestion classique (GCL), de travail profond du sol (TPS) et de gestion de conservation (GCV).
Mollisols (called black soil in China) are fertile and productive soils covering an area of 5,900,000 ha in northeastern China, but food production in the area is threatened by soil erosion. The objective of this study was to generate scientifically-based comparative information that can be used to help farmers improve their field management practices in order to reduce soil loss while at the same time decreasing input costs and increasing crop yields. Plot experiments to compare runoff, soil loss, crop growth, crop yield and economic margins for soybeans and corn under conventional management (CVM), deep-till management (DTM) and conservation management (CSM) were carried out in northeastern China in 2007, 2008, and 2009. Dry matter (measured aboveground) accumulation in DTM deep-till management was consistently higher than in CVM or CSM before early September, while the highest aboveground dry matter (DM) over all was obtained in CSM at maturity, which was 11.1% more than DTM or CVM. Compared to the conventional management, runoff in soybean in 2007 and 2008 was 71% and 98% less, respectively, under conservation management, and 12% less and 1% greater under deep tillage treatment. Similarly, sediment loss was 89%, 99%, and 97% less, respectively, under conservation management than under conventional management and 75% less, 72% greater, and 13% greater under deep tillage management than under conventional management. There was no significant difference in yield between deep-till management and conventional management in any year, but it was 19% (soybean, 2007) and 12.6% (soybean, 2008) higher under conservation management than under either of the other two treatments. Economic margin was 34%, and 27% higher under CSM than under CVM in 2007 and 2008 when the plots were cropped to soybean, respectively, but showed no significant difference between CVM and DTM in 2007 and 2008, or no significant difference between all treatments when corn was planted in 2009. It is apparent that conservation management can reduce soil loss, increase soybean yield and improve its profit margin on sloping fields in the black soil landscape of northeastern China.