|
|
Supposing truth is a womanwhat then? Are there not grounds for the suspicion that all philosophers, insofar as they were dogmatists, have been very inexpert about women? that the gruesome seriousness, the clumsy obtrusiveness with which they have usually approached truth so far have been awkward and very improper methods for winning a woman's heart? What is certain is that she has not allowed herself to be won:and today every kind of dogmatism is left standing dispirited and discouraged. If it is left standing at all! For there are scoffers who claim that it has fallen, that all dogmatism lies on the ground, even more, that all dogmatism is dying. Speaking seriously, there are good reasons why all philosophical dogmatizing, however solemn and definitive its airs used to be, may nevertheless have been no more than a noble childishness and tyronism; and perhaps the time is at hand when it will be comprehended again and again what actually was sufficient to furnish the cornerstone for such sublime and unconditional philosophers' edifices as the dogmatists have built so farany old popular superstition from time immemorial (like the soul superstition which, in the form of the subject and ego superstition, has not even yet ceased to do mischief), some play on words perhaps, a seduction by grammar, or an audacious generalization of very narrow, very personal, very human, all too human facts. The dogmatists' philosophy was, let us hope, only a promise across millennia: as astrology was in still earlier times when perhaps more work, money, acumen, and patience were expended than for any real science so far:to astrology and its "supernatural" pretensions we owe the grand style of architecture in Asia and Egypt. It seems that all great things first have to bestride the earth in monstrous and frightening caricatures in order to inscribe themselves in the hearts of humanity with eternal demands: dogmatic philosophy was such a caricature, for example the Vedanta doctrine in Asia and Platonism in Europe. Let us not be ungrateful to it, although it must certainly be conceded that the worst, most protracted, and most dangerous of all errors so far was a dogmatist's error, namely Plato's invention of the pure spirit and the good in itself. But now that it is overcome, now that Europe is breathing a sigh of relief after this nightmare and at least can enjoy a healthiersleep, we, whose task is wakefulness itself, are the heirs of all that strength which has been fostere
|
